Hi,
I have the same problem in Safari, no matter what version. The problem
has something to do with a left-margin: -3px css setting on
element.style, when I deselect its check box the problem is solved.
Kind regards,
Annet.
I used SQLFORM to generate a form like that: (by return
dict(form=form) on Controller)
Field1: [...input box...]
Field2: [...input box...]
Field3: [...input box...]
But how I can write description beside each input-box like that:
Field1: [...input box...] - Description of field1 here
Field2:
In db.py I defined the following table:
db.define_table('function',
Field('bedrijf_id',db.bedrijf,default='',notnull=True,unique=True),
Field('home',type='boolean',default=True,writable=False),
Field('logo',type='boolean',default=False),
On Tue, 13 Sep 2011 19:04:48 -0300
Martín Mulone mulone.mar...@gmail.com
wrote:
I decide to release a new version of instant press: version
2.0https://bitbucket.org/mulonemartin/instantpress/wiki/Home,
many changes from the original version 1.0. I think I rewrite almost
everything, now is
Ok, so I've just spent an hour trying to recreate the old problems I have
(without the PARSE_DECLTYPES), and I am unable to.
I know for sure that I was occasionally getting strings back when I expected
a datetime() object, because I had a test in the code that would report
that, and it stopped
I have a custom register function from which I send an html mail:
@auth.requires_membership('Admin')
def register_email(aanhef,last_name,email,username,password):
context=dict(aanhef=aanhef,last_name=last_name,username=username,password=password)
Hi,
Field(,comment='Description of field1 here')
Kind regards,
Annet
Hi,
(1) I want to substitute auth by email_auth. I have added the following
lines to db.py (localhost):
# My Code:
from gluon.contrib.login_methods.email_auth import email_auth
# from the book:
auth.settings.login_methods.append(email_auth(smtp.gmail.com:587,
@gmail.com))
Hi Massimo,
On 14/09/2011 04:26, Massimo Di Pierro wrote:
I hate crud. I want it to die but slowly.
I've been making heavy use of it lately, and have found it very useful.
Can you explain why you hate it, and what die means?
I'm assuming that it will stay in place for backward
On Tue, 13 Sep 2011 15:17:44 -0700 (PDT)
Anthony abasta...@gmail.com wrote:
I think Instant Press 1.0 included CKEditor -- have you thought about
offering that as an option in Instant Press 2.0 as well?
Although it would be nice to have CKEditor included, I wonder about different
markup
Hello, Omi!
Do you have any idea where I should check ?
I use IIS 7.5 with IIS 6 Management Cimpatibility.
1. Check you app is working through usual web2py startup.
2. if you did junction folder - set full access for IIS_WPG for the target
folder ...\applications
also check access for
CKeditor as a default editor not for now. But let me think if we can add as
optional. CKeditor is heavy, slow, too much. The editor included is fast
lightweight, and support multiples markup languages. I included textile
support because can handle chained list that markmin can't.
2011/9/14
While it could be a bug, and seems to be similar to another reported
issue:
http://groups.google.com/group/web2py/browse_thread/thread/aa5fa98a74e9364f#
there has been no formal acknowledgement of it in .grid or .smartgrid,
nor have there been any defect tickets raised.
You can also see it in a
On Wed, 14 Sep 2011 07:33:35 -0300
Martín Mulone mulone.mar...@gmail.com
wrote:
CKeditor as a default editor not for now. But let me think if we can
add as optional. CKeditor is heavy, slow, too much.
The editor included is fast lightweight, and support multiples markup
languages. I
Isn't the one of them obsolete/redundant?
Yes I know, perhaps... but, what I want is to have in content, an space to
edit the text, without extra fields noising the enviroment.
2011/9/14 Gour-Gadadhara Dasa g...@atmarama.net
On Wed, 14 Sep 2011 07:33:35 -0300
Martín Mulone
While it looks like a bug, it may not be implemented in the new .grid
or .smartgrid.
There is a posting that may imply this
http://groups.google.com/group/web2py/browse_thread/thread/aa5fa98a74e9364f
and certainly in image examples posted by Bruno Rocha
http://www.diigo.com/item/image/121xl/3iob
On Wednesday, September 14, 2011 6:33:35 AM UTC-4, Martin.Mulone wrote:
CKeditor as a default editor not for now. But let me think if we can add as
optional. CKeditor is heavy, slow, too much. The editor included is fast
lightweight, and support multiples markup languages.
