[ ±¤ °í ] 3°³¿ù ¸¸ ¿¡ ¿ù 500 ÀÌ»ó ¹ú ¼ö ÀÖ´Ù¸é ¹ÏÀ¸½Ã°Ú½À´Ï±î?

2002-04-12 Thread ¼ÛÈ­½Å
-º» ¸ÞÀÏÀº Á¤º¸Åë½Å¸Á ÀÌ¿ëÃËÁø ¹× Á¤º¸º¸È£ µî¿¡ °üÇÑ ¹ý·ü Á¦ 50Á¶¿¡ ÀÇ°ÅÇÑ [±¤°í] ¸ÞÀÏÀÔ´Ï´Ù e-mailÁÖ¼Ò´Â ÀÎÅͳݻó °Ô½ÃÆÇ¿¡¼­ ÃëµæÇÏ¿´À¸¸ç, ÁÖ¼Ò¿Ü ¾î¶°ÇÑ °³ÀÎ Á¤º¸µµ °¡Áö°í ÀÖÁö ¾Ê½À´Ï´Ù

Re: wget crash

2002-04-12 Thread Steven Enderle
Great! Thanks a lot for your help Regards Steven Enderle Hrvoje Niksic wrote: Hack Kampbjørn [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: assertion percentage = 100 failed: file progress.c, line 552 zsh: abort (core dumped) wget -m -c --tries=0

Re: wget-1.8.1: build failure on SGI IRIX 6.5 with c89

2002-04-12 Thread Ian Abbott
On 11 Apr 2002 at 18:55, Nelson H. F. Beebe wrote: what happens if you configure it with the option --x-includes=/usr/local/include ? On SGI IRIX 6.5, in a clean directory, I unbundled wget-1.8.1.tar.gz, and did this: % env CC=c89 ./configure --x-includes=/usr/local/include

newbie question

2002-04-12 Thread dbotham
Just when I thought it was safe to start downloading files, I get this: wget --mirror -v -I/ -X/report,/Software -w1 -gon ftp://x:[EMAIL PROTECTED] --11:27:41-- ftp://x:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:21/ = `64.226.243.208/.listing' Connecting to 64.226.243.208:21... connected!

Re: Referrer Faking and other nifty features

2002-04-12 Thread Ian Abbott
On 12 Apr 2002 at 17:21, Thomas Lussnig wrote: So that if one fd become -1 the loader take an new url and initate the download. And than shedulingwould work with the select(int,) what about this idee ? It would certainly make handling the logging output a bit of a challenge,

Re: No clobber and .shtml files

2002-04-12 Thread Ian Abbott
On 11 Apr 2002 at 21:00, Hrvoje Niksic wrote: This change is fine with me. I vaguely remember that this test is performed in two places; you might want to create a function. Certainly. Where's the best place for it? utils.c?

Re: No clobber and .shtml files

2002-04-12 Thread Hrvoje Niksic
Ian Abbott [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On 11 Apr 2002 at 21:00, Hrvoje Niksic wrote: This change is fine with me. I vaguely remember that this test is performed in two places; you might want to create a function. Certainly. Where's the best place for it? utils.c? As good a place as any.

Re: /usr/include/stdio.h:120: previous declaration of `va_list'

2002-04-12 Thread Hrvoje Niksic
Kevin Rodgers [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: 1. Don't #define _XOPEN_SOURCE 500 (by commenting it out). 2. Do #define _VA_ALIST. I can confirm that (1) works. I didn't try (2). Could you please try (2) and see if it works out? I'm reluctant to withdraw the _XOPEN_SOURCE definition because

Re: No clobber and .shtml files

2002-04-12 Thread Ian Abbott
On 11 Apr 2002 at 21:00, Hrvoje Niksic wrote: This change is fine with me. I vaguely remember that this test is performed in two places; you might want to create a function. I've found three places where it checks the suffix, so I called a new function in all three places for consistency.

