Hi Paul, hi Fabian,
thank you both. That worked! The correct way is to make it like $0.
Thomas
Am 15.09.2014 um 03:09 schrieb Paul Hoadley :
> Hi Thomas,
>
> On 15 Sep 2014, at 5:20 am, Thomas Grass
> wrote:
>
>> How can i tell the inline-bindings that 0 should be
Hi Thomas,
On 15 Sep 2014, at 5:20 am, Thomas Grass wrote:
> How can i tell the inline-bindings that 0 should be an Integer and not a
> String? I know that it would be possible to add 0 to a int-variable in the
> javaclass (f.e. int zero = 0;) and bind it with value=„$zero“ to it.
Hi Thomas,
Just a wild guess, have you tried value = "$0"? That's the way inline bindings
work for boolean values, e.g. value = "$false".
Fabian
Am 14.09.2014 um 21:50 schrieb Thomas Grass :
> Hi to all,
>
> what is the right way to bind Integer values wit
Hi to all,
what is the right way to bind Integer values with inline bindings?
I tried to bind 0 (zero) like this to a radio button:
The problem is, that the number „0“ as value is not allowed, because it is in
this case a string. The following exception will be displayed:
"While tryi
Eclipse Platform
Version: 3.5.2.R35x_v20100210-0800-9hEiFzmFst-TiEn9hNYgDWg1XN8ulH_JvCNGB
Build id: M20100211-1343
WOLips 3.5.6066
I will check out the warning settings...
thanks,
Ted
--- On Sat, 6/19/10, Mike Schrag wrote:
> From: Mike Schrag
> Subject: Re: inline bindings and
nable to verify operator 'sum.amountOfTime // VALID'
>>
>>
>> without the // VALID I get a warning:
>>
>> Unable to verify operator 'sum.amountOfTime'
>>
>> It is just a warning, I know... but I thought I was doing something w
, 6/19/10, Mike Schrag wrote:
>
>> From: Mike Schrag
>> Subject: Re: inline bindings and valid...
>> To: "Theodore Petrosky"
>> Cc: webobjects-dev@lists.apple.com
>> Date: Saturday, June 19, 2010, 7:45 AM
>>> > numberformat = "##.##"
Ted
--- On Sat, 6/19/10, Mike Schrag wrote:
> From: Mike Schrag
> Subject: Re: inline bindings and valid...
> To: "Theodore Petrosky"
> Cc: webobjects-dev@lists.apple.com
> Date: Saturday, June 19, 2010, 7:45 AM
> > numberformat = "##.##"/>
>
>
> numberformat = "##.##"/>
ms ___
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list (Webobjects-dev@lists.apple.com)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobje
Is there a way to mark this line as VALID... with inline bindings... I know I
can push it to the WOD and mark it there, but I thought I would ask..
Ted
___
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev
On Feb 19, 2010, at 7:46 PM, Pascal Robert wrote:
I'm trying to hide some text if an array is empty, so I tried this :
"$member.organizationProfiles.isEmpty">
But I'm getting :
valueForKey(): lookup of unknown key: 'isEmpty'. This class does not
have an instance variable of the name
It works just fine. @count without checking for > 0 is working too.
> In principle, all @ key will be handled by the nsarray class, so you could
> try member.organizationprofil...@isempty and see if it work.
>
> - jfv
>
> Le 10-02-19 à 22:46, Pascal Robert a écrit :
>
>> I'm trying to hide som
> I'm trying to hide some text if an array is empty, so I tried this :
>
>
>
> But I'm getting :
>
> valueForKey():
> lookup of unknown key: 'isEmpty'. This class does not have an instance
> variable of the name isEmpty or _isEmpty, nor a method of the name
> isEmpty, _isEmpty, getIsEmpty, or _
In principle, all @ key will be handled by the nsarray class, so you
could try member.organizationprofil...@isempty and see if it work.
