On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 10:59 AM, Maciej Stachowiak m...@apple.com wrote:
In addition to your comments, I also find the gyp syntax somewhat unpleasant.
In particular, in .gypi lists of files to compile, ever entry is
double-quoted, comma-separated, line-separated, and then grouped in
Hi Brent,
I definitely agree that gyp is rather undocumented and kind of hard to
use. It's nowhere near the level of documentation of CMake, let alone
Xcode or GNU makefiles. Hopefully we can fix this in the near future.
That said, I'd be kind of surprised if cmake was already installed on
your
In addition to your comments, I also find the gyp syntax somewhat unpleasant.
In particular, in .gypi lists of files to compile, ever entry is double-quoted,
comma-separated, line-separated, and then grouped in multiple levels of braces.
This is noisier than any of our current formats except
On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 8:46 PM, Maciej Stachowiak m...@apple.com wrote:
On Mar 23, 2011, at 3:33 AM, Adam Barth wrote:
From my perspective, approach (2) is more desirable than checking in
generated project files because approach (2) encapsulates
Apple-internal build process to Apple folks,
On Mar 24, 2011, at 12:28 AM, Adam Barth wrote:
On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 8:46 PM, Maciej Stachowiak m...@apple.com wrote:
On Mar 23, 2011, at 3:33 AM, Adam Barth wrote:
From my perspective, approach (2) is more desirable than checking in
generated project files because approach (2)
First, let me warm the tone of this thread a bit with an earnest
salute to Adam for trying to solve the problem by actually doing
_something_, rather than talking about it, as we've done for years
now. My own contributions to the matter are small and insignificant in
comparison.
To recall, we do
Hi Dimitri,
LONG screed follows...
On Mar 24, 2011, at 9:24 AM, Dimitri Glazkov wrote:
\With the gyp conversion at this stage, we now have a possible solution
to this problem. Given that there aren't any other viable alternatives
in the present, please consider the most productive way of
On 2011-03-23, at 03:33, Adam Barth wrote:
On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 12:22 AM, Mark Rowe mr...@apple.com wrote:
On 2011-03-22, at 23:50, Adam Barth wrote:
On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 8:14 PM, Mark Rowe mr...@apple.com wrote:
Product names for targets are redundantly declared in the Xcode project
On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 3:33 AM, Adam Barth aba...@webkit.org wrote:
On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 12:22 AM, Mark Rowe mr...@apple.com wrote:
In any case, I'm glad we've found a technically feasible solution.
We've had at least one technically feasible solution from day zip: check
in the
On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 1:33 PM, David Levin le...@google.com wrote:
On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 12:17 PM, Adam Barth aba...@webkit.org wrote:
$ time git svn rebase
[... update my working copy from changes during lunch (four revisions)
...]
real 1m10.316s
user 0m8.194s
sys 0m16.400s
On 2011-03-23, at 13:49, Adam Barth wrote:
On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 1:33 PM, David Levin le...@google.com wrote:
On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 12:17 PM, Adam Barth aba...@webkit.org wrote:
$ time git svn rebase
[... update my working copy from changes during lunch (four revisions)
...]
real
On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 1:58 PM, Mark Rowe mr...@apple.com wrote:
On 2011-03-23, at 13:49, Adam Barth wrote:
On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 1:33 PM, David Levin le...@google.com wrote:
On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 12:17 PM, Adam Barth aba...@webkit.org wrote:
$ time git svn rebase
[... update my working
On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 2:08 PM, Adam Barth aba...@webkit.org wrote:
Indeed. I suspect (2) and (3) are worth doing regardless.
AFAIK, gyp currently always regenerates everything and then compares the new
versions to the old to see if it actually needs to touch the files on disk.
This seems
On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 2:13 PM, Peter Kasting pkast...@chromium.org wrote:
On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 2:08 PM, Adam Barth aba...@webkit.org wrote:
Indeed. I suspect (2) and (3) are worth doing regardless.
AFAIK, gyp currently always regenerates everything and then compares the new
versions to
On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 1:33 PM, David Levin le...@google.com wrote:
On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 12:17 PM, Adam Barth aba...@webkit.org wrote:
$ time git svn rebase
[... update my working copy from changes during lunch (four revisions)
...]
real 1m10.316s
user 0m8.194s
sys
On Mar 23, 2011, at 3:33 AM, Adam Barth wrote:
While this is certainly technically feasible, it would add a huge amount
of overhead to the process of performing a submission.
How often do you submit WebKit to the Apple internal build system? If
that's sensitive information, I'm just
On 2011-03-22, at 19:16, Adam Barth wrote:
WebKit-folk,
With a bunch of help from Dimitri and Eric, we now have a functioning
GYP-based build for the Apple Mac port. There are still a couple bugs
we need to fix before this build system is ready for production
(they're filed as blocking
On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 8:14 PM, Mark Rowe mr...@apple.com wrote:
On 2011-03-22, at 19:16, Adam Barth wrote:
WebKit-folk,
With a bunch of help from Dimitri and Eric, we now have a functioning
GYP-based build for the Apple Mac port. There are still a couple bugs
we need to fix before this
On 2011-03-22, at 21:28, Eric Seidel wrote:
On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 8:14 PM, Mark Rowe mr...@apple.com wrote:
On 2011-03-22, at 19:16, Adam Barth wrote:
WebKit-folk,
With a bunch of help from Dimitri and Eric, we now have a functioning
GYP-based build for the Apple Mac port. There
19 matches
Mail list logo
