Thanks for these answers. I added a note about this to step 5.IanOn 24/08/2006, at 11:41 AM, Mike Schrag wrote:Too bad! :) I got this too and it went away when I ran Ant with 1.4 instead of 1.5 (export JAVA_HOME=/System/Library/Frameworks/JavaVM.framework/Versions/1.4/Home before you run ant).msOn
Yeah someone else mentioned this also ... I haven't had a chance to look into where that value comes from. I assume it's a trivial fix, just have to track down the source of the "2".msOn Aug 23, 2006, at 9:38 PM, Ian Joyner wrote:Hate to be a pain, but this page says "Project Wonder 2.0".
Too bad! :) I got this too and it went away when I ran Ant with 1.4 instead of 1.5 (export JAVA_HOME=/System/Library/Frameworks/JavaVM.framework/Versions/1.4/Home before you run ant).msOn Aug 23, 2006, at 9:38 PM, Ian Joyner wrote:Any answers appreciated, I don't expect Mike to have to answer this
Hi Mike (and all),Hate to be a pain, but this page says "Project Wonder 2.0". I gather you must have regenerated it on the latest 3.0 since the date at the bottom says 23 Aug 2006 and it includes your Ajax stuff.I'm glad you put this online because I had problems generating it from the wiki quickst
On 8/22/06, Mike Schrag <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Which is why I think that Bill Bumgarner was totally wrong last> year: Wonder *is* exactly for beginners. You may have problems, or> you may not understand 5% or it. But it contains 99% of what you> will build for yourself if left on your own, on
We agree on everything except when I am wrong. :-) Mike Schrag
had a good quote at WWDC, "Those of you who don't like Eclipse,
well you're wrong. But that's OK. Sort of..."
Now if only I had a t-shirt ...
ms
___
Do not post admin requests to the
Taunts, retorts, and comments below.
On Aug 22, 2006, at 7:35 PM, Jerry W. Walker wrote:
On Aug 22, 2006, at 8:12 PM, Anjo Krank wrote:
Am 23.08.2006 um 00:59 schrieb Jerry W. Walker:
I'm now (finally) using Project Wonder primarily because a client
wants AJAX features and PR seems to prov
What is the "old CVS download"? Has something changed in how to get
the latest source?
I think he means CVS checkout vs just downloading from the nightly
build server.
ms
___
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-d
On Aug 22, 2006, at 7:17 PM, David Holt wrote:
Hi Jerry,
First, Anjo and gang, thanks for Project Wonder (PW)! I address
the comment to Anjo because he tends to remain the most vocal PW
champion. My thanks go to you all.
+1
+999
I am actually in the same boat as you. You caught me j
http://www.mdimension.com/~wonder/apihttp://www.mdimension.com/~wonder/Wonder-latest-Documentation.tar.gzmsOn Aug 22, 2006, at 10:35 PM, Jerry W. Walker wrote:I think that Mike Schrag solved that problem for me in a separate message, but it's too late here (on the east coast of the US) for me to wa
On 23/08/2006, at 10:12 AM, Anjo Krank wrote:
Am 23.08.2006 um 00:59 schrieb Jerry W. Walker:
they will save me that time and effort and make PW even more
available to the newbies (like me) who haven't yet bought into
Eclipse. The easy answer, of course, is for me to just take the
Eclipse
On Aug 22, 2006, at 4:35 PM, Jerry W. Walker wrote:
On Aug 22, 2006, at 8:12 PM, Anjo Krank wrote:
PS: what really would be nice would be some ComponentElementTrous
clone, but given the sheer amount of components and combinations,
that's proably not in the cards.
All right, now you've go
Hi, Anjo,
On Aug 22, 2006, at 8:12 PM, Anjo Krank wrote:
Hi Jerry,
I'll try to answer this really long post, even though it's full of
words like "trepidation" (eech!) and it's totally late here.
Aw, c'mon, Anjo, just Google for it, you can find lots of
definitions. Do you expect me to wr
Am 23.08.2006 um 02:51 schrieb [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
That may very well be. But you can't have it both ways - either
it's for beginners, and therefore needs documenting, or it's for
gurus and doesn't.
Huh? Where does the "both ways" come from?
I said (and meant):
- you will have problems i
On Aug 22, 2006, at 5:12 PM, Anjo Krank wrote:
Which is why I think that Bill Bumgarner was totally wrong last
year: Wonder *is* exactly for beginners. You may have problems, or
you may not understand 5% or it. But it contains 99% of what you
will build for yourself if left on your own, onl
Which is why I think that Bill Bumgarner was totally wrong last
year: Wonder *is* exactly for beginners. You may have problems, or
you may not understand 5% or it. But it contains 99% of what you
will build for yourself if left on your own, only that it works.
