Re: [Wengophone-devel] G772 and P2P SIP/SIMPLE

2008-02-27 Thread Ralf Schlatterbeck
On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 10:19:46PM +0100, Ralf Schlatterbeck wrote: I'm getting the feeling that my whole advanced config stuff isn't working, (the dialog *is* working but it seems the values there aren't used by wengo) any idea if this could be the case? That would explain that

Re: [Wengophone-devel] G772 and P2P SIP/SIMPLE

2008-02-27 Thread Ralf Schlatterbeck
On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 10:36:16AM +0100, Ralf Schlatterbeck wrote: Note that this time while I had wengo running I had a pop-up that asked me to authorize presence info for a remote (unknown) party. So there seems some support of p2p presence working. I'll now re-test with several clients.

Re: [Wengophone-devel] G772 and P2P SIP/SIMPLE

2008-02-27 Thread Vadim Lebedev
Ralf Schlatterbeck wrote: On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 10:19:46PM +0100, Ralf Schlatterbeck wrote: I'm getting the feeling that my whole advanced config stuff isn't working, (the dialog *is* working but it seems the values there aren't used by wengo) any idea if this could be the case? That would

Re: [Wengophone-devel] G772 and P2P SIP/SIMPLE

2008-02-26 Thread Vadim Lebedev
Ralf Schlatterbeck wrote: On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 06:17:57PM +0100, Vadim Lebedev wrote: Ralf we did a lot of fixes to presence stuff Please try latest version Hmm, I've just compiled tested without much further news: - When turning on p2p presence, it still doesn't work for our

Re: [Wengophone-devel] G772 and P2P SIP/SIMPLE

2008-02-26 Thread Andreas Schneider
Vadim Lebedev wrote: you can do hg update -r 0 command to get intial version of repository which should be the same wengophone_2.2 on SVN Does hg have a bisect function? I haven't found somthing like git-bisect. -- andreas signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [Wengophone-devel] G772 and P2P SIP/SIMPLE

2008-02-26 Thread Ralf Schlatterbeck
On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 12:48:23PM +0100, Vadim Lebedev wrote: Ralf Schlatterbeck wrote: I'd like to revert to an older version (maybe to the one when you moved to hg) -- can you give me a short intro how I can revert to the start of the hg version of the 2.2 branch, then I re-test ekiga.net

Re: [Wengophone-devel] G772 and P2P SIP/SIMPLE

2008-02-26 Thread Vadim Lebedev
Andreas Schneider wrote: Vadim Lebedev wrote: you can do hg update -r 0 command to get intial version of repository which should be the same wengophone_2.2 on SVN Does hg have a bisect function? I haven't found somthing like git-bisect. -- andreas Yes

Re: [Wengophone-devel] G772 and P2P SIP/SIMPLE

2008-02-26 Thread Vadim Lebedev
Ralf Schlatterbeck wrote: On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 12:48:23PM +0100, Vadim Lebedev wrote: Ralf Schlatterbeck wrote: I'd like to revert to an older version (maybe to the one when you moved to hg) -- can you give me a short intro how I can revert to the start of the hg version of the 2.2

Re: [Wengophone-devel] G772 and P2P SIP/SIMPLE

2008-02-26 Thread Ralf Schlatterbeck
On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 02:48:04PM +0100, Vadim Lebedev wrote: No revert is the wrong thing... Maybe hg udpate 0 Ok that did it -- revert seems to do the same but deletes local changes. I've built r0 and still don't get presence with ekiga.net. So either they changed something or I'm missing

Re: [Wengophone-devel] G772 and P2P SIP/SIMPLE

2008-02-26 Thread Vadim Lebedev
Ralf Schlatterbeck wrote: On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 02:48:04PM +0100, Vadim Lebedev wrote: No revert is the wrong thing... Maybe hg udpate 0 Ok that did it -- revert seems to do the same but deletes local changes. I've built r0 and still don't get presence with ekiga.net. So either

Re: [Wengophone-devel] G772 and P2P SIP/SIMPLE

2008-02-26 Thread Ralf Schlatterbeck
On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 03:36:50PM +0100, Vadim Lebedev wrote: With the following patch I'm able to chat via ekiga.net although wengophone thinks my party (myself :-) isn't connected (you'll want to remove my debug output and tie the behaviour of hasIM to a config option) the idea of the patch

Re: [Wengophone-devel] G772 and P2P SIP/SIMPLE

2008-02-26 Thread Vadim Lebedev
Vadim Lebedev wrote: Ralf Schlatterbeck wrote: On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 02:48:04PM +0100, Vadim Lebedev wrote: No revert is the wrong thing... Maybe hg udpate 0 Ok that did it -- revert seems to do the same but deletes local changes. I've built r0 and still don't get presence with

