I'd be suprised if wicket changed it. Based on the code, we do not
touch div tags and it is no wicket tag. Are you sure wicket changed
it?
Juergen
On 8/27/05, Johan Compagner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> please op een bug report if you see something in the generation of html
> that is wrong or st
hmm? the body is "" isn't it?
On 8/26/05, Phil Kulak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yea, but also has no body.
>
> On 8/26/05, Juergen Donnerstag <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > We used to have that some time ago and users complaint about the
> > m
please open a bug for it.
thanks
Juergen
On 8/26/05, pepone pepone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> wicket:link tag is not removed when i set
> getSettings().setStripWicketTags(true) 1.1.b3
>
>
> ---
> SF.Net email is Sponsored by the Better Softw
We used to have that some time ago and users complaint about the
magic, which didn't fit there use case. Currently it is easy: we do
not automatically convert into . We do not change any
tag automatically. And because a has no body, onComponentBody
is not called either.
Juergen
On 8/26/05, Eelc
Yes, there seems to be a problem with components inside .
Juergen
On 8/26/05, pepone pepone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I trying what Stefan lindner says wicth wicket.1.1-b3 but is not
> working for me It´s only render childs head
>
> any ideas? thanks
>
> On 8/25/05, Stefan Lindner <[EMAIL P
Actually it should be up-to-date, but may there is little mistake.
Might be that it is addToHeader(new Label("label")), but I could be
wrong. I try to evaluate it tonight.
Juergen
On 8/25/05, Ingram Chen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Dear friends,
>
> I want a feature that inherit both and li
provide a french version of PageExpiredErrorPage_FR_fr.html in
wcket/markup/html/pages is one option. Providing your own Page through
registering on Apps (or Apps Setting) is another option.
Juergen
On 8/25/05, Dzenan Ridjanovic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> In Wicket-1.1-b3 sign out (get
Right. It is meant only for resources on the class path.
Juergen
On 8/25/05, Phil Kulak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> But that doesn't work for resources that are not on the classpath.
>
> On 8/23/05, Juergen Donnerstag <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Another al
I fixed it. But please be aware that we strongly suggest you use maven
to build wicket.
Juergen
On 8/24/05, Scott Sauyet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It's not a big thing, but the Javadoc task in the 1.1-b3 Ant build file
> is expecting packages named "com.voicetribe.*", and it failed since
> the
ue, hrefReplacement));
> >> addToHeader(css);
> >>
> >>This is definitely simpler than the example in the wiki, and looks
> >>pretty straightforward.
> >>
> >>Is my understanding correct?
> >>
> >>Thanks for the help,
>
Wicket provides several difference means to reference css and js
files. Unfortunately the documentation is perfect, ... What exactly is
your problem or your question. In the simplest case use plain (X)HTML
without any wicket specific code. . The examples may serve as references as
well.
Juergen
O
I'm +1 on changing this as well
Juergen
On 8/24/05, Anders Peterson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Eelco Hillenius wrote:
>
> > I find it perfectly natural that the 'name'
> > property of a null object gets me null when working with Ognl. In
> > fact, that's another good reason to support this; al
And I think the eclipse plugin provided by Joni is meant to help in
that area as well.
Juergen
On 8/24/05, Eelco Hillenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Nothing written you to my knowledge. You could start looking at both
> the unit tests we provide with Wicket and Wicket-examples (that use
> jWeb
ne condition i don't want to render quite a large part. of it.
> Then i could build up all the components
> Or just insert one empty markupcontainer that has no childs but is just
> invisible..
>
> I like that.. It even shaves of page sizes.
> But ofcourse we can have a choi
On 8/24/05, Anders Peterson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Isn't that strict checking something that should be done when compiling
> (someone has the time to code a wicket builder for eclipse) and not at
> runtime?
>
1) you suggest to compare java code and markup at compile time?
2) than you need t
we could do, it seems not to be a large change, but ...
Currently users (designers and developers) can be sure that wicket
throws an exception if there not a 1:1 mapping between all wicket tag
(wicket:id and wrote:
> ehmm it does get renderd.. Only the output doesn't get streamed (all
> rendering
1 org.eclipse.osgi 2005-08-23 23:19:53.34
!MESSAGE Missing required bundle org.eclipse.gef_0.0.0.
no problem
Juergen
On 8/24/05, Joni Suominen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 2005-08-24 at 09:15 +0200, Juergen Donnerstag wrote:
> > Doesn't help. But never mind. I wanted
Doesn't help. But never mind. I wanted to move to 3.1 final anyway.