Yes, I
I have tried this using a new app, no jQuery UI or anything yet, just stock
welcome app. I have a couple of issues. First in the list, it only shows the
index numbers instead of the auth.user representation. Boolean values are
also given in numbers instead of checkboxes, or simply 'Yes' / 'No':
Are you telling me that the line
driver_args['detect_types'] = self.driver.PARSE_DECLTYPES
which I added yesterday can be safely removed?
I thought this was a performance issue as well as db(...).select()
returns parsed types and it is best if the driver does it as opposed
if web2py does it.
do not worry. crud it not going to disappear and it will remain
backward compatible. It is indeed useful. I think the new SQLFORM.grid
is easier and more powerful.
On Sep 14, 3:22 am, Philip Kilner phil.kil...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Massimo,
On 14/09/2011 04:26, Massimo Di Pierro wrote:
I hate
Solution:
buildrepr=lambda table: lambda id:
SPAN(A(id,_href=URL(r=request,c='default',f='view',vars={'a':table,'i':id})))
for table in a_list:
db.define_table('a_'+table,*[field for field in
db.ipo,db['ipo_'+table]])
db['a_'+table].id.represent=buildrepr(table)
On 12 Αύγ, 20:35,
Dear All ,
am using Webfaction for hosting and am using postgreSQL when i try to
add things to the database through the CMS it gives me a limit the
the litters cant be more than 512 , what to do ??
On Wednesday, September 14, 2011 8:38:23 AM UTC-4, Web2Py Freak wrote:
Dear All ,
am using Webfaction for hosting and am using postgreSQL when i try to
add things to the database through the CMS it gives me a limit the
the litters cant be more than 512 , what to do ??
What do you mean
On 14 September 2011 10:47, Simon Ashley simonashle...@gmail.com wrote:
While it looks like a bug, it may not be implemented in the new .grid
or .smartgrid.
There is a posting that may imply this
http://groups.google.com/group/web2py/browse_thread/thread/aa5fa98a74e9364f
and certainly in
Thank you Anthony ,, and no not the appadmin , i created a Cms , and
i will try the length
On 14 September 2011 00:04, Martín Mulone mulone.mar...@gmail.com wrote:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vGkR246URRk
Thanks for making this available. I have tried it out, but I could not log
in as admin because some characters of initial the password appeared as
blocks on my browser
I'm not float/double guy but yes, it make sense.
With that, we can use this.
input.decimal, input.integer, input.double {
text-align: right;
}
I also understand the Anthony's point. My table actually has five decimal
field for different pricing for the product, which look really weird
I think auth.messages.reset_password just has to be a string that has
%(key)s somewhere in it (for the reset key to be inserted). So, couldn't you
do something like
auth.messages.reset_password=response.render('admincms/register_email.html',some_context)
to generate the message?
Anthony
On
Hi Massimo,
On 14/09/2011 13:15, Massimo Di Pierro wrote:
do not worry. crud it not going to disappear and it will remain
backward compatible. It is indeed useful. I think the new SQLFORM.grid
is easier and more powerful.
Great, thanks for confirming that.
I'm a database developer first and
See one answer down there...
On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 2:38 AM, annet annet.verm...@gmail.com wrote:
In db.py I defined the following table:
db.define_table('function',
Field('bedrijf_id',db.bedrijf,default='',notnull=True,unique=True),
Yes.
I'm saying I can't find my test case that was failing without it (although
I'm still trying to recreate one).
I thought this was a performance issue as well as db(...).select()
returns parsed types and it is best if the driver does it as opposed if
web2py does it.
It probably is
On Wednesday, September 14, 2011 10:04:31 AM UTC-4, Richard wrote:
row.counter should be set based on the number of functions being True,
is there a way to loop through a table's fields?
for field in db[table].fields:
do something
Note, that will loop through the field names. If you
Temporary solution: http://code.google.com/p/web2py/issues/detail?id=354 ;
todor's version is better than mine (also see my comment #4 in that thread)
Haven't yet tested it with 1.99 dal, but it should work as it is not very
dependent on implementation details.
