Re: [Webware-devel] distutils re-packaging of Webware

2001-09-16 Thread Tom Schwaller
Tavis Rudd wrote: > > Hi Tom, > you've just reminded me about the one thing I really > dislike with Distutils: I have to manually delete the > existing MANIFEST file before making a src tarball or it > misses all the new files. I'd forgotten to do that with > the most recent update. There's a c

Re: [Webware-devel] distutils re-packaging of Webware

2001-09-16 Thread Tavis Rudd
Hi Tom, you've just reminded me about the one thing I really dislike with Distutils: I have to manually delete the existing MANIFEST file before making a src tarball or it misses all the new files. I'd forgotten to do that with the most recent update. There's a complete copy of it there no

Re: [Webware-devel] distutils re-packaging of Webware

2001-09-16 Thread Tom Schwaller
Tavis Rudd wrote: > > updated again ... Jeff found a bug ... > http://calrudd.com/Webware-experimental_redesign.tar.gz I wanted to update your package and found from FastQueue import Queue Where does FastQueue come from? Did you forget to include that? then I got en arror from from zCookie

RE: [Webware-devel] distutils re-packaging of Webware

2001-08-28 Thread Tavis Rudd
updated again ... Jeff found a bug ... http://calrudd.com/Webware-experimental_redesign.tar.gz ___ Webware-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/webware-devel

RE: [Webware-devel] distutils re-packaging of Webware

2001-08-27 Thread Tavis Rudd
just a quick note: I've updated a few things in that package. If you're testing or reviewing it please download a new version from http://calrudd.com/Webware-experimental_redesign.tar.gz ___ Webware-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.so

RE: [Webware-devel] distutils re-packaging of Webware

2001-08-27 Thread Love, Jay
> Geoff wrote: > >- Many of the differences in your design sound very similar > >to the multi-app stuff that Jay has been working on. > > I haven't looked closely at Jay's implementation, but many > the design ideas are the same. If we go ahead with > finishing this refactoring off it woul

RE: [Webware-devel] distutils re-packaging of Webware

2001-08-27 Thread Tavis Rudd
Geoff wrote: >- Many of the differences in your design sound very similar >to the multi-app stuff that Jay has been working on. I haven't looked closely at Jay's implementation, but many the design ideas are the same. If we go ahead with finishing this refactoring off it would be great to go

RE: [Webware-devel] distutils re-packaging of Webware

2001-08-27 Thread Love, Jay
they make sense to apply to the main trunk. Jay > -Original Message- > From: Geoff Talvola [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, August 27, 2001 10:34 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [Webware-devel] distutils re-packaging of Webware > > > At 02:40

Re: [Webware-devel] distutils re-packaging of Webware

2001-08-27 Thread Geoff Talvola
At 02:40 PM 8/26/01 -0700, Tavis Rudd wrote: >I've been quietly working away an experimental redesign and >repackaging of Webware. It is not a 'rewrite' of Webware. >Chuck, Geoff, Jay, and the other Webware developers have >done some excellent work with the existing Webware. Most of >the code in

Re: [Webware-devel] distutils re-packaging of Webware

2001-08-27 Thread Tom Schwaller
Tavis Rudd wrote: > I've been quietly working away an experimental redesign and > repackaging of Webware. It is not a 'rewrite' of Webware. > Chuck, Geoff, Jay, and the other Webware developers have > done some excellent work with the existing Webware. Most of > the code in this redesign is thei