Juergen
On 8/24/05, Joni Suominen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 2005-08-24 at 08:53 +0200, Juergen Donnerstag wrote:
> > I used to eclipse update link to install it on eclipse 3.1M3. Now
> > ecl
I used to eclipse update link to install it on eclipse 3.1M3. Now
eclipse doesn't start anymore. It points me to an error log full of
exceptions. As eclipse doesn't start anymore I've no clue how to
revert back. Which eclipse version are you using?
Juergen
On 8/24/05, Joni Suominen <[EMAIL PROTEC
Another alternativ is , though the current version in CVS
is flawed for none-html, but has already been fixed on my laptop.
Wicket will than create the necessary Link components at runtime for
you. So the css file and images remain in the directory of your java
or html file, keeping previewability
hopefully it does.
Juergen
On 8/23/05, Nick Heudecker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Does beta3 fix the problems with DatePicker as well? This is
> regarding the javascript not getting inserted into the head of the
> rendered page.
>
>
> ---
>
please see the linkomatic example for the various links available.
wicket:link is limited that the html must either be in the same
directory, a subdirectory (subpackage) or you provide an absolute path
like /mydir/my.html.
Juergen
On 8/23/05, pepone pepone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello
>
>
On 8/23/05, Anders Peterson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Juergen Donnerstag wrote:
>
> > I'm not very fond of replacing the model object, but I guess sometimes
> > it is the only or the better choice.
>
> What do you normally do? Having a panel that, in the sa
the models?
>
> Should I create the model in the initModel method - I trust it is not
> called as long as the component is invisible.
>
> Is replacing a model's object a "normal" thing to do?
>
> /Anders
>
> Juergen Donnerstag wrote:
> > You could us
You could use setVisible(true/false). Create your markup and panel
class with all the different data, assign a wicket:id to all tags to
be either visible or not and control visibility by your java code.
Juergen
On 8/23/05, Anders Peterson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Here's a more specific case..
On 8/22/05, Ralf Ebert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > where do you reference the component (from below) in your markup
> > (either parent or child) above? Somewhere I'd expect > wicket:id="myJavascriptComponent />
>
> I skipped over that as there is another panel markup file... Here you
On 8/22/05, Ralf Ebert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > must be ...
> > Everything else doesn't make sense and is not supported
> ok, I thought is a replacement for , mainly
> because of an example you gave for component javascript:
>
>
>
>function testFunction(select) { ale
On 8/22/05, Ralf Ebert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > It'll NOT merge with
> Sorry, I have to admit, I don't like that. This makes the rules for
> header generation far two complicated. I would favor something more
> transparent like: wicket:head is for runtime and gets into the
> header
I currently get a error on our wiki. It says:
Fatal error: main(): Failed opening required 'LanguageUtf8.php'
(include_path='.:/home/groups/w/wi/wicket/htdocs/wiki:/home/groups/w/wi/wicket/htdocs/wiki/includes:/home/groups/w/wi/wicket/htdocs/wiki/languages')
in /home/groups/w/wi/wicket/htdocs/wiki
On 8/22/05, Ralf Ebert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > there is definitely something wrong about your wiki entry
> > http://wicket.sourceforge.net/wiki/index.php/Markup_inheritance . It
> > [...]
> > except for autolink generated CSS url. But that has nothing to do with
> > header component
On 8/21/05, Dan Gould <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Dan,
> >
> > what is the reason that you manually set the cookies? Why don't you
> > use FormComponent.setPersistence(true) which should be all you need
> > for TextBoxes etc.. Wicket stores the cookies and reloads them into
> > the model automa
Dan,
what is the reason that you manually set the cookies? Why don't you
use FormComponent.setPersistence(true) which should be all you need
for TextBoxes etc.. Wicket stores the cookies and reloads them into
the model automatically.
Juergen
On 8/21/05, Dan Gould <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
is not limited to panels. It should basically work with
all components. It it doesn't, than we should try to extend that it
does. FormComponent is derived from WebContainer, and I think that
should work already. Did you try it already?
