As we do every year just before the current WOWODC, we released the
recordings from the previous WOWODC to make them available to everyone.
Presentations:
• COScheduler in Depth
• Apache FTP Server Integration
• CMS / Blog and SnoWOman
• Practical ERSync
hi
@Chuck Hill
The snapshots are referenced counted.
(...) There is no way to accelerate this and I doubt it would be overall
beneficial to do so. That would just increase the database traffic to
re-generate the snapshot.
The points which I see which could make it interesting for us are:
-
Looks like I forgot two presentations:
• Persistent Session Storage
• Security and performance designs for client-server communications
I'm adding them right now.
As we do every year just before the current WOWODC, we released the
recordings from the previous WOWODC to make
why are we keeping videos private until they are a year old?
they should be published right away so people can use them.
On May 2, 2013, at 8:05 AM, Pascal Robert prob...@macti.ca wrote:
Looks like I forgot two presentations:
• Persistent Session Storage
• Security and
Jesse,
Members have full immediate access, and memberships are not expensive.
D
--
David LeBer
Codeferous Software
On 2013-05-02, at 10:13 AM, Jesse Tayler jtay...@oeinc.com wrote:
why are we keeping videos private until they are a year old?
they should be published right away so people
indeed, I can see they are valued and keeping things private has its place.
I'm certain my membership is paid up to date, as are my tickets to the event,
however-
I would not find that a neighborly thing to grow community myself, is all.
since I'm not in charge of the community, this is of
why are we keeping videos private until they are a year old?
they should be published right away so people can use them.
And the hosting of WOCommunity.org and other things will magically be paid by
magic? I had stopped working for ONE MONTH last year to work on my WOWODC
presentations
It's a tough decision.
Running the community is not free, there are cost involved and the only revenue
we have it the memberships. Early access to the videos is a significant
incentive to purchasing them.
The pessimist in me says that the ship has sailed on enlarging the community to
any
Le 2013-05-02 à 10:57, David LeBer dleber_wo...@codeferous.com a écrit :
It's a tough decision.
Running the community is not free, there are cost involved and the only
revenue we have it the memberships. Early access to the videos is a
significant incentive to purchasing them.
The
Jesse,
I am certain that no one, you included, would give out your code for free in
the interest of growing your business. If that were true, I am sure this
community and others would follow in those footsteps. I have full confidence in
the community leaders that they know what they are doing.
And JMHO there is finally a core of Free videos that should get anyone started.
But I can say, that without them, I would have given up a long time ago. I
still go back and re-watch them and realize that some problem I had was because
I missed some very little comment from the presenter.
---
did I miss something? was this going to be released? It looked good at WOWODC12.
Ted
___
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list (Webobjects-dev@lists.apple.com)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your
On May 2, 2013, at 4:53 AM, Joseph Pachod wrote:
hi
@Chuck Hill
The snapshots are referenced counted.
(...) There is no way to accelerate this and I doubt it would be overall
beneficial to do so. That would just increase the database traffic to
re-generate the snapshot.
The
Hi there,
I've got a series of WOPopUpButtons each with their own AjaxObserveField. They
all have the same options and related to different objects. When manually
manipulating pop-ups, everything works perfectly.
I've also got another WOPopPupButton that is used to set the other pop-ups all
Chuck Hill said:
The snapshots are referenced counted. When the last EO using the
snapshot is refaulted or garbage collected, the snapshot is discarded.
Just to make sure:
- let say the editing context someEditingContext is asked to fetch some
entity and the result is assigned to foo, some
On 2013-05-02, at 4:11 PM, Joseph Pachod wrote:
Chuck Hill said:
The snapshots are referenced counted. When the last EO using the snapshot
is refaulted or garbage collected, the snapshot is discarded.
Just to make sure:
- let say the editing context someEditingContext is asked to
Hi Joseph,
On 2013-05-02, at 4:53 AM, Joseph Pachod wrote:
@Chuck Hill
The snapshots are referenced counted.
(...) There is no way to accelerate this and I doubt it would be overall
beneficial to do so. That would just increase the database traffic to
re-generate the snapshot.
On May 2, 2013, at 4:25 PM, Chuck Hill wrote:
On 2013-05-02, at 4:11 PM, Joseph Pachod wrote:
Chuck Hill said:
The snapshots are referenced counted. When the last EO using the snapshot
is refaulted or garbage collected, the snapshot is discarded.
Just to make sure:
- let say the
Hi,
I'm trying to figure out something and I'm lost again. And I figure there is
an easy answer so here goes:
I'm using embedded components and I have a master list style page. On my
inspect component I have an ERDActionBar that lets the user go between
different screens such as inspect
Hi Johnny,
You can make a custom link component with target = _blank for the embedded
list. You need to declare a dummy property key for that entity, and call your
customComponent for that property key. If you need a hand with the actual
component, let me know.
David
On 2013-05-02, at 5:13
Thanks David,
I'll take you up on that :)
So maybe what I'm doing is the wrong approach but this is my method:
The ERDActionBar's delegate assigns a pageConfiguration.
In my rules I say for that page configuration use an inspect page template that
subclasses ERD2WInspectPage. On that
Hi Johnny,
Ok, I admit to now being confused.
Your master list is D2W? Or is it just loading embedded D2W components below it?
When you said new page I interpreted that as new window. Not sure what this
looks like. Screen shots would help.
Is the link in question from a to-many relationship
I have the power to confuse anyone when it comes to this WO/D2W!
OK. I created a screenshot with comments and I've posted it here:
http://www.kahalawai.com/ToManyLink.jpg
So yes... I'm using embedded d2w components. Each of the thumbnails is a link.
When the user clicks on the thumbnail it
23 matches
Mail list logo
