I will look at it
thank you
Em qui., 21 de mai. de 2020 às 20:48, Jose C
escreveu:
> A bit off-topic (other than the title) but given the GoDaddy buyout of
> webfaction (putting it on temporary life support) you may want to consider
> thinking about options for your hosting if they follow throu
A bit off-topic (other than the title) but given the GoDaddy buyout of
webfaction (putting it on temporary life support) you may want to consider
thinking about options for your hosting if they follow through and shutdown
webfaction and enforce the godaddy migration they announced. I'd been a
Please delete this post. Already created another with a better subject :)
Em qua., 20 de mai. de 2020 às 17:15, António Ramos
escreveu:
> hello i´m using webfaction and this script
>
> https://github.com/duducosmos/webfaction-web2py-nginx-uwsgi-installer/blob/master/install.py
>
> that installed
On Wednesday, June 1, 2016 at 1:10:58 PM UTC-7, Jose wrote:
>
> I chose to use nginx + uwsgi.
>
> Thanks
> José
>
Did that solve the session issues? Did you check that tickets are behaving?
/dps
--
Resources:
- http://web2py.com
- http://web2py.com/book (Documentation)
- http://github.com
I chose to use nginx + uwsgi.
Thanks
José
--
Resources:
- http://web2py.com
- http://web2py.com/book (Documentation)
- http://github.com/web2py/web2py (Source code)
- https://code.google.com/p/web2py/issues/list (Report Issues)
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Goo
On Tuesday, May 31, 2016 at 8:10:52 PM UTC-7, Jose wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Before upgrading was this: mod_wsgi 3.4/Python 2.7 + Web2py Version
> 2.5.1-stable
>
> [I have several applications in web2py]
>
>
> 1) upgrade to mod_wsgi 4.5.2/Python 2.7 + Web2py Version 2.14.6
>
> After this, when starting
If you read the discussion on the webfaction community link in your first
post, you'll see someone else is having same issue with uwsgi.
One of the other users said he created a new script - you might want to
look into that.
On Monday, January 12, 2015 at 8:23:16 AM UTC-5, Richard Penman wrote:
it's the correct file, run it and you would see.
As mentioned this worked fine for me with previous versions of web2py!
Anyone else?
On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 4:37 PM, Paolo Valleri wrote:
> I haven't run that script but as far as I can get your are referring to the
> wrong file.
> The correct fil
I haven't run that script but as far as I can get your are referring to the
wrong file.
The correct file should be placed in
~/webapps/${webfaction_app_name}/uwsgi/uwsgi.xml . Check there, otherwise
it would be better to re-run the script to double check that everything has
been installed/configure
When the script is run it converts this template into what I posted.
So how has web2py changed since that would break this?
On Sun, Jan 11, 2015 at 11:29 PM, Paolo Valleri wrote:
> According to the script you mention, the uwsgi.xml should be much different
> because it doesn't referee to any spe
According to the script you mention, the uwsgi.xml should be much different
because it doesn't referee to any specific app.
it should be something like
127.0.0.1:${nginx_uwsgi_port}
4
/home/${USER}/webapps/${webfaction_app_name}/web2py
/home/${USER}/webapps/${webfaction_app
Thank you as always, Anthony. Working great. ;)
On Wed, May 1, 2013 at 2:29 PM, Anthony wrote:
> What if you add exclusive_domain=True to the BASE dict? I believe that
> prevents creating outgoing URLs like that, but not sure if it affects
> incoming requests.
>
> Anthony
>
>
> On Wednesday, Ma
What if you add exclusive_domain=True to the BASE dict? I believe that
prevents creating outgoing URLs like that, but not sure if it affects
incoming requests.
Anthony
On Wednesday, May 1, 2013 12:37:11 PM UTC-4, Loïc wrote:
>
> I would like to understand too...
> Maybe somebody else has an ide
+1 !!
On Wednesday, May 1, 2013 11:37:20 AM UTC-5, Loïc wrote:
>
> I would like to understand too...
> Maybe somebody else has an idea ?
--
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"web2py-users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving ema
I would like to understand too...
Maybe somebody else has an idea ?
--
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"web2py-users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to web2py+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
Fo
I would like to understand too...
Maybe somebody else has an idea ?
