At present data stored in indexDB is written some where deep in the
profile folder, which is difficult to find.
Instead, if the web application files are stored in
\Users\{windows_userid}\WebApps\www.mycompany.com\ it will be easy to
navigate and be managed by user.
UA should only allow web app
On 17 November 2014 13:10, Tab Atkins Jr. jackalm...@gmail.com wrote:
These are just alternate image formats, yes? In that case, browsers
can expand their img support to allow pointing to these kinds of
files. They'd need some sort of native controls on the img element,
I suppose.
I see
On 17 November 2014 03:11, Anne van Kesteren ann...@annevk.nl wrote:
Why would we replace one form of bad UI with an equivalent other?
dialog can be used.
Thanks, I tried in google chrome, It will be good for many case.
But there is no way for user to resize, or move the dialog on the screen.
It is years since we have popup blockers. Still most intranet
application uses window.open() frequently.
Usually it is to easily code a closable window with close/min/max controls.
As a user, I wish we could encourage to stop the need for coding popup window.
Can HTML5 add controls attribute to
New cameras/phone cameras comes with Panorama, Photo Sphere, Surround
shot options. But there is no standard way to display the image on a
webpage. Can WHATWG standardize it and provide HTML tags.
Photo Sphere https://www.google.com/maps/about/contribute/photosphere/
Surround shot
On 14 August 2014 03:07, Jonas Sicking jo...@sicking.cc wrote:
On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 9:46 PM, Biju bijumaill...@gmail.com wrote:
On 13 August 2014 21:00, Jonas Sicking jo...@sicking.cc wrote:
An alternative design would be something like
x = new WakeLock(display);
x.request();
x.release
Additionally in the browser UI, if user can get a way to find which
tabs/pages are locking the system/display it will be great help.
On 15 July 2014 15:51, Marcos Caceres w...@marcosc.com wrote:
On July 15, 2014 at 3:31:32 PM, Jasper St. Pierre (jstpie...@mecheye.net)
wrote:
Should the lock automatically be released if the user switches to a
different tab or somehow makes the content unviewable?
Yes. But it could be
thanks all for discussing this...
As an application developer I just want a consistent way across
browser to do this operation..
regular page at http://ndia-tvc.org/
Also I feel if download is not triggered by CLICK event browsers
should not prompt user to download content that not HTML/JPG/PNG.
Cheers
Biju
On 6 February 2012 19:03, Ian Hickson i...@hixie.ch wrote:
On Tue, 10 Jan 2012, Ojan Vafai wrote:
The only
On 5 March 2012 23:52, Rick Waldron waldron.r...@gmail.com wrote:
All three of these are considered highly effective tools in mobile web
development - they offer functional UI for free.
along with window.open() malicious sites also love those features.
to make browsing safe (especially for
Hi,
setInterval(function(){location='#'+(1*new Date())},0)
At least in Firefox 4 above code make entire history filled with
current url with different hash.
And hence already now a website can make Backward/Forward button useless.
---
When I am on a web application, my naturally
On Sat, Apr 16, 2011 at 11:14 AM, Ashley Sheridan
a...@ashleysheridan.co.uk wrote:
Couldn't that be badly abused by sites that wanted you to force you to use
their navigation
rather than allow you to use back and forwards buttons on your browser?
This proposal wont give any more facility to
On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 3:25 AM, Alexandre Morgaut
alexandre.morg...@4d.com wrote:
What are the use cases for readonly oninput type=text?
The primary one I've seen is to have a non-editable text input that the
user can still select-and-copy from.
Well... span could be enough for this use
popups
I also wanted browser vendors to provide easy option for user to lie
about their location.
Cheers
Biju
Nearly all browsers have word Mozilla in userAgent string, hence no
benefit in detecting that at server.
So why do we need Mozilla in userAgent string?
Cheers
Biju
On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 1:48 PM, Simpson, Grant Leyton
glsim...@indiana.edu wrote:
This is what I had assumed. I love the idea.
However, I think installation is a bad metaphor, given that users will have
preconceived notions about what installation means,
namely that installed apps live on
proposed link
rel=application-description href=myapp.json ?