I very much agree with this. Pr
Hi Jerry,
I'll try to answer this really long post, even though it's full of
words like "trepidation" (eech!) and it's totally late here.
Am 23.08.2006 um 00:59 schrieb Jerry W. Walker:
I'm now (finally) using Project Wonder primarily because a client
wants AJAX features and PR seems to p
Just updated and added the non-Eclipse way to build the javadocs to the Wonder/Quickstart.On 22 Aug 2006, at 4:17 PM, David Holt wrote:What I would do is follow the advice in Kieran's blog:Additionally if you want to generate latest java API documentation from the source, you can...Using Terminal..
On Aug 22, 2006, at 3:59 PM, Jerry W. Walker wrote:
So now that I've gotten the rant out of my system, I will try to
offer one to two hours per day for the next several days (years) to
supplement the PW ERExtensions JavaDocs and the ERExtensions wiki
page if anyone on the PW team will offer
Hi Jerry,First, Anjo and gang, thanks for Project Wonder (PW)! I address the comment to Anjo because he tends to remain the most vocal PW champion. My thanks go to you all.+1I am actually in the same boat as you. You caught me just trying to follow David Teran's advice and get the Wonder source goi
Hi, David & Anjo,
First, Anjo and gang, thanks for Project Wonder (PW)! I address the
comment to Anjo because he tends to remain the most vocal PW
champion. My thanks go to you all.
I feel obliged to include that in every comment I make about PW
because it is an incredible code base.
I'
Thanks David!
Gee, I should whine about Wonder documentation more often. :-)
Chuck
On Aug 22, 2006, at 2:09 PM, David Holt wrote:
I have just updated the Wonder/Quickstart page to include some
pointers from David Teran on what JavaDocs to read in order to
begin to use Wonder.
David
On
I have just updated the Wonder/Quickstart page to include some
pointers from David Teran on what JavaDocs to read in order to begin
to use Wonder.
David
On 22 Aug 2006, at 1:26 PM, Mike Schrag wrote:
http://en.wikibooks.org/w/index.php?
title=Programming:WebObjects#Project_WONDER
Still p
On Aug 22, 2006, at 2:01 PM, Anjo Krank wrote:
Am 22.08.2006 um 22:57 schrieb Chuck Hill:
That page does also mention ProjectBuilder and Wonder 0.9 :-P
Well...the second gripe I have is that people are too lazy too read :P
"The information below the following two links is very old. New
Am 22.08.2006 um 22:57 schrieb Chuck Hill:
That page does also mention ProjectBuilder and Wonder 0.9 :-P
Well...the second gripe I have is that people are too lazy too read :P
"The information below the following two links is very old. New users
are encouraged to refer to the wiki or Kier
On Aug 22, 2006, at 1:47 PM, Anjo Krank wrote:
Am 22.08.2006 um 22:26 schrieb Mike Schrag:
I am not sure really. Kieran had a Quick Start on his blog, not
sure if I can still find it. This is a complaint that people
often have about Wonder: there is not much in the way of
documentatio
Am 22.08.2006 um 22:26 schrieb Mike Schrag:
I am not sure really. Kieran had a Quick Start on his blog, not
sure if I can still find it. This is a complaint that people
often have about Wonder: there is not much in the way of
documentation on how to get started and how to use it and what
http://en.wikibooks.org/w/index.php?
title=Programming:WebObjects#Project_WONDER
Still plenty left to do in here, but it's a start ...
ms
On Aug 22, 2006, at 4:09 PM, Chuck Hill wrote:
On Aug 22, 2006, at 2:03 AM, Fabrice Pipart wrote:
Thanks to you both Timo and Chuck
You were right, I
On Aug 22, 2006, at 2:03 AM, Fabrice Pipart wrote:
Thanks to you both Timo and Chuck
You were right, I was in the wrong direction and it was far far
easier to use project wonder for that purpose (though I loved the
KVC thing with @localize)
The ERXSession and its ERXLocalizer was set up in
Thanks to you both Timo and ChuckYou were right, I was in the wrong direction and it was far far easier to use project wonder for that purpose (though I loved the KVC thing with @localize)The ERXSession and its ERXLocalizer was set up in 5min and works just like I dreamed :-)Since it seems that all
Am 21.08.2006 um 17:19 schrieb Fabrice Pipart:I am trying to make a reusable component to have buttons translated.The idea is to just provide a key to the button that will take care to find the translation in the .stringsThis looks like Chuck's "LocaleString" but for buttons.You could use Project W
On Aug 21, 2006, at 8:19 AM, Fabrice Pipart wrote:
Hi list !
I am trying to make a reusable component to have buttons translated.
The idea is to just provide a key to the button that will take care
to find the translation in the .strings
This looks like Chuck's "LocaleString" but for button
32 matches
Mail list logo