--
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"web2py-users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to web2py+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
Fo
:) Thank you for trying, Loic!
Should I just ignore this concern? I am not too concerned about this but I
would like to learn about how to solve this problem.
On Wednesday, May 1, 2013 8:59:41 AM UTC-5, Loïc wrote:
>
> You're right.
> On my webserver :
>
> www.domain1.com redirects to app1 ==> O
You're right.
On my webserver :
www.domain1.com redirects to app1 ==> OK
www.domain2.com redirects to app2 ==> OK
*but*
www.domain1.com/app2 redirects to app2, and I don't understand why...
Le mercredi 1 mai 2013 15:54:08 UTC+2, Kenneth a écrit :
>
> Yeah. I follow the same pattern.
> Could you
Yeah. I follow the same pattern.
Could you try to browse "www.domain1.com/app2" to see if it doesn't direct
to app2? Mine does. hmm
On Wednesday, May 1, 2013 8:48:31 AM UTC-5, Loïc wrote:
>
> Did you restart your webserver / reload routes?
>
> I use a similar routes.py for multiple domains and it
Did you restart your webserver / reload routes?
I use a similar routes.py for multiple domains and it works fine.
Maybe you could try :
routers = dict(
BASE = dict(
domains = {
'www.domain1.com' : 'app1',
'domain1.com' : 'app1',
'www.domain2.com' : 'a
I am using the routers.domains method to routing the applications to
domains,
I have a problem that I can access to the applications which are not routed
to the assigned domain.
for example
routers = dict(
BASE = dict(
domains = {
'domain1.com' : 'app1',
'domain2.c
Eu havia conseguido fazer o admin funcionar, e quando acessei a página da
aplicação deu um erro:
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/home/igrejarama/webapps/rama/web2py/gluon/restricted.py",
line 212, in restricted
exec ccode in environment
File
"/home/igrejarama/webapps/rama/web2p
Thanks but this does not appear to be case, I built everything from scratch
(except controllers and views - which aren't the issue because there's
nothing exotic going on there).
When I did a fresh installation and rebuilt my website using SQLite and
installed remotely, the problem went away.
> then re-enter the URL and now I get auth_user table already exists
error.
I have no idea where the problem might be, but I think this could help, if
you didn't try it already:
http://web2py.com/books/default/chapter/29/06?search=fake_migrate#Fixing-broken-migrations
--
If this helps.
I noticed two things happen after I install the web2py script.
- standard installation script - the welcome application works fine
- edit the db.py file to switch from SQLITE to MYSQL
db =
DAL('mysql://myusername:mypwd@localhost/databasename',pool_size=1,check_reserved=['al
How do you do this on Webfaction (use web2py/uwsgi with the native nginx
instance)? I've asked for this specifically and been told by Webfaction
staff that it's not actually possible to use a framework with the native
nginx instance, only with static and PHP apps.
Right now I'm using a custom n
PS: I also have websites on webfaction
--
I prefer using built in uwsgi webserver - very fast and low memory usage
--
I'm certainly no expert, but I'm also on webfaction and you may want to
consider using nginx/uwsgi. At least in my case, there was very little I
needed to worry about in terms of configuration/memory management. Just two
tricks:
- no need to install nginx, as you can just use webfaction's nginx
excellent news - 80 MB wasn't enough for web2py + Apache on webfaction.
but the binary works as it executes web2py and website works but doesn't
allow me to login (without showing errors)
and my flex app shows the error that I wrote before,
and --version shows this error
./uwsgi --version
uWSGI 1.0-dev
*** glibc detected *** ./uwsgi: free(): invalid pointer: 0x099204e
> and also uwsgi --version doesn't give the version but tells that there
> is an error
>
This could only be generated by a wrong compiled-binary (maybe a make
without a make clean after some config changes).
