Here are some examples of old and new format:
BUGCR24182 SLOW MAC DEBUG : fast/css/large-list-of-rules-crash.html = PASS
BUGCR24182 SLOW LINUX MAC DEBUG :
fast/dom/Window/window-postmessage-clone-really-deep-array.html = PASS
BUGCR24182 SLOW MAC DEBUG :
Oops, some really bad typos.
On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 3:10 AM, Ryosuke Niwa rn...@webkit.org wrote:
Beginning of line (current proposal with expectations):
End of line with expectations (current proposal)
WONTFIX SKIP : media/media-captions.html = TIMEOUT
BUGWK43459 WONTFIX :
Dear,
I kindly request to stop the messages,
--
kiran Gokidi
+91-9043174437
___
webkit-dev mailing list
webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org
http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/webkit-dev
On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 6:53 PM, Dirk Pranke dpra...@chromium.org wrote:
* We'll probably rename IMAGE+TEXT to IMAGE_AND_TEXT.
Can someone please remind me why IMAGE+TEXT even exists?
Wouldn't it be simpler to just mark a test as follows?
- IMAGE : allow image failure; go red if there is
On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 1:39 PM, Elliot Poger epo...@chromium.org wrote:
Can someone please remind me why IMAGE+TEXT even exists?
Wouldn't it be simpler to just mark a test as follows?
- IMAGE : allow image failure; go red if there is a text failure
- TEXT: allow text failure; go red
On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 1:44 PM, Peter Kasting pkast...@chromium.orgwrote:
On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 1:39 PM, Elliot Poger epo...@chromium.org wrote:
Can someone please remind me why IMAGE+TEXT even exists?
Wouldn't it be simpler to just mark a test as follows?
- IMAGE : allow image
On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 4:44 PM, Peter Kasting pkast...@chromium.orgwrote:
On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 1:39 PM, Elliot Poger epo...@chromium.org wrote:
Can someone please remind me why IMAGE+TEXT even exists?
Wouldn't it be simpler to just mark a test as follows?
- IMAGE : allow image
On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 1:44 PM, Peter Kasting pkast...@chromium.org wrote:
On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 1:39 PM, Elliot Poger epo...@chromium.org wrote:
Can someone please remind me why IMAGE+TEXT even exists?
Wouldn't it be simpler to just mark a test as follows?
IMAGE : allow image failure;
I created a page with instructions how to use content_shell here:
https://sites.google.com/a/chromium.org/dev/developers/testing/webkit-layout-tests/content-shell
At the bottom, I summarized next steps, esp. how we can reuse chromium's
test controller for the content shell
best
-jochen
On Mon,
On Jun 14, 2012, at 1:47 PM, Ryosuke Niwa rn...@webkit.org wrote:
On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 1:44 PM, Peter Kasting pkast...@chromium.org wrote:
On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 1:39 PM, Elliot Poger epo...@chromium.org wrote:
Can someone please remind me why IMAGE+TEXT even exists?
Wouldn't it be
Done in http://trac.webkit.org/changeset/120371
- Ryosuke
___
webkit-dev mailing list
webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org
http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/webkit-dev
On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 4:22 PM, Maciej Stachowiak m...@apple.com wrote:
On Jun 14, 2012, at 1:47 PM, Ryosuke Niwa rn...@webkit.org wrote:
On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 1:44 PM, Peter Kasting pkast...@chromium.org
wrote:
On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 1:39 PM, Elliot Poger epo...@chromium.org wrote:
Can
On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 4:34 PM, Adam Barth aba...@webkit.org wrote:
I too would like to see us remove TEXT+IMAGE. It's really confusing
to non-experts, and it doesn't scale as we introduce new kinds of
failures (like Audio). Do we really need TEXT+IMAGE+AUDIO,
TEXT+AUDIO, and IMAGE+AUDIO?
On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 4:22 PM, Maciej Stachowiak m...@apple.com wrote:
On Jun 14, 2012, at 1:47 PM, Ryosuke Niwa rn...@webkit.org wrote:
On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 1:44 PM, Peter Kasting pkast...@chromium.org
wrote:
On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 1:39 PM, Elliot Poger epo...@chromium.org wrote:
On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 4:34 PM, Adam Barth aba...@webkit.org wrote:
On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 4:22 PM, Maciej Stachowiak m...@apple.com wrote:
On Jun 14, 2012, at 1:47 PM, Ryosuke Niwa rn...@webkit.org wrote:
On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 1:44 PM, Peter Kasting pkast...@chromium.org
wrote:
On
On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 4:34 PM, Dirk Pranke dpra...@chromium.org wrote:
On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 4:22 PM, Maciej Stachowiak m...@apple.com wrote:
On Jun 14, 2012, at 1:47 PM, Ryosuke Niwa rn...@webkit.org wrote:
On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 1:44 PM, Peter Kasting pkast...@chromium.org
On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 8:56 PM, Ojan Vafai o...@chromium.org wrote:
On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 4:34 PM, Dirk Pranke dpra...@chromium.org wrote:
On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 4:22 PM, Maciej Stachowiak m...@apple.com wrote:
On Jun 14, 2012, at 1:47 PM, Ryosuke Niwa rn...@webkit.org wrote:
On Thu, Jun
On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 9:00 PM, Adam Barth aba...@webkit.org wrote:
On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 8:56 PM, Ojan Vafai o...@chromium.org wrote:
On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 4:34 PM, Dirk Pranke dpra...@chromium.org
wrote:
On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 4:22 PM, Maciej Stachowiak m...@apple.com
wrote:
On
On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 9:02 PM, Ojan Vafai o...@chromium.org wrote:
On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 9:00 PM, Adam Barth aba...@webkit.org wrote:
On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 8:56 PM, Ojan Vafai o...@chromium.org wrote:
On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 4:34 PM, Dirk Pranke dpra...@chromium.org
wrote:
On Thu,
On Jun 14, 2012, at 9:06 PM, Adam Barth aba...@webkit.org wrote:
On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 9:02 PM, Ojan Vafai o...@chromium.org wrote:
Seems like it will be a common error to mark a reftest failure as
ImageOnlyFail and then be confused why it's not working, no?
Maybe that can be solved
On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 9:20 PM, Maciej Stachowiak m...@apple.com wrote:
On Jun 14, 2012, at 9:06 PM, Adam Barth aba...@webkit.org wrote:
On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 9:02 PM, Ojan Vafai o...@chromium.org wrote:
Seems like it will be a common error to mark a reftest failure as
ImageOnlyFail
On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 10:37 PM, Ojan Vafai o...@chromium.org wrote:
On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 9:20 PM, Maciej Stachowiak m...@apple.com wrote:
On Jun 14, 2012, at 9:06 PM, Adam Barth aba...@webkit.org wrote:
On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 9:02 PM, Ojan Vafai o...@chromium.org wrote:
Seems
22 matches
Mail list logo
