RE: [Webware-discuss] extrapathinfo (Re: virtual paths without mod_rewrite)

2003-08-14 Thread paul.boddie
deelan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > yes, this is the issue i wanted to point out with my post. > after "index" servlet everything is fictional: "param1" and "param2" > are just used to make the URL more friendly, so instead of write: > http://somehost.com/context/servlet?key=1param1&key2=pa

RE: [Webware-discuss] extrapathinfo (Re: virtual paths without mod_rewrite)

2003-08-14 Thread paul.boddie
Nick Murtagh [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > deelan wrote: > > > > @import url("styles/weblog.css"); > > > > the problem is that webware searches for such CSS files > > under the /param1/param2/ folders (of course both are > > fictional): > > > > /WK/weblog/index/param1/param2/styles/print

RE: [Webware-discuss] looping through a list of tuples

2003-08-08 Thread paul.boddie
Tim Roberts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > By the way, it is a very bad idea to use variables named "list", "dict", > and "file". Starting in Python 2.2, those become type names. It's always good to be reminded of this, although the impact is fairly limited if you aren't expecting to use t

RE: [Webware-discuss] WK/FFK and Unicode?

2003-06-19 Thread paul.boddie
Costas Malamas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > I've been researching a move of my website to Unicode instead of the > Latin-1/Ascii mess that it's now. I realized that WK/FFK may limit that > process; so my question is, is there a way (easy or hard) to have WK/FFK > treat both input and out

RE: [Webware-discuss] waitforreply()

2003-06-19 Thread paul.boddie
Ian Sparks [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Paul Boddie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote : > > > >The big question, however, is: what happens to all those threads if the > >average user never fills in the first registration page? ;-) > > I believe the ATCT acts as a virtual machine able to sus

RE: [Webware-discuss] waitforreply()

2003-06-19 Thread paul.boddie
Aaron Held [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > >The big question, however, is: what happens to all those threads if the > >average user never fills in the first registration page? ;-) > > > >Paul > > User state should be stored in user sessions, not another thread. You > may need a better sess

RE: [Webware-discuss] waitforreply()

2003-06-18 Thread paul.boddie
Ian Sparks [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > You have seen this article linked from the daily python list. > > www.freeroller.net/page/alexkrut After various local DNS issues, I managed to get a page which looked as if it were some kind of proxy error. > In it Alex describes using Cocoon and

RE: [Webware-discuss] Zope vs Webware (Not Really)

2003-06-13 Thread paul.boddie
Ian Bicking [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > I would also like to see a standard "container". I don't think it even > has to be terribly intrusive or conformist -- it just has to create > request and response objects, and map those to some "resource", which > would be somewhat more abstract t

RE: [Webware-discuss] Re: WebWare, MiddleKit, MySQLdb, Python 2.3

2003-06-12 Thread paul.boddie
kj7ny [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > No, I don't need enhanced metaclass support (as far as I know). I was > only using Python 2.3 because the download page for WebWare said Python > 2.3 (at least that's what I thought I read). You should be able to use Python 2.2 with Webware 0.8. I don

RE: [Webware-discuss] Zope vs Webware (Not Really)

2003-06-12 Thread paul.boddie
Hancock, David (DHANCOCK) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > It seems to me that adopting a process-based architecture would reduce > performance considerably, but maybe there's some middle ground using FastCGI > or mod_python. I suppose I should have said "process pooling" rather than process-

RE: [Webware-discuss] Zope vs Webware (Not Really)

2003-06-12 Thread paul.boddie
Geoffrey Talvola [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > If Webware used some sort of process pool instead of a > thread pool, and served only one request per process, this > wouldn't be as much of a problem. It could be interesting to investigate the tantalising, but still apparently obscure, POS

RE: [Webware-discuss] WebWare, MiddleKit, MySQLdb, Python 2.3

2003-06-12 Thread paul.boddie
kj7ny [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > I am attempting to learn how to use MiddleKit against MySQL. I am > running WebWare 0.8 Released. The set of instructions/tutorial I have > found has MiddleKit attempting to talk to MySQL using MySQLdb. I am > running it in Python 2.3. However, the

RE: [Webware-discuss] Zope vs Webware (Not Really)

2003-06-12 Thread paul.boddie
Ian Bicking [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Well, I'm not exactly objective, but then while Webware is my > preference, Zope is my current reality in professional programming. You're relatively lucky, then. The closest to job-related Web applications I get these days involves vanilla J2EE t