Looks like IE team only just used Ian's comment for
- a name
meta name=application-name content=Flickr
Cheers
Biju
'); /
Just curious, why do we want to allow alert/confirm/prompt in URLs for
embed, object, applet etc?
I see some times problem in Firefox
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=616838
And I dont see any use case for that.
Cheers
Biju
On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 3:30 AM, Nils Dagsson Moskopp
1. Can we deprecate alert(), confirm(), prompt() ?
If sites rely on them, it is not possible to deprecate them.
That is why I asked to deprecate, but not obsolete..
However, I melieve browsers are making these dialogs tab-modal.
Yes I
On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 8:26 AM, Benjamin Poulain
Although in my opinion, it would not make sense to deprecate without a good
alternative for modal dialogs.
But how many good sites use it.
Only place in GMail is when user try to send mail with no text in
Subject or Body field. Which they will
On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 8:45 AM, Markus Ernst
Maybe, instead of your original suggestion, it might be worth thinking about
making alert()/confirm()/prompt() dialogs styleable via CSS? Then those
fancy JS lib dialogs would get obsolete, and we had the favour of both nice
look and support for
disable them in
onbeforeunload/onunload[/onhide] etc. Many sites add extra dialogs in
those events to confuse users, so that they can trap users for little
longer.
3. also if we are keeping them, can we add an optional parameter for a
timeout milliseconds to self dismiss the modal prompt.
Thanks
Biju
Question, whether html5 spec is specific about behavior for steps at...
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=197709#c0
See also https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=197709#c3
I dont see HTML5 is specific about it at
http://www.w3.org/TR/html5/browsers.html#dom-open
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=264525
We need
HTMLNode.getSupportedEvents() == returns a text array of event names
HTMLNode.isSupportedEvent(eventName) == returns true/false
Many times in particular version of browser we dont know whether an
HTMLNode/window support particular
On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 11:37 PM, Jonas Sicking jo...@sicking.cc wrote:
if (onhashchange in document.body) {
...
}
assuming
if ('onhashchange' in document.body) {
That should solve one issue, but Firefox is not doing that for all events,
example:- 'onbeforeunload' in window === gives
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=571822
Firefox fires the timeupdate event once per frame.
Safari 5 and Chrome 6 fire every 250ms. Opera 10.50 fires every 200ms.
Now in firefox bug 571822 they are changing Firefox fires the
timeupdate event at every 250ms
But this takes away
On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 7:05 AM, Silvia Pfeiffer
silviapfeiff...@gmail.com wrote:
Incidentally: What use case did you have in mind, Biju ?
I was thinking about applications like
https://developer.mozilla.org/samples/video/chroma-key/index.xhtml
( https://developer.mozilla.org/En
On Mon, Jul 5, 2010 at 12:05 AM, Joseph Pecoraro pecor...@apple.com wrote:
- I didn't have access to IE to test. I'd appreciate
someone giving it a shot to see how they act.
On IE8 it is printing string,string,string
And it looks like in Firefox
1) name = with_a_number changes type to
On Sun, Jun 20, 2010 at 5:07 PM, Mike Wilcox m...@mikewilcox.net wrote:
I sincerely hope developers' needs aren't made secondary in such debates.
While I appreciate proper browser security, in some cases it forces us to
just look for workarounds to circumvent the security. The lack of
There are many cases where we want to sort child nodes of a DOM node.
Many times it is TR nodes of a TBODY
Right now user writes javascript code to achive that.
Dont you think it is better if there was built DOM method for each node.
Additionally the method will have a sort function parameter to
It would be good if we can also get the same at server side when user
upload a file using form with file controls
ie, like the suggestion at https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=549253
(it works even with javascript disabled)
Also remember modificationDate can be a time before
Can we have a new DOM property textarea.selectionText
which can be used to set/get selection text of a TEXTAREA/INPUT type=text.
Current method is complicated and varies between IE and Firefox
Thanks
BijuGC
PS,
I have already submitted https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=404981
Trying
I dont know whether you all saw list of people on
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=391834
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=61098
Why cant we consider % some text % and ? some text ? as
pre-processor command node in HTML DOM.
