I read with great interest as I encountere the same situation some time ago.
In practice (at least in my case), it worked to have the app run on separate
EOF stacks accessing different database. So , it simplified the case to
only have one instance in JavaMonitor for multi databases. However,
Hi All,
Eclipse 3.3.2 / WOLips 3.3.5304 / WebObjects 5.3 / Leopard 10.5.8
I am trying to build a project using ant embedding the 5.3 frameworks to
deploy on 5.4.
I can build and run the project fine within eclipse.
Yesterday I started getting java heap space issue while trying to build the
war
BUT my build process which zips up the dist directory now creates a
300Mb tar file instead of a 40Mb tar file.
Can anyone suggest why the significant change?
untar it and see what's taking up the space? are we adding something
to the tar that we didn't before?
ms
On Sep 22, 2009, at 7:36 PM, Chuck Hill wrote:
Not sure why that works and not inclined to dig into it right now.
Chuck
According to the 'legacy' docs, that's the way it's supposed to work.
That seems odd as Boolean is not a Number. There is trickery there
in EOF.
David, your
On Sep 22, 2009, at 11:29 AM, Freddie Tilley wrote:
Value class of type NSNumber does not work for me, using a value class
of java.lang.Boolean does.
What are the results if you use NSNumber? You could also try Number
or java.lang.Number
I'm suspicious of the Boolean setting...
Dave
Hi list,
we are developping a web service frontend to a wo application and we
try to implement some security/authentication controls in it.
However, when we try to access the SOAPEnvelope part of the ws
message, we obtain this exception:
java.lang.ClassCastException:
FWIW
We uses an setup were access is organized by groups, sub-groups and
sub-sub-groups, etc.
We have sales reps which manage channel partners, which manage clients
or schools. In the schools are more groups. These are all group
objects.
There are classes that relate to groups,
WO'ers:
I am writing an application where users can upload pdf files - which
my app saves to the database. I also need to have mechanisms in place
where a reviewer can browse the documents that have been uploaded.
The upload and saving to the database seems to be working. This is
modeled
Hi Tim,
We do this all the time with receiving reports, prints, etc. Since the
component I use for upload handles any file type ( Word, images, PDF)
I keep track of the file extension that the file was uploaded with in
an attribute of my File entity. I then use that information to
John:
Thanks for the response. In our case the files will always be pdf
since we are requiring that as the format of the originating user's
submission. I can definitely see the file size concern if the pdf is a
big ole glorified image. Hopefully, most of the users will produce
their
That's all I do. Are you embedding the file in the page or having the
response download the file as an attachment?
John A. Larson
President
Precision Instruments, Inc.
Ph: 847-824-4194
Fax: 866-240-7104
Sent from my iPhone
On Sep 23, 2009, at 11:24 AM, Tim Worman li...@thetimmy.com wrote:
Here's another do'oh question: are you sure the data is making it to
the db from the upload?
John A. Larson
President
Precision Instruments, Inc.
Ph: 847-824-4194
Fax: 866-240-7104
Sent from my iPhone
On Sep 23, 2009, at 11:24 AM, Tim Worman li...@thetimmy.com wrote:
John:
Thanks for the
Hi Tim,
Have you looked at ERAttachment? It has been designed to do exactly
what you are attempting and optionally ties into the AjaxFileUpload
component.
The framework provide a single unified set of components and models
that can allow the storage of attachments on your local
On Sep 23, 2009, at 10:15 AM, Chuck Hill wrote:
Hi Tim,
On Sep 23, 2009, at 9:24 AM, Tim Worman wrote:
John:
Thanks for the response. In our case the files will always be pdf
since we are requiring that as the format of the originating user's
submission. I can definitely see the file
I'm going to try and do the same as I am doing with my other component
and have these open in a new window.
Tim
On Sep 23, 2009, at 10:16 AM, John Kim Larson wrote:
That's all I do. Are you embedding the file in the page or having
the response download the file as an attachment?
