On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 10:28 PM, Eric Seidel wrote:
> I wish it were easy to work on feature branches.
>
> We have no good solution for features. For one-patch features, you do them
> on your own. For larger, you maybe use github or most likely you just land
> on trunk behind a #define. None o
On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 1:15 AM, Maciej Stachowiak wrote:
>
> On Jan 30, 2013, at 3:24 PM, Dirk Pranke wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 1:50 PM, Filip Pizlo wrote:
> >> Thanks for sharing this.
> >>
> >> On Jan 30, 2013, at 1:28 PM, Eric Seidel wrote:
> >>
> >> I wish we only had one build
On Jan 30, 2013, at 5:46 PM, Laszlo Gombos wrote:
> Hi !
>
>
> > I'd also like to add that I think a key related issue to common build
> > system is common feature configuration. The many different ways ports
> > control their feature flags is super confusing. I've long wanted to
> > implem
Hello,
I would like to let you know that I plan to add support for the FontLoader
interface to WebCore. It provides ways to detect font loading is actually
occurred and when the loading finished.
The spec is here:
http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css3-fonts/#font-load-events
Here is the tracking bug:
htt
Hi !
> > I'd also like to add that I think a key related issue to common build
> system is common feature configuration. The many different ways ports
> control their feature flags is super confusing. I've long wanted to
> implement common configuration management, but have not had time.
> >
>
>
On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 4:15 PM, Maciej Stachowiak wrote:
>
> On Jan 30, 2013, at 3:24 PM, Dirk Pranke wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 1:50 PM, Filip Pizlo wrote:
>>> Thanks for sharing this.
>>>
>>> On Jan 30, 2013, at 1:28 PM, Eric Seidel wrote:
>>>
>>> I wish we only had one build system
On Jan 30, 2013, at 3:24 PM, Dirk Pranke wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 1:50 PM, Filip Pizlo wrote:
>> Thanks for sharing this.
>>
>> On Jan 30, 2013, at 1:28 PM, Eric Seidel wrote:
>>
>> I wish we only had one build system (it were easy to add/remove/move files).
>>
>> I believe changes
Hi,
I'd like to delete all the ENABLE(WEB_INTENTS) code. As far as I know,
nobody ever shipped this and nobody intents to. Please speak up if
you'd like that code to stick around.
Nico
___
webkit-dev mailing list
webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org
https://list
On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 1:50 PM, Filip Pizlo wrote:
> Thanks for sharing this.
>
> On Jan 30, 2013, at 1:28 PM, Eric Seidel wrote:
>
> I wish we only had one build system (it were easy to add/remove/move files).
>
> I believe changes like http://trac.webkit.org/changeset/74849 are an
> unhealthy
Hi,
Am 30.01.2013 um 22:28 schrieb Eric Seidel:
> I wish we only had one build system (it were easy to add/remove/move files).
I've created CMake files for two different ports at [1] and [2] already, but
did't get positive feedback from the port-maintainer. So I stopped working on
it. If any p
On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 1:28 PM, Eric Seidel wrote:
> *
> I wish I felt like reviewers understood/trusted each other more.
>
> *
> *I’ve worked at both Apple and Google. The WebKit community is full of
> brilliant engineers. Yet I frequently feel a lack of trust in my (or
> others) judgement, o
Hi Eric,
On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 10:28 PM, Eric Seidel wrote:
> I wish we didn’t have to worry about platforms we couldn’t test.
>
> It can’t be the job of the core maintainers to care about all the peripheral
> ports which contribute very little core code. Our code needs to be
> structured in su
Hi Eric,
These are great thoughts. I agree with you on all points. One informative
comment below:
On Jan 30, 2013, at 1:28 PM, Eric Seidel wrote:
> I wish we only had one build system (it were easy to add/remove/move files).
>
> I believe changes like http://trac.webkit.org/changeset/74849 a
Thanks for sharing this.
On Jan 30, 2013, at 1:28 PM, Eric Seidel wrote:
> I wish we only had one build system (it were easy to add/remove/move files).
>
> I believe changes like http://trac.webkit.org/changeset/74849 are an
> unhealthy sign for the project. Adam is not the only person who ha
*I wish we only had one build system (it were easy to add/remove/move
files).*
*
I believe changes like http://trac.webkit.org/changeset/74849 are an
unhealthy sign for the project. Adam is not the only person who has chosen
to empty files instead of removing them. The pain of updating 8 build
sy
Thanks for the advance warning! :)
- E
On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 3:17 PM, Anders Carlsson wrote:
> Hello!
>
> This is just a friendly heads-up that the Mac specific parts of WebKit2
> will soon start requiring C++11 features (move semantics and variadic
> templates being the two most important).
The future! Is now! :)
Very exciting. I hope some day we can use C++11 for the rest of WebCore too.
On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 12:17 PM, Anders Carlsson wrote:
> Hello!
>
> This is just a friendly heads-up that the Mac specific parts of WebKit2 will
> soon start requiring C++11 features (move se
Hello!
This is just a friendly heads-up that the Mac specific parts of WebKit2 will
soon start requiring C++11 features (move semantics and variadic templates
being the two most important).
Any recent version of Xcode (4.2 or later) should support this, and we're
already building all of WebKit
On Jan 30, 2013, at 12:21 AM, Adam Barth wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 11:58 PM, Maciej Stachowiak wrote:
>> I agree that the regression should be fixed. But before we discuss that...
>>
>> I am puzzled by the apparent stance of "Alexey must immediately fix this
>> himself or we must revert
unsubscribe
The information contained in this electronic message and any attachments to
this message are intended for the exclusive use of the addressee(s) and may
contain proprietary, confidential or privileged information. If you are not the
intended recipient, you should not disseminate, dis
Hi Maciej, Thanks for your attention!
> For reference: will the feature flag be comprehensive, or will parts of
the implementation/scaffolding be outside the ifdef?
It should be comprehensive. So it will.
Although some trivial inline stubs, like just returning null or false, or
even doing nothin
On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 11:58 PM, Maciej Stachowiak wrote:
> I agree that the regression should be fixed. But before we discuss that...
>
> I am puzzled by the apparent stance of "Alexey must immediately fix this
> himself or we must revert immediately". That's not the standard we have
> applied i
22 matches
Mail list logo