- jfv
Le 10-02-19 à 22:46, Pascal Robert a écrit :
I'm trying to hide some text if an array is empty, so I tried this :
But I'm getting :
valueForKe
I'm trying to hide some text if an array is empty, so I tried this :
But I'm getting :
valueForKey():
lookup of unknown key: 'isEmpty'. This class does not have an instance variable
of the name isEmpty or _isEmpty, nor a method of the name isEmpty, _isEmpty,
getIsEmpty, or _getIsEmpty
Wh
I override validationFailedWithException to catch the (throwable t
Object value String keyPath) and store them into a page level
NSMutableDictionary using keyPath as the key and a custom class to
hold the variables t and value. This custom class has isError (returns
a true if the keyPath ex
WOL-930 _is_ the ticket: http://issues.objectstyle.org/jira/browse/WOL-930
On Aug 11, 2009, at 5:12 PM, Sanford Selznick wrote:
Hi Mike,
Thank you for the insight. :-)
ognl looks very powerful. Features like looking at statics could
help simplify a lot of programs. Since ognl is able t
Hi Mike,
Thank you for the insight. :-)
ognl looks very powerful. Features like looking at statics could
help simplify a lot of programs. Since ognl is able to process
statements like these, it would be great to get errors on the
compile-time side of the fence.
Is there a ticket op
Yes, a very simple reason -- what you're doing is not supported. What
you're describing is requested in WOL-930. you're using a static
variable, not a normal binding. If you were using a regular keypath
(tag = ~person.firstName + ' ' + person.lastName) it would validate.
If you find it odd,
Hi Mike,
Is there some reason WOLips is not validating my variable names?
Do I have to turn that on somehow? (I think I have it on in
preferences.)
It seems odd that it would validate text operators but not variable
names. :-)
That is:
tag="~...@com.me.bogus._contact@BOGUS_NAME"
text operators are "ne" "eq", etc .. it validates binding-style
keypaths only right now. you want WOL-930
ms
On Aug 11, 2009, at 2:02 PM, Sanford Selznick wrote:
At 7:11 PM +0200 8/11/09, Johann Werner wrote:
Question 3: How do I get the syntax checker to work so I can get
compile-time err
At 7:11 PM +0200 8/11/09, Johann Werner wrote:
Question 3: How do I get the syntax checker to work so I can get
compile-time errors with this stuff?
Question 4: Auto completion would be cool here too. Can that be
enabled somehow? :-)
Simple answer: it is not possible (yet). I reported th
Hi Sanford,
Am 11.08.2009 um 18:15 schrieb Sanford Selznick:
Hello,
I'm a little new.
I also tried:
tag="~...@com.me.product._contact@ENTITY_NAME", which _is_ working.
But I would _really_ like to have that syntax checked inside the
wod, which is the whole point of using static str
Hello,
I'm a little new.
I would like to access a "final static" string from a class from my
wod in a tag, as in:
tag="$com.me.product._Contact.ENTITY_NAME"
But this always results in a parsing error in WOLips: "There is no
com in blah."
Question 1: Is this supposed to work?
--
Yep, I've been living with it - or lumping it really. I started
having a look at porting the postgresql plugin a few weeks back but
got bored -- er distracted by work.
Anyone willing to collaborate on this?
I'd be interested in helping out.
I can certainly help on the testing front. happ
On 9-Oct-08, at 10:24 PM, Lachlan Deck wrote:
On 06/10/2008, at 4:23 PM, Guido Neitzer wrote:
On 05.10.2008, at 17:37, Thomas Worrall wrote:
When I go to do Generate SQL for my EOModel, it does not escape
the table or field names in backticks (`). Because of this, table
names like Order
On 09.10.2008, at 20:24, Lachlan Deck wrote:
Yep, I've been living with it - or lumping it really. I started
having a look at porting the postgresql plugin a few weeks back but
got bored -- er distracted by work.
Anyone willing to collaborate on this?
I'm not using MySQL, but overall it's
On 06/10/2008, at 4:23 PM, Guido Neitzer wrote:
On 05.10.2008, at 17:37, Thomas Worrall wrote:
When I go to do Generate SQL for my EOModel, it does not escape the
table or field names in backticks (`). Because of this, table names
like Order cause SQL errors.
The problem is, that the MySQ
e, maybe they invest some time into that.
Second question: I can't get inline bindings to work. My Properties
file (in the Resources group) has the following:
# OGNL
ognl.active = true
ognl.helperFunctions=true
ognl.inlineBindings=true
But you are actually linking to WOOgnl.fra
me my tables
something else. I can do that, but it seems I shouldn't have to:
regardless of what words are reserved, putting them all in backticks
would solve the problem entirely. Why doesn't EO do that?