This is by no means an academic benchmark, but I was doing some testing with
RPC methods and decided to come up with a benchmark to get some average
times for the time it takes to make several types of RPC calls, and if one
protocol has a performance advantage over another. I tested JSON-RPC
Perhaps you want to use columns instead of fields.
replace your controller with this:
def index():
columns = ['dog.name', 'dog.owner']
table = SQLFORM.grid(db.dog, columns=columns)
return dict(table=table)
columns affect the grid column displaying only. Pass to column the field you
On Wed, 14 Sep 2011 14:54:35 +0200
Johann Spies johann.sp...@gmail.com
wrote:
Thanks for making this available. I have tried it out, but I could
not log in as admin because some characters of initial the password
appeared as blocks on my browser (Firefox 5.0). I will try on another
computer
Boolean values are also given in numbers instead of checkboxes, or simply
'Yes' / 'No':
please open a ticket.
2011/9/14 Ross Peoples ross.peop...@gmail.com
I have tried this using a new app, no jQuery UI or anything yet, just stock
welcome app. I have a couple of issues. First in the
Does the app include any model files? If so, can you attach them?
On Wednesday, September 14, 2011 10:49:48 AM UTC-4, Ross Peoples wrote:
This is by no means an academic benchmark, but I was doing some testing
with RPC methods and decided to come up with a benchmark to get some average
Another detail I should mention is that the JSON-RPC client can't seem to
serialize datetime values, which is why I wrap them in str() in the test.py
file. The server can serialize them, and the client can deserialize them (as
strings), but the client cannot send a datetime to the server.
Anthony, the only model is the one generated by the welcome app when a new
app is created. I have attached it here just for clarification. It has only
one model defined (besides the default Auth tables), and that is a simple
task model.# -*- coding: utf-8 -*-
# this file is released under
seems fixed in 0.9.9.2
thank you
and some questions:
is it possible to run uwsgi with jython ?
when do you think it will be possible to run uwsgi with pypy ?
thank you again for your awesome project
Issue 421 http://code.google.com/p/web2py/issues/detail?id=421
On Sep 14, 2011, at 7:49 AM, Ross Peoples wrote:
I ran this test several times because of the HUGE difference between the
protocols when used over SSL. I think this may be more of a problem with the
JSON client or server rather than the protocol itself. You'll see what I mean:
I believe
On Sep 14, 2011, at 7:49 AM, Ross Peoples wrote:
As you can see, there wasn't much of a change. In fact, turning off sessions
added about 400 ms to the testing time. Now let's try with SSL:
Have you done enough runs to know what kind of noise level you're getting? I'd
be sort of surprised
Il giorno 14/set/2011, alle ore 17:08, elffikk ha scritto:
seems fixed in 0.9.9.2
thank you
and some questions:
is it possible to run uwsgi with jython ?
i really do not know, no plan currently to push the jvm/jni plugin
when do you think it will be possible to run uwsgi with pypy ?
it
Jonathan,
I have downloaded the jsonrpclib and rerun the SSL without Sessions test
again. MUCH better:
ADD TWO NUMBERS
==
JSON-RPC: 102.86 ms
XML-RPC: 62.83 ms
Result: XML won by: 40.04 ms
CONCATENATE TWO STRINGS
==
JSON-RPC:
Jonathan,
I remember now that sessions were optimized so that you didn't need to use
session.forget(response) to increase performance. I ran these tests several
times, and each test run makes 100 RPC calls per protocol, so there is a
large test sample size. When playing with sessions, I would
I understand that these two grid are brand new, but has anyone created
any documentation on all of the options and how to use them yet?
Here are a couple issues I'm wondering about:
1. In reading this post -
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!msg/web2py/1eSMh8TlHGs/rB9Hx2UIP4cJ -
and looking
On Sep 14, 2011, at 8:41 AM, Ross Peoples wrote:
I have downloaded the jsonrpclib and rerun the SSL without Sessions test
again. MUCH better:
Good.
Another suggestion: insert some dummy request, a nop of some sort, as the first
operation (before ADD). I'm guessing that in both cases (JSON
Hi martín, And with powergrid?
--
Enviado desde mi teléfono Android con K-9 Mail. Disculpa mi brevedad
Martín Mulone mulone.mar...@gmail.com escribió:
Perhaps you want to use columns instead of fields.
replace your controller with this:
def index(): columns = ['dog.name', 'dog.owner']
Looks like I found the answer to #1. Updated to latest trunk and
recreated app from scratch. Must be something new in the scaffolding
view/css that changed the default behavior.
-Jim
On 9/14/2011 11:01 AM, Jim Steil wrote:
I understand that these two grid are brand new, but has anyone
It might be interesting to run the benchmark without including db.py, as
there's a lot of stuff in there that has nothing to do with the RPC calls
that is probably taking up a lot of time.