--version triggers only a fprintf() on a fixed binary blob, so if it fails
something rea
and also uwsgi --version doesn't give the version but tells that there
is an error
with the latest uwsgi version I cannot login to my website, even no
error is generated
I use also a flex app with web2py service and it gives an error
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/home/yourname/web2py/gluon/restricted.py", line 194, in
restricted
exec ccode in environment
File
a question to Roberto
I don't see --async parameter in this command
uwsgi --http-socket 127.0.0.1:port --pythonpath /user/web2py --module
wsgihandler
-d /user/uwsgi.log -t 20 -r --no-orphans -M -p 1--touch-reload
/user/uwsgireload.txt --evil-reload-on-rss 64
how does it work?
does it spawns gree
your 2 cents are misguided
I said that before
- web2py is a great framework
- webfaction is a great hosting but have memory constraints
!!! *uwsgi *makes it possible to use them together !!!
yes, I got memory problems when I installed apache+mod_wsgi,
I tried there many servers/modes: nginx+u
I have started with webfaction (as I was going to learn Django, and people
suggested them very strongly for Django) a month ago but meanwhile I found
out web2py since I was trying to find my own way of programming IN Python.
Now I went for VPS of Hetzner (and I'm still fiddling with the basics of
a
> I was migrated to a newer webfaction server and now uwsgi compiles. I
> first
> tried limiting to 64 MB of memory and 1 process:
>
> uwsgi --http=127.0.0.1:port --pythonpath /user/web2py --module wsgihandler
> -d /user/uwsgi.log -t 20 --async 24 --ugreen --limit-as 64 -r --no-orphans
> -M -p 1 -
a few advises:
- I tested many uwsgi versions, but the most stable one I found to be
0.9.8.6 http://projects.unbit.it/downloads/uwsgi-0.9.8.6.tar.gz
- you can set --async 10 without fear, this is the maximum requests
handled at the same time
- limit your database queries: gae limits database sea
I was migrated to a newer webfaction server and now uwsgi compiles. I first
tried limiting to 64 MB of memory and 1 process:
uwsgi --http=127.0.0.1:port --pythonpath /user/web2py --module wsgihandler
-d /user/uwsgi.log -t 20 --async 24 --ugreen --limit-as 64 -r --no-orphans
-M -p 1 --touch-relo
Il giorno 22/nov/2011, alle ore 14:19, Plumo ha scritto:
> very useful information - thanks Robert.
>
> I got compile errors for nginx - tried multiple versions and only 0.9.6.5
> built, which doesn't support --http-socket.
> I am on web9 which I understand is one of the older servers:
> http:
very useful information - thanks Robert.
I got compile errors for nginx - tried multiple versions and only 0.9.6.5
built, which doesn't support --http-socket.
I am on web9 which I understand is one of the older servers:
http://community.webfaction.com/questions/3042/uwsgi-installation
Which serv
hi Roberto,
a few questions about uwsgi 1:
- how it is running by default: threaded or async?
- does it limits memory usage or I have to use as before --limit-as
80 ? I suppose that I have to pass parameter as it doesn't know the
memory limit
please tell me what you think about my command
uw
Thanks Roberto.
How about you send me a setup-script to include in the scrips folder?
On Nov 14, 3:03 am, "Roberto De Ioris" wrote:
> > Again at Webfaction my memory usage is way over my limit:
>
> > Below is the list of processes that you're running with the memory
> > that they use (the command
Dear Annet,
I had the same problem as you Remember but there is one thing that was
helpful to me ,
First : i am using now one application for all my websites .
second : i prepared the welcome app to be like a router and its
working fine
in welcome/default.py:
def index():
if request.env.http
Any progress with uwsgi?
I am about to give up on this project and will have to wait for another to
try web2py again. I have a deadline of having to renew a hosting
arrangement and that date is pretty much fixed. It is now nearly two weeks
since I decided to give web2py a shot and unfortunate
Yes Johann,
I also believe that there is something happening webfaction side and I think
that they are fiddling something. It has happened before in my short
experience and I am slightly weary.
Your issue is probably different as in this case it was working and then
stopped without any interf
On 5 October 2011 06:48, MidGe wrote:
> Ah, ok, I thought this was a different branch and that I had to use a
> different repo name or branch to pull it.
>
> But now, uwsgi, doesn't seem to work again. So I am not sure about
> introducing another issue prior to fixing the main one.. to have uwsg
Ah, ok, I thought this was a different branch and that I had to use a
different repo name or branch to pull it.
But now, uwsgi, doesn't seem to work again. So I am not sure about
introducing another issue prior to fixing the main one.. to have uwsgi
working.
> But where do I download the code for that version?
