Re: [Wicket-develop] 1.x branch is missing files

less talk more deleting branches purfavor!-IgorOn 9/20/06, Eelco Hillenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote:Last last objections?EelcoOn 9/16/06, Eelco Hillenius < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:> Yeah. We should remove that. Any last objections?>> Eelco>> On 9/16/06, Matej Knopp < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:> >

Re: [Wicket-develop] 1.x branch is missing files

Last last objections? Eelco On 9/16/06, Eelco Hillenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Yeah. We should remove that. Any last objections? > > Eelco > > On 9/16/06, Matej Knopp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I hope so. Anyway, why is 1.2 still in svn? shouldn't it be removed by > > now? Martijn? > >

Re: [Wicket-develop] 1.x branch is missing files

Ah, yeah. Nice one. Eelco On 9/17/06, Frank Bille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > or this: > http://fisheye3.cenqua.com/browse/wicket/branches/wicket-1.2.x > > > On 9/16/06, Eelco Hillenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > When I run a diff to the moment of branch creation, I see a couple of > >

Re: [Wicket-develop] 1.x branch is missing files

or this:http://fisheye3.cenqua.com/browse/wicket/branches/wicket-1.2.xOn 9/16/06, Eelco Hillenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > When I run a diff to the moment of branch creation, I see a couple of> changes that seem important:>> svn diff https://svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/wicket/tags/wicket-1.2.2

Re: [Wicket-develop] 1.x branch is missing files

> When I run a diff to the moment of branch creation, I see a couple of > changes that seem important: > > svn diff https://svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/wicket/tags/wicket-1.2.2 > https://svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/wicket/branch > es/wicket-1.2.x Let's give people until tuesday to check that then.

Re: [Wicket-develop] 1.x branch is missing files

I never understood it was my duty to do so... Are we sure *NO* changes have been made in 1.2.x, that aren't also in 1.x? When I run a diff to the moment of branch creation, I see a couple of changes that seem important: svn diff https://svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/wicket/tags/wicket-1.2.2 https:

Re: [Wicket-develop] 1.x branch is missing files

Yeah. We should remove that. Any last objections? Eelco On 9/16/06, Matej Knopp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I hope so. Anyway, why is 1.2 still in svn? shouldn't it be removed by > now? Martijn? > > -Matej - Using Tomcat bu

Re: [Wicket-develop] 1.x branch is missing files

I hope so. Anyway, why is 1.2 still in svn? shouldn't it be removed by now? Martijn? -Matej Johan Compagner wrote: > wicket 1.x is still 1.2.3 as far as i know. > > On 9/16/06, *Juergen Donnerstag* <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > wrote: > > forget about it, everything is

Re: [Wicket-develop] 1.x branch is missing files

wicket 1.x is still 1.2.3 as far as i know.On 9/16/06, Juergen Donnerstag <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote:forget about it, everything is okJuergenOn 9/16/06, Juergen Donnerstag < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:> Provided I didn't misunderstand it, than wicket-1.x is the development> branch for 1.3. I checked

Re: [Wicket-develop] 1.x branch is missing files

forget about it, everything is ok Juergen On 9/16/06, Juergen Donnerstag <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Provided I didn't misunderstand it, than wicket-1.x is the development > branch for 1.3. I checked out all sources (parent, wicket, extension > and examples) from SVN, created the eclipse file wi

[Wicket-develop] 1.x branch is missing files

Provided I didn't misunderstand it, than wicket-1.x is the development branch for 1.3. I checked out all sources (parent, wicket, extension and examples) from SVN, created the eclipse file with maven, cleaned up the project and completely rebuild everything. But I still have ~60 compiler errors Ab