Anthony
On Wednesday, September 14, 2011 11:08:24 AM UTC-4, Ross Peoples wrote:
Anthony, the only model
Hello
i dont know if this is a stupid question but imagine i have 10 apps running
in my server
If i detect an error in one app and want do avoid users from loggin in what
do i do.
What is the best practice?
A buttonEnable/Disable would be great in admin
Thank you
António
2. Can I override the default links for Add and Edit?
links = [lambda row: A('Edit',_href=URL(default,edit,args=[row.id])),
lambda row: A('Delete',_href=URL(default,delete,args=[row.id]))]
table = SQLFORM.grid(query,
links=links,
deletable=False,
sherdim,
I checked all including your suggesion but it just didn't work. I keep
getting HTTP Error 500.
Windows event says Failed to import callback module 'ochibaapp'
Have you successfully working on IIS 7.5 ?
If not, I need to say there are maybe some compatible issue with isapi-wsgi
module
Thanks for the tip Anthony!
Btw, I'm not using grid or powergid.
On 13 set, 15:45, Anthony abasta...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tuesday, September 13, 2011 2:28:50 PM UTC-4, Roberto Perdomo wrote:
This small detail I think is affecting grid and powergrid not think it
should be solved that way
I
I notice that the old editor had image upload feature, this will not be
included in this version?
May be could have a simpler way to detect the presence of a plugin for
editor, so users can decide which HTMl editor to use
I am using http://dev.s-cubism.com/plugin_elrte_widget and I like it, so
Jonathan,
Good point about the nop. The nop is on BOTH protocols and does not count
against the total time or the averages. Here are the results from that:
ADD TWO NUMBERS
==
JSON-RPC: 75.57 ms
XML-RPC: 45.65 ms
Result: XML won by: 29.92 ms (165.5% faster)
On Sep 14, 2011, at 10:25 AM, Ross Peoples wrote:
Jonathan,
Good point about the nop. The nop is on BOTH protocols and does not count
against the total time or the averages. Here are the results from that:
I'm still puzzled by the anomalous JSON ADD time. How about dropping a second
ADD
Ok, I think I've narrowed down the problem:
I put the old db.py file back (the one from the welcome app), then I
commented everything. The percentage difference with everything commented
out is XML 293% faster. I started uncommenting lines, one by one and running
the test with each one. I
I notice that the old editor had image upload feature, this will not be
included in this version?
take a look to:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vGkR246URRkfeature=player_detailpage#t=200s
Yes only in content (post/ page)
2011/9/14 Bruno Rocha rochacbr...@gmail.com
I notice that the old
If you use the permission system you just need to do
auth_user.registration_key = blocked or disabled... Use one of both for
permenently disabled a user without remove it record from the table. So
blocked for momently block access to your app and disabled for permanently
block a user to logon...
Are you saying you want to block specific users, or completely take the
entire application offline? If the latter, you could redirect all traffic to
a static page with a message, either by configuring your web server, making
a change in routes.py, or adding a redirect() call in a model file of
On Wednesday, September 14, 2011 1:25:37 PM UTC-4, Ross Peoples wrote:
I also took Anthony's advice and removed all the models, except for three
lines from db.py that are required:
from gluon.tools import Service
service = Service()
response.generic_patterns = ['*']
This has changed the
On Sep 14, 2011, at 10:47 AM, Ross Peoples wrote:
Ok, I think I've narrowed down the problem:
I put the old db.py file back (the one from the welcome app), then I
commented everything. The percentage difference with everything commented out
is XML 293% faster. I started uncommenting
On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 1:11 PM, roberto...@gmail.com
roberto...@gmail.comwrote:
** Hi martín, And with powergrid?
PowerGrid is a bit different, because its data is based in JSON callback.
My initial view was that users may code their own JSON callback to work with
grid.
Bit it is in my TODO
Normally, I wouldn't use that kind of percentage, except I wanted to
highlight the large gap between the two protocols with Auth is used.
JSON-RPC calls stay around 56 ms regardless of what I enable or disable in
db.py. But for some reason, XML-RPC falls from 45 ms to 18 ms when Auth is
There may be an issue that was fixed in trunk.
