Why aren't you returning 'velocity.Scheduler.product.success'? Did you debug
the ServletDispatcher to see what the result and the view output is?
- Original Message -
From: "G.L. Grobe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "matt baldree" <[EMAIL PROTECT
Forwarding to new site.
How do you know it is not reaching the view? Is it returning 404 or some
other error?
- Original Message -
From: "G.L. Grobe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, August 17, 2002 6:19 PM
Subject: [Webwork-user] actions not returning view cor
WebWork has moved over to opensymphony and its new
mailing list opensymphony-webwork. But, in short, yes
you can use the iterator tag and use its status to see
what index you are on. You can also use the generator
to create an index. So, there are many ways to solve
your problem. If you need a mor
; >
> > All webwork related questions should be sent here:
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> > Developers should also sign up for:
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> > -Matt
> >
> >
> > ---
> > T
tions should be sent here:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Developers should also sign up for:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> -Matt
>
>
>
---
> This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
> Welcome to geek heaven.
> http://thinkgee
evisions. Later, we can take a look at
inadequecies.
All webwork related questions should be sent here:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Developers should also sign up for:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Matt
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to ge
Yes because WW is providing a wrapper around HTTP Session.
- Original Message -
From: "Ryan LeCompte" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, July 09, 2002 6:39 PM
Subject: [Webwork-user] Session (Map) contents.
>
> Hello,
>
>
> I'm curious... do the objects t
see below.
- Original Message -
From: "Rickard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Matt Baldree" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "Christoph Kiehl" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, July 12, 2002 12:07 PM
Subject: Re: [Webwork-use
Yes, we could really use some help in regards to Velocity+WebWork. For now,
the preferred format is still docbook. I will be transitioning this soon. If
you are still interested, you can e-mail me offline to work out the doc
details.
-Matt
- Original Message -
From: "Marc Log
What are you using instead of Aspect and why did you decide not to use it?
- Original Message -
From: "Rickard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Christoph Kiehl" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2002 4:22 AM
Subject: Re: [Webwork-user] Why I like WebWork
Chr
a normal MVC web tier or into an
EJB tier directly. I guess that is the real question we are trying to
answer. I'll be happy to participate/critique/do nothing. What do you say?
-Matt
>
>
>
>
> > I have been doing a lot of thinking recently about web services and
>
>
> >4. Begin work on leveraging the synergy of the merge.
> >- IMO, I believe a key to OS is concise well-built building blocks. A
> >developer can choose to use only OS-Cache, Sitemesh, WW, FormTags,
> >OS-Workflow, or all of them. Abstracting out core functionality like bean
> >manipulation, co
> > 1. Does OS need 13 mailing lists? I suggest one general mail list,
one
> >per module, and one cvs mail list. There should be no need to cross post
> >messages. If the message pertains to the group, then send it there;
> >otherwise, send it to the module specific list. If traffic is light
e
>
> > 1. Does OS need 13 mailing lists?
>
> Yes, we hate our mailing lists, but the admin tools don't have any way to
> remove them! We'll have to bug the SF people directly I suppose. We really
> only want os-dev, os-users, and os-cvsmail.
>
You can delete them or not make them public.
-
ebsite itself would be a module that would be released and
available for download.
Comments on the plan?
-Matt
- Original Message -
From: "Joe Walnes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2002 6:41 AM
Subject
t; hang out and wait. Since then, a lot has changed and I
> think it is time to bring this subject up again. I
> think WW could benefit from the exposure, common
> infrastructure, developers, etc.
>
> So, I'll start off
nefit from the exposure, common
infrastructure, developers, etc.
So, I'll start off and say +1. What do you say?
-Matt
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkg
tom formatting.
- Added primitive and object arrays support. This means
you can have Action attributes that are
primitive arrays or object arrays and WW will convert
them for you. See BeanUtil test for more details.
-Matt
---
This sf.net emai
Ok. Thanks Peter. I'll look into this.
-Matt
On Tue, 25 June 2002, Peter Kelley wrote
>
> Oops, forgot to say that I opened issue
>
http://opensource.atlassian.com/projects/webwork/secure/ViewIssue.jspa?id=10048
> about this problem
>
> --
>
> regards,
>
Ok. Thanks for the debug. I'll get this fixed.
