Here is the new version of the patch, with print_*_number_to_string
replaced with a single number_to_static_string, which does the buffer
ring stunt we discussed (and has a more accurate name to boot).
Please try it out and let me know if it works for you. I'd especially
be interested in
Does MSVC support long long? If not, how does one...
* print __int64 values? I assume printf(%lld, ...) doesn't work?
* retrieve __int64 values from strings? I assume there is no
strtoll?
I'm asking because I noticed that my LFS patch kind of depends on long
long on machines with LFS.
Hrvoje Niksic wrote:
Does MSVC support long long? If not, how does one...
No, it has a '__int64' built-in.
* print __int64 values? I assume printf(%lld, ...) doesn't work?
Correct, use %I64d for signed 64-bit and %I64u for unsigned.
* retrieve __int64 values from strings? I assume there is no
Hello Hrvoje, wishing you all well!
On Saturday, February 19, 2005 at 6:20:52 PM +0100, Hrvoje Niksic wrote:
I propose to make this list available via gmane, www.gmane.com. It
buys us good archiving, as well as NNTP access. Is there anyone who
would object to that?
There are pros and
Gisle Vanem [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hrvoje Niksic wrote:
Does MSVC support long long? If not, how does one...
No, it has a '__int64' built-in.
* print __int64 values? I assume printf(%lld, ...) doesn't work?
Correct, use %I64d for signed 64-bit and %I64u for unsigned.
* retrieve
El 20/02/2005, a las 15:02, Hrvoje Niksic escribió:
Here is the new version of the patch, with print_*_number_to_string
replaced with a single number_to_static_string, which does the buffer
ring stunt we discussed (and has a more accurate name to boot).
Please try it out and let me know if it
Gisle Vanem [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hrvoje Niksic wrote:
Thanks for the info. Is it OK to just require MSVC7, or should we
write a compatibility function for earlier versions?
Write a compatible function IMHO. A lot of users (including me) still
uses MSVC6.
OK. I don't think we can
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Steven M. Schweda) writes:
1. I'd say that code like if ( sizeof(number) == 8 ) should have
been a compile-time #ifdef rather than a run-time decision.
Where do you see such code? grep 'if.*sizeof' *.c doesn't seem to
show such examples.
As I recall, it was in
Am Mittwoch, den 09.02.2005, 10:40 +0200 schrieb Nick Shaforostoff:
hi, i've translated wget.1 to Russian
what should i do to get it added to the official wget distro?
Just send your ru.po or a patch/diff to the po/ru.po in the wget cvs to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Nol Kthe noel
El 20/02/2005, a las 16:52, Hrvoje Niksic escribió:
Greg Hurrell [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Is this a patch against the current CVS version, or against 1.9.1?
It's against the current CVS version, sorry for having forgotten to
point it out. Perhaps you've forgotten to run cvs update?
No. Must be
Greg Hurrell [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
No. Must be some other weirdness on my system. [...]
Maybe your mail client mangled the long lines in the patch? Try to
download the patch from here and see if it works then:
http://fly.srk.fer.hr/~hniksic/lfs-patch
string_t.c uses the function iswblank, which doesn't seem to exist on
Solaris 8 I tried to compile it on. (Compilation is likely broken on
other non-Linux platforms as well for the same reason.) Since nothing
seems to be using the routines from string_t, I solved the problem by
removing
Dave Yeo [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
ps anyone getting a bunch of what look like viruses on the
wget-patches list?
I just noticed them on gmane. I've now asked the SunSITE.dk staff to
deploy the kind of virus/spam protection currently used by this list
(confirmation required for non-subscribers
On Fri, 18 Feb 2005, [ISO-8859-1] Jens Rösner wrote:
} Hi Vince!
}
} I did give -X*backup a try, and
} it too didn't work for me. :(
}
} Does the -Xdir work for you at all?
} If not, there might be a problem with MacOS.
} I hope one of the more knowledgeable people here
} can help you!
I've
On Sunday 20 February 2005 06:31 pm, Hrvoje Niksic wrote:
string_t.c uses the function iswblank, which doesn't seem to exist on
Solaris 8 I tried to compile it on. (Compilation is likely broken on
other non-Linux platforms as well for the same reason.) Since nothing
seems to be using the
Hello WGET Team,
I'm in your e-mail distribution list,
please please delete me at this list because I´ve got so much mails
with viruses and in my company they become crazy
Please let me know about the deleting.
Thank you very much
Greetings
Philipp
16 matches
Mail list logo