On Sep 14, 7:52 am, Web2Py Freak halna...@gardeniatelco.com wrote:
Thank you Anthony ,, and no not the appadmin , i created a Cms , and
i will try the length
On Sep 14, 2011, at 11:07 AM, Anthony wrote:
On Wednesday, September 14, 2011 1:25:37 PM UTC-4, Ross Peoples wrote:
I also took Anthony's advice and removed all the models, except for three
lines from db.py that are required:
from gluon.tools import Service
service = Service()
On Sep 14, 2011, at 11:16 AM, Ross Peoples wrote:
Normally, I wouldn't use that kind of percentage, except I wanted to
highlight the large gap between the two protocols with Auth is used. JSON-RPC
calls stay around 56 ms regardless of what I enable or disable in db.py. But
for some reason,
On Wednesday, September 14, 2011 2:20:26 PM UTC-4, Jonathan Lundell wrote:
How can the JSON times have increased (slightly) with the removal of all
the db.py code? This seems odd.
The JSON-vs-XML speed issue probably has to do with using the pure-Python
simplejson library from contrib.
On Sep 14, 2011, at 11:29 AM, Anthony wrote:
On Wednesday, September 14, 2011 2:20:26 PM UTC-4, Jonathan Lundell wrote:
How can the JSON times have increased (slightly) with the removal of all the
db.py code? This seems odd.
The JSON-vs-XML speed issue probably has to do with using the
I've been dabbling with web2py for a bit. Kudos to the developers! Things
are coming together nicely.
I've been using the stable release (1.98.2), but would like to try some of
the newer features (SQLFORM.grid, SQLFORM.smartgrid, etc.). I'm using
Ubuntu 11.04 with Python 2.7.1+. I'm somewhat
I'm away from my sources for a while. I think you'll find the headers in
request.headers. How about an rpc function that just returns them.
On Sep 14, 2011, at 12:13 PM, Ross Peoples ross.peop...@gmail.com wrote:
I'll see if I can intercept the headers somehow. If you are interested in
Oh.
This is what I see:
Hello, i dont understant quite well how to interpret the *** in this
code:
table = [['a', 'b'], ['c', 'd']]
2 print TABLE(***[TR(***rows) for rows in table])
If my eyes don't deceive me, I do see *** in three locations.
:)
Noel
On Sep 14, 10:25 am, Anthony
I don't think request stores headers. I tried but couldn't find it in the
sources or through introspection. The response object has it, and I included
that here. Had to do some work arounds as just returning response.headers
generated a ticket, but these are the headers for when Auth is
What the hell, that was not what i wrote
Only one *
You have a problem in your email.
2011/9/14 Noel Villamor noe...@gmail.com
Oh.
This is what I see:
Hello, i dont understant quite well how to interpret the *** in this
code:
table = [['a', 'b'], ['c', 'd']]
2 print
On Sep 14, 2011, at 1:23 PM, Ross Peoples wrote:
I don't think request stores headers. I tried but couldn't find it in the
sources or through introspection. The response object has it, and I included
that here. Had to do some work arounds as just returning response.headers
generated a
Actually, it shows up as *** in the old Google Groups
interface:
https://groups.google.com/group/web2py/browse_frm/thread/f4475684a88fef17/45622d797458e974?hl=en#45622d797458e974.
The new interface correctly displays only one *. I use the new interface, so
saw the intended single *.
Anthony
The source is hosted here: http://code.google.com/p/web2py/source/checkout
Using Mercurial, just do:
hg clone https://code.google.com/p/web2py/
Anthony
On Wednesday, September 14, 2011 3:26:15 PM UTC-4, BamaRob wrote:
I've been dabbling with web2py for a bit. Kudos to the developers!
Interesting!
The old:
https://groups.google.com/group/web2py/browse_frm/thread/f4475684a88fef17/45622d797458e974?hl=en#45622d797458e974
The new:
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/web2py/9EdWhKiP7xc
Thanks for clearing up the confusion Anthony.
Noel
On Sep 15, 9:07 am, Anthony
Hello Massimo,
I will try to make myself clear...
My objective is to manage the insertion of an arbitrary number of records in
a second table with a normalised one to many relation between 2 tables.
I had this Idea :
I would make a form and use the virtual field to get the number of rows to
The Anthony suggestion seems what you want.
Don't know how hard or insecure it could be to implement a on/off button...
Having a kind of empty app or redirecting app for off application could be
deliver with web2py like the welcome app and the routes.py having a redirect
procedure to trigger if
Just tried that, but it still returns the Id ..
1. it just returns a ticket if
On Sep 15, 12:57 am, Martín Mulone mulone.mar...@gmail.com wrote:
Perhaps you want to use columns instead of fields.
replace your controller with this:
def index():
columns = ['dog.name', 'dog.owner']
i manage to build a Qooxdoo , only ui and i am quite impressed by its power.