Also as a user I feel why cant Firefox, Safari, Opera, Chrome agree to
behave same.
Apple and Google, as at least Safari/Chrome/Webkit
developers are active participant on this list.
Thanks
Biju
should user agent display and
as well as content of .innerHTML
Thanks
Biju
On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 12:56 AM, Tab Atkins Jr. jackalm...@gmail.com wrote:
All of these cases appear to be an ASP or PHP page that is
accidentally being sent as ordinary html. You shouldn't be seeing
these tags at all in the source of the page unless a server is
misconfigured.
At least in
On Sun, Sep 13, 2009 at 10:01 PM, Robert O'Callahan
rob...@ocallahan.org wrote:
I guess we should just suck it up.
Cant we wait some more time before we change current behavior in Mozilla.
I believe once IE8 is popular enough the firmware people will make
change in their code and they will also
On Sun, Sep 13, 2009 at 10:25 PM, Biju bijumaill...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Sep 13, 2009 at 10:01 PM, Robert O'Callahan
rob...@ocallahan.org wrote:
I guess we should just suck it up.
Cant we wait some more time before we change current behavior in Mozilla.
Also it wont solve all the path
A web browser with plugin is supposed to work as a seamless integrated
single system.
But they are not for security setting UI. Each comes up with their own
UI to confuse users.
Example:-
1. Adobe PDF reader
I have disabled mailto URL handler in my firefox setting.
But if click mailto URL in an
I dont see a way to do frame advance feature for a paused VIDEO.
Is there a way to achieve that ?
As well as frame backward also.
Thanks
Biju
On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 9:37 AM, Philip Jägenstedt phil...@opera.com wrote:
Since static markup uses the src attribute it needs to be supported via the
DOM, so adding a parameter to load/play would only mean that there are
several ways to do the same thing. I'm not sure replacing an already
On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 7:01 AM, Philip Jägenstedt phil...@opera.com wrote:
element). Given the already ridiculous complexity of media element's
loading behavior I'm not sure adding more equivalent syntax will help
matters.
I am sorry if I am missing something, how do adding it make spec
For video tags we need events oncontrolson and oncontrolsoff
This will be useful if web page author want to hide his interface when
native controls becomes active.
Example where it is useful
1. Get firefox trunk build
2. go to http://people.opera.com/howcome/2007/video/opacity.html
3. right on
from https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=480376
It's not too uncommon for videos to have no audio track. It would be really
nice if the video controls could indicate this, so that users know why there's
no sound (is something broken? is my volume too low? wtf?).
Unfortunately this
if a video element is already playing/loaded video from URL
http://mysite.com/a.ogg
and if we want play another file http://mysite.com/b.ogg
we should do following JS code
v = $('v1');
v.src = http://mysite.com/b.ogg;;
v.load();
v.play();
Why cant it be as simple
I was looking at favicon at http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/
on firefox tab it looks little ugly as there is no transparency
outside the green ring around the ?
And the same for logo also.
See
http://www.whatwg.org/images/logo
http://www.whatwg.org/images/icon
Thanks
Biju
On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 5:26 PM, Kartikaya Gupta
This behavior seems rather inconsistent and possibly buggy.
At first look I also thought it is inconsistent
But later I found Firefox is very consistent.
I think reason why it happening like that is because Firefox clean up
URL by removing extra
I have a poor memory,
hence not good in spelling,
if there is not much gain with a change,
i wish every thing follow a similar pattern
and with short spelling,
which make my life little easier.
On C:\fakepath\ in HTML5 thread Anne mentioned fileList for input
type=file
On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 3:11 AM, Ian Hickson i...@hixie.ch wrote:
On Sat, 14 Mar 2009, Biju wrote:
Just like canvas.getImageData() and canvas.putImageData()
Why canvas.getImageHSLData() and canvas.putImageHSLData() API are
not provide? Is it something discussed and planned not have
On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 1:09 AM, Ian Hickson i...@hixie.ch wrote:
The original plan was to just have the filename. Unfortunately, it turns
out that if you do that, there are certain sites that break, because they
Chance of this happening is only for intranet site.