In the directory where you cloned the sources yesterday, run
hg pull
hg update
make
--
Roberto De Ioris
http://unbit.it
> Bad news...
>
> I left my site well alone after the success yesterday.
>
> This morning, unfortunately, it was as if nothing had be done.
>
> I killed uwsgi and re-started after overwriting the copy... All to no
> avail...
>
> I get the double log in (wth two web2py logos in top left corner), a
Bad news...
I left my site well alone after the success yesterday.
This morning, unfortunately, it was as if nothing had be done.
I killed uwsgi and re-started after overwriting the copy... All to no
avail...
I get the double log in (wth two web2py logos in top left corner), and
request to r
But where do I download the code for that version?
Ok Roberto,
I am willing to try that. Does this version of uwsgi include the fix for my
problem?
Or can I run two different version of uwsgi at the same time. If so, is it
just a matter of renaming uswgi file to something different?
> Ok Roberto,
>
> I managed to build and test. At first view It seems to work. I can
> modify
> files and save them.
>
> So, there is great progress, thanks a lot.
>
> Is there anything else I could do to help you or the community in anyway?
> Don't hesitate to ask or suggest.
>
> Michel
>
Tha
Ok Roberto,
I managed to build and test. At first view It seems to work. I can modify
files and save them.
So, there is great progress, thanks a lot.
Is there anything else I could do to help you or the community in anyway?
Don't hesitate to ask or suggest.
Michel
Hi Roberto,
Unfortunately, it failed on the make. It is missing libxml2 development
package,
In the error message there is a mention of using libexpat or disabling
XML...
Anything I can do about this?
Michel
> OK, will give it a shot and let you know.
>
> What is the mercurial command for the version you committed?
>
> Michel
>
hg clone http://projects.unbit.it/hg/uwsgi
cd uwsgi
make
--
Roberto De Ioris
http://unbit.it
OK, will give it a shot and let you know.
What is the mercurial command for the version you committed?
Michel
Il giorno 03/ott/2011, alle ore 07:51, MidGe ha scritto:
> Thank you for your interest and quick reply.
>
>
>
>
> Ah! Yes, I could do that, But I also am able to log in and edit when using
> apache as a server.
>
>
> Yes, something like that is the cause.
>
>
> Fine I can duplic
>
> Thank you for your interest and quick reply.
>
>
>
> Ah! Yes, I could do that, But I also am able to log in and edit when
using apache as a server.
Yes, something like that is the cause.
Fine I can duplicate an re-duplicate here. I can insert any code to
debug/test and am quite p
> Hi there,
>
> If I disable the https requirement for the admin, I will not be able
> to get into the admin area either.
I was meaning disabling it in:
applications/welcome/controllers/appadmin.py
>
> The strange thing is that I can log in. The system recognizes my
> password as valid (when i
try to change for the uswgi user.
can you see which user it is using? may be www-data or even www or apache
On Sun, Oct 2, 2011 at 10:20 PM, MidGe wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> If I disable the https requirement for the admin, I will not be able
> to get into the admin area either.
>
> The strange thi
Hi there,
If I disable the https requirement for the admin, I will not be able
to get into the admin area either.
The strange thing is that I can log in. The system recognizes my
password as valid (when it is, and not when it is not) but it does get
me back to the login screen, in an endless loo
The answer to my question will please the fans of the Hitchhiker guide
to the galaxy.
The answer is: 3031!
That's it folks!
Ah! for those interested as to why, it is simply because
request.env.server_port returns 3031!
See line 23 of admin/models/access.py.
I would love a more in-depth explanat
Permissions seem to be right: -rw-rw-r--
>From other posts I gather that there is another port number in play in
the webfaction setup... or web2py doesn't derive the port number
correctly when building the filename it is looking for!
On Sep 28, 10:46 am, pbreit wrote:
> Maybe check the owners
Maybe check the ownership or permissions on those files?
I used the same installation as olivier, which is causing my modules
(installed with easy_install-2.6) not to be located when I try to run
my application. I've tried changing my .bash_profile per the
webfaction instructions to change the default python version. Same
problem, modules aren't found an
Quoting Jonathan Lundell:
It should be* IOError* (capital E)
---
with that change it works.