But when i put inside web2py , it dont load at all what did i do wrong?
in controller: /sExtract/default/ft
def fasttract():
return dict(test=ok)
in view:
html xmlns=http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml;
i.body is null
http://localhost:8080/sExtract/static/ft/script/ft_ui.js
Line 3816
exact error.
Can you show me how u call it in ur example?
On 9/15/11, Phyo Arkar phyo.arkarl...@gmail.com wrote:
i manage to build a Qooxdoo , only ui and i am quite impressed by its
power.
But when i put
I started taking a look at PhoneGap for making a simple iPhone app and can't
seem to figure out how I would implement login, authentication and session
management. Has anyone here looked at PhoneGap or any other self-contained
JavaScript-based app?
I suppose I could Ajax in a username/password
I would love to be able to stick sessions in Redis.
Is that a possibility with redis_cache.py?
I tried it but was unable to get it to work. MEMDB complained about
type 'exceptions.AttributeError'('RedisClient' object has no
attribute 'incr')
If I use redis-py from pip as a plain cache I am
Thanks you! Thanks to this info I was able to recreate the exact form
clearing problem by loading another instance of the form in another
tab/window.
I have taken out the session from form.accepts in those forms and now
everything is fine.
Can anybody forsee any problems with my removing that?
Double submits can happen.
On Sep 14, 9:16 pm, Lennon lpru...@hotmail.com wrote:
Thanks you! Thanks to this info I was able to recreate the exact form
clearing problem by loading another instance of the form in another
tab/window.
I have taken out the session from form.accepts in those
Also, cross-site request forgery
attacks: https://www.owasp.org/index.php/Top_10_2010-A5
Anthony
On Wednesday, September 14, 2011 10:36:41 PM UTC-4, Cliff wrote:
Double submits can happen.
On Sep 14, 9:16 pm, Lennon lpr...@hotmail.com wrote:
Thanks you! Thanks to this info I was able
I do not see the screenshot. :-(
This should work, although may not work the way you want.
On Sep 14, 4:48 pm, Jim Steil j...@qlf.com wrote:
In response to #3, I see what is going on now. I'm working on a
membership database where I have the following model:
### db.py
member =
It would actually be trivial to add a checkbox to the sites.html page
that is always checked (active) and when inactive stores the app name
in disabled_apps.txt (or a better named file) and then the router
ignores apps listed in this file.
On Sep 14, 5:03 pm, Richard Vézina
Not yet. Sessons for now go in filesystem or db only, they cannot go
on cache.
Actually, I would digitally sign sessions and store them client-side
than store them in cache.
massimo
On Sep 14, 7:49 pm, TheSweetlink yanosh...@gmail.com wrote:
I would love to be able to stick sessions in Redis.
Thank you Massimo.
Would you be so kind as to point me in the direction of where I could
learn to do that with web2py?
Are there any security implications? I would imagine the digitally
signing takes care of that.
Is that done with that secure cookies post from a while back?
-David
On Sep
On Wednesday, September 14, 2011 11:10:13 PM UTC-4, Massimo Di Pierro wrote:
It would actually be trivial to add a checkbox to the sites.html page
that is always checked (active) and when inactive stores the app name
in disabled_apps.txt (or a better named file) and then the router
ignores
I'm using the new format of the google group and see them as attachments
at the bottom of the post. I can create new ones if that helps?
-Jim
On 9/14/2011 10:07 PM, Massimo Di Pierro wrote:
I do not see the screenshot. :-(
This should work, although may not work the way you want.
On Sep
What I do in such cases is--
In the controller C.py,
def myController1():
return dict()
for returning a dict, I write a script
def getDict():
do the processing...
D={key:value pairs go here}
return response.json(D)
In myController.html View file,
...
access D by using
Ok, found the problem. I was missing an 's' in the line:
memberTag.memberId.requires = IS_IN_DB(db, db.member.id,
'%(firstName) %(lastName)s',
zero=('select member'))
Should have been:
memberTag.memberId.requires =
Again, found to be a typo on my end. I should give it up for the night
-Jim
On 9/15/2011 12:12 AM, Jim Steil wrote:
Ok, found the problem. I was missing an 's' in the line:
memberTag.memberId.requires = IS_IN_DB(db, db.member.id,
'%(firstName)
100 matches
Mail list logo