Second question: I can't get inline bindings to work. My Properties
fi
So, I know that regular WebObjects 5.4.x can be used along with
inline bindings and the resulting WAR file can be deployed
successfully to JBoss. I don't know whether there is a complication
related to Wonder since I am not using it.
tom
On Apr 24, 2008, at 11:51 AM, Tom Pelaia wrote:
Hi,
I should qualify my statement by noting that I'm not using Wonder. So,
I know that regular WebObjects 5.4.x can be used along with inline
bindings and the resulting WAR file can be deployed successfully to
JBoss. I don't know whether there is a complication related to Wonder
simply the WAR and not a directory of _thousands_ of files, some with
path names that are too long for Windows to delete
Dave
On Apr 24, 2008, at 11:51 AM, Tom Pelaia wrote:
Hi,
Yes, I have gotten inline bindings to work fine with True WAR
deployment to JBoss. I have a "Hello Worl
Hi,
Yes, I have gotten inline bindings to work fine with True WAR
deployment to JBoss. I have a "Hello World" type example that works
and can send it to you if you want it. I just started with a
WebObjects sample project, applied the patch that I mentioned in a
previous e
I'm having problems getting Inline Bindings to work with a Servlet
deployment (to Tomcat).
I've double- and triple-checked the classpaths and .jars and
everything is where and as it is supposed to be, but the inline
bindings just don't work once deployed to a Servlet. They w
But you *can* set the pre- and postfix chars, so the question was
how to escape them. Which is the same problem how to escape "[" at
the start.
Uh ... what he said :)
ms
___
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-d
With WO 5.4 the syntax should be:
By default the dynamic binding use [] and not $.
So how do you escape the dynamic binding prefix in 5.4 if you want to
show it in the string? For instance, if you actually want the string
"[amount]" to appear, what does the binding look like?
ms ___
at 8:52 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
From: Mike Schrag <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Inline bindings: attribute string value begining
with $
To: WebObjects-Dev Mailing List
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
\$#,##0
Do I n
.
ms
On Apr 5, 2008, at 1:09 AM, Ricardo Parada wrote:
On Apr 4, 2008, at 8:52 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
From: Mike Schrag <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Inline bindings: attribute string value begining with $
To: WebObjects-Dev Mailing List
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Oh, I assumed you were using Wonder with the $ syntax ... I have no
idea how to escape the attribute prefix in 5.4.
ms
On Apr 5, 2008, at 1:09 AM, Ricardo Parada wrote:
On Apr 4, 2008, at 8:52 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
From: Mike Schrag <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re:
On Apr 4, 2008, at 8:52 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
From: Mike Schrag <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Inline bindings: attribute string value begining with $
To: WebObjects-Dev Mailing List
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii&qu
\$#,##0
ms ___
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list (Webobjects-dev@lists.apple.com)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/archive%40m
Hi All,
If I have something like this:
what do I need to do to make sure that the value for the numberformat
is interpreted as a string instead of a method call to #,##0.
Right now my workaround is to insert a space before the $ sign:
Is there a better way than putting a space in front
On 28 Mar 2008, at 01:26, Mike Schrag wrote:
How about inserting the closing "]" as soon as one types the
opening "[" in the context of a binding value?
Valid point -- totally could do that ... Trying to think if there's
a case where this would get confused, but it seems pretty
straightforw
How about inserting the closing "]" as soon as one types the opening
"[" in the context of a binding value?
Valid point -- totally could do that ... Trying to think if there's a
case where this would get confused, but it seems pretty
straightforward. Patches welcome :)
ms
On 27 Mar 2008, at 20:19, Lachlan Deck wrote:
[snip]
On a related note, I wish eclipse would behave more like TextMate
which always does the Right Things e.g. surrounding the selection
with the opening char and corresponding closing char when one type
a opening char type with some text se
* $xxx is the standard inline markup of just about every template
language, which, for one, also makes it consistent with the velocity
templates that we use other places inside of WOLips
and I wish it wasn't.
Plenty times (in just about every template language) the 'xxx' makes
it through to th
e markup of just about every template
language, which, for one, also makes it consistent with the
velocity templates that we use other places inside of WOLips
Which makes also most templating languages consistently ugly :-)...
And you can set the WebObjects 5.4 inline bindings to use the
th the velocity
templates that we use other places inside of WOLips
And you can set the WebObjects 5.4 inline bindings to use the $ style
too. So this is currently the one working on both systems.
cug
--
http://www.event-s.net
___
Do not post admin
used to denote non-litteral expressions in ognl bindings (e.g
use the WO 5.4.x "[...] " marker)? And if it is, how to do it?
