OK, I've re-worked my proposal a bit from the feedback I've received,
and I'll submit to w3.org public-html-comments. Here's my revised
proposal:
Seeking feedback for my (hopefully relatively painless in practice
compared to the alternatives - i.e. -webkit-image-set and html5
) proposal t
On Wednesday 25 April 2012, Chris Hutten-Czapski wrote:
> >> Assuming I'm understanding Kalle correctly, it seems this could
> >> already be accomplished with @media resolution?
> >>
> >> http://www.w3.org/TR/css3-mediaqueries/#resolution
>
> Not to be too cute about it, but CSS dpi is _always_ 9
Thanks Chris,
I'll go bring it up on the relevant w3.org lists (I'm guessing I'll start on
public-HTML-comments) and see where that takes me, after refining my idea a bit
to use more conventional naming, and to hopefully account for other scales than
2x in an elegant manner.
I just wanted to ma
>> Assuming I'm understanding Kalle correctly, it seems this could
>> already be accomplished with @media resolution?
>>
>> http://www.w3.org/TR/css3-mediaqueries/#resolution
Not to be too cute about it, but CSS dpi is _always_ 96 CSS pixels per CSS
inch. What this means onscreen is (almost) comp
On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 3:22 AM, Kenneth Rohde Christiansen
wrote:
> So the original iPhone has a dpi of 163, but it reported a CSS dpi of
> 96? meaning that in screen width it had around 3,3 CSS inches where as
> the physical inches are more close to 1.96.
>
> Why is this? Because the original iP
Hi there,
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 11:48 PM, Edward O'Connor wrote:
> Eric Seidel wrote:
>
>> Assuming I'm understanding Kalle correctly, it seems this could
>> already be accomplished with @media resolution?
>>
>> http://www.w3.org/TR/css3-mediaqueries/#resolution
>>
>> @media screen and (min-res
Eric Seidel wrote:
> Assuming I'm understanding Kalle correctly, it seems this could
> already be accomplished with @media resolution?
>
> http://www.w3.org/TR/css3-mediaqueries/#resolution
>
> @media screen and (min-resolution: 264dpi) { … }
>
> Which according to:
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/
I would prefer something that works gracefully with img html tags, without
relying on CSS. Plus, it's the user agent that needs to make the decision of
which asset to request, not the server.
-Tom P.
On Apr 23, 2012, at 9:28 PM, Kalle Vahlman wrote:
> 2012/4/24 Tom Penzer :
>> Hi Everybody!
It would be more readable to use:
@media screen and (min-device-pixel-ratio: 2) { … }
The -webkit-image-set proposal explains why it is a useful shorthand despite
the existing device pixel ratio option.
Regards,
Maciej
On Apr 23, 2012, at 11:11 PM, Eric Seidel wrote:
> Assuming I'm understa
To answer my own question:
http://trac.webkit.org/browser/trunk/Source/WebCore/css/MediaQueryEvaluator.cpp#L66
On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 11:11 PM, Eric Seidel wrote:
> Assuming I'm understanding Kalle correctly, it seems this could
> already be accomplished with @media resolution?
>
> http://www.w3
Assuming I'm understanding Kalle correctly, it seems this could
already be accomplished with @media resolution?
http://www.w3.org/TR/css3-mediaqueries/#resolution
@media screen and (min-resolution: 264dpi) { … }
Which according to:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_displays_by_pixel_density
2012/4/24 Tom Penzer :
> Hi Everybody!
>
> As a first-time poster, I am sorry ahead of time for any lapses in
> etiquette. I am seeking feedback for my (hopefully relatively painless in
> practice compared to the alternatives - i.e. -webkit-image-set and html5
> ) proposal to solve the probl
On Apr 23, 2012, at 3:42 PM, Ryosuke Niwa wrote:
> On what standard mailing lists have this idea been proposed or discussed?
I have not yet submitted to w3.org public-html or public-html-comments as I
wanted to get the take of the webkit community first, since you guys are
particularly interes
On what standard mailing lists have this idea been proposed or discussed?
At glance, it seems like a bad idea to add a specific element for the
double resolution images. What makes us think that someone won't come up
with 3x or 4x resolution screens in near future?
On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 2:44 PM
Hi Tom,
You wrote:
> I am seeking feedback for my (hopefully relatively painless in
> practice compared to the alternatives - i.e. -webkit-image-set and
> html5 ) proposal to solve the problem of 2x-res (double-
> resolution) images with our current HTML and CSS standards for devices
> with high-
Hi Everybody!
As a first-time poster, I am sorry ahead of time for any lapses in
etiquette. I am seeking feedback for my (hopefully relatively painless
in practice compared to the alternatives - i.e. -webkit-image-set and
html5 ) proposal to solve the problem of 2x-res (double-
resolution
16 matches
Mail list logo
