On Tue, 04 Jan 2011 23:02:45 +0100, Glenn Maynard gl...@zewt.org wrote:
On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 4:24 AM, Philip Jägenstedt phil...@opera.com
wrote:
If you need an intermediary format while editing, you can just use any
syntax you like and have the editor treat it specially.
If I'd need to
On Wed, 05 Jan 2011 10:58:56 +0100, Philip Jägenstedt phil...@opera.com
wrote:
Therefore, my thinking is that comments should be removed during parsing
and not be exposed to any layer above it.
CSS does that too. It has not caused problems so far. It does mean editing
tools need a slightly
On Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 4:58 AM, Philip Jägenstedt phil...@opera.com wrote:
!-- comments -- in particular won't work because -- is already used in
the timing format:
00:00.000 -- 00:01.000
In any case, coming up with a syntax is not a problem, /* comments */ and //
comments like
On Mon, 03 Jan 2011 21:40:51 +0100, Glenn Maynard gl...@zewt.org wrote:
On Mon, Jan 3, 2011 at 10:57 AM, Philip Jägenstedt phil...@opera.com
wrote:
But what's the use case? Is it really useful to have comments in a
subtitle file?
Being able to put licensing/contact information at the top of
On Mon, 03 Jan 2011 18:56:56 +0100, Simon Pieters sim...@opera.com wrote:
On Mon, 03 Jan 2011 16:57:50 +0100, Philip Jägenstedt
phil...@opera.com wrote:
To use a different style for the cues that are sung together, so that
you know when it's your turn to sing.
It's not clear whether
On Mon, 3 Jan 2011, Glenn Maynard wrote:
By the way, the WebSRT hit from Google
(http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/websrt.html) is 404.
I've had to read it out of the Google cache, since I'm not sure where it
went.
Oops. I thought I'd set up a redirect but I flubbed the
On 03/01/2011 15:57, Philip Jägenstedt wrote:
There was also some discussion about metadata. Language is sometimes
necessary for the font engine to pick the right glyph.
Could you elaborate on this? My assumption was that we'd just use CSS,
which doesn't rely on language for this.
It's not
On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 4:24 AM, Philip Jägenstedt phil...@opera.com wrote:
If you need an intermediary format while editing, you can just use any
syntax you like and have the editor treat it specially.
If I'd need to write my own parser to write an editor for it, that's
one thing--but I hope I
On Sat, 25 Dec 2010 07:39:02 +0100, Ian Hickson i...@hixie.ch wrote:
+ I've made track have a feature whereby a track can be enabled by
default so that users who would otherwise not have any tracks enabled
will get it enabled (without overriding the preferences of users who
would have
On Mon, 03 Jan 2011 16:57:50 +0100, Philip Jägenstedt phil...@opera.com
wrote:
To use a different style for the cues that are sung together, so that
you know when it's your turn to sing.
It's not clear whether multiple voices is really necessary. Can't you
just
do (using the new syntax):
Can someone please let me know how to unsubscribe? Many thanks.
Sincerely,
Craig S. Kiessling
www.PathsAtlanta.org http://www.pathsatlanta.org - Martial Arts More
www.CSKnet.net http://www.csknet.net - SEO More
/www.AtlantaMahjong.com http://www.atlantamahjong.com - The Mahjong Source
in
By the way, the WebSRT hit from Google
(http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/websrt.html) is
404. I've had to read it out of the Google cache, since I'm not sure
where it went.
On Mon, Jan 3, 2011 at 10:57 AM, Philip Jägenstedt phil...@opera.com wrote:
But what's the use case? Is
On Mon, Jan 3, 2011 at 3:40 PM, Glenn Maynard gl...@zewt.org wrote:
By the way, the WebSRT hit from Google
(http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/websrt.html) is
404. I've had to read it out of the Google cache, since I'm not sure
where it went.
The format was renamed to WebVTT:
On Sat, 25 Dec 2010 06:39:02 -, Ian Hickson i...@hixie.ch wrote:
[...]
On Fri, 5 Nov 2010, Bruce Lawson wrote:
http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/complete/video.html#sourcing-in-band-timed-tracks
says to create TimedTrack objects etc for in-band tracks which are then
Another note on WebSRT:
seeing the addition of the bdi element into HTML, we probably also
need to add that to WebSRT cue level markup to allow bidirectional
text formatting.
http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/multipage/text-level-semantics.html#the-bdi-element
Cheers,
Silvia.