Not currently, though it may be coming. I still say $xxx is a better
syntax than [xxx].
It may be better but I don't like special prefix characters à la
perl (just a p
On 27 Mar 2008, at 18:06, Mike Schrag wrote:
I assume you mean WOOGNL inline bindings? Yes, the syntax is ?
Yep.
key="value" ... Pretty easy, huh :)
Of course, thanks! I *almost* tried it but'?' not being a valid XML
name character, I though it wouldn't work.
I assume you mean WOOGNL inline bindings? Yes, the syntax is ?
key="value" ... Pretty easy, huh :)
On a related note is it possible to change the market ( currently
"$") used to denote non-litteral expressions in ognl bindings (e.g
use the WO 5.4.x "[...] " ma
Hello,
Subject line says it all.
Btw I'm using WO 5.3.x NOT WO 5.4.x for which apparently such syntax
exists.
On a related note is it possible to change the market ( currently "$")
used to denote non-litteral expressions in ognl bindings (e.g use the
WO 5.4.x "[...] " marker)? And if it
On 14.01.2008, at 02:25, Simon McLean wrote:
What is the difference ? What do the [ ] imply ?
The square brackets are WO 5.4 default style, you can change that to a
dollar though. WOOgnl has the dollar as the inline style.
cug
--
Real-World WebObjects class at the Big Nerd Ranch
March 2
should be:
Actually, it should be more like:
cug
Hi cug
This seems to work too:
What is the difference ? What do the [ ] imply ?
Simon
___
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list (Web
On 13.01.2008, at 13:51, Simon McLean wrote:
should be:
Actually, it should be more like:
cug
--
Real-World WebObjects class at the Big Nerd Ranch
March 2008, Frankfurt, Germany
http://www.bignerdranch.com/classes/webobjects.shtml
___
Do n
Oh my goodness, I just noticed the glaring error in my code:
should be:
for my stupidity i am sitting in the dumb corner with people pointing
at me and laughing ;-)
Thanks for the nudge in the right direction Clark.
Simon
On 13 Jan 2008, at 20:39, Clark Mueller wrote:
Well, the synta
Hi All -
Ok, what am I missing ? It has to be something really stupid but it's
stumped me...
com.webobjects.foundation.NSForwardException for
ognl.helperfunction.compatibility.WOMiddleManHTMLFormatException:
"Header" span = 24 last = true> . It has no NAME=... parameter
Simon
Yep, it's a known bug. Add a space between your , the lack of
!DOCTYPE is also annoying.
On 12/13/07, Oswaldo Bueno <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi, I'm staring a new project on WO 5.4 and decided to use the new
> inline bindings.
>
>I have a component
Hi, I'm staring a new project on WO 5.4 and decided to use the new inline
bindings.
I have a component with the following first lines:
http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml11/DTD/xhtml11.dtd";>
http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"; xml:lang="en">
2007/11/1, Mike Schrag <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
The WOOGNL framework is included in the project and my main
application constructor looks like this:
I think all of the shortcuts you listed are registered by default in
Wonder, btw ...
Where can I find the complete list of all the shortcuts?
Only
2007/11/1, Mike Schrag <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> The WOOGNL framework is included in the project and my main application
> constructor looks like this:
>
> I think all of the shortcuts you listed are registered by default in
> Wonder, btw ...
>
Where can I find the complete list of all the shortcut
The WOOGNL framework is included in the project and my main
application constructor looks like this:
I think all of the shortcuts you listed are registered by default in
Wonder, btw ...
ms ___
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ign
Nailed it, thanks Guido!
Jon
On Oct 31, 2007, at 5:14 PM, Guido Neitzer wrote:
On 31.10.2007, at 20:14, Jonathan Miller wrote:
Trying to use WOOGNL for the first time and I'm not sure where I've
gone wrong. As a first attempt I added the following line of code
to my sample project
, ho
I believe it should be:
, how are you?
-Andrew
On Oct 31, 2007, at 10:14 PM, Jonathan Miller wrote:
Hi,
Trying to use WOOGNL for the first time and I'm not sure where I've
gone wrong. As a first attempt I added the following line of code
to my sample project
, how are you?
The page r
Hi,
Trying to use WOOGNL for the first time and I'm not sure where I've
gone wrong. As a first attempt I added the following line of code to
my sample project
, how are you?
The page renders but it only displays
, how are you?
I have the following in my properties file:
ognl.active = t
66 matches
Mail list logo
