On Mar 1, 2012, at 12:54 PM, Osztrogonac Csaba wrote:
> William Siegrist írta:
>> The Szeged slaves are unblocked. -Bill
>
> Many thanks, I copied up-to-date svn working copy to them and then started.
>
> I have only one more little request. Could you kick git.webkit.org too? It
> seems it is
William Siegrist írta:
The Szeged slaves are unblocked.
-Bill
Many thanks, I copied up-to-date svn working copy to them and then started.
I have only one more little request. Could you kick git.webkit.org too? It
seems it is still stay on r109303. Our EWS would be happy if it works again.
P
On Mar 1, 2012, at 11:13 AM, William Siegrist wrote:
>
> On Mar 1, 2012, at 9:36 AM, Osztrogonac Csaba wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> William Siegrist írta:
>>> On Mar 1, 2012, at 7:56 AM, Osztrogonac Csaba wrote:
And one more technical question. Could you add an svn post-commit hook to
do
On Mar 1, 2012, at 9:36 AM, Osztrogonac Csaba wrote:
> Hi,
>
> William Siegrist írta:
>> On Mar 1, 2012, at 7:56 AM, Osztrogonac Csaba wrote:
>>> And one more technical question. Could you add an svn post-commit hook to
>>> do svnsync on the mirror svn server if we finished setting up the serve
Hi,
William Siegrist írta:
On Mar 1, 2012, at 7:56 AM, Osztrogonac Csaba wrote:
And one more technical question. Could you add an svn post-commit hook to
do svnsync on the mirror svn server if we finished setting up the server?
How would you want svn.webkit.org to signal the mirror? I think
On Mar 1, 2012, at 7:56 AM, Osztrogonac Csaba wrote:
> And one more technical question. Could you add an svn post-commit hook to
> do svnsync on the mirror svn server if we finished setting up the server?
How would you want svn.webkit.org to signal the mirror? I think having
svn.webkit.org reque
Hi,
Marc-Antoine Ruel írta:
Here are some things that may help;
*#1 svn server overloading when all the slaves bootstrap at the same time*
The only good work around is to keep an internal read-only svn-mirror
that the slaves use instead of the real svn server.
This means that builds must be
Here are some things that may help;
*#1 svn server overloading when all the slaves bootstrap at the same time*
The only good work around is to keep an internal read-only svn-mirror that
the slaves use instead of the real svn server.
This means that builds must be triggered on the svn-mirror, whic
We're back to the slaves overloading svn. The Apple slaves are blocked
temporarily while everyone else catches up. Sorry for the inconvenience.
-Bill
___
webkit-dev mailing list
webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org
http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi
On Feb 29, 2012, at 6:33 PM, William Siegrist wrote:
>
> On Feb 29, 2012, at 6:26 PM, William Siegrist wrote:
>
>>
>> On Feb 29, 2012, at 6:22 PM, Mark Rowe wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> On 2012-02-29, at 18:20, Dirk Pranke wrote:
>>>
On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 6:10 PM, Mark Rowe wrote:
>
On Feb 29, 2012, at 6:26 PM, William Siegrist wrote:
>
> On Feb 29, 2012, at 6:22 PM, Mark Rowe wrote:
>
>>
>> On 2012-02-29, at 18:20, Dirk Pranke wrote:
>>
>>> On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 6:10 PM, Mark Rowe wrote:
On 2012-02-29, at 17:05, Lucas Forschler wrote:
If anyon
On Feb 29, 2012, at 6:22 PM, Mark Rowe wrote:
>
> On 2012-02-29, at 18:20, Dirk Pranke wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 6:10 PM, Mark Rowe wrote:
>>>
>>> On 2012-02-29, at 17:05, Lucas Forschler wrote:
>>>
>>> build.webkit.org should be back online now with 0.8.5.