Juergen
On 8/21/05, Ralf Ebert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> 2) Question: The component does some javascript handling like this:
>
> @Override
> public void printHead(HtmlHeaderContainer container) {
> super.printHead(container);
> container.getResponse().write(" \">"+
> "function testFunction(select) {"+
>
mo. The advantage of
> calling setVisible instead of overriding isVisible is that by calling,
> the state change will be recorded which has the effect that the
> back-button will be better supported. If that's important in your case.
>
> Eelco
>
> Juergen Donnerstag wr
you may override Form.onRender() or Form.onComponenTagBody(). First do
your check and set components invisible/visible and than call the
super implementation.
Juergen
On 8/20/05, Ralf Ebert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm currently building a form which has some components which are not
There is something called ExternalLink. It is does not allow arbitrary
body content, on text, but may it is sufficient already.
Juergen
On 8/19/05, Johan Compagner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> if find a tag as a panel very strange
> Designer just do this:
> Text
>
> In wicket we suddenly have t
lication to it, or the
> SpringContextLocator is implemented as a singleton/factory requiring the page
> to pass the request to it.
>>
>> I was just wondering if this could be a plausable
> alternative since it seems like a lot of overhead just to get to the
> applicationContext.
email in the archiv (gmane).
Juergen
On 8/19/05, Juergen Donnerstag <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm sure there more way to integrate with Spring and may be better
> ones as well (may depend on circumstances though).
>
> Most users tend to prefer a a combination of what yo
ervlet
> to then assign the application to it, or the SpringContextLocator is
> implemented as a singleton/factory requiring the page to pass the request to
> it.
>
> I was just wondering if this could be a plausable alternative since it seems
> like a lot of overhead just to
please have a look at sourceforge project wicket-stuff which contains
additional higher level component. It contains also a modul with
different alternatives on how to integrate with Spring. I think there
is even a example application in there.
Juergen
On 8/19/05, Koen Serry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> w
DatePicker is a Panel and DatePicker.html contains the header section
which is automatically copied to the pages output. Because this is
something we have worked on recently I suggest you use cvs head and
than try it again.
Where is where you add the DatePicker to? Do you add it to a Border compo
Example taken from wicket-examples. I think the javadoc related to the
resource classes is not bad, what I think is lacking is a overview on
Resources, ResourceLocators, ResourceReferences etc..
return new ResourceReference(Letter.class, asString() + (enabled ?
"_enabled" : "_disabled"))
{
pro
could be both. The exception is related to markup inheritance. please
create a (stripped down) test case (see test/src) and I'll try to fix
it (if it is an bug in wicket)
Juergen
On 8/16/05, Gili <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Is this a bug in Wicket? Or if it is a bug in my own co
wicketservlet.getlastmodified -> Packageresource.getresourcestream ->
packageClass.getClassloader() == null ?!?!?!
Juergen
On 8/15/05, Juergen Donnerstag <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm experiencing similar problems. Seems to be related to the
> classloader issue discus
I'm experiencing similar problems. Seems to be related to the
classloader issue discussed today.
Juergen
On 8/15/05, Dariusz Wojtas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The code that worked in the morning, retrieved from HEAD, does not
> work anymore now.
> Just a call to DatePicker resources produces a
We did it for many classes already, but obviously not all. Would it
possible for you to provide a patch and we put it into cvs?
Juergen
On 8/15/05, Dariusz Wojtas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I think it would be a good idea to add meaningful toString() methods
> in some places.
> Some id
) instead?
>
> Does anyone have an example of this?
>
> Thanks.
>
> --Johann
>
>
> --- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> >
> > Message: 3
> > Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2005 21:25:30 +0200
> > From: Juergen Donnerstag <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To
ll or more likely as it is available in PHP as well,
some other means. May be you can make a wicket component similar to
our existing file upload component and contribute it to the project?
Juergen
On 8/15/05, Michael Glauche <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Juergen Donnerstag wrote:
> > an
and it works. I just tested it. What I'm missing though is a cancel button.
Juergen
On 8/15/05, Graeme J Sweeney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 15 Aug 2005, Johan Compagner wrote:
>
> > How would you do that in a browser...
> > Because the browser is also on the other hand still posting th
I agree, it is a good component for extensions.
Juergen
On 8/15/05, Eelco Hillenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I like the component! Customization could be a bit easier maybe.
>
> I think this would be a great component to put in extensions too. What
> do you think?