Re: /usr/include/stdio.h:120: previous declaration of `va_list'

2002-04-12 Thread Kevin Rodgers
Hrvoje Niksic writes: Kevin Rodgers [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: 1. Don't #define _XOPEN_SOURCE 500 (by commenting it out). 2. Do #define _VA_ALIST. I can confirm that (1) works. I didn't try (2). Could you please try (2) and see if it works out? OK, (2) also works (but it's _VA_LIST, not

Re: Goodbye and good riddance

2002-04-12 Thread Hrvoje Niksic
James C. McMaster (Jim) [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: This could be a great resource, but (I hate to say this) it has been rendered more trouble than it is worth by the stubbornness and stupidity of the owner. He has turned a deaf ear to all pleas to do something, ANYTHING, to stop the flood of

Re: Goodbye and good riddance

2002-04-12 Thread James C. McMaster (Jim)
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Hrvoje Niksic said: James C. McMaster (Jim) [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: This could be a great resource, but (I hate to say this) it has been rendered more trouble than it is worth by the stubbornness and stupidity of the owner. He has turned a deaf ear to all

Your Mailing List Subscription

2002-04-12 Thread MailingList
Thank you for your mailing list subscriptions. If you have any questions about the content of any of the mailing you receive as a result of your subscription you may contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] Anytime you would like to modify your subscription list you may do so by clicking on the

Re: Your Mailing List Subscription

2002-04-12 Thread Ian Abbott
On 12 Apr 2002 at 14:12, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: IGaming Exchange and IGaming News News Letter information You have chosen to remove yourself from all of the IGaming Exchange and IGaming News email list. If you have any questions or comments about the news letters please feel free to

Re: Goodbye and good riddance

2002-04-12 Thread sphargis
Give me a break. just throw the unwanted mail away like everyone else or set up a spam filter. Big Deal.. -- Samuel Hargis -- Systems Consultant/Software Developer [EMAIL PROTECTED] - (850) 508-8583

Re: /usr/include/stdio.h:120: previous declaration of `va_list'

2002-04-12 Thread Hrvoje Niksic
I've now noticed that this solution fails under Sun's CC, because va_list never gets defined. Since this is needed only under gcc (to prevent a clash between Sun's and gcc's va_list), I've conditionalized the define under #ifdef __GNUC__. I've tested the result on Solaris 8, and it seems to

Goodbye and good riddance

2002-04-12 Thread James C. McMaster (Jim)
This could be a great resource, but (I hate to say this) it has been rendered more trouble than it is worth by the stubbornness and stupidity of the owner. He has turned a deaf ear to all pleas to do something, ANYTHING, to stop the flood of spam, viruses and annoyances posted to the list.

F-R-E-E TRIAL

2002-04-12 Thread ricci
To opt out from future mailings CLICK HERE

RE: HTTP 1.1

2002-04-12 Thread Boaz Yahav
So basically I only need to make this change and recompile? I wish this was a switch :) -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 12:58 PM Cc: Boaz Yahav; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: HTTP 1.1 On 11/04/2002 18:26:15 hniksic

Re: HTTP 1.1

2002-04-12 Thread Tony Lewis
Hrvoje Niksic wrote: Is there any way to make Wget use HTTP/1.1 ? Unfortunately, no. In looking at the debug output, it appears to me that wget is really sending HTTP/1.1 headers, but claiming that they are HTTP/1.0 headers. For example, the Host header was not defined in RFC 1945, but wget

Re: wget 1.6 inconveniences with FTP access through a FWTK firewall

2002-04-12 Thread Hrvoje Niksic
Paul Eggert [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I'm using wget 1.6 on Solaris 8 (sparc), and am connected to the Internet via a FWTK FTP proxy http://www.fwtk.org/main.html. If I want to retrieve a file via the standard Solaris 'ftp' command, without using 'wget', I do something like this: $