On Tue, 9 Apr 2002, Hrvoje Niksic wrote:
> > I'll grab the "other" part and explain what curl does. It shows a "current
> > speed" based on the past five seconds,
>
> Does it mean that the speed doesn't change for five seconds, or that you
> always show the *current* speed, but relative to the la
Hi!
Someone please slap me with a gigantic sledgehammer?!
*whump*
Thanks!
Oh man, how could I not see it?
I mean, I used the "index" search function in the wget.hlp file.
I should have searched the whole text.
Even with index search "proxies" is just one line above "proxy".
Oh well.
Here is the
Jens Rösner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Could someone please tell me, what
> "the appropriate environmental variable" is
> and how do I change it in Windows
> or what else I need to do?
The variables are listed in the manual under Various->Proxies. Here
is the relevant part:
`http_proxy'
Hi!
I recently managed to get my "big" machine online using a two PC
(Windows boxes) LAN.
A PI is the server, running both Zonealaram and Jana under Win98.
The first one a firewall, the second one a proxy programme.
On my client, an Athlon 1800+ with Windows 2000
I want to work with wget and d
Andre Majorel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> If find it very annoying when a downloader plays yoyo with the
> remaining time. IMHO, remaining time is by nature a long term thing
> and short term jitter should not cause it to go up and down.
Agreed wholeheartedly, but how would you *implement* a n
"Tony Lewis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Could you keep an array of speeds that is updated once a second such that
> the value from six seconds ago is discarded and when the value for the
> second that just ended is recorded?
Right now I'm doing that kind of trick, but for the last N reads fro
Hrvoje Niksic wrote:
> > I'll grab the "other" part and explain what curl does. It shows a
"current
> > speed" based on the past five seconds,
>
> Does it mean that the speed doesn't change for five seconds, or that
> you always show the *current* speed, but relative to the last five
> seconds?
"Tony Lewis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I'm often annoyed by ETA estimates that make no sense. How about showing two
> values -- something like:
>
> ETA at average speed: 1:05:17
> ETA at current speed: 15:05
The problem is that Wget is limited by what fits in one line. I'd
like to keep enou
Daniel Stenberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Tue, 9 Apr 2002, Hrvoje Niksic wrote:
>
>> Should we revert to the average speed for ETA, or is there a smarter way to
>> handle it? What are other downloaders doing?
>
> I'll grab the "other" part and explain what curl does. It shows a "current
>
Maurice Cinquini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I don't think using only a fraction of a second is a reliable method
> for estimating current bandwidth. Here are some factors that can
> make for a wildly varing ETAs when just looking at the last fraction
> of a second.
> - TCP slow start.
>
Hrvoje Niksic wrote:
> The one remaining problem is the ETA. Based on the current speed, it
> changes value wildly. Of course, over time it is generally
> decreasing, but one can hardly follow it. I removed the flushing by
> making sure that it's not shown more than once per second, but this
>
On 2002-04-09 20:51 +0200, Hrvoje Niksic wrote:
> The one remaining problem is the ETA. Based on the current speed, it
> changes value wildly. Of course, over time it is generally
> decreasing, but one can hardly follow it. I removed the flushing by
> making sure that it's not shown more than
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Attn: Marketing Department
From: I.Q. Software - Bucharest
Ref.: Romanian Software Production & Export
Our anti-spamming company policy:
NEVER BOTHER YOU AGAIN
I don't think using only a fraction of a second is a reliable method
for estimating current bandwidth. Here are some factors that can
make for a wildly varing ETAs when just looking at the last fraction
of a second.
- TCP slow start.
- Kernel level buffering
- Other network traffic
I sugge
On Tue, 9 Apr 2002, Hrvoje Niksic wrote:
> Should we revert to the average speed for ETA, or is there a smarter way to
> handle it? What are other downloaders doing?
I'll grab the "other" part and explain what curl does. It shows a "current
speed" based on the past five seconds, it shows an ave
Since I implemented the progress bar, I've progressively become more
and more annoyed by the fact that the download speed it reports is the
average download speed. What I'm usually much more interested in is
the current download speed.
This patch implements this change; the "current" download sp
On 9 Apr 2002 at 16:52, Ian Abbott wrote:
> Wget recently adopted use of another extension (SIZE) and has long
> supported another extension (REST), so it could potentially adopt
> other extensions if commonly used.
