For me it looks like your editor is not saving the html document in
UTF-8 format but your computers default locale. Which editor are you
using?
And
meta http-equiv=Content-Type content=text/html; charset=iso-8859-1 /
why iso-8859-1? As far as I can tell browsers, firewalls, filters etc
behave
It all has to do with wicket:head and panels being able to
contribute body onLoad=xxx attributes to the page. In order to
support that feature, a webmarkupcontainer is automatically created
and associated with the body tag of the page (in case of an exception,
on the exception page you can see a
This is a duplicate. I'm already working on it.
Juergen
-- Forwarded message --
From: SourceForge.net [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Nov 22, 2005 8:20 PM
Subject: [Wicket-develop] [ wicket-Patches-1364072 ] New Resource Stream Locator
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Patches item #1364072, was
On 11/22/05, Scott Sauyet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
== Scott Sauyet [EMAIL PROTECTED]
== Juergen Donnerstag [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thanks for the info, Juergen.
So my first question is why don't I get an exception when there is a
wicket:id attribute on the BODY tag and no corresponding
Two options (may be 3):
- see WebRequest/ResponseWithCryptedUrl for an example
- subclass WebRequestCycle.doParseRequest (a user hook)
- wait until we defined and implemented a revised URL strategy
Juergen
On 11/22/05, Nick Heudecker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I would like to create a URL
On 11/21/05, David Leangen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
I did some searching, but could only find info about i18n at the message
level. I am interested in i18n at the page level.
In other words, I have a site that needs to support more than one
locale. The user should be able to switch
On 11/21/05, Matej Knopp [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Having a component on every place localized text is, doesn't seem to be
a very good solution for me. As well as not be able to localize button
captions.
The solution I've chosen was to translate the markup during parsing
(using my own
As Igor mentioned. It is completely fine to use. Nothing wrong with it.
Juergen
On 11/20/05, Andrew Lombardi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So, I see all this talk of using static factory methods to generate a
Page, but what would be wrong with just using
add(new Link(myLink) {
public
On 11/18/05, Arto Arffman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It might be the intention, but if it is, there is an error with this
solution.
When the template is parsed each link-tag inside wicket:link is assigned
id named _autolink_. Later this tag is handled by AutoLinkResolver.
AutoLinkResolver:
BTW: when I did the 'custom form processing' I also wanted to call
Form.persistFormComponentData() but this is private. Should this be called
when Button.defaultFormProcessing = false.
use formComponent.setPersistent(true) instead. Wicket will do the rest.
Juergen
On 11/18/05, Laurent PETIT [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
yet another question concerning PasswordField ?
the getModelValue() returns and encrypted version, and the setModelValue()
decrypts it, why ?
The idea: prevent access to the plain password by accident. An attempt
to make wicket
Of course not.
Quote: BTW: when I did the 'custom form processing' I also wanted to call
Form.persistFormComponentData() but this is private. Should this be called
when Button.defaultFormProcessing = false.
I understood it to be a side note to your question (because of BTW).
You can not call
I can do it.
But why links are generated in every render???
2005/11/19, Juergen Donnerstag [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On 11/18/05, Arto Arffman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It might be the intention, but if it is, there is an error with this
solution.
When the template is parsed each link
autoAdd components like AutoLink are removed from the component
hierachie at the end of the render cycle. Hence, they can not be found
during the second render. Which makes me wonder, how/why you get the
exception. But may be I misunderstand you comment.
When this is done second time id will
/
+ a href = Page2.htmlPage2/abr/
/wicket:link
/p
/div
Now, click Page 2 and voila.
2005/11/19, Juergen Donnerstag [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
autoAdd components like AutoLink are removed from the component
hierachie
I can not test it right now, but it should work.
Besides
file.ro_RO.properties = file_ro_RO.properties
Juergen
On 11/17/05, Dorel Vaida [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm developing a localized web application, where the use can change the
language he wants the content to be displayed. However, if
The online page throws an exception.
Are you using a resource reference(!) and not a plain resource? Check
out PackagedResourceReference.
Juergen
On 11/17/05, Dorel Vaida [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all, I've deployed my first application with wicket. However, I have
a BIG annoying performance
No specific reason. Please open an RFE. Thanks
Juergen
On 11/15/05, Scott Sauyet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm using Wicket 1.1, and am trying Markup Inheritance for the first
time. I'm confused as to why wicket:child must be empty.
