It seems that some of the build bots have now been broken longer than
we have records on build.webkit.org:
$ ./WebKitTools/Scripts/webkit-patch what-broke
Tiger Intel Release : FAIL (blame-list: sometime before 56055?)
Leopard Intel Release (Build) : ok
Leopard Intel Release
On Mar 17, 2010, at 12:02 AM, Adam Barth wrote:
Manual investigation seems to implicate
http://trac.webkit.org/changeset/56074 for at least some of the
brokenness in SnowLeopard Intel Release (Tests). There's a patch in
https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36194 that claims to fix
things,
On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 9:02 AM, Adam Barth aba...@webkit.org wrote:
Manual investigation confirms http://trac.webkit.org/changeset/56079
broke GTK Linux 32-bit Release, GTK Linux 64-bit Release, and Qt Linux
Release. Is there some reason we didn't roll out the offending patch?
FWIW this
On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 12:44 AM, Maciej Stachowiak m...@apple.com wrote:
On Mar 17, 2010, at 12:02 AM, Adam Barth wrote:
Manual investigation seems to implicate
http://trac.webkit.org/changeset/56074 for at least some of the
brokenness in SnowLeopard Intel Release (Tests). There's a patch
On Mar 17, 2010, at 1:49 AM, Kenneth Russell wrote:
On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 12:44 AM, Maciej Stachowiak m...@apple.com
wrote:
On Mar 17, 2010, at 12:02 AM, Adam Barth wrote:
Manual investigation seems to implicate
http://trac.webkit.org/changeset/56074 for at least some of the
brokenness
On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 2:16 AM, Maciej Stachowiak m...@apple.com wrote:
On Mar 17, 2010, at 1:49 AM, Kenneth Russell wrote:
On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 12:44 AM, Maciej Stachowiak m...@apple.com wrote:
On Mar 17, 2010, at 12:02 AM, Adam Barth wrote:
Manual investigation seems to implicate
On Mar 17, 2010, at 2:31 AM, Kenneth Russell wrote:
Our best current plan is more widespread testing. We will file a Radar
bug as soon as we have more information about the nature of the
failure -- by virtue of working around the bugs. If we knew the
precise hardware configuration of the
On 17.03.2010, at 0:45, Xan Lopez wrote:
Manual investigation confirms http://trac.webkit.org/changeset/
56079
broke GTK Linux 32-bit Release, GTK Linux 64-bit Release, and Qt
Linux
Release. Is there some reason we didn't roll out the offending
patch?
FWIW this patch seems to only add
On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 2:52 AM, Maciej Stachowiak m...@apple.com wrote:
On Mar 17, 2010, at 2:31 AM, Kenneth Russell wrote:
Our best current plan is more widespread testing. We will file a Radar
bug as soon as we have more information about the nature of the
failure -- by virtue of working
On 17.03.2010, at 12:14, Kenneth Russell wrote:
websocket/tests/frame-lengths.html is one.
This tests needs to be broken into several pieces to reliably pass in
the time allowed. Or perhaps timeouts in run-webkit-tests and DRT
should be increased. I'm not sure which is better - the
On Mar 17, 2010, at 12:14 PM, Kenneth Russell wrote:
I think what
should be done is to get the tree green by skipping these flaky
tests;
file high-priority bugs against the test authors to fix the
flakiness;
and then figure out a way the commit queue can be used for the vast
majority of
11 matches
Mail list logo