>>>
>>> Thanks for yo
On 2012-02-29, at 18:20, Dirk Pranke wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 6:10 PM, Mark Rowe wrote:
>>
>> On 2012-02-29, at 17:05, Lucas Forschler wrote:
>>
>> build.webkit.org should be back online now with 0.8.5.
>>
>> Thanks for your patience!
>>
>>
>> For anyone following along at home, u
On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 6:10 PM, Mark Rowe wrote:
>
> On 2012-02-29, at 17:05, Lucas Forschler wrote:
>
> build.webkit.org should be back online now with 0.8.5.
>
> Thanks for your patience!
>
>
> For anyone following along at home, upgrading to Buildbot v0.8.5 alone
> actually made build.webkit.
On 2012-02-29, at 17:05, Lucas Forschler wrote:
> build.webkit.org should be back online now with 0.8.5.
>
> Thanks for your patience!
For anyone following along at home, upgrading to Buildbot v0.8.5 alone actually
made build.webkit.org substantially slower. After profiling it for a while we
build.webkit.org should be back online now with 0.8.5.
Thanks for your patience!
Lucas
On Feb 29, 2012, at 3:44 PM, Lucas Forschler wrote:
> I'm currenlty upgrading build.webkit.org from 0.8.3 to 0.8.5. It should be
> back online shortly.
> Lucas
>
> On Feb 29, 2012, at 12:38 PM, Ryosuke Ni
I'm currenlty upgrading build.webkit.org from 0.8.3 to 0.8.5. It should be
back online shortly.
Lucas
On Feb 29, 2012, at 12:38 PM, Ryosuke Niwa wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 11:32 AM, Lucas Forschler
> wrote:
> I am looking into improving performance of build.webkit.org. After doing
>
On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 3:38 PM, Ryosuke Niwa wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 11:32 AM, Lucas Forschler wrote:
>
>> I am looking into improving performance of build.webkit.org. After
>> doing some initial research I feel that buildbot isn't the most efficient
>> in terms of processing a large n
On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 11:32 AM, Lucas Forschler wrote:
> I am looking into improving performance of build.webkit.org. After doing
> some initial research I feel that buildbot isn't the most efficient in
> terms of processing a large number of requests. I believe requests are
> processed serial
Hi Lucas,
Thank you very much for your answer!
One change that was applied to Chromium's build bot console[1] recently was
to cache the overview page for a minute. This may be relevant to the
Apache caching layer you mentioned. If requests are really handled
serially then updating to version 0.
Hi Peter,
I am looking into improving performance of build.webkit.org. After doing some
initial research I feel that buildbot isn't the most efficient in terms of
processing a large number of requests. I believe requests are processed
serially, and not in parallel. The buildbot documentation
Hi Bill,
Would it be possible to get some more information on your/Lucas' plans on
improving stability of the infrastructure? This was the third significant
interruption within a week, and especially for us non-PST folks it's
becoming quite inconvenient.
Thanks,
Peter
On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 15
This should be fixed now.
-Bill
On Feb 29, 2012, at 3:19 AM, David Barr wrote:
>> Is it any trick to update my git-svn repo from svn?
>>
>> I set up my git svn repo about
>> $http://trac.webkit.org/wiki/UsingGitWithWebKit :
>> - git clone git://git.webkit.org/WebKit.git WebKit
>> - git svn ini
> Is it any trick to update my git-svn repo from svn?
>
> I set up my git svn repo about
> $http://trac.webkit.org/wiki/UsingGitWithWebKit :
> - git clone git://git.webkit.org/WebKit.git WebKit
> - git svn init --prefix=origin/ -T trunk
> http://svn.webkit.org/repository/webkit
> - git config --rep
Hi,
git.webkit.org is behind svn.webkit.org again. :(
r109205 is the latest svn commit, but r109202 in git.
Unfortunately I can't commit to svn because this problem.
Is it any trick to update my git-svn repo from svn?
I set up my git svn repo about $http://trac.webkit.org/wiki/UsingGitWithWebKi
25 matches
Mail list logo