This:
wicket:child/
works fine, but this:
Label does not impose any restrictions on the tag it gets attached to.
What exactly does the runtime exception say?
Juergen
-- Forwarded message --
From: SourceForge.net [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Nov 15, 2005 6:26 PM
Subject: [Wicket-develop] [ wicket-Bugs-1357506 ] Can't add label
I'll check it later tonight
Juergen
On 11/15/05, Scott Sauyet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Phil Kulak wrote:
Here we go. Right now you'll get a RuntimeException. Change the ps to
divs and it's all good.
Confirmed. (Except that the attachment was the one with the DIV not the
P.) Running
Could be. I haven't tested it yet, but I think it is a good guess.
Juergen
On 11/15/05, Eelco Hillenius [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just an idea Juergen... could that be related to the fact that p is
one of those tags we allow to be unbalanced (doesn't need a closing
tag)?
Eelco
On 11/15/05,
Shouldn't we add such functionality to core? Or at least extension. I
understand that the way it is implemented is because he didn't want to
patch core, but I assume it can be put into core and made available to
users more easily: no specific request and response wrapper etc.
Juergen
On
why not add it inside the panel?
Juergen
On 11/14/05, Marco van de Haar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We built a custom Tooltip which extends panel. In order to make ik IE
compatible we need to render a simple IFRAME with some static content
after we render our component. We want to make our
Another option could be to use Image and override onComponentTag
Juergen
On 11/14/05, James Yong [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Johan Compagner jcompagner at gmail.com writes:
Of course you save youre files to a server you have to know the folder where
you have write access.
Then you can
Yes it is illegal. It was in the past as well, but we didn't check it.
In order to support per-component re-render there has to be a 1:1
match.
Juergen
On 11/14/05, Andrew Berman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I just did another test and did this:
div wicket:id=pagingNavigator/div
div
Agreed. Would you please of a bug for it. Thanks
Juergen
On 11/14/05, Andrew Berman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Since it is illegal, I think Wicket should be throwing an Exception instead
of yielding an OutOfMemoryError
--Andrew
On 11/14/05, Juergen Donnerstag [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
No. Wicket uses the locale information provided by the browser (http
header). And only if none is provided, it'll use the remembered one.
nl - is the standard dutch language
Some languages have dialects (not sure this is the right word.).
Think about like US english, UK english, NZ english etc.
i guess the hangman is a good example for how to do it.
Juergen
On 11/12/05, Arto Arffman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I have a ListView which has ImageButtons for editing. In IE those images
render slowly and it causes unpleasent visual effects. If the src attribute
would be exactly the
with exactly same src. Hangman repeats
different images (and they have different src attributes as they should
have)
2005/11/12, Juergen Donnerstag [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
i guess the hangman is a good example for how to do it.
Juergen
On 11/12/05, Arto Arffman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
PROTECTED] wrote:
Juergen Donnerstag wrote:
I'm all for making things easier for the user.
Perhaps Wicket could have something like this:
span wicket:id=message:myLabelHere/span
I'm not sure this makes sense. wicket:id is not a text to be displayed
anywhere
Igor,
Eclipse warns me that Discouraged access: The type
RenameResourceChange is not accessible due to restriction on required
library D:\Programme\eclipse-3.1\eclipse\plugins\org.eclipse.jdt.ui_3.1.1.jar
Any idea what I'm doing wrong?
What is the easiest way to deploy it. I know I can copy the
First draft version available in CVS HEAD
Juergen
On 11/10/05, Juergen Donnerstag [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've implemented it last night. Was fairly easy. I'll commt it tonight.
wicket:message key=my-keyDefault value/wicket:message
input wicket:message=attrName=my-key type=.../
As wicket
I guess the sources would have to be modified. I don't think it is
supported out-of-the box. Please bare in mind that these components
are experimental only and have been developed at the very beginning of
wicket. In the meantime the community has developed a much improved
paged / sortable table
I'm all for making things easier for the user.
Perhaps Wicket could have something like this:
span wicket:id=message:myLabelHere/span
I'm not sure this makes sense. wicket:id is not a text to be displayed
anywhere. It is a name which identifies a component. It definitely
won't work.