-Matt
On Tue, 25 June 2002, "Taavi Tiirik" wrote
>
> Matt,
>
> The only issue left with redirect action is when
somebody
> uses it as a result view of another action.
>
> I used to have in my views.propert
taglib
affect our theme?
>
> Thanks
> Vipul Manglik
>
>
>
> Matt Baldree wrote:
>
> > Last chance! Anybody using CSS theme taglib?
> >
> > -Matt
> >
> > - Original Message -
> > From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: <
Last chance! Anybody using CSS theme taglib?
-Matt
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, June 14, 2002 1:16 PM
Subject: [Webwork-devel] CSS tags
> Is anybody using the CSS tags? I'm in the process of
> making sur
I committed this fix and fixed URLTag to allow you to override the request
params with children param tags.
-Matt
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, June 22, 2002 3:29 PM
Subject: Re: [Webw
This is fixed and I will commit it sometime tomorrow. I
also added a couple of test pages to test this
functionality.
-Matt
On Sat, 22 June 2002, "Taavi Tiirik" wrote
>
>
> I am in kind of a hurry with getting redirect.action
or
> it's equivalent to work with late
Can you submit a simple example that illustrates the problem?
-Matt
- Original Message -
From: "Peter Kelley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Chris Miller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, June 21, 2002 4:03 AM
Subject: Re: [Webwork-u
a WW issue, then repost and somebody will
look into it.
-Matt
On Thu, 20 June 2002, "Dion Almaer" wrote
>
>
> Hi guys -
>
> I am running into this problem running code that uses
webwork and
> sitemesh on WLS 7.x.
>
> I have a simple war file that shows th
There are several examples in the example WAR that
include tests and examples. 0.98?, you should
definitely upgrade. :)
-Matt
On Tue, 18 June 2002, Michael van Leeuwen wrote
>
> Hi,
>
> I cannot seem to figure out how to get the requestURI
> from the HTTPServletRequest into
I'll take a look and add an example. I'm out of pocket
for next couple of days so it will be later this week.
-Matt
On Tue, 18 June 2002, "Taavi Tiirik" wrote
>
> What has happened to redirect.action? It does not
seem to work with
> latest CVS.
>
> I ha
So, the issues is that we don't want to allow
overriding a request param from an internal param tag?
If so, then we can add the request params last to
override any internal param. But, I guess I could see
situations where people might want to override these
params.
-Matt
On Tue, 18 June
If an error was passed along ActionSupport will change
the view to INPUT so you will need an input view. If
that is not the fix, zip me up something and I'll take
a look.
-Matt
On Fri, 14 June 2002, "Patrick Lightbody" wrote
>
> Matt,
> This doesn't appear to be
k. Maybe "Jay Bose" can take a look at this later.
Anyway, its not a big deal for now.
That's it. Don't forget about questions below!!
-Matt
On Fri, 14 June 2002, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
>
> Is anybody using the CSS tags? I'm in the process of
> making sure our sta
ple use it with
OSCache, Sitemesh, and other complimentary frameworks.
- We haven't profiled WW yet. This needs to be done.
- We still have lots to do but I think we have a solid
start. Check it out and tell us what you think.
-Matt
On Thu, 13 June 2002, Steven Haines wrote
>
> Hi
I see better documentation has been a popular issue
but, I don't see specific suggestions or problems with
what we have. It would be helpful if those of you that
would like better docs would provide some specific
comments so we could fix this problem.
thx.
-Matt
http://opensource.atlassia
k the chain as long as each
action returns another alias action. This will continue
until a non-action, usually a view, is returned.
3. Each action will first be set via the context and
then the previous action's attributes will be copied to
the current action if applicable.
Enj
It out of date. I'll get it up to date soon.
-Matt
Boris Tamarkin wrote
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Scheleton project
>
>
>
> As first time user tried to deploy
scheleton.ear on JBoss2.0(with Jetta)
> Got following exception
>
>
> Any advice?
&g
Need to get this scenario recorded. Aapo, will you add a comment?
http://opensource.atlassian.com/projects/webwork/secure/ViewIssue.jspa?id=10
000
- Original Message -
From: "Jason Carreira" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, June 06, 2002 7:45 AM
Subject: RE: [
a new feature/upgrade then lets
hear it.
