Re: [whatwg] map id=

2007-08-20 Thread Jonas Sicking
Simon Pieters wrote: On Sat, 18 Aug 2007 19:37:03 +0200, Jonas Sicking [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I don't see any need for it to be case-sensitive for XHTML5. :-) [1] http://lists.whatwg.org/pipermail/whatwg-whatwg.org/2007-April/010975.html Since ID is case sensitive everywhere else, I

Re: [whatwg] map id=

2007-08-20 Thread Anne van Kesteren
On Mon, 20 Aug 2007 12:58:29 +0200, Jonas Sicking [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Given that behavior is so different in different UAs, it seems unlikely that a lot of sites depend on IEs behavior. So I suggest not matching what IE does. What exactly is the problem? For image maps you can't use

Re: [whatwg] map id=

2007-08-20 Thread Jonas Sicking
Anne van Kesteren wrote: On Mon, 20 Aug 2007 12:58:29 +0200, Jonas Sicking [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Given that behavior is so different in different UAs, it seems unlikely that a lot of sites depend on IEs behavior. So I suggest not matching what IE does. What exactly is the problem? For

Re: [whatwg] map id=

2007-08-18 Thread Jonas Sicking
As for case: [Opera] match for id or name is case-insensitive regardless of mime type. [Firefox and Safari] application/xhtml+xml match for id is case-sensitive text/html match for name is case-insensitive [IE6] match for name or id is case-insenstive. So, it seems it might have to be

Re: [whatwg] map id=

2007-08-18 Thread Simon Pieters
On Sat, 18 Aug 2007 19:37:03 +0200, Jonas Sicking [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I don't see any need for it to be case-sensitive for XHTML5. :-) [1] http://lists.whatwg.org/pipermail/whatwg-whatwg.org/2007-April/010975.html Since ID is case sensitive everywhere else, I don't see a reason to

Re: [whatwg] map id=

2007-08-10 Thread Benjamin Hawkes-Lewis
Simon Pieters wrote: I don't see any need for it to be case-sensitive for XHTML5. :-) Correct me if this is incorrect but as far as I can see, according to the specs authors have been using, id and name are case-sensitive in XHTML 1.x just as in HTML 4.01. Since HTML5 handles standard

Re: [whatwg] map id=

2007-08-10 Thread Michael A. Puls II
On 8/9/07, Simon Pieters [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wed, 08 Aug 2007 20:21:00 +0200, Michael A. Puls II [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Just wan to be sure: Even though id is required, name is allowed on map. Correct? No. name is currently not allowed (but I have suggested we change to name

Re: [whatwg] map id=

2007-08-10 Thread Michael A. Puls II
On 8/10/07, Benjamin Hawkes-Lewis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Simon Pieters wrote: I don't see any need for it to be case-sensitive for XHTML5. :-) Correct me if this is incorrect but as far as I can see, according to the specs authors have been using, id and name are case-sensitive in XHTML

Re: [whatwg] map id=

2007-08-09 Thread Simon Pieters
On Wed, 08 Aug 2007 20:21:00 +0200, Michael A. Puls II [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Just wan to be sure: Even though id is required, name is allowed on map. Correct? No. name is currently not allowed (but I have suggested we change to name instead of id [1]). (It currently needs to be for

Re: [whatwg] map id=

2007-08-08 Thread Ian Hickson
On Sat, 6 Jan 2007, Shadow2531 wrote: In Opera, regardless of mime type, Opera can match usemap=#test to map id=test, map name=test or map name=test id=test. Whether Opera uses the map element with the name or the map element with the id depends on which one comes first in the document.

Re: [whatwg] map id=

2007-08-07 Thread Ian Hickson
On Sat, 6 Jan 2007, Anne van Kesteren wrote: I think that besides supporting map name= it should also support map id= to be referenced from usemap (not with an IDREF, but with an URI, mind you). This is compatible with what Opera does in both HTML and XHTML, Firefox in XHTML and Internet