Even
I think you are right. I didn't know it is used in AbstractChoice as
well (and there seems to be no test for it either).
Juergen
On 11/9/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sorry, you were right.
YES, overriding of validation messages now works as expected.
BUT overring of other
and there are about 5 more source to be modified.
Juergen
On 11/9/05, Juergen Donnerstag [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think you are right. I didn't know it is used in AbstractChoice as
well (and there seems to be no test for it either).
Juergen
On 11/9/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED
?
Juergen
On 11/9/05, Dorel Vaida [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Juergen Donnerstag wrote:
I'm all for making things easier for the user.
Perhaps Wicket could have something like this:
span wicket:id=message:myLabelHere/span
I'm not sure this makes sense. wicket:id is not a text to be displayed
On 11/9/05, Andrew Berman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I like wicket:message key=../ as long as it would work how normal JSP
tags currently work. In other words, I would be able to do this:
input type=button value=wicket:message key='labelKey'//
or
script
alert(wicket:message
wicket:message key=..Default Text/wicket:message
and
input type=button value=message:key=my-key/
But i think the second one will be pretty hard.
Because then we have to parse the complete xml and see if in any attribute
something starts with message:key
even for non wicket tags as
there definitely needs to be a way to do it in attributes.
Here is the link for how Tapestry 4.0 does it:
http://jakarta.apache.org/tapestry/UsersGuide/localization.html
--Andrew
On 11/9/05, Juergen Donnerstag [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 11/9/05, Andrew Berman
could store one for every locale we encouter if that is
faster/better somehow
johan
On 11/9/05, Juergen Donnerstag [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We have different options (as explained in my first mail)
- do the replacement while loading the markup, prior to xml reading
it. The cached
good idea, except I would like to make a =. wicket:i18n=value=my-key
Juergen
On 11/9/05, Scott Sauyet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Johan Compagner wrote:
i can live with:
wicket:message key=..Default Text/wicket:message
This makes sense.
input type=button value=message:key=my-key/
I
changes when they alter there messages
So suddenly we also have to watch those??
johan
On 11/9/05, Juergen Donnerstag [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 11/9/05, Johan Compagner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
if you do the replacement at parse time.
then every html in the markup cache
/
uses the same kind of notation.
Als value=My Val can then be seen as the default value if the value is
not found for the given locale?
That would be nice i think.
johan
On 11/9/05, Juergen Donnerstag [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
good idea, except I would like to make a =. wicket:i18n=value
This is wrong
...
wicket:extend
span wicket:id=subLabelsub label/span
/wicket:extend
wicket:child/...
must be
wicket:extend
span wicket:id=subLabelsub label/span
wicket:child/
/wicket:extend
Juergen
On 11/10/05, Ramnivas Laddad [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I am
I think Eelco fixed it already in HEAD
Juergen
On 11/8/05, Marco van de Haar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That would, ofcourse, be the perfect solution. Do I have to report a bug
for this?
I guess it would make sense to provide just a single implementation to
be used by both components,
Try using jetty and the jetty-launcher plugin for eclipse. That is realy easy.
Juergen
On 11/8/05, Ralf Ebert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Which version of Wicket are you using? Lastest HEAD? You're not using
the component re-render feature, do you?
no, Wicket 1.1.
It is a redirect you
You may not even need Jetty or Tomcat. Take a look at the unit tests
which make use of WicketTester. It provides all the mock objects and
wireing required.
Juergen
On 11/8/05, Juergen Donnerstag [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Try using jetty and the jetty-launcher plugin for eclipse. That is realy
yet another way would be to enable debug logs on
wicket.Component=DEBUG. You should see messages like Begin render
... and End render The last Begin render .. should be of
interest.
Juergen
On 11/8/05, Juergen Donnerstag [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You may not even need Jetty or Tomcat. Take
, Juergen Donnerstag [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If you are sure that you are realy not interested in path=xxx, may be
it worth if you create your own WebRequest/WebResponse (see
WebRequestCrawlerSaver for an example what can be done)
Juergen
On 11/8/05, pepone pepone [EMAIL PROTECTED
On 11/8/05, Jeff Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How are the base url's different? In all cases, aren't the base url's the
following?
www.wicket-library.com/wicket-examples/template
My desire is to have url's that are as simple as possible. Long url's are
problems for nontechnical users
you know you can have that today by implementing it yourself? Take a
look WebRequestCrawlerSave and you'll see that you can easily change
bookmarkablePage to page; you can make it case insensitive etc.
