Why can't these data structures be implemented as JavaScript built-ins that
behave as if they were DOM objects?
-Filip
On Jun 12, 2014, at 10:45 PM, Dirk Schulze k...@webkit.org wrote:
On Jun 13, 2014, at 1:54 AM, Benjamin Poulain benja...@webkit.org wrote:
On 6/12/14, 11:24 AM, Dirk
On Jun 13, 2014, at 8:36 AM, Filip Pizlo fpi...@apple.com wrote:
Why can't these data structures be implemented as JavaScript built-ins that
behave as if they were DOM objects?
I am not sure. What do you have in mind? How could it look like?
Greetings,
Dirk
-Filip
On Jun 12, 2014, at
On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 11:42 PM, Dirk Schulze k...@webkit.org wrote:
On Jun 13, 2014, at 8:36 AM, Filip Pizlo fpi...@apple.com wrote:
Why can't these data structures be implemented as JavaScript built-ins
that behave as if they were DOM objects?
I am not sure. What do you have in mind?
On Fri, Jun 13, 2014 at 9:53 AM, Ryosuke Niwa rn...@webkit.org wrote:
I think Phil and Ben are suggesting to implement these types in JSC like we
did for typed arrays.
If you were to do that you probably want to ping TC39 this time around.
--
http://annevankesteren.nl/
On 6/13/14, 12:53 AM, Ryosuke Niwa wrote:
On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 11:42 PM, Dirk Schulze k...@webkit.org
mailto:k...@webkit.org wrote:
On Jun 13, 2014, at 8:36 AM, Filip Pizlo fpi...@apple.com
mailto:fpi...@apple.com wrote:
Why can't these data structures be implemented as
On Fri, Jun 13, 2014 at 12:59 AM, Anne van Kesteren ann...@annevk.nl
wrote:
On Fri, Jun 13, 2014 at 9:53 AM, Ryosuke Niwa rn...@webkit.org wrote:
I think Phil and Ben are suggesting to implement these types in JSC like
we
did for typed arrays.
If you were to do that you probably want to
On Fri, Jun 13, 2014 at 10:12 AM, Ryosuke Niwa rn...@webkit.org wrote:
What I'm saying is that we can implement it in JavaScriptCore for
performance and we still make it look like a regular DOM object with
wrappers to preserve the semantics.
I understand that, but given that it is in the
On Jun 13, 2014, at 10:17 AM, Anne van Kesteren ann...@annevk.nl wrote:
On Fri, Jun 13, 2014 at 10:12 AM, Ryosuke Niwa rn...@webkit.org wrote:
What I'm saying is that we can implement it in JavaScriptCore for
performance and we still make it look like a regular DOM object with
wrappers to
On Fri, Jun 13, 2014 at 1:16 AM, Anne van Kesteren ann...@annevk.nl wrote:
On Fri, Jun 13, 2014 at 10:12 AM, Ryosuke Niwa rn...@webkit.org wrote:
What I'm saying is that we can implement it in JavaScriptCore for
performance and we still make it look like a regular DOM object with
wrappers
On Fri, Jun 13, 2014 at 1:27 AM, Dirk Schulze dschu...@adobe.com wrote:
On Jun 13, 2014, at 10:17 AM, Anne van Kesteren ann...@annevk.nl
wrote:
On Fri, Jun 13, 2014 at 10:12 AM, Ryosuke Niwa rn...@webkit.org
wrote:
What I'm saying is that we can implement it in JavaScriptCore for
On Fri, Jun 13, 2014 at 10:32 AM, Ryosuke Niwa rn...@webkit.org wrote:
I understand your concern and sentiment but I'm having a hard time imagining
what kind of problems/concerns would TC39 have with these interfaces that
are clearly prefixed with DOM.
That if they end up as objects in
On Fri, Jun 13, 2014 at 1:53 AM, Anne van Kesteren ann...@annevk.nl wrote:
On Fri, Jun 13, 2014 at 10:32 AM, Ryosuke Niwa rn...@webkit.org wrote:
I understand your concern and sentiment but I'm having a hard time
imagining
what kind of problems/concerns would TC39 have with these interfaces
On Fri, Jun 13, 2014 at 2:05 AM, Ryosuke Niwa rn...@webkit.org wrote:
On Fri, Jun 13, 2014 at 1:53 AM, Anne van Kesteren ann...@annevk.nl
wrote:
On Fri, Jun 13, 2014 at 10:32 AM, Ryosuke Niwa rn...@webkit.org wrote:
I understand your concern and sentiment but I'm having a hard time
13 matches
Mail list logo