John A.
On Sep 23, 2009, at 1:27 PM, Tim Worman wrote:
On Sep 23, 2009, at 10:15 AM, Chuck Hill wrote:
Hi Tim,
On Sep 23, 2009, at 9:24 AM, Tim Worman wrote:
John:
Thanks for the response. In our case the files will always be pdf
since we are requiring that as the format of the originating
Yeah, there is definitely data being stored. My only concern is that I
don't have proof yet that I can read what I've written to the
database. So, I was concerned but I expect that Chuck is right that
the database probably manipulates file it stores.
Tim
On Sep 23, 2009, at 10:26 AM, John
On Sep 23, 2009, at 1:41 PM, Chuck Hill wrote:
On Sep 23, 2009, at 1:27 PM, Tim Worman wrote:
On Sep 23, 2009, at 10:15 AM, Chuck Hill wrote:
Hi Tim,
On Sep 23, 2009, at 9:24 AM, Tim Worman wrote:
John:
Thanks for the response. In our case the files will always be pdf
since we are
On Sep 23, 2009, at 2:28 PM, Tim Worman wrote:
Thanks for the response. In our case the files will always be
pdf since we are requiring that as the format of the originating
user's submission. I can definitely see the file size concern if
the pdf is a big ole glorified image. Hopefully,
On Sep 23, 2009, at 2:43 PM, Chuck Hill wrote:
On Sep 23, 2009, at 2:28 PM, Tim Worman wrote:
Thanks for the response. In our case the files will always be
pdf since we are requiring that as the format of the
originating user's submission. I can definitely see the file
size concern if
On 24/09/2009, at 12:02 AM, Jarda Hanuš wrote:
we are developping a web service frontend to a wo application and we
try to implement some security/authentication controls in it.
However, when we try to access the SOAPEnvelope part of the ws
message, we obtain this exception:
Hi Guido,
Guido Neitzer wrote:
On Sep 22, 2009, at 4:34 PM, Chuck Hill wrote:
- some increase in RAM usage due to duplicated loading of code and JVM
If you don't want to do that and are committed to doing this in one
instance, the next best way is to tag the root object with the
tenant.
Hi all,
I just updated to 3.5. It's very fast. I like it a lot (^_^) However,
I'm getting *lots* of red Xs in ERExtensions and ERDirectToWeb
regarding unclosed br hr ... that sort of thing. Now, for my
stuff, I like that... but for the wonder frameworks, some of those
things are
I just updated to 3.5. It's very fast. I like it a lot (^_^)
However, I'm getting *lots* of red Xs in ERExtensions and
ERDirectToWeb regarding unclosed br hr ... that sort of thing.
Now, for my stuff, I like that... but for the wonder frameworks,
some of those things are correct because
Hi Lachlan,
Lachlan Deck wrote:
On 23/09/2009, at 8:46 AM, Henrique Prange wrote:
Chuck Hill wrote:
- problems / load on one tenant do not impact others
- guaranteed that one tenant will not accidently see information from
another
This last one is exactly the reason why we can't have a
Hi Cheong,
Cheong Hee (Gmail) wrote:
I read with great interest as I encountere the same situation some time
ago. In practice (at least in my case), it worked to have the app run on
separate EOF stacks accessing different database. So , it simplified
the case to only have one instance in
Hi Chuck,
Chuck Hill wrote:
Not so easy when you have more than 20 different instances (and
counting) running on JavaMonitor. :p
20 does not seem like that many to manage.
Yeah. I'm worried about the future. 100+ instances can become a problem
to manage.
Cons:
- more instances to
On Sep 23, 2009, at 11:16 PM, Mike Schrag wrote:
I just updated to 3.5. It's very fast. I like it a lot (^_^)
However, I'm getting *lots* of red Xs in ERExtensions and
ERDirectToWeb regarding unclosed br hr ... that sort of thing.
Now, for my stuff, I like that... but for the wonder
28 matches
Mail list logo