Juergen
On 11/8/05, Dan Gould [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jeff Miller wrote:
I considered
What is the use case for that change? Why do need to IModel with
bookmarkable links?
Juergen
-- Forwarded message --
From: SourceForge.net [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Nov 7, 2005 8:36 AM
Subject: [Wicket-develop] [ wicket-Feature Requests-1350014 ] Add
IModel in BookmarablePageLink
It is already in CVS HEAD, though not yet accesible through a URL. The
method to call RequestCycle.render(component). It is the first
implementation, so please bare with us if is not perfect yet. Hence,
we appreciate any feedback.
Juergen
On 11/7/05, Johan Compagner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
in
Please see the signin2 example.
Juergen
On 11/7/05, pepone pepone [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello i have a form in my border to do login/logout
I wan to redirect user to same url before login the url that i use
are allways bookmarkable and i wan to mantain the url whith the same
parameters
The page must be rendered completly at least once. Thus components can
only be re-rendered. src/test/.../Simple*Test provides some examples.
Juergen
On 11/7/05, Janne Hietamäki [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Juergen Donnerstag wrote:
It is already in CVS HEAD, though not yet accesible through a URL
Donnerstag [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The page must be rendered completly at least once. Thus components can
only be re-rendered. src/test/.../Simple*Test provides some examples.
Juergen
On 11/7/05, Janne Hietamäki [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Juergen Donnerstag wrote:
It is already in CVS HEAD, though
On 11/7/05, Janne Hietamäki [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Juergen Donnerstag wrote:
To answer you question: components must be attached to a page. This is
required to find the markup. I don't think we are able to support all
different kind of components without an attached page. Think about
On 11/7/05, Johan Compagner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Not a markup container but a panel (that is besides page the one with there
own markup)
should be able to render itself completely standalone.
But maybe i am mistaken? juergen?
Page and Panel are the only components that could be rendered
Well, yes, I could add all those components to my Page, but that can be
few hundred Panels, and that sound like an overkill to construct.
Specially when probably only few of them will ever be rendered.
Not sure I understand your comment. Lets say you have a standard
wicket application with
Maybe RequestCycle.onBegin/EndRequest is what you are looking for?
Juergen
On 11/7/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Igor,
here is something i threw together that solves the deserialization
andability to use the new operator to create pages.
thanks for your work on this.
I guess it would make sense to provide just a single implementation to
be used by both components, avoiding problems while trying to keep
them in sync.
Juergen
On 11/7/05, Ruud Booltink [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think adding this code to WebComponent's renderHead() would solve this
problem.
you may take a look at WebRequestWithCryptedUrl or
WebRequestCrawlerSave as well. They are experimental only, but may
point you into the right direction. Any improvements on this code are
of course wellcome.
Juergen
On 11/7/05, Jeff Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
putClassAlias is close to
On 11/7/05, Steven McNeel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
I think I've read all of the pertinent articles in the documentation,
especially
http://www.wicket-wiki.org.uk/wiki/index.php/Lifecycle. On
each request to my app, I first need to run a database query,the parameters
of which are
y.RequiredValidator
Obviously x.y.y.RequiredValidator and y.y.RequiredValidator are the
wrong prefixKeys to look up.
Sven
Juergen Donnerstag wrote:
It shouldn't. I guess the important point is that
ComponentStringResourceLoade does not get the FormComponent (text1)
You don't start looking for text1
is not
bookmarkable
what i want is keep the previous bookmarkable Url
continueToOriginal not make sense here because i haven´t a separted
singin page that i redirect to using void
redirectToInterceptPage(Page
page)
On 11/7/05, Juergen Donnerstag
It is a redirect you do and the response gets rendered. Based on the
stack trace something is wrong in one of the headers. Within
head/head or wicket:head/wicket:head. In order to track it
down: set a breakpoint at
wicket.markup.html.HtmlHeaderContainer.resolve
(HtmlHeaderContainer.java:196) and
is required
However, if I move above messages into global MyWebApplication.properties,
the message I got become: bookId is required, which use componentId
instead of defined label: myForm.bookId.
