On Tue, 20 Mar 2007, ddailey wrote:
I sometimes enjoy the ability to clone images that have no src or no
width or no style. I certainly like to vary the height and width
attributes via setAttribute, and I might like, in the future, to be able
to attach an animate tag (ala SMIL) to the
On Wed, 21 Mar 2007, Henri Sivonen wrote:
On Mar 3, 2007, at 21:58, Ian Hickson wrote:
The question isn't whether or not you should have the ability to scale
images; it's clear that this is desirable. The question is whether it
makes sense to put this in HTML as opposed to CSS. Why
any more.
Chris
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ian Hickson
Sent: Friday, April 11, 2008 9:02 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [whatwg] require img dimensions to be correct?
On Fri, 16 Mar 2007, Benjamin West wrote:
img style=height
2007/3/21, Nicholas Shanks:
On 17 Mar 2007, at 23:28, Andrew Fedoniouk wrote:
I think that in most cases will be better if we could package
complex pages into zip envelopes and deliver them in the whole.
That would be real solution of jumps. And img width=...
height=... is a palliative.
I
On 21 Mar 2007, at 09:37, Henri Sivonen wrote:
OTOH, the left/right alignment of table cells *is* often tightly
coupled with the cell data, which suggests that the cell alignment
attributes should not be dropped.
Alternatively it could just be allowed on the col and colspan,
where it
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sander Tekelenburg [EMAIL PROTECTED];
Benjamin West [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, March 16, 2007 8:14 PM
Subject: Re: [whatwg] require img dimensions to be correct?
Gareth Hay wrote:
If i'm not mistaken, the idea of separation of content and style means
On 17 Mar 2007, at 23:28, Andrew Fedoniouk wrote:
I think that in most cases will be better if we could package
complex pages into zip envelopes and deliver them in the whole.
That would be real solution of jumps. And img width=...
height=...
is a palliative.
I have an open bug with
At 15:28 -0800 UTC, on 2007-03-17, Andrew Fedoniouk wrote:
[...]
So the main motivation is to avoid jumpy rendering, correct?
Correct.
In principle style sheet downloading is also asynchronous process.
And CSS can do many things that may cause jumps.
So if we will require image to have
On Sun, 18 Mar 2007 00:28:30 +0100, Andrew Fedoniouk
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think that in most cases will be better if we could package
complex pages into zip envelopes and deliver them in the whole.
That would be real solution of jumps. And img width=... height=...
is a palliative.
- Original Message -
From: Sander Tekelenburg [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, March 17, 2007 2:05 PM
Subject: Re: [whatwg] require img dimensions to be correct?
| At 03:46 +1300 UTC, on 2007-03-17, Dean Edridge wrote:
|
| The chance of someone not being able
Regarding: img dimensions to be correct?
Sander Tekelenburg wrote:
We struggled with this for the WRI requirements[*]. We seem to be settling on
requiring a width and height to be specified in HTML, because as nice as CSS
is, Web pages must not be CSS-dependant. Even if the author means to
On 3/16/07, Dean Edridge [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Firstly, the chance of someone not being able to access the CSS for a web
page is I'm guessing, pretty slim.
img style=height: 50px; width: 50px; / Why is accessing CSS a problem?
-Ben West
If i'm not mistaken, the idea of separation of content and style
means you can use your own css, or even none at all, and still have
the ability to view the content.
If a page is dependent on the css, then, although in a separate file,
it is fundamentally not separate at all, and we might
Benjamin West wrote:
On 3/16/07, Dean Edridge [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Firstly, the chance of someone not being able to access the CSS for
a web
page is I'm guessing, pretty slim.
img style=height: 50px; width: 50px; / Why is accessing CSS a
problem?
-Ben West
I never said that
Gareth Hay wrote:
If i'm not mistaken, the idea of separation of content and style means
you can use your own css, or even none at all, and still have the
ability to view the content.
If a page is dependent on the css, then, although in a separate file,
it is fundamentally not separate at
At 19:58 + UTC, on 2007-03-03, Ian Hickson wrote:
On Sat, 3 Mar 2007, Elliotte Harold wrote:
[...]
I'm +1 on allowing percentages. That seems like a useful feature to me.
Allowing percentages would be entirely presentational and thus have no place
in HTML.
The question isn't whether or
On Sat, 3 Mar 2007, Elliotte Harold wrote:
There's an open issue in Web Apps 1.0 on img dimensions:
The height and width attributes give the preferred rendered dimensions
of the image if the image is to be shown in a visual medium.
Should we require the dimensions to be correct? Should
17 matches
Mail list logo
