Re: [whatwg] Backend Implementation

2016-10-06 Thread Jacob Villarreal
Hello Domenic,Thanks for responding.  I think I've discussed this too much as 
it is.  I didn't know it was so difficult to get anything done.  I've gotten 
all mixed up at this point.  I guess there are several options in getting this 
implemented.  By internet server script update, browser driver/script update, 
or by user agent update.  So I think I'll let this one go for now, until I have 
more resources to get it done.Thanks,Jacob 

On Thursday, October 6, 2016 8:58 AM, Domenic Denicola  
wrote:
 

 From: Jacob Villarreal [mailto:jv1...@yahoo.com] 

> I'm trying to get some information on how to implement some new 
> tags/attributes on the backend.  I would like to know if my only option is 
> the use case discussion, or if there are other resources for getting it done.

Yes, we aren't interested in adding features to HTML without use cases.

> It's really simple, but I'm not sure if it would require a full specification 
> to be implemented by the html guys, www guys, or what.

To be clear, we only add features to the spec that have use cases and interest 
in being implemented in at least two major browser engines. (Those are the most 
important steps of the process I linked you to.) So there is nothing really 
simple about this; adding features to the web platform is generally a 
multi-year effort that involves convincing a lot of people that what you want 
is (a) important; (b) cannot be accomplished any other way; (c) will be used by 
lots of people (on the same order as existing features of the web); (d) is 
something browser engine engineers want to spend their resources on.

>From what I gather, you have some new markup language and server-side system 
>that you want to get everyone to use, but it's unclear why: that is, it's 
>unclear what the use cases are, and whether they could be solved in any other 
>way using existing web platform technologies. So you need to start there. 


   


Re: [whatwg] Backend Implementation

2016-10-06 Thread Domenic Denicola
From: Jacob Villarreal [mailto:jv1...@yahoo.com] 

> I'm trying to get some information on how to implement some new 
> tags/attributes on the backend.  I would like to know if my only option is 
> the use case discussion, or if there are other resources for getting it done.

Yes, we aren't interested in adding features to HTML without use cases.

> It's really simple, but I'm not sure if it would require a full specification 
> to be implemented by the html guys, www guys, or what.

To be clear, we only add features to the spec that have use cases and interest 
in being implemented in at least two major browser engines. (Those are the most 
important steps of the process I linked you to.) So there is nothing really 
simple about this; adding features to the web platform is generally a 
multi-year effort that involves convincing a lot of people that what you want 
is (a) important; (b) cannot be accomplished any other way; (c) will be used by 
lots of people (on the same order as existing features of the web); (d) is 
something browser engine engineers want to spend their resources on.

From what I gather, you have some new markup language and server-side system 
that you want to get everyone to use, but it's unclear why: that is, it's 
unclear what the use cases are, and whether they could be solved in any other 
way using existing web platform technologies. So you need to start there. 


[whatwg] Backend Implementation

2016-10-06 Thread Jacob Villarreal
On your last reply:Have you read 
https://wiki.whatwg.org/wiki/FAQ#Is_there_a_process_for_adding_new_features_to_a_specification.3F
 ? In particular, it seems you've jumped straight to step 7. Can you instead 
start with steps 1 and 2, and describe the problems you are trying to solve? As 
far as I can tell they are something to do with databases and having a specific 
existing server-side architecture full of .frm files that you need to adapt to, 
and other files that I think you want to display inline. There are well-studied 
solutions for these sort of problems, and I'd encourage you to first describe 
your problem in detail, so that we can guide you toward existing solutions.

Hey Domenic,I'm trying to get some information on how to implement some new 
tags/attributes on the backend.  I would like to know if my only option is the 
use case discussion, or if there are other resources for getting it done.  I 
don't think what I proposed would require an existing server-side architecture 
full of .frm files.  I've sent out some other messages, you can find them on 
the mail archive to get a better picture of what I proposed as a solution for 
form, and menu creation in html.  The .frm/.mnu files can be created by means 
of a simple text editor, like with html.  They are created with the source 
paths for content.  The source is called up by means of a source tag, and 
redirected for storage by means of a destination tag.  It's really simple, but 
I'm not sure if it would require a full specification to be implemented by the 
html guys, www guys, or what.  Let me know what you think.Thanks,Jacob