So if browser vendors want to
Hi,
Just like canvas.getImageData() and canvas.putImageData()
Why canvas.getImageHSLData() and canvas.putImageHSLData() API are provide?
Is it something discussed and planned not have?
Cheers
Biju
oops...
Why canvas.getImageHSLData() and canvas.putImageHSLData() API are NOT
provide?
Is it something discussed and planned not TO have?
I'd suggest filing a bug within Mozilla's Bugzilla.
Done...
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=479622
event on all items and .pause()
and .play() to make every thing in sync.
Cheers
Biju
setting.
What do spec say, how the settings should be remembered?
TIA
Biju
Multiple-page version link at http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/
ie, http://whatwg.org/html5
which is linked to http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/multipage/
is displaying a dir list
will be dropped later.
Thanks
Biju
On Sun, Nov 16, 2008 at 12:50 AM, Nils Dagsson Moskopp
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Not to be rude, but can you desribe a use case that is not some kind of
game ?
It can be educational or game sites for kids.
Like
http://www.starfall.com/
http://pbskids.org/
Some where at these sites I saw a
On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 3:16 AM, Chris Double [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 6:36 PM, Biju [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
video_element.src=http://www.double.co.nz/video_test/ascannerdarkly480.ogg;;
video_element.currentTime=10;
video_element.play();
You can
On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 3:24 AM, Chris Double [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 6:36 PM, Biju [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
toKeyFrame - optional, boolean, default false. if true indicates goto
the nearest keyframe of the value provided in secondsToSeek
) - will give currently being seek-ed position.
With out this extra method it will lot more Javascript code to archive the same.
Cheers
Biju
page with lot of javascript event
handler, which may work in IE but not in Firefox.
Thanks.
Biju
Can AUDIO/VIDEO tag have a balance attribute like?
http://developer.mozilla.org/En/HTML/Element/Bgsound
BTW: Thanks to
http://lists.whatwg.org/pipermail/whatwg-whatwg.org/2008-October/016699.html
for dmo link.
spec: http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/#dom-media-volume
How can I make a video loop for ever?
Will playcount = infinity works?
TIA
Biju
On Sat, Sep 27, 2008 at 11:27 AM, Jorgen Horstink
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
but why don't you just use a large number?
If the video is 1 sec, with a playcount set to 999 it will
I know that is a work around for web developer...
But here is a the problem.
Many software Video players have a
On Sun, Aug 31, 2008 at 4:00 AM, Ian Hickson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, 30 Aug 2008, Biju [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://www.w3schools.com/ is a very popular tutorial site. They have
already started tutorials for HTML5
http://www.w3schools.com/tags/html5.asp
I see errors
at http
http://www.w3schools.com/ is a very popular tutorial site.
They have already started tutorials for HTML5
http://www.w3schools.com/tags/html5.asp
I see errors
at http://www.w3schools.com/tags/html5_video.asp
and http://www.w3schools.com/tags/html5_audio.asp
autoplay == true | false
controls ==
On Thu, Aug 7, 2008 at 1:49 AM, Ian Hickson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
playbackRate is the right way to do it, but maybe Firefox doesn't yet
support it.
So can I assume HTML5 spec also allow playbackRate to be negative value.
ie to support go backward at various speed
Thanks
~Biju
.org/test/html/semantics/video/002.htm
(on my PC the girl in the video looks taller)
On Mon, Aug 4, 2008 at 6:58 AM, Ian Hickson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 4 Aug 2008, Biju [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's automatically like this.
# Video content should be rendered inside the element's
How can I get Slow motion, fast forward effect on VIDEO.?
Is it possible to go backward at various speed also?
TIA
Biju
PS: On Firefox I tried changing playbackRate attribute by
Markup as well as script, but did not see any effect.
I dont get this effect in new firefox see
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/attachment.cgi?id=332287
So can I am assuming it is a firefox bug
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=449142
On Mon, Aug 4, 2008 at 6:58 AM, Ian Hickson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 4 Aug 2008, Biju [EMAIL
I apologize if I did not understood
http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/#video
I see a situation where we want to specify the height and width of the
BOX in which a video need to be displayed. And while writing HTML code
we dont know the height/width of the video. But when playing
74 matches
Mail list logo
