thus im quite new,
2[x]
as its the only way to have a preview wich works in WYSIWYG editors and wont
be ** up (hopefully...) by your next designer who changed the text so it
looks better...
On 8/3/06, Dirk Markert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
2 [x]
2006/8/3, Eelco Hillenius [EMAIL
On Fri, 2006-08-04 at 08:50 +0200, Korbinian Bachl wrote:
thus im quite new,
2[x]
be ** up (hopefully...) by your next designer who changed the text so it
looks better...
This a good point, with option 1 it is likely that designers touch the
value-attribute. In option 2, it doesn't
I assume you have checked out wicket-portal-examples?
It hasn't received a release yet, but you can find it in SVN:
https://svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/wicket/branches/WICKET_1_2/
Martijn
On 8/3/06, Christofer Jennings [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sorry if this question is off topic, but has
Hi Eelco,
Thanks very much for the reply, i assume the problem is some class path
issue,
because the same set of files works the way it is supposed to work on
another machine.
Regards
Dipu
- Original Message -
From: Eelco Hillenius [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:
1 [X]
Btw.
We are using ${key} everywhere (customized markup parsing) and it's much
more convenient than wicket:message :-)
-Matej
Eelco Hillenius wrote:
For localized attributes - so that you don't have to attach attribute
modifiers all over the place for that sole reason - we have two
1 [ ]
2 [X]
input type=submit value=Default Value wicket:message=value:my_key/
If you want to express it without a default value, that would be
written as:
input type=submit value=my_key wicket:message=value/
And if Wicket is going to support multiple attributes:
input type=submit
But this:input type=submit value=my_key wicket:message=value/i really don't like.That is worsed of both worlds. You still don't have default/preview but you do have an
extra input attribute to parse. Ok knowing that something must be i18n is easier.But you are right about that it looks neather
Hi,
I like to have browser be automatically instructed not to cache anything
when in Wicket development mode. (I can't count the times I did not
remember to clear the cache after making some modification in a CSS and
couldt not find why the changes were not visible).
May be it's there and I
Hi,
the only 100% way is to deactivate the cache in the browser itself - as i
found out some versions dont count on that no-cache, if they get the data
for the same connection within short time, they usually use the chunks in
the 0-time cache, especially if its embedded (like CSS files).
the
hello,the code is like this ://final RadioGroup radioGroup = new RadioGroup(myValue);System.out.println(nat model: +
radioGroup.getModelObject()); //this //outputs null everytime - that's my problemfinal ListString optLabelList =
Hi,
I've got a form problem that I don't really now how to handle.
I've got three entities Person, PersonProperty and PropertyType.
A Person has a SetPersonProperty
A PersonProperty has a reference to a Person, a PropertyType and
contains a value.
What I would like to do is to edit a users
Just to follow up on this, I'd flag the fact that there's a rather
impressive code generation tool for iBATIS called Abator that can do a
*lot* of the basic work needed if you've got a DB table to point it
at!
I might even have to go back branch wicket-phonebook to show it at some stage!
/Gwyn
final RadioGroup radioGroup = new RadioGroup(myValue);System.out.println(nat model: +
radioGroup.getModelObject()); //this //outputs null everytime - that's my problemwhy wouldnt it output null? you havent set the model on the RadioGroup so it is null unless there is a compound model somewhere
yep this will indeed require model trickery which is not really that tricky.public class PersonPropertyModel extends AbstractModel { private final IModel person; private final IModel type;
//imagine a constructor here// Object getObject(Component c) { Person p=person.getObject(c); PropertyType
Thanks guys!
On 8/4/06, Martijn Dashorst [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I assume you have checked out wicket-portal-examples?
It hasn't received a release yet, but you can find it in SVN:
https://svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/wicket/branches/WICKET_1_2/
Martijn
On 8/3/06, Christofer Jennings
Still being worked on (by Janne, and possibly soon by Ate as well), so
the more people that can test/ play with it, the better.
Eelco
On 8/4/06, Julian Klappenbach [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks guys!
