OK, I've re-worked my proposal a bit from the feedback I've received,
and I'll submit to w3.org public-html-comments. Here's my revised
proposal:
Seeking feedback for my (hopefully relatively painless in practice
compared to the alternatives - i.e. -webkit-image-set and html5
image)
Hi there,
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 11:48 PM, Edward O'Connor eocon...@apple.com wrote:
Eric Seidel wrote:
Assuming I'm understanding Kalle correctly, it seems this could
already be accomplished with @media resolution?
http://www.w3.org/TR/css3-mediaqueries/#resolution
@media screen and
On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 3:22 AM, Kenneth Rohde Christiansen
kenneth.christian...@gmail.com wrote:
So the original iPhone has a dpi of 163, but it reported a CSS dpi of
96? meaning that in screen width it had around 3,3 CSS inches where as
the physical inches are more close to 1.96.
Why is
Assuming I'm understanding Kalle correctly, it seems this could
already be accomplished with @media resolution?
http://www.w3.org/TR/css3-mediaqueries/#resolution
Not to be too cute about it, but CSS dpi is _always_ 96 CSS pixels per CSS
inch. What this means onscreen is (almost) completely
Thanks Chris,
I'll go bring it up on the relevant w3.org lists (I'm guessing I'll start on
public-HTML-comments) and see where that takes me, after refining my idea a bit
to use more conventional naming, and to hopefully account for other scales than
2x in an elegant manner.
I just wanted to
On Wednesday 25 April 2012, Chris Hutten-Czapski wrote:
Assuming I'm understanding Kalle correctly, it seems this could
already be accomplished with @media resolution?
http://www.w3.org/TR/css3-mediaqueries/#resolution
Not to be too cute about it, but CSS dpi is _always_ 96 CSS pixels
Assuming I'm understanding Kalle correctly, it seems this could
already be accomplished with @media resolution?
http://www.w3.org/TR/css3-mediaqueries/#resolution
@media screen and (min-resolution: 264dpi) { … }
Which according to:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_displays_by_pixel_density
To answer my own question:
http://trac.webkit.org/browser/trunk/Source/WebCore/css/MediaQueryEvaluator.cpp#L66
On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 11:11 PM, Eric Seidel e...@webkit.org wrote:
Assuming I'm understanding Kalle correctly, it seems this could
already be accomplished with @media resolution?
It would be more readable to use:
@media screen and (min-device-pixel-ratio: 2) { … }
The -webkit-image-set proposal explains why it is a useful shorthand despite
the existing device pixel ratio option.
Regards,
Maciej
On Apr 23, 2012, at 11:11 PM, Eric Seidel wrote:
Assuming I'm
Eric Seidel wrote:
Assuming I'm understanding Kalle correctly, it seems this could
already be accomplished with @media resolution?
http://www.w3.org/TR/css3-mediaqueries/#resolution
@media screen and (min-resolution: 264dpi) { … }
Which according to:
Hi Tom,
You wrote:
I am seeking feedback for my (hopefully relatively painless in
practice compared to the alternatives - i.e. -webkit-image-set and
html5 image) proposal to solve the problem of 2x-res (double-
resolution) images with our current HTML and CSS standards for devices
with
On what standard mailing lists have this idea been proposed or discussed?
At glance, it seems like a bad idea to add a specific element for the
double resolution images. What makes us think that someone won't come up
with 3x or 4x resolution screens in near future?
On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 2:44
On Apr 23, 2012, at 3:42 PM, Ryosuke Niwa rn...@webkit.org wrote:
On what standard mailing lists have this idea been proposed or discussed?
I have not yet submitted to w3.org public-html or public-html-comments as I
wanted to get the take of the webkit community first, since you guys are
2012/4/24 Tom Penzer tpen...@mailcan.com:
Hi Everybody!
As a first-time poster, I am sorry ahead of time for any lapses in
etiquette. I am seeking feedback for my (hopefully relatively painless in
practice compared to the alternatives - i.e. -webkit-image-set and html5
image) proposal
14 matches
Mail list logo
