At 08:37 AM 6/9/2001 -0400, Jay Love wrote:
>No, it should be "path" for psp:include. I just haven't updated the
>documentation. @include includes the source of a file, psp:include
>actually does a application.includeURL call.
Perhaps it should be "url"?
-Chuck
___
Well, that seeming inconsistency came straight from JSP. It actually
does have a purpose, though.
@ commands are done at compile time.
psp: commands do something at runtime.
Jay
Chuck Esterbrook wrote:
> At 01:52 PM 6/8/2001 -0400, Geoff Talvola wrote:
>
>> I just noticed that the documen
No, it should be "path" for psp:include. I just haven't updated the
documentation. @include includes the source of a file, psp:include
actually does a application.includeURL call.
Jay
Geoff Talvola wrote:
> I just noticed that the documentation for PSP specifies the following
> syntax:
>
At 02:03 PM 6/8/01 -0400, Chuck Esterbrook wrote:
>At 01:52 PM 6/8/2001 -0400, Geoff Talvola wrote:
>>I just noticed that the documentation for PSP specifies the following syntax:
>>
>>If you want to include another PSP file in this PSP file and have it be
>>parsed for PSP content:
>><%@include f
At 01:52 PM 6/8/2001 -0400, Geoff Talvola wrote:
>I just noticed that the documentation for PSP specifies the following syntax:
>
>If you want to include another PSP file in this PSP file and have it be
>parsed for PSP content:
><%@include file="myfile.txt"%>
>
>If you want to forward the request