Massimo, I did a fresh install with the new trunk and this is the traceback:
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "web2py.py", line 16, in
import gluon.widget
File "/home/pepearaya/webapps/crewcatalyst2/web2py/gluon/__init__.py",
line 15, in
from globals import current
File "/h
can you check the new trunk? If ok, I will post 1.96.4
On Jun 4, 5:45 pm, Pepe Araya wrote:
> Massimo, bad news :( it not work
> this is the log:
>
> [Sat Jun 04 17:41:31 2011] [error] [client 127.0.0.1] File
> "/home/pepearaya/webapps/crewcatalyst/web2py/gluon/html.py", line 29, in
>
> [Sat
Massimo, bad news :( it not work
this is the log:
[Sat Jun 04 17:41:31 2011] [error] [client 127.0.0.1] File
"/home/pepearaya/webapps/crewcatalyst/web2py/gluon/html.py", line 29, in
[Sat Jun 04 17:41:31 2011] [error] [client 127.0.0.1] from utils import
web2py_uuid, hmac_hash
[Sat Jun 04
Thanks Massimo!
I'll give a try
To add some more, on Ubuntu and according to man urandom all major Linux
distributions since 2000 the file /etc/init.d/urandom saves the random
number pool into a seed file and restores it on startup by writing it back
to /dev/urandom.
On my Ubuntu 10.04 system /dev/urandom has mode 666 which means read and
write for everyone. If it is not writeable on Webfaction for others then it
is either a policy for a different Linux distribution or a policy of
Webfaction.
The idea behind writing to /dev/urandom is to seed the random num
I am releasing 1.96.3 in a minute to fix this.
Massimo
On Jun 4, 3:09 am, Pepe Araya wrote:
> Reply 2:
>
> > open('/dev/urandom','r').write(''.join(chr(t) for t in ctokens))
>
> In this line, you are attempting to open /dev/urandom for reading, and then
> are attempting to write to it.
>
> Ins
Reply 2:
> open('/dev/urandom','r').write(''.join(chr(t) for t in ctokens))
In this line, you are attempting to open /dev/urandom for reading, and then
are attempting to write to it.
Instead, you need to read the data from /dev/urandom, and then open a new
file for writing to write your output
Thanks Vasile, I will give it a go.
I guess you can use nginx 1.0.1, but I send you what I did and I know that
it works
[nginx]
wget http://nginx.org/download/nginx-0.8.54.tar.gz
tar xvxf nginx-0.8.54.tar.gz
cd nginx-0.8.54
./configure \
--prefix=/home/yourusername/nginx \
--sbin-path=/home/yourusername/nginx/sbin/nginx \
--co
I'd appreciate if you could share your insight on that configuration,
as I'm currently using Apache and would like to slim down the setup.
On May 6, 5:29 pm, Vasile Ermicioi wrote:
> I also use webfaction : python2.7 + uwsgi + nginx
>
> if you like and need help with that configuration...
I also use webfaction : python2.7 + uwsgi + nginx
if you like and need help with that configuration...
Is this what you want?
http://docs.webfaction.com/software/python.html
1. Open an SSH session.
2. Open ~/.bash_profile in a text editor.
3. On a new line, add alias python=python*X.Y* where *X.Y* is the Python
version number. For example, to use Python 2.6 by default, add a new line
of course ;-)
appadmin sets
session.secure()
which turns the session cookie into a secure cookie and it cannot go
over http, only https.
You can disable this by commenting session.secure() in appadmin.py
Massimo
On Jul 30, 10:14 am, Iceberg wrote:
> webfaction day2: the auto-logout probl
webfaction day2: the auto-logout problem and why
Many coincidence lead to the "auto-logout (lost session)" problem.
Here is a how-to which you shall not follow. :-)
Problem: Even the web2py welcome app on webfaction tends to ask me to
re-login often, due to so
On Jul 30, 12:29 am, iceb...@21cn.com wrote:
> Hi pals,
>
> Today I start my day 1 with webfaction. Here come some experience and
> thoughts to share.
