Re: [Web-SIG] Changes for WSGI 1.1

2016-02-18 Thread Cory Benfield
Yeah, the directionality needs to be specified more clearly here. Thanks! Cory > On 17 Feb 2016, at 17:55, Michael Merickel wrote: > > I'm not sure the "backward-incompatible" text in your proposal makes sense. I > think you actually mean to say that applications written to use new WSGI 1.1 >

Re: [Web-SIG] Changes for WSGI 1.1

2016-02-17 Thread Dirkjan Ochtman
On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 12:51 PM, Cory Benfield wrote: > Please let me know what you think! I reviewed all the pull requests and they look good to me, save one tiny nit that I left a comment for. Cheers, Dirkjan ___ Web-SIG mailing list Web-SIG@python