Re: [Wengophone-devel] G772 and P2P SIP/SIMPLE

2008-02-26 Thread Vadim Lebedev
Ralf Schlatterbeck wrote: On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 03:36:50PM +0100, Vadim Lebedev wrote: With the following patch I'm able to chat via ekiga.net although wengophone thinks my party (myself :-) isn't connected (you'll want to remove my debug output and tie the behaviour of hasIM to a config

Re: [Wengophone-devel] G772 and P2P SIP/SIMPLE

2008-02-26 Thread Ralf Schlatterbeck
On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 03:41:03PM +0100, Vadim Lebedev wrote: Vadim Lebedev wrote: I've just commit fix to syntax error you mentionned before. Try the latest version whule activaiting sip.chat.without.prsenece advanced config option Compiles but throws an exception: debug/wengophone

Re: [Wengophone-devel] G772 and P2P SIP/SIMPLE

2008-02-26 Thread Ralf Schlatterbeck
On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 06:38:21PM +0100, Vadim Lebedev wrote: Ralf, I've fixed the spelling error (it should be *sip.chat.without.presence*) and added the the item into config.xml Ah, didn't notice the spelling error, sorry And here it appears in advanced config as item nr 72 Works

Re: [Wengophone-devel] G772 and P2P SIP/SIMPLE

2008-02-25 Thread Ralf Schlatterbeck
On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 06:17:57PM +0100, Vadim Lebedev wrote: Ralf we did a lot of fixes to presence stuff Please try latest version Hmm, I've just compiled tested without much further news: - When turning on p2p presence, it still doesn't work for our infrastructure - ekiga.net is

Re: [Wengophone-devel] G772 and P2P SIP/SIMPLE

2008-02-19 Thread Ralf Schlatterbeck
On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 05:52:36PM +0100, Vadim Lebedev wrote: Folks, I've commited on 2.2 G722 codec support and P2P presence support. To acitivate P2P presnece in set sip.p2P_presence to TRUE in advanced config dialog It is not really well tested but seems to work Hi Vadim,

Re: [Wengophone-devel] G772 and P2P SIP/SIMPLE

2008-02-19 Thread Vadim Lebedev
Ralf Schlatterbeck wrote: On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 05:52:36PM +0100, Vadim Lebedev wrote: Folks, I've commited on 2.2 G722 codec support and P2P presence support. To acitivate P2P presnece in set sip.p2P_presence to TRUE in advanced config dialog It is not really well tested but

Re: [Wengophone-devel] G772 and P2P SIP/SIMPLE

2008-02-19 Thread Vadim Lebedev
Vadim Lebedev wrote: Ralf Schlatterbeck wrote: On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 05:52:36PM +0100, Vadim Lebedev wrote: Folks, I've commited on 2.2 G722 codec support and P2P presence support. To acitivate P2P presnece in set sip.p2P_presence to TRUE in advanced config dialog It is not

Re: [Wengophone-devel] G772 and P2P SIP/SIMPLE

2008-02-19 Thread wengophone-devel-bounces
Hi Vadim, thanks for looking into this. Any reason why your response didn't go to the mailinglist (my post had a CC)? OK if I also bounce my answer to the list? On Tue, Feb 19, 2008 at 06:53:28PM +0100, Vadim Lebedev wrote: - I'm *not* seeing a sip.p2P_presence in the (advanced) config dialog

Re: [Wengophone-devel] G772 and P2P SIP/SIMPLE

2008-02-19 Thread Ralf Schlatterbeck
On Tue, Feb 19, 2008 at 08:54:34PM +0100, Vadim Lebedev wrote: Vadim Lebedev wrote: Thanks for the info... I never paid attention to the warnings from osip_dialog.c i'll look into it... The item in advanced dialog is called sip.p2p.prsence and is FALSE by default it is stored (if

Re: [Wengophone-devel] G772 and P2P SIP/SIMPLE

2008-02-19 Thread Vadim Lebedev
Ralf Schlatterbeck wrote: On Tue, Feb 19, 2008 at 10:18:56PM +0100, Ralf Schlatterbeck wrote: With the old version (2.2 before move to HG) I got grey bubbles for my contact @ekiga.net and a green bubble if I added myself as a contact. In addition I tested with a colleague against an older

Re: [Wengophone-devel] G772 and P2P SIP/SIMPLE

2008-02-19 Thread Ralf Schlatterbeck
On Tue, Feb 19, 2008 at 10:18:56PM +0100, Ralf Schlatterbeck wrote: With the old version (2.2 before move to HG) I got grey bubbles for my contact @ekiga.net and a green bubble if I added myself as a contact. In addition I tested with a colleague against an older version of 2.2 and also saw