>
> a. web2py installation will be smooth if you use these install script [1] &
> [2], and follow its docstring instructions. (One bug in [2] is f
On Jul 30, 1:40 am, Vasile Ermicioi wrote:
> I think you don't need that a install script for web2py
>
> I would recommend
>
> 1. Create from your panel an application:
> - category: mod_wsgi
> - type: mod_wsgi 3.2 / python2.6
> 2. Use mod_wsgi deployment
> recipeshttp://web
What these people do not understand is what they could do with web2py.
If configured properly a web2py-ready virtual machine would allow them
to provide a service very similar to heroku for Rails. I have tried to
convince webfaction but no luck there either.
Massimo
On May 9, 12:48 pm, Albert Abr
>From a year ago I'm using djangoeurope.com, because its cheap plans, because
it's near home (Europe), and because its one-click Django-Install, for do my
test with django. Also, it does support for php, and for mysql or postresql
databases.
djangoeurope.com serves with lighttpd (may config web2py
Oh... Great! Thank you for the information, Yarko! (I really have a
lot to learn...)
Regards,
Aurelien
On 28 avr, 10:59, Yarko Tymciurak wrote:
> You are using a shared SSL certificate (courtesy of webfaction);
>
> That is, the SSL certificate is issued to a URI other than yours.
> Depending on
... see http://docs.webfaction.com/user-guide/websites.html#secure-sites-https
On Apr 28, 3:24 am, aure wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> Thanks for your help!
>
> @Jonathan: yes, if I disable https I can access the welcome web2py app
> without any problem. I just cannot login into the admin..
>
> @Thade
You are using a shared SSL certificate (courtesy of webfaction);
That is, the SSL certificate is issued to a URI other than yours.
Depending on browser, and it's security settings it will react in
different ways (for example, you can have some browsers permanently
remember the exception you make a
Hi everyone,
Thanks for your help!
@Jonathan: yes, if I disable https I can access the welcome web2py app
without any problem. I just cannot login into the admin..
@Thadeus, yes I have told firefox to accept the SSL certificate
anyway, and I can then access the app. But I would not want that to
Aurelien,
Don't you have a domain name? I asked my domain registrar to point my
domain name to WebFaction's domain name servers:
ns1.webfaction.com
ns2.webfaction.com
ns3.webfaction.com
ns4.webfaction.com
Comment: Your domain name registrar may not require all four domain
name servers; enter as
You should be able to tell your browser (if firefox) to accept the SSL
certificate anyways.
At least, you have to do that with self-signed certificates as well.
As far as publishing SSH, sometimes I just fire up a program called
gFTP (for Ubuntu Linux), and SFTP (ssh-ftp) into my account, and jus
On Apr 27, 2010, at 7:32 AM, aure wrote:
> As I had started to do it your way before you even mentioned it
> (created 2 websites...), I decided to try your solution.
> Unfortunately, when I try to access the admin website I get this in
> Firefox:
>
> --
> Secure Connection Failed
>
> admin.a
Hello Thadeus,
After trying Annet's solution, I tried yours.
Now if I try to access my site I get a webfaction message: "Site not
configured..."
This seems to be because I have enables HTTPS. Is normal that I cannot
access the website using HTTP now? I am a bit confused.
Now if try to access the
Hello Annet,
As I had started to do it your way before you even mentioned it
(created 2 websites...), I decided to try your solution.
Unfortunately, when I try to access the admin website I get this in
Firefox:
--
Secure Connection Failed
admin.aurerua.webfactional.com uses an invalid securi
Annet and Thadeus,
Thanks a lot for the quick reply! :)
I will check that tomorrow.
Aurelien
On Apr 25, 6:30 pm, annet wrote:
> I took a somewhat different approach. I signed up for a shared 1 plan
> and got a dedicated IP address. Under domains I added two subdomains:
> www and admin. Under a
I took a somewhat different approach. I signed up for a shared 1 plan
and got a dedicated IP address. Under domains I added two subdomains:
www and admin. Under applications I created a web2py application of
type custom install script (http://wiki.webfaction.com/wiki/Web2py-
LatestSource?format=txt
- SSH into the machine, navigate to your root web2py directory
(containing web2py.py), and then run ``python2.5 web2py.py -a
``
- Then rename parameters_8000.py to parameters_443.py
- Make sure you have HTTPS triggered for your domain inside the
webfaction control panel.
Replace your app like any
1 - 100 of 115 matches
Mail list logo