>
On 8/15/05, Seth Ladd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 8/14/05, Jonathan Locke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > fixed in head.
>
> Great! Can you explain the relationship between XHTML, HTML, and
> rendering components? What is The Wicket Way? Is it configurable?
> Or is the idea to subclass/o
I tried different concepts to integrate with a database and wasn't
very happy with any. Though I admit I used it to learn more about it
as well as a bit about AndroMda and Spring. Next thing is to use Jons
wicket-database classes.
Juergen
On 8/15/05, Eelco Hillenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I
what exactly do you mean by template page? A Panel or are you using
Velocity? The header support is still fairly new and there might still
be some bugs. Today I committed to HEAD an updated version. Are you
able to test it with HEAD. If not, please send me the (stripped down)
sources and see what I
> I see,
>
> The 2nd question was posted before I got the answer for the 1st one.
> There is some delay before messages from the list are delivered.
>
> Quite important part of the wicket-examples application is 'displaytag'.
> Is it also something made 'ad hoc', just to show the idea of how it
>
Dariusz,
as I mentioned. CsvView and the others are just a empty frames.
Juergen
On 8/14/05, Dariusz Wojtas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> One more question on exporting.
> In the app i use utf-8, and after reading/applying the wiki
> information - works perfectly.
> But the data exported with Csv
Are talking about the displaytag example and the exporter therein? The
exporter in there is very rudimentary only and actually not part of
Wicket. It was just meant to be a very very rough implementation.
Juergen
On 8/14/05, Dariusz Wojtas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have successfully added ta
Yes that is my understanding as well. It is just about the name. E.g.
/wicket/examples/HelloWorld.html to /helloworld.html or whatever you
like. And that is one string into another.
Juergen
On 8/14/05, Johan Compagner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Dynamically.. that is something we (jan and i) alr
I put it on my todo list. I'm currently cleaning up the markup
inheritance and header support sources which I would like to finish
first
Juergen
On 8/14/05, Jonathan Locke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> maybe juergen would be willing to do this from our comments... he's the
> markup guy these da
Gili,
there is definitely something wrong about your wiki entry
http://wicket.sourceforge.net/wiki/index.php/Markup_inheritance . It
may work like that but it is definitely not intended and it is not how
we want it to be used. What you do manually should be done by wicket.
You (users) normally do
>/* How do I do this in wicket ?
>
>resp.setHeader("Content-disposition",
>"attachment; filename=" +
>document.getFileName());
>*/
public class MyPage extends WebPage
{
protected void configureResponse()
{
super.configureR
My todo list is currently growing and I have only limited access to
CVS and limited time. not sure much I do until beginning of next week.
Juergen
On 8/11/05, Martijn Dashorst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Unknown... probably somewhere early next week. It depends on how much
> stuff is fixed.
>
>
It is fixed in HEAD already
Juergen
On 8/10/05, David Liebeherr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi when i try the wicket example on:
> http://www.wicket-library.com/wicket-examples/library?path=2
>
> i get the following error:
> wicket.markup.MarkupException: Unable to find component with id 'books
What is a compiling classloader used for? How would Wicket benefit
from it? What are the use cases?
Juergen
On 8/10/05, Nick Heudecker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> One idea that's being introduced in StrutsTi is a compiling class
> loader. Has this been considered for Wicket?
>
>
> --
Please see the various test cases for how to use. Eelco is using it as well.
Juergen
On 8/9/05, Gili <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
>Is there a CSS contribution live example anywhere? I'm trying to
> following the directions in
> http://wicket.sourceforge.net/wiki/index.php/JavaScrip
markup inheritance and header support is something completely
different. Header support is basically for panel components which like
to contribute to the page's head section.
Inheritance is vey similar to Border, but IMO simpler to understand.
The extended markup might be like
my extension
a
Dzenan,
I didn't walk through your code, but the NullPointerException while
loading a class makes me suspicious. Are you sure the spelling of the
parameters and there values are all correct?
Juergen
On 8/8/05, Dzenan Ridjanovic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have tried to use the application con
anyone interested in an old wicket based version of appfuse? It is
about 6 months old because I didn't find the time to maintain it. It
doesn't have all the nice features you are looking at, as it was meant
to proove that wicket works with "real" application, but may be it is
a starting point for y
gt; >> at
> >> com.caucho.server.dