On Sep 9, 2009, at 7:26 PM, Maciej Stachowiak wrote:
On Sep 9, 2009, at 7:11 PM, Brady Eidson wrote:
On Sep 9, 2009, at 6:51 PM, Maciej Stachowiak wrote:
On Sep 9, 2009, at 4:07 PM, Brady Eidson wrote:
-Many are designed to do the same work in the pagehide handler
under Firefox.
D
On Sep 9, 2009, at 7:11 PM, Brady Eidson wrote:
On Sep 9, 2009, at 6:51 PM, Maciej Stachowiak wrote:
On Sep 9, 2009, at 4:07 PM, Brady Eidson wrote:
-Many are designed to do the same work in the pagehide handler
under Firefox.
Does Firefox apply back/forward caching to pages with an
On Sep 9, 2009, at 6:51 PM, Maciej Stachowiak wrote:
On Sep 9, 2009, at 4:07 PM, Brady Eidson wrote:
-Many are designed to do the same work in the pagehide handler
under Firefox.
Does Firefox apply back/forward caching to pages with an "unload"
listener?
No.
My proposed experiment
On Sep 9, 2009, at 4:07 PM, Brady Eidson wrote:
-Many are designed to do the same work in the pagehide handler under
Firefox.
Does Firefox apply back/forward caching to pages with an "unload"
listener?
Regards,
Maciej
___
webkit-dev mailing
Since the beginning, WebKit has excluded pages with unload handlers
from its back/forward cache. There has been an unspoken assumption
for 6 years now that we "have to do it."
In recent explorations to improvements we can make to the back/forward
cache, we've collected tons of data that su
On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 2:17 PM, David Hyatt wrote:
> I guess that might make the fence too tall if something outside of it is
> taller than what's inside. You may have to just drill into your children
> line boxes in order to compute your top and your bottom position. We don't
> really have the c
I guess that might make the fence too tall if something outside of it
is taller than what's inside. You may have to just drill into your
children line boxes in order to compute your top and your bottom
position. We don't really have the concept of caching "line top" and
"line bottom" exce
So fencing should extend from the line top to the line bottom it
sounds like without affecting the overall height of the line? Have
you tried placing them with a y position of the root line box's line
top and a height of line bottom - line top?
dave
On Sep 9, 2009, at 12:39 PM, Alex Milow
On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 10:17 PM, Roland Steiner wrote:
> Hi Alex,
>
> AFAIK, the approach of stacking special characters goes back to TeX, and you
> even have special Unicode code points for this purpose (see
> http://www.unicode.org/charts/PDF/U2300.pdf), so the approach at least has
> broad conse
On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 9:08 AM, David Hyatt wrote:
> It's hard for me to understand what this problem is without more
> information. Are these objects inlines or blocks or what?
They are a sequence of inline (e.g. mi or mn elements) or inline-blocks (i.e.
more complicated elements like mfrac or o
experimental would be one option. We used to have build-webkit
--svg-experimental iirc.
-eric
On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 9:47 AM, Darin Fisher wrote:
> Perhaps... any suggestions?-Darin
>
>
> On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 8:45 AM, Adam Barth wrote:
>
>> Maybe it's worth distinguishing these settings with
Perhaps... any suggestions?-Darin
On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 8:45 AM, Adam Barth wrote:
> Maybe it's worth distinguishing these settings with some sort of
> naming convention so that embedders know they'll be removed at some
> point?
>
> Adam
>
>
> On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 11:47 PM, Darin Fisher wrote
On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 4:28 PM, Darin Fisher wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 1:18 PM, Eric Seidel wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 11:55 AM, Peter Kasting
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Maintaining a cultural attitude that is widely positive towards cleanup
>>> makes people feel less reticent about cle
It's hard for me to understand what this problem is without more
information. Are these objects inlines or blocks or what?
dave
On Sep 8, 2009, at 6:30 PM, Alex Milowski wrote:
I've been doing some comprehensive testing and find that my technique
for handling fencing isn't working properly
Maybe it's worth distinguishing these settings with some sort of
naming convention so that embedders know they'll be removed at some
point?
Adam
On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 11:47 PM, Darin Fisher wrote:
> As is described in https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=28941, for
> the Chromium project, we
On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 4:30 PM, Alex Milowski wrote:
>
> The problem of nested fences is much more tricky. I thought I had a handle on
> this with the only odd thing being the need to adjust the fence size after
> a layout pass. You can see this code in the patch [1] and specifically
> by looking
16 matches
Mail list logo
