Hi All,
In Gtk-Webkit browser, we are facing issues with respect to accessing DOM
elements directly, without using getElementById() from inside javascripts. We
have many XHTML pages written already, without using getElementById() and all
the pages are perfectly working fine in Opera.
As
Nov 12, 2008, в 5:53 PM, Johan Lund написал(а):
Can I control spellchecking on/off from html/css in some way in
webkit?
https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14552
Add a way to disable spell checking for specific element
- WBR, Alexey Proskuryakov
It would also be useful if, when and if this enhancement is added, the
functionality could disable the automatic correction on iPhone. Google
Finance could probably use this - each time I type in a symbol, iPhone
attempts to correct my spelling.
Alex
On Nov 12, 2008, at 9:22 AM, Alexey
Please file a bug using https://bugs.webkit.org/enter_bug.cgi?product=WebKit
and attach your reduced test case. Thanks!
Dave
From: Deshpande, Raghavendra [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org
Sent: Wednesday, November
Hi All,
I would like to go ahead with implementing the below mentioned logic in
Webkit. Can anyone (mjs or hyatt?) comment on this approach?
Thanks.
Regards,
Prunthaban
On Fri, Nov 7, 2008 at 10:58 AM, Prunthaban Kanthakumar
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi All,
This is a continuation of the
It's possible that the bug is in JSC, but since it works for *.html pages, it
seems like it may be an issue with enabling this feature in XHTML pages.
https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=22211
Thanks again for filing this bug!
Dave
From: Deshpande,
On Nov 12, 2008, at 1:06 PM, Maciej Stachowiak wrote:
On Nov 12, 2008, at 4:56 AM, Prunthaban Kanthakumar wrote:
Hi All,
I would like to go ahead with implementing the below mentioned
logic in Webkit. Can anyone (mjs or hyatt?) comment on this approach?
It sounds ok to me, but I am not
We chatted a little bit more on IRC about this.
The best first approach will probably be a patch, since it will be
easier to discuss the details on a bug than on this discussion list
(as you found, there sometimes isn't a lot of response). I'm told that
Dan is the expert in this area.
Some
On Nov 12, 2008, at 4:56 AM, Prunthaban Kanthakumar wrote:
Hi All,
I would like to go ahead with implementing the below mentioned logic
in Webkit. Can anyone (mjs or hyatt?) comment on this approach?
It sounds ok to me, but I am not a rendering expert.
Thanks.
Regards,
Prunthaban
On
Hi everyone-
Recently I've been wondering when it's appropriate to use USE(X)
vs. ENABLE(X), for a given feature/capability X. My impression is that
we currently use ENABLE(X) far more than USE(X). How does one decide
which one to choose?
-Adam
On Nov 12, 2008, at 4:35 PM, Adam Roben wrote:
Hi everyone-
Recently I've been wondering when it's appropriate to use USE(X)
vs. ENABLE(X), for a given feature/capability X. My impression is
that we currently use ENABLE(X) far more than USE(X). How does one
decide which one to choose?
On Nov 12, 2008, at 1:35 PM, Adam Roben wrote:
Recently I've been wondering when it's appropriate to use USE(X) vs.
ENABLE(X), for a given feature/capability X. My impression is that
we currently use ENABLE(X) far more than USE(X). How does one decide
which one to choose?
I believe USE
On Nov 12, 2008, at 1:44 PM, Adam Roben wrote:
I guess while we're at it we might as well clear up the meaning of
PLATFORM(X) and HAVE(X), as well.
I believe PLATFORM is for large scale questions like What kind of
compiler is this?
And HAVE is for smaller scale questions like Does this
I attached a patch where the function
webkit_web_frame_click_element_by_id(WebKitWebFrame *frame, char *id)
does exactly what you want.
Greets,
Luka
Dne 12.11.2008 (sre) ob 11:58 +0100 je Deshpande, Raghavendra
zapisal(a):
Hi All,
In Gtk-Webkit browser, we are facing issues with
On Nov 12, 2008, at 4:57 PM, Darin Adler wrote:
On Nov 12, 2008, at 1:44 PM, Adam Roben wrote:
I guess while we're at it we might as well clear up the meaning of
PLATFORM(X) and HAVE(X), as well.
I believe PLATFORM is for large scale questions like What kind of
compiler is this?
For
On Nov 12, 2008, at 2:07 PM, Adam Roben wrote:
On Nov 12, 2008, at 4:57 PM, Darin Adler wrote:
On Nov 12, 2008, at 1:44 PM, Adam Roben wrote:
I guess while we're at it we might as well clear up the meaning of
PLATFORM(X) and HAVE(X), as well.
I believe PLATFORM is for large scale
This is what I get:
Build Log
Build started: Project: WebKit, Configuration: Release|Win32
Command Lines
Build machine environment variables may not be correct.
Build machine environment variables may not be correct.
Build machine environment variables may not be correct.
Build machine
On Nov 12, 2008, at 9:48 PM, Raymond Lasten wrote:
This is what I get:
Performing Pre-Build Event...
Project : error PRJ0002 : Error result 1 returned from 'c:\Windows
\system32\cmd.exe'.
Project : warning PRJ0018 : The following environment variables were
not found:
$(PRODUCTION)
Results
18 matches
Mail list logo
