Hi again,
Just to inform I've carefully followed the guidelines from Ryosuke as
well as other reviewers, and also people from www-style (regarding
"blink" value). The following patches are now pending review:
-webkit-text-decoration-line:
https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=90959
-webkit-tex
On Thu, Aug 2, 2012 at 9:43 PM, Bruno Abinader wrote:
>
> On Thu, Aug 2, 2012 at 6:10 PM, Ryosuke Niwa wrote:
> > Does the spec require to return new values in the computed style of
> > text-decoration property without authors specifying new text-decoration
> > properties and values?
> >
> > If n
Hi again,
On Thu, Aug 2, 2012 at 6:10 PM, Ryosuke Niwa wrote:
> Does the spec require to return new values in the computed style of
> text-decoration property without authors specifying new text-decoration
> properties and values?
>
> If not, then using text-decoration property is probably better
Hi again,
I too think so, but I thought it was a general rule to not make
non-prefixed properties follow candidate recommendation strictly. If
it is a general consensus that it is ok to accept prefixed keywords,
then I'll happily change the implementation to do so :)
On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 9:53 P
On Aug 1, 2012, at 4:36 PM, Elliott Sprehn wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 7:35 PM, Bruno Abinader
> wrote:
> Hi all :)
>
> As suggested by Ojan, I am writing a mail to you about my intention to
> implement all updated and missing text-decoration* properties from
> CSS3 spec (currently in
Hi Elliott,
On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 7:36 PM, Elliott Sprehn wrote:
> It seems weird to have a prefixed version of text-decoration instead of just
> making text-decoration allow the new prefixed keywords.
>
> What's the reason for having a whole new prefixed property?
The rationale is that the CSS
On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 7:35 PM, Bruno Abinader wrote:
> Hi all :)
>
> As suggested by Ojan, I am writing a mail to you about my intention to
> implement all updated and missing text-decoration* properties from
> CSS3 spec (currently in development), named below:
>
> -webkit-text-decoration ( http
Sure, that's fine.
But please make sure not to ship these CSS properties until editing code is
properly fixed.
On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 4:47 AM, Bruno Abinader wrote:
> Hi Ryosuke,
>
> Indeed. On the proposed implementation I've assured that the original
> "text-decoration" from CSS 2.1 spec remai
Hi Ryosuke,
Indeed. On the proposed implementation I've assured that the original
"text-decoration" from CSS 2.1 spec remains with exactly same behavior
as before (though I've managed to get some shared code to avoid
duplication). Layout tests results from my local run points no new
failing tests
Please make sure the new text decoration values don't break editing (rich
text editing & execCommand). In particular, we probably need to update
ApplyStyleCommand/EditingStyle to handle -webkit-text-decoration*.
On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 7:35 PM, Bruno Abinader wrote:
> Hi all :)
>
> As suggested b
Hi all :)
As suggested by Ojan, I am writing a mail to you about my intention to
implement all updated and missing text-decoration* properties from
CSS3 spec (currently in development), named below:
-webkit-text-decoration ( https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=92000 )
CSS3 dev spec: http://de
11 matches
Mail list logo