Is this a bug ?
On 11/8/05, Juergen Donnerstag [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It works on my side. I
of the validated
component in prefixId? e.g.
form1.text1.text1.RequiredValidator
But maybe I'm wrong - so I'll better give it a try on Monday.
Thanks
Sven
Juergen Donnerstag wrote:
Repetition: Message retrieval for the following scenario -
form-panel-textfield - is currently
No, but I work wih CVS only. I don't download the jars. And I modify
project.xmll to use the snapshot jar which I build myself.
Juergen
On 11/6/05, jan_bar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I use DiffUtil. The extension may help. You don't have troubles with it?
Jan
Juergen Donnerstag [EMAIL
results. It
should not break because of changed line endings. I have to write comparator
that will take different line endings into account.
Jan
Juergen Donnerstag [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I think it can be solved at all. What ever the OS of the container
What kind of exception? ClassCastException? If yes, than you most
likely don't use application.getSessionFactory8) to create a session
of type MySession.
Juergen
On 11/5/05, Manuel Corrales [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi, i want to extends WebSession and do a simple session managment like in
the
/5/05, Juergen Donnerstag [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What kind of exception? ClassCastException? If yes, than you most
likely don't use application.getSessionFactory8) to create a session
of type MySession.
Juergen
On 11/5/05, Manuel Corrales [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi, i want
Well, Wicket is not a templating engine like velocity or freemarker
but wicket supports them. Please see wicket-contrib-freemarker and
wicket-contrib-velocity, both are projects in wicket-stuff.
Juergen
On 11/5/05, James Yong [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
yongbl i_yongbl at yahoo.com.sg writes:
May we have the stack trace and may be the (stripped down) sources as
well. Thanks
Juergen
On 11/5/05, Manuel Corrales [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes, the class is on the same package. As soon as i can i post some code and
the error description. Any other idea of what can be??
I've tried the
Which version are you using? There is a test in cvs head which tests
it and it seems to work. Defaults can be defined if the key is just
RequiredValidator (the validators class name without any prefix). In
case no other key is found, it'll be used as default.
Juergen
On 11/3/05, Matej Knopp
That is part of 1.2 and currently under development
Juergen
On 11/3/05, Laurent PETIT [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
I wonder if it is possible to create mutable form components, e.g. for
my application the same administration page is shown but depending on
the rights of the user, an
anything, I get
java.util.MissingResourceException: Unable to find resource:
RequiredValidator
But I don't know, for which validator the message is missing.
-Matej
Juergen Donnerstag wrote:
Which version are you using? There is a test in cvs head which tests
it and it seems to work. Defaults
Did you take a look at wicket-examples already? Compared to what is
explained on the page you pointed to, it is very easy in Wicket and
IMO much more flexibel.
Juergen
On 11/2/05, Laurent PETIT [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 11/2/05, Eelco Hillenius [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That's easy to do in
() in order to rebuild the ListItems.
* If you nest a ListView in a Form, ALLWAYS set this property to true,
as
* otherwise validation will not work properly.
*/
private boolean optimizeItemRemoval = false;
Juergen
On 11/2/05, Juergen Donnerstag [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
Anyway, I am now trying to include my javascript files in the way
But this page only really describes css in any detail. The approach does
not appear to be exactly the same for javascript. For those like me who
are doing this for the first time and haven't got it yet, it's not
quite enough to
Yes, you'll find it in wicket-extensions and an example in wicket-examples
Juergen
On 11/1/05, David Liebeherr [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I guess i will find this all in the CVS versions, do i?
Thank you very much,
Dave
Igor Vaynberg wrote:
Just checked in my first pass at implementation.
Is it not possible to extend an extension with the wicket:child and
wicket:extension tags?
It is supported.
BaseBase.html
baseBase: before
wicket:child/
baseBase: after
Base.html
extension: before (will be ignored)
wicket:extend
base before
wicket:child/
base after
yes your are right. External documentation needs to be
improved, thought the javadoc should be fairly good.
Sorry, didn't mean to sound like I was complaining.
It is not complaining, it is making us aware what needs to be improved.
