-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Tony Godshall wrote:
About the parser... I'm thinking I can hack the parser that now
handles the K, M, etc. suffixes so it works as it did before but also
sees a '%' suffix as valid- that would reduce the amount of code
necessary to implement
Tony Godshall wrote:
If it was me, I'd have it default to backing off to 95% by default and
have options for more aggressive behavior, like the multiple
connections, etc.
I don't like a default back-off rule. I often encounter downloads with
often changing download speeds. The idea that the
Greetings,
Was the feature being discussed here
http://www.mail-archive.com/wget@sunsite.dk/msg05546.html
and here
http://www.mail-archive.com/wget@sunsite.dk/msg05577.html
ever get implemented?
In other words, is it possible to do:
wget --bind-address=1.2.3.4:2000-3000 http://...
From trying
Micah -
I haven't tested this yet, but I've been pondering on the impact of having
a dependency on Hg for the actual build process of Wget. Seems like an
awful lot of trouble for a product that in the past has only needed
Make|Nmake and a C compiler.
Is it possible with Hg to create a file
On 10/17/07, Micah Cowan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Tony Godshall wrote:
About the parser... I'm thinking I can hack the parser that now
handles the K, M, etc. suffixes so it works as it did before but also
sees a '%' suffix as valid- that
On 10/17/07, Matthias Vill [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Tony Godshall wrote:
If it was me, I'd have it default to backing off to 95% by default and
have options for more aggressive behavior, like the multiple
connections, etc.
I don't like a default back-off rule. I often encounter downloads
... Perhaps it should be one of those things that one can do
oneself if one must but is generally frowned upon (like making a
version of wget that ignores robots.txt).
Damn. I was only joking about ignoring robots.txt, but now I'm
thinking[1] there may be good reasons to do so... maybe it
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
(Accidentally sent private reply).
Tony Godshall wrote:
On 10/17/07, Matthias Vill [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Tony Godshall wrote:
If it was me, I'd have it default to backing off to 95% by default and
have options for more aggressive behavior,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Guess I was forgetting to hit Reply-All today... resent to list.
Christopher G. Lewis wrote:
Micah -
I haven't tested this yet, but I've been pondering on the impact of having
a dependency on Hg for the actual build process of Wget. Seems
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Tony Godshall wrote:
... Perhaps it should be one of those things that one can do
oneself if one must but is generally frowned upon (like making a
version of wget that ignores robots.txt).
Damn. I was only joking about ignoring robots.txt,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Oleg Ace wrote:
Greetings,
Was the feature being discussed here
http://www.mail-archive.com/wget@sunsite.dk/msg05546.html
and here
http://www.mail-archive.com/wget@sunsite.dk/msg05577.html
ever get implemented?
In other words, is it
Tony Godshall wrote:
... Perhaps it should be one of those things that one can do
oneself if one must but is generally frowned upon (like making a
version of wget that ignores robots.txt).
Damn. I was only joking about ignoring robots.txt, but now I'm
thinking[1] there may be good
On 10/17/07, Micah Cowan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Oleg Ace wrote:
Greetings,
Was the feature being discussed here
http://www.mail-archive.com/wget@sunsite.dk/msg05546.html
and here
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Tony Godshall wrote:
Well, I'm don't have much to say about about the other points but one
certainly does not need to keep an array for something like this- with
the classic pseudorandom shuffle algorithm you only need to keep a
count of the
On 10/17/07, Micah Cowan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Tony Godshall wrote:
Well, I'm don't have much to say about about the other points but one
certainly does not need to keep an array for something like this- with
the classic pseudorandom
On 10/17/07, Tony Godshall [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/17/07, Micah Cowan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Tony Godshall wrote:
Well, I'm don't have much to say about about the other points but one
certainly does not need to keep an array
On 10/17/07, Tony Godshall [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/17/07, Tony Godshall [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/17/07, Micah Cowan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Tony Godshall wrote:
Well, I'm don't have much to say about about the other
Well, I got the mercurial version of wget to build (and look at).
README.checkout talks about subversion, and autogen.sh (which isn't there,
I did an autoreconf).
Also, there's a GNUmakefile in the repository -- I guess its not necessary
to build (so we can configure in other directories).
18 matches
Mail list logo