Correction: 'REST' is a standard FTP protocol command, not an
extension.
On 8 Apr 2002 at 11:43, Urs Thuermann wrote:
> Please CC: any answers to my email address, since I'm not on this
> list.
>
> I'd like wget to get the time stamp of a file that is downloaded via
> FTP and to set the mtime after writing the file to the local disk.
>
> When using HTTP, this alread
On 9 Apr 2002 at 15:11, Daniel Stenberg wrote:
> On Tue, 9 Apr 2002, Hrvoje Niksic wrote:
>
> > Instead, the "TrendMicro Viruswall Proxy" returns:
> >
> > 220 InterScan Version 3.6-Build_1166 $Date: 04/24/2001 22:13:0052$ (mucint01,
>dynamic, get: N, put: N): Ready
> >
> > That is so far fr
¾È³çÇϽʴϱî? ÇÁ¸°ÅÍ À×Å©/Åä³Ê Àü¹®¼îÇθô À×Å©·Î´åÄÄ(www.inkro.com)ÀÔ´Ï´Ù.
º» ¸ÞÀÏÀº À¥¼ÇÎÁß ¾Ë°ÔµÇ¾úÀ¸¸ç °í°´´ÔÀÇ À̸ÞÀÏ ÁÖ¼ÒÀÌ¿Ü¿¡ ¾î¶°ÇÑ Á¤º¸µµ °®°íÀÖÁö ¾Ê½À´Ï
Netgain specifics are closed source and proprietrary, however the BST protocol is
open.
Bug in BST/TCP/NetGain, no matter which it is, the rollback option [when used]
appears to fix the problem quite nicely.
"Alexander V. Lukyanov" wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 09, 2002 at 02:55:25PM +0200, Hrvoje Niksic
On Tue, 9 Apr 2002, Hrvoje Niksic wrote:
> Instead, the "TrendMicro Viruswall Proxy" returns:
>
> 220 InterScan Version 3.6-Build_1166 $Date: 04/24/2001 22:13:0052$ (mucint01,
>dynamic, get: N, put: N): Ready
>
> That is so far from HTTP that even if Wget's parser were lenient it still
> wou
Matthias Jim Knopf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> there is a bug (or a feature...) in the version 1.5.3
Note that the latest version of Wget is 1.8.1. I suggest you to
upgrade because the new version handles URLs much better.
> I discovered that every doubled slash (//) is converted to a single
Torsten Fellhauer -iXpoint- #429 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> when connecting to a FTP-Server using a TrendMicro Viruswall Proxy,
> we get the error "Malformed status line",
Unfortunately, Wget is right; that status line is quite different from
what HTTP mandates. The status line should be som
On Tue, Apr 09, 2002 at 02:55:25PM +0200, Hrvoje Niksic wrote:
> It seems so. But I really find it strange that there would be an FTP
> server that fails in this scenario. I've only heard of such proxy
> failures, and that's not applicable to your case.
I think it is tcp layer bug. Does the Net
Justin Piszcz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> --12:12:21-- ftp://war:*password*@0.0.0.0:21//iso/file.iso
>=> `iso/file.iso'
> ==> CWD not required.
> ==> PASV ... done.==> RETR file.iso ... done.
> Length: 737,402,880
>
> 24% [>] 180,231,952 37
Guys
For what its worth:-
Most of my code logs to a level using something like
command --verbose 10 .|| -v10 etc.
In my code, I call a trace routine that simply checks the verbose level
with the call level and log if it is -ge.
EG:-
// in sim
On 9 Apr 2002 at 10:34, Hrvoje Niksic wrote:
> "Ian Abbott" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > On 5 Apr 2002 at 18:17, Noel Koethe wrote:
> >> Will this be changed so the user could use -nv with >/dev/null
> >> and get only errors or warnings displayed?
> >
> > So what I think you want is for any lo
Title: Untitled Document
"Ian Abbott" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On 5 Apr 2002 at 18:17, Noel Koethe wrote:
>
>> Will this be changed so the user could use -nv with >/dev/null
>> and get only errors or warnings displayed?
>
> So what I think you want is for any log message tagged as
> LOG_VERBOSE (verbose information)
31 matches
Mail list logo