On 8/4/06, Martijn Dashorst [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I assume you have checked out
I created a table with wicket (1.2.1) using a
DataTable (DefaultDataTable) and a DataProvider
(SortableDataProvider).
My table has one column like PropertyColumn(new
Model(name'), name, name).
Is it possible to have a linkable name instead of a
plain name?
Here's the code:
ListIColumn
Well, for some reason I cannot render a page using MockupWebApplication. I get an exception saying that all components on the page failed to render. Log file, however, says that every one of them was rendered. I think that the problem lies inside
ComponentRequestTarget.respond(final RequestCycle
Thats exactly what I did...here is how I implemented it. I use this a lot, maybe slap it in extensions?wicket:panela href="" wicket:id=linkspan wicket:id=labellink/span/a
/wicket:panelpackage com.whatever;import wicket.extensions.markup.html.repeater.data.table.PropertyColumn;import
One more roadblock... RequestCycle constructor current ThreadLocal variable. There is no way to alter value of current RequestCycle after it was set in the constructor, which means that I cannot suspend current request cycle, generate my page into a string, and then resume the original request
yeah, the threadlocal context vars are prob going to be a problem. you can spin off a worker thread to do the render and wait for it.-IgorOn 8/4/06,
Alexei Sokolov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
One more roadblock... RequestCycle constructor current ThreadLocal variable. There is no way to alter value
You can introduce push/pop methods on RequestCycle in the next version of wicket.AlexOn 8/4/06, Igor Vaynberg
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:yeah, the threadlocal context vars are prob going to be a problem. you can spin off a worker thread to do the render and wait for it.
-IgorOn 8/4/06,
Alexei
request cycle is not the only problem. we have application and session threadlocals as well.-IgorOn 8/4/06, Alexei Sokolov
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:You can introduce push/pop methods on RequestCycle in the next version of wicket.
AlexOn 8/4/06, Igor Vaynberg
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
yeah, the
For Application Session you have set() methods. So, you can backup current values and then restore them.AlexOn 8/4/06, Igor Vaynberg
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:request cycle is not the only problem. we have application and session threadlocals as well.
-IgorOn 8/4/06, Alexei Sokolov
[EMAIL
we can add a set() to request cycle as well :)-IgorOn 8/4/06, Alexei Sokolov [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:For Application Session you have set() methods. So, you can backup current values and then restore them.
AlexOn 8/4/06, Igor Vaynberg
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
request cycle is not the only
And if you can do it in 1.2.2 it would be great.AlexOn 8/4/06, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:we can add a set() to request cycle as well :)
-IgorOn 8/4/06, Alexei Sokolov
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
For Application Session you have set() methods. So, you can backup current values and then
add an rfe so it doesnt slip, or of course a patch would be welcome :)-IgorOn 8/4/06, Alexei Sokolov
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:And if you can do it in 1.2.2 it would be great.
AlexOn 8/4/06, Igor Vaynberg
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
we can add a set() to request cycle as well :)
-IgorOn 8/4/06,
Thanks, I've used that (and the way I do it) in a new page on the Wiki
http://www.wicket-wiki.org.uk/wiki/index.php/Extensions:datatablelinks
/Gwyn
On 04/08/06, Joe Toth [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thats exactly what I did...here is how I implemented it. I use this a lot,
maybe slap it in
Thanks, I'll give it a try!
On 8/4/06, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
yep this will indeed require model trickery which is not really that
tricky.
public class PersonPropertyModel extends AbstractModel {
private final IModel person;
private final IModel type;
//imagine a
Hi All,Is it possible to remove unnecessary whitespaces (end-of-line space characters) from wicket output without changing original templates? I'm sorry if this question was answered before...Alex
-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash.
I think you're looking for IMarkupSettings#setCompressWhitespace
Eelco
On 8/4/06, Alexei Sokolov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi All,
Is it possible to remove unnecessary whitespaces (end-of-line space
characters) from wicket output without changing original templates? I'm
sorry if this
31 matches
Mail list logo