On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 5:32 AM, Silvia Pfeiffer
silviapfeiff...@gmail.com wrote:
Another note on WebSRT:
seeing the addition of the bdi element into HTML, we probably also
need to add that to WebSRT cue level markup to allow bidirectional
text formatting.
On Fri, 22 Oct 2010 13:49:00 +0200, Silvia Pfeiffer
silviapfeiff...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 10:18 PM, Simon Pieters sim...@opera.com wrote:
On Fri, 22 Oct 2010 13:09:24 +0200, Philip Jägenstedt
phil...@opera.com
wrote:
Using !-- -- is a bad idea since the WebSRT syntax
On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 8:53 PM, Philip Jägenstedt phil...@opera.com wrote:
On Fri, 22 Oct 2010 13:49:00 +0200, Silvia Pfeiffer
silviapfeiff...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 10:18 PM, Simon Pieters sim...@opera.com wrote:
On Fri, 22 Oct 2010 13:09:24 +0200, Philip Jägenstedt
On Tue, 19 Oct 2010 22:35:50 +0200, Silvia Pfeiffer
silviapfeiff...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 7:49 PM, Philip Jägenstedt phil...@opera.com
wrote:
On Tue, 14 Sep 2010 10:30:03 +0200, Simon Pieters sim...@opera.com
wrote:
On Tue, 14 Sep 2010 10:11:16 +0200, Philip Jägenstedt
On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 7:19 PM, Philip Jägenstedt phil...@opera.com wrote:
On Tue, 19 Oct 2010 22:35:50 +0200, Silvia Pfeiffer
silviapfeiff...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 7:49 PM, Philip Jägenstedt phil...@opera.com
wrote:
On Tue, 14 Sep 2010 10:30:03 +0200, Simon Pieters
On Fri, 22 Oct 2010 11:21:44 +0200, Silvia Pfeiffer
silviapfeiff...@gmail.com wrote:
Since the attributes in track are a hint, probably what is available
in the file should overrule what is in the track attributes. It is
the same for the @charset attribute, which is overruled to utf-8 for
On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 8:45 PM, Simon Pieters sim...@opera.com wrote:
On Fri, 22 Oct 2010 11:21:44 +0200, Silvia Pfeiffer
silviapfeiff...@gmail.com wrote:
Since the attributes in track are a hint, probably what is available
in the file should overrule what is in the track attributes. It is
On Fri, 22 Oct 2010 12:48:02 +0200, Silvia Pfeiffer
silviapfeiff...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 8:45 PM, Simon Pieters sim...@opera.com wrote:
On Fri, 22 Oct 2010 11:21:44 +0200, Silvia Pfeiffer
silviapfeiff...@gmail.com wrote:
Since the attributes in track are a hint,
On Fri, 22 Oct 2010 11:45:24 +0200, Simon Pieters sim...@opera.com wrote:
On Fri, 22 Oct 2010 11:21:44 +0200, Silvia Pfeiffer
silviapfeiff...@gmail.com wrote:
Since the attributes in track are a hint, probably what is available
in the file should overrule what is in the track attributes. It
On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 1:09 PM, Philip Jägenstedt phil...@opera.com wrote:
Right. If we must have comments I think I'd prefer /* ... */ since both CSS
and JavaScript have it, and I can't see that single-line comments will be
easier from a parser perspective.
Just a small, personal subjective
On Fri, 22 Oct 2010 13:09:24 +0200, Philip Jägenstedt phil...@opera.com
wrote:
Using !-- -- is a bad idea since the WebSRT syntax already uses --.
I don't see the need for multiline comments.
Right. If we must have comments I think I'd prefer /* ... */ since both
CSS and JavaScript have
On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 10:18 PM, Simon Pieters sim...@opera.com wrote:
On Fri, 22 Oct 2010 13:09:24 +0200, Philip Jägenstedt phil...@opera.com
wrote:
Using !-- -- is a bad idea since the WebSRT syntax already uses --. I
don't see the need for multiline comments.
Right. If we must have
On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 7:49 PM, Philip Jägenstedt phil...@opera.com wrote:
On Tue, 14 Sep 2010 10:30:03 +0200, Simon Pieters sim...@opera.com wrote:
On Tue, 14 Sep 2010 10:11:16 +0200, Philip Jägenstedt phil...@opera.com
wrote:
The point of a header is that browsers can identify WebSRT
On Wed, Sep 8, 2010 at 1:19 AM, Ian Hickson i...@hixie.ch wrote:
[...] You're also excluding roll-on captions then which is a feature of
live broadcasting.