I'll try to help out a bit on the wiki if I have the
Please open a bug for it.
Juergen
On 11/2/05, Andrew Lombardi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've been trying to use the WebResponse/RequestCrawlerSave functionality,
and have migrated up to 1.1 in hopes this was fixed. But I keep getting
this IllegalArgumentException. Anyone know what this could
I agree, it should be improved. Thanks for the information.
Juergen
On 11/1/05, David Leangen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 2005-10-31 at 17:05 -0800, Igor Vaynberg wrote:
if you autolink to a page that doesnt exist you get an npe, maybe
we should dress it up with a better exception?
On 10/30/05, Iman RahmatiZadeh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Argh ! Unit testing is way too hard in wicket. I'm using a custom
implementation of WebSession in my application. The problem arises when I
use the MockWebApplication class for testing, which creates and uses
WebSession for tests and my
abstract way of validating the markup than just a string
equality check.
Regards,
Iman
On 10/30/05, Juergen Donnerstag [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/30/05, Iman RahmatiZadeh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Argh ! Unit testing is way too hard in wicket. I'm using a custom
implementation
This doesn't happen with CVS head any more. When you look at your
stack trace the root cause says Caused by:
wicket.WicketRuntimeException: Markup not found. Component class:
example.EditPricing. With cvs head that is a MarkupNotFoundException
which will not be catched on its way up the call stack
I remove final from class. It is in cvs head now.
Juergen
On 10/29/05, Janne Hietamäki [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Johan Compagner wrote:
but that looks to me like a AttributeModifier
On 10/28/05, *Janne Hietamäki* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Juergen
Are you sure you are not confused by log.error() outputs? They are
generated during tests which deliberately cause exceptions. The
associated unit tests catch (expect) the exception and test against
it.
Juergen
On 10/29/05, Andrew Berman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I just built HEAD and noticed
Exactly. The summary junit reports says there are failure of the
TimeOfDay issue (see related mail thread). But the stack traces
printed during the tests are deliberate because we try not only to
test good situation, but error handling as well.
Juergen
On 10/29/05, Martijn Dashorst [EMAIL
On 10/28/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Regarding the newly added 'around functionality' of WebRequestCycle and
WebPage.
I certainly welcome this addition in the background of Spring integration and
AOP, but I see some problems with this implementation.
First of all we now
Did you open a bug or RFE already? If not, please do so, otherwise
there is always a risk that it'll be forgotten.
Juergen
On 10/27/05, Martijn Dashorst [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1, if it doesn't break stuff.
Martijn
On 10/27/05, Juergen Donnerstag [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Would you
Why? What is your use case?
Juergen
On 10/28/05, Janne Hietamäki [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Class wicket.markup.html.navigation.paging.PagingNavigationLink is
final, but
wicket.markup.html.navigation.paging.PagingNavigationIncrementLink is
not. Could these both be non-final?
Thanks.
I'm also +1 on moving OGNL into extension
I guess this is: person.children.[0].name and Johan already mentioned it.
I think Johan mentioned, it'll be person.children.0.name
Juergen
On 10/27/05, Alexandru Popescu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
#: Martijn Dashorst changed the world a bit at a time
it
is clearly described
somewhere ;-).
./alex
--
.w( the_mindstorm )p.
On 10/27/05, Juergen Donnerstag [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm also +1 on moving OGNL into extension
I guess this is: person.children.[0].name and Johan already mentioned
it.
I think Johan mentioned, it'll
Would you please open a bug for it. Thanks.
As long as long as no one else on the list is against fixing it that
way, I'll try and put it into 1.1.
Juergen
On 10/27/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Looks to me you are right. We didn't think about a Panel being a child
of a Form.
May be I'm wrong, but I think it does not solve the problem. The
current exception messages says Markup of type 'html' for component
'wicket.markup.html.basic.SimplePage' not found or invalid. = (the
last two words: OR INVALID). And the the causing exception say exactly
which tag, which file,
Looks to me you are right. We didn't think about a Panel being a child
of a Form. I guess it was our assumption that FormComponents are
always a direct child of a Form.
I'm currently not able to look into the code. Do we traverse up the
component tree already, like you do? Isn't there a risk that
501 - 600 of 907 matches
Mail list logo