Thanks go out to the people who are already taking time
to let their voice be heard.
-Matt
http://opensource.atlassian.com/projects/webwork/
___
Don't miss the 2002 Sprint PCS Application D
Take a look at this
http://www.mail-archive.com/webwork-user@lists.sourceforge.net/msg00152.html
Boris Tamarkin wrote
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Code examples using Webork in J2EE
>
>
>
> Are exist any code examples including
simple ejbs and how they called from webwork
layer?
> Thanks
>
>
>
>
think
it will be well worth the effort.
-Matt
http://opensource.atlassian.com/projects/webwork
___
Don't miss the 2002 Sprint PCS Application Developer's Conference
August 25-28 in Las Vegas -- http://devcon.sprintp
WebWork 1.1 was relesed. This minor release includes
new features:
- HTML escape support
- Native multipart content support
- VoiceXML tags
In addition, it includes bug fixes that stabalizes WW
on most major servlet containers. If it doesn't work on
yours, let us know.
Go here and you can search the forum for past conversations concerning
"redirect"
http://www.mail-archive.com/webwork-user@lists.sourceforge.net/
-Matt
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, May 29, 2002 4:04 PM
The last thing I remember was that you were going to
submit some scenarios where it makes sense.
On Thu, 30 May 2002, "Patrick Lightbody" wrote
>
> So what's the status with action chaining? Last I
heard, it looked like it
> was being questioned and wasn't going to be
implemented. If this is th
legacy method. I removed it.
- Original Message -
From: "Harvey Kandola" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Newsgroups: gmane.comp.java.webwork.user
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, May 27, 2002 10:46 AM
Subject: [Webwork-user] handlesCommands() ?
> protected boolean handlesCommands() { return tr
my.yyy.action will map to
yyy.vm or calls to my.action will map to x.vm. Will this not give you the
flexibility you need?
- Original Message -
From: "Aapo Laakkonen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "'Matt Baldree'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
<[EMAIL PROTECTED
I'm not quite sure what you are after. Can you give a more concrete example?
- Original Message -
From: "Aapo Laakkonen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, May 27, 2002 5:37 AM
Subject: RE: [Webwork-user] Using views as an action
> >> What is the proper way to ma
done. thx.
- Original Message -
From: "Tom Quellenberg" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 1:59 AM
Subject: [Webwork-user] Two small problems
> Hallo,
>
> we found two small bugs in webwork (and more important, two fixes):
> - in class NodeWalker a
This should be fixed with the latest CVS.
-Matt
On Thu, 23 May 2002, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
>
> I've downloaded Resin and am seeing the error. I'll
get
> this fixed. Thanks Mike.
>
> On Thu, 23 May 2002, Mike Cannon-Brookes wrote
>
> >
> > I g
I've downloaded Resin and am seeing the error. I'll get
this fixed. Thanks Mike.
On Thu, 23 May 2002, Mike Cannon-Brookes wrote
>
> I get a lot of NullPointerExceptions at the moment -
like 68 of
> PropertyTag.java.
>
> Investigating (and trying to patch) now - but just
thought I'd ask. Surely
- action tag
- you can access the value stack directly
- hmmm.
On Wed, 22 May 2002, "Francisco Hernandez" wrote
>
> how many different ways of retrieving data from an
action are there?
>
> I know that i could use in my actions getFoo() and
just use webwork's
> property jsp tag to retrieve that
Do you have an example I can look at?
On Wed, 22 May 2002, "Baldree, Matthew" wrote
> - Original Message -
> From: "Bady Ludovic" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Tuesday, May 14, 2002 9:08 AM
> Subject: [Webwork-user] tabbedPane : (get)selectedUrl
>
>
> > Hello,
>
see below
On Wed, 22 May 2002, Hans Steinraht wrote
>
> Hi,
>
> I'm playing a bit with webwork and started going
through the examples to see
> how it works.
>
> I came to this question, what is meant by the
following action:
>
>
> I do understand that the action:
"exprformtest.action" wil
I fixed the call order to super() in the latest CVS as well as the branch.