It isn't clear to me that an external file would be a good solution for
live broadcasting, so I'm not sure this really matters.
The
On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 9:59 AM, Odin Omdal Hørthe odin.om...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Sep 8, 2010 at 1:19 AM, Ian Hickson i...@hixie.ch wrote:
[...] You're also excluding roll-on captions then which is a feature of
live broadcasting.
It isn't clear to me that an external file would be a good
On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 6:11 PM, Philip Jägenstedt phil...@opera.comwrote:
On Mon, 13 Sep 2010 15:50:09 +0200, Silvia Pfeiffer
silviapfeiff...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 5:55 PM, Philip Jägenstedt phil...@opera.com
wrote:
On Sat, 11 Sep 2010 01:27:48 +0200, Silvia Pfeiffer
On Tue, 14 Sep 2010 10:11:16 +0200, Philip Jägenstedt phil...@opera.com
wrote:
The point of a header is that browsers can identify WebSRT files and not
keep parsing through a 100GB movie file,
I don't think we should break SRT compat for this. I don't think this is a
problem at all. We
On Tue, 14 Sep 2010 10:33:42 +0200, Philip Jägenstedt phil...@opera.com
wrote:
I don't know, do we need comments anywhere? Putting them between cues
might work, but is that useful?
Apart from text/plain I cannot think of a web text format that does not
have comments. Validators should
On Tue, 14 Sep 2010 10:30:03 +0200, Simon Pieters sim...@opera.com wrote:
On Tue, 14 Sep 2010 10:11:16 +0200, Philip Jägenstedt
phil...@opera.com wrote:
The point of a header is that browsers can identify WebSRT files and
not keep parsing through a 100GB movie file,
I don't think we
On Sat, 11 Sep 2010 01:27:48 +0200, Silvia Pfeiffer
silviapfeiff...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 11:00 PM, Philip Jägenstedt
phil...@opera.comwrote:
On Thu, 09 Sep 2010 15:08:43 +0200, Silvia Pfeiffer
silviapfeiff...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Sep 8, 2010 at 9:19 AM, Ian
On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 5:55 PM, Philip Jägenstedt phil...@opera.comwrote:
On Sat, 11 Sep 2010 01:27:48 +0200, Silvia Pfeiffer
silviapfeiff...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 11:00 PM, Philip Jägenstedt phil...@opera.com
wrote:
On Thu, 09 Sep 2010 15:08:43 +0200, Silvia
On Sep 9, 2010, at 6:08 AM, Silvia Pfeiffer wrote:
On Wed, Sep 8, 2010 at 9:19 AM, Ian Hickson i...@hixie.ch wrote:
On Fri, 23 Jul 2010, Philip Jägenstedt wrote:
I'm not a fan of pauseOnExit, though, mostly because it seems
non-trivial to implement. Since it is last in the argument
On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 11:00 PM, Philip Jägenstedt phil...@opera.comwrote:
On Thu, 09 Sep 2010 15:08:43 +0200, Silvia Pfeiffer
silviapfeiff...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Sep 8, 2010 at 9:19 AM, Ian Hickson i...@hixie.ch wrote:
On Fri, 23 Jul 2010, Philip Jägenstedt wrote:
If we must have
On Wed, 08 Sep 2010 01:19:17 +0200, Ian Hickson i...@hixie.ch wrote:
On Fri, 23 Jul 2010, Philip Jägenstedt wrote:
http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/multipage/video.html#attr-track-kind
The distinction between subtitles and captions isn't terribly clear.
It says that
On Wed, Sep 8, 2010 at 2:27 AM, Philip Jägenstedt phil...@opera.com wrote:
On Wed, 08 Sep 2010 01:19:17 +0200, Ian Hickson i...@hixie.ch wrote:
We could say that a custom voice has to start with some punctuation or
other, say :philip?
Yes, that would be better than numerical voices IMO.
On Wed, Sep 8, 2010 at 11:19 AM, Ian Hickson i...@hixie.ch wrote:
On Thu, 26 Aug 2010, Chris Double wrote:
Firefox (in the case of video) uses file extensions to identify video
files. We have an internal maping of file extensions to mime types. We
don't sniff the content. I imagine we'd do the
41 matches
Mail list logo
