On Tue, Sep 9, 2014 at 6:21 PM, Marcos Caceres wrote:
> On September 9, 2014 at 9:10:27 PM, Jonas Sicking (jo...@sicking.cc) wrote:
>> On Tue, Sep 9, 2014 at 5:13 PM, Marcos Caceres wrote:
>> >> What about icons that need to change daily? E.g. for a calendaring site?
>> >
>> > This is scary, IMO.
On Tue, Sep 9, 2014 at 5:13 PM, Marcos Caceres wrote:
>> What about icons that need to change daily? E.g. for a calendaring site?
>
> This is scary, IMO. A hijacked site could have its icon replaced for a bank's
> icon or something. I dunno.
At least in FirefoxOS we found that we need to support
On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 9:42 PM, Marcos Caceres wrote:
> There are also some notifications that don't make sense as badges: for
> instance, iTunes shows me a notification every time a new track starts
> playing, but doesn't get added as a badge.
Hmm yeah. Should probably be a distinct API then.
On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 10:36 AM, Domenic Denicola
wrote:
> +Marcos because he is really good at that kind of investigative work, and
> might have some idea what FFOS is doing for numeric badges.
We don't do anything yet. But we'd like to. I definitely feel like
having a badge is a separate API
From: whatwg on behalf of Mike
> I really believe that the notification api is a related topic but can exist
> as a separate api used in page icon. I think it’s a good idea not to bind
> them together.
I think there are potentially three distinct APIs:
1. Icons
2. Notifications
3. Numeric b
Mathias, Anne
I really believe that the notification api is a related topic but can exist as
a separate api used in page icon. I think it’s a good idea not to bind them
together.
Mike Tomshinsky
tomshin...@yandex-team.ru
On 26 авг. 2014 г., at 10:50, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 2
Tab, You’re right if we take as given that: 1. FF and Chrome will finally fix
the bug with handling different size attributes (hopefully they will)
2.standard aspect ratio will be 1:1 (although maybe it can be different) 3.the
layout of hi-res favicon will differ from a standard (16x16/32x32) fa
On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 8:46 AM, Mathias Bynens wrote:
> Sure, but what about the “notification counter” use case that Mike outlined?
We should investigate that as a feature of the notifications API I
think. Someone suggested that last week:
https://github.com/whatwg/notifications/issues/23 I hav
On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 8:21 AM, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 8:59 PM, Mike wrote:
>> 2) There is already a couple of standards or quasi-standads:
>> - favicons (most promising seems to be the increasing of their size and
>> svg support)
>> - apple-touch-icon used b
On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 4:21 PM, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 8:59 PM, Mike wrote:
>> 2) There is already a couple of standards or quasi-standads:
>> - favicons (most promising seems to be the increasing of their size and
>> svg support)
>> - apple-touch-icon used b
On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 8:59 PM, Mike wrote:
> 2) There is already a couple of standards or quasi-standads:
> - favicons (most promising seems to be the increasing of their size and
> svg support)
> - apple-touch-icon used by Apple and Android
> - msapplication-TileImage used by MS
>
On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 4:59 AM, Mike wrote:
> Hey Folks,
> Let’s get back to this subject as it seems there is still no solution.
> Recently we - Yandex.Browser - discussed with Opera if there could be a
> standard for page icons (let’s call it so) on NewTabPage that replace small
> screenshot
Hey Folks,
Let’s get back to this subject as it seems there is still no solution. Recently
we - Yandex.Browser - discussed with Opera if there could be a standard for
page icons (let’s call it so) on NewTabPage that replace small screenshots with
nice logos like this:
https://dl.dropboxuserconte
On Wed, 28 Aug 2013, Brian Blakely wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 1:32 PM, Ian Hickson wrote:
> >
> > You are welcome to register these on the wiki and convince people to
> > use them, sure.
>
> Would you kindly link me to the wiki?
http://wiki.whatwg.org/wiki/MetaExtensions
--
Ian Hickson
On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 1:32 PM, Ian Hickson wrote:
> You are welcome to register these on the wiki and convince people to use
> them, sure. Seems like they already have solutions, though, as you show:
Would you kindly link me to the wiki?
> Sounds like this is already solved, then.
>
In a s
On Mon, 11 Feb 2013, Brian Blakely wrote:
>
> Meta elements for defining a canonical image and color to be associated
> with the page(s) in which they are included. This is intended for use
> by user agents and third-party applications (such as social networks),
> referred to collectively as "
On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 4:17 PM, Brian Blakely wrote:
> Sure thing. Let me go through the use cases that I see as applicable today,
> derived from instances where an existing vendor or service currently
> utilizes a non-standard implementation.
>
> * Social network sharing
>
> Facebook currently
Sure thing. Let me go through the use cases that I see as applicable
today, derived from instances where an existing vendor or service currently
utilizes a non-standard implementation.
* Social network sharing
Facebook currently scrapes "OpenGraph tags" from shared pages to create a
content snip
On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 2:33 PM, Brian Blakely wrote:
> * Proposal
>
> Meta elements for defining a canonical image and color to be associated
> with the page(s) in which they are included. This is intended for use by
> user agents and third-party applications (such as social networks),
> referre
* Proposal
Meta elements for defining a canonical image and color to be associated
with the page(s) in which they are included. This is intended for use by
user agents and third-party applications (such as social networks),
referred to collectively as "parsers" in this document. It is inspired b
20 matches
Mail list logo
