Re: Complimentary App Server Choice

Hi And about wo components framework ? What are you using with Bootique ? Jérémy Le 13 févr. 2020 à 23:08, Matthew Ness via Webobjects-dev a écrit :  I wouldn't hesitate to recommend Bootique. We've had various types of Bootique apps in production for years now to great success, some

Re: Back again....

First let me say that I appreciate the help that was offered to me. I'm especially thankful as I was able to follow a process and succeed. Which a day ago I thought was impossible. ;-) Thank you for your offer Theodor, to remote debug my install, thankfully that wasn't needed. Let me quickly

Re: Back again....

Hi Tony, On 14 Feb 2020, at 01:26, Tony Giaccone via Webobjects-dev wrote: > Can I do WODev on a Linux box? Is there a package to install on Ubuntu 18.04? I'm going to say a qualified yes: anecdotally, I know people have done this, and quite recently. I don't know about a package of any

Re: Complimentary App Server Choice

I can second the vote for bootique. We built two micro-services using bootique and I couldn’t be happier with their performance. One has been running since December of 2018 the other since August of 2019. We built apps that use Bootique with jetty, Jersey and Cayenne. The apps both

Re: Complimentary App Server Choice

I wouldn't hesitate to recommend Bootique. We've had various types of Bootique apps in production for years now to great success, some with the Cayenne module directly derived from older WO apps/dbs, some communicating with existing WO apps, others simply processing tasks. Regards, -- Matt

Re: Back again....

Tony, I am not saying I can fix this (as you are on a linux distro), but if you want to connect with TeamViewer, I would be willing to look. Let me know. Ted > On Feb 13, 2020, at 11:02 AM, Tony Giaccone via Webobjects-dev > wrote: > > WOLips is installed and the views are available. > >

Re: Back again....

WOLips is installed and the views are available. When I create a new WOApp all the frameworks that it depends on are not found. And I can’t compliment. I’m not at my workstation right now but when I am I’ll update with more details. Tony > On Feb 13, 2020, at 10:00 AM, Jesse Tayler wrote:

Re: Back again....

> On Feb 13, 2020, at 9:56 AM, Tony Giaccone via Webobjects-dev > wrote: > > > I used to do WebObjects dev back in the day. Now I’m just a little curious to > see where things stand in WOWorld. > Outstanding! > I’m building a simple one page master detail app and I wanted to compare a >

Back again....

I used to do WebObjects dev back in the day. Now I’m just a little curious to see where things stand in WOWorld. I’m building a simple one page master detail app and I wanted to compare a few different frameworks and tech stacks. As part of that I thought I’d go back to my roots and do a WO

Re: Complimentary App Server Choice

Made my day, thanks! 藍 > Am 13.02.2020 um 13:30 schrieb Gino Pacitti via Webobjects-dev > : > > LOL!! > > > >> On 13 Feb 2020, at 12:29, Andrus Adamchik > > wrote: >> >> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pointy-haired_Boss >>

Re: Complimentary App Server Choice

LOL!! > On 13 Feb 2020, at 12:29, Andrus Adamchik wrote: > > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pointy-haired_Boss > > >> On Feb 13, 2020, at 3:28 PM, Gino Pacitti via Webobjects-dev >> mailto:webobjects-dev@lists.apple.com>> >> wrote: >>

Re: Complimentary App Server Choice

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pointy-haired_Boss > On Feb 13, 2020, at 3:28 PM, Gino Pacitti via Webobjects-dev > wrote: > > Thank Andrus for you take… really good write up. > > And what is PHBs? > > Gibi > >> On 13 Feb 2020, at 12:25,

Re: Complimentary App Server Choice

Thank Andrus for you take… really good write up. And what is PHBs? Gibi > On 13 Feb 2020, at 12:25, Andrus Adamchik wrote: > > My opinionated take is the following: > > * The "official" JavaEE is dead and is now a pure volunteer effort under > https://jakarta.ee/ . The

Re: Complimentary App Server Choice

My opinionated take is the following: * The "official" JavaEE is dead and is now a pure volunteer effort under https://jakarta.ee/ . The "appserver" concept has almost disappeared and morphed to something different. All the past market leaders have moved on to more

Re: Complimentary App Server Choice

Thanks for that… it looks really interesting… Is it a commercially viable alternative to some of the others like JBoss, Tomcat, Websphere etc.. I would like to add another feather to my bow but not really sure which architecture to devote time to so that I can work on bigger projects in a

Re: Complimentary App Server Choice

We are using Bootique: https://bootique.io/ Just like SpringBoot, its idea is that it is not an "appserver". It gives you a plain Java app with your own "main" method, and a way to assemble various components together (and also modularity, dependency injection, consistent

Netlify and others

Hi list Coming across these services that let repository access and build processes co-exist plus deployment makes me wonder how would a WO app exist in this framework? Obviously a Java environment and combined Jars lets the app run standalone but what about WOMonitor and WOTask… How can you