See if this fixes the problem. If you are correct and Orion doesn't call
release(), then we will need to place the release logic in the doEndTag() as
well. Will you check on this and let me know?
-Matt
- Ori
s to super().
Thx.
-Matt
- Original Message -
From: "Heng Sin Low" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, May 20, 2002 8:49 PM
Subject: RE: [Webwork-user] Webwork/Orion
> Yes, it seems like a bug to me. In the
> ComponentTag.release method, ge
Good points. I'll take a look at this.
-Matt
- Original Message -
From: "Heng Sin Low" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, May 20, 2002 9:10 PM
Subject: RE:Re: FW: [Webwork-user] multipart support
> 1. It might be usefull if there
I eliminated the multipart filter and moved this logic
into the dispatcher. Thanks Pat for your input.
-Matt
> - Original Message -
> From: "Patrick Lightbody" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Matt Baldree" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
"Webwork-User
I assume you mean moving the filter logic in the ServletDispatcher and wrap
the request there. I'll take a look.
-Matt
- Original Message -
From: "Patrick Lightbody" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Matt Baldree" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Webwork-User"
's by
setting a new property setting "webwork.multipart.parser". You can always
add your own parser and adapter if you like. See "Multipart Request Test"
for more details.
-Matt
___
Hundreds of nodes, one
Throw Tomcat 4.0.3 away and get 4.0.4bx. 4.0.2 and
4.0.3 has classloader bugs.
-Matt
On Thu, 16 May 2002, "Dave Maher" wrote
>
> Hi WW group -
>
> I have Tomcat 4.0.3 and WW 1.0.3. I dropped the
webwork.war into my webapps
> folder and ensured log4j.jar was in tomc
I've branched 1.0.3 "branch-release-1-0-3" so new
features should be committed to the HEAD which will
become 1.1 release. I will manage 1.0.3 for bug fixes
that are needed before 1.1 release.
-Matt
On Thu, 16 May 2002, "Jason Carreira" wrote
>
> When / Wher
content type is soon
coming.
Stay tune for more.
-Matt
___
Have big pipes? SourceForge.net is looking for download mirrors. We supply
the hardware. You get the recognition. Email Us: [EMAIL PROTECTED
you don't need an action loaded for this. it will first
try to use the action on the stack, if it can't find
your bundle, then it will load ActionSupport and use it
to find your bundle.
-Matt
On Wed, 15 May 2002, "Harvey Kandola" wrote
>
> Matt,
>
> Thank
It is on our TODO list to look into this.
On Tue, 14 May 2002, "Ryan LeCompte" wrote
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Hello,
>
>
> Is there any way to
utilize the new JSTL (JSP
> Standard Tag Libraries) in the WebWork
framework?
>
> Thanks.
>
> Ryan
LeCompte
>
href="mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTE
this then
this resource bundle will be called unless you offer a
more specific bundle for you class.
-Matt
On Tue, 14 May 2002, "Harvey Kandola" wrote
>
> How can you specify global resource bundle files that
can be used/accessed
> by all JSP's?
>
> The examples that
This seems to be fixed in CVS now. Paolo gave it a
preliminary pass.
-Matt
On Fri, 10 May 2002, Vedovato Paolo wrote
>
> hi matt
>
> just a question:
> which bea wls did you use to check these bugfixes?
> with wls6.1sp2 or with wls7.0?
>
> it seems that your laste
My last tests were with 7.0. I will investigate the
6.1sp2 issue. Damn WL. ;-)
On Fri, 10 May 2002, Vedovato Paolo wrote
>
> hi matt
>
> just a question:
> which bea wls did you use to check these bugfixes?
> with wls6.1sp2 or with wls7.0?
>
> it seems that your l
It is a simple project from which you can start with if
you like. It is there to help people who might not be
as comfortable as others in setting up their own
project from scratch.
On Fri, 10 May 2002, Webwork wrote
>
> Hi !
>
> I'm a new user of the webwork framework. I just check
all from CV
Just a reminder that all CVS traffic is now forward to the CVS mailing list
and not webwork developer list.
-Matt
___
Have big pipes? SourceForge.net is looking for download mirrors. We supply
the hardware. You get the recognition
Send me some code with the environment you are working on and we'll take a
look.
-Matt
- Original Message -
From: "Chonalal, Anil (Contractor)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, May 07, 2002 5:27 AM
Subject: help on webwork
>
I tested 1.0.2 tabbedpane example and it WOMM. Can you
give more specifics? What app server, etc.? Can you
drop in the WAR in Tomcat and see if it works just to
serve as a sanity check.
-Matt
Graf Patrick wrote
>
> Hi,
>
> I'd like to use the tabbed pane template for my
webw
I created a CVS related mail list for those of you that
like to read commits :). All future CVS changes will be
sent there. This means WW has three mail lists - user,
development, and cvs. I decided to keep user and
development. I think this makes the most sense long
term.
-Matt
mplemented this
to some degree that would like to donate their code and/or work with me on
this.
-Matt
___
Have big pipes? SourceForge.net is looking for download mirrors. We supply
the hardware. You get the recognition. Email Us: [EMAIL
? All UI tags - body and attributes?
2. Should PROPERTY escape by default?
-Matt
___
Have big pipes? SourceForge.net is looking for download mirrors. We supply
the hardware. You get the recognition. Email Us: [EMAIL PROTECTED
In webwork.properties, the "webwork.action.packages" is set to
"skeleton.action" and not "com.skeleton.action". So, in your JSP page you
would post to formtest.action where this is mapped in your views file
views.properties or actions.xml.
-Matt
- Origina
Well, this worked fine for me. In this scenario, the WW property/calendar
retrieves the date object from the action on the stack and the WW pram/..
fetches this object to set in Date.
Looking at your code I'm wondering if should be .
- Original Message -
From: "Ri
I don't think anybody answered you on this. Its quite common to use hidden
tags to store the values as they are passed form to form.
- Original Message -
From: "yes I am" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, April 29, 2002 9:22 AM
Subject: [Webwork-user] wizard behav
uccess" from
action execution. But right now I can't think of any
other way.
Comments?
-Matt
"Anthony Eden" wrote
>
> The benefit of action chaining, as far as I am
concerned, is to promote action reuse. With chaining
you can make more
> fine-grained actions and
I'm looking at the feature "action chaining" and I need
some input. Can someone give me a good scenario for
chaining actions? What are we trying to accomplish here
that we cannot do now? Or how does it alleviate present
headaches? Or how will it allow us to do something we
can&#
Try this and see if you can get it to work. If you
still need help, I'll send you a project skeleton.
On Thu, 02 May 2002, Fredrik Karlsson wrote
>
> Hi Matt (and others)!
>
> I think you misunderstood me, I wanted to create my
own small
> application by modifying some exi
ed on before
these but rather serves as a temperature gauge to see what people would like
released for 1.1.
[Priority]
20
8
29
9
6
19
28
-Matt
[From TODO.txt]
- Documentation
1. Better velocity documentation. [suggested by Matt]
2. A more detailed section describing the view mapping focusing on
name
"webwork.examples.ProjectList".
So, if you started your own project, you would have a properties file
similar to the one provided but with a property setting similar to the
following: "webwork.action.packages=webwork.action.standard,com.foo.action".
See inline comments
ch. I believe Mike has done some work with it in his Jira
project and made appropriate modifications/improvements. I think we should
take him up on his offer to look at some of his ui components and see if we
can incorporate some of them.
-Matt
- Original Message -
From: "Graf Patric
WebWork 1.0.2 was released which includes numerous bug fixes and FAQ for
installing the WAR on WebLogic 6.1 and 7.0. See the CHANGES.txt for more
details.
-Matt
___
Webwork-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists
ing to get these knocked out before new
freatures are worked on. Are there any objections?
-Matt
Bugs:
- [ 474111 ] IllegalArgumentException propogated
- [ 545110 ] taglib.tld parsing error under JBoss3RC1
- [ 507922 ] ClientInfo throws NPE when no User-Agent
- [ 536189 ] Expression Language and
as far as I
> know)
>
> -patrick
>
> > -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
> > Von: Matt Baldree [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Gesendet: Donnerstag, 25. April 2002 00:28
> > An: Jason Carreira; WebWork-User (E-Mail)
> > Betreff: Re: [Webwork-user] ui:radio
o:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, April 24, 2002 5:05 AM
> To: 'Matt Baldree'
> Cc: WebWork-User (E-Mail)
> Subject: AW: [Webwork-user] ui:radio
>
>
> Hi Matt,
>
>
> thanks for your answer. Yes, I can duplicate the error with
> the test pages.
> I h
e. It
will not print "Success".
13) webwork:if test="bool('true') == true"
Success
So, looks like a bug. Thanks.
-Matt
- Original Message -
From: "Scott Farquhar" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Matt Baldree" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]&
see inline
- Original Message -
From: "Scott Farquhar" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, April 21, 2002 10:10 PM
Subject: [Webwork-user] webwork:if tag problems
> I am having problems with the webwork:if tag, and I am not sure if I am
> doing something wrong.
>
>
You can take the ui:radio in the form test and duplicate it and it works
fine. Can you duplicate the error with one of the test pages or submit some
code?
- Original Message -
From: "Graf Patrick" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "'Matt Baldree'&qu
You might also want to look at
action.standard.ClientInfo. It has browser detection
stuff.
-Matt
On Tue, 23 April 2002, "Toby Hede" wrote
>
> That is a very interesting idea. Thanks.
>
> Truth be told, I have been playing with .Net (boo
hiss! traitor!) and one of
> t
In a recent project, we used a theme filter that determined the appropriate
theme to return (XHTML, VXML, WML). Just another idea you might want to look
at.
-Matt
- Original Message -
From: "Toby Hede" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
<[EMAIL PROTEC
try
Ok
- Original Message -
From: "Graf Patrick" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "WebWork-User (E-Mail)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, April 16, 2002 1:42 AM
Subject: [Webwork-user] How to use Referrer.action ?
> Hi,
>
> I'm trying to use the ww Referrer class in my project.
> In case
done. thx.
- Original Message -
From: "Mike Cannon-Brookes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2002 10:22 PM
Subject: [Webwork-user] Annoyance with UI tags
> Minor annoyance with the UI tags that took me an hour or two to track down
> (I thought I was
Try quoting the label. Without the quote, WW is looking for a method with
that name.
- Original Message -
From: "Graf Patrick" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "WebWork-User (E-Mail)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, April 18, 2002 8:42 AM
Subject: [Webwork-user] ui:radio
> Hello,
>
> I h
- Original Message -
From: "erik" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, April 16, 2002 3:31 PM
Subject: [Webwork-user] Dynamic Include
Hello,
I saw some discussion on dynamic includes but haven't found anything that
works yet. Here is what I want to do:
"/>
The $
I've been toying
with the idea of hooking up Axis as a view into WebWork.
-Matt
- Original Message -
From: "Vaishakhi Ajmera" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, April 15, 2002 4:40 PM
Subject: [Webwork-user] SOAP Integration with webwork
He
? Do you have any feature(s) you would like to
work on or take ownership of? If you have any revisions
or comments, please reply.
I will commit this summary as TODO.txt to the root of
CVS.
-Matt
- Documentation
1. Better velocity documentation. [suggested by Matt]
2. A more detailed section
Tomcat 4.0.2 and 4.0.3 have a classloader bug. You can extract the
taglib.tld from the JAR and modify the web.xml or upgrade to 4.0.4b2.
- Original Message -
From: "Vladimir Yusseem" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 5:59 PM
Subject: [Webwork-user]
Can you provide more specifics - what WL version, JDK, is it WL out of the
box, etc. Enough so we can try and reproduce it.
-Matt
- Original Message -
From: "Ashish Jain" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, April 06, 2002 6:07 PM
Subject:
ost be for inclusion/exclusion/prioritization.
Documentation
1. Better velocity documentation (Matt)
2. A more detailed section describing the view mapping focusing on using
actions.xml and views.properties with an example containing all the goodies
(commands, aliases, hierarchical aspects
list
> > 3. Instrument/profile code - where is our bottlenecks? how well does WW
> > scale?
> > 4. Logging - overhaul debug statements to use proper logging levels -
debug,
> > info, etc.
> > 5. Nightly builds
> >
> > Incorporating new view technologies
> &g
1 - 100 of 130 matches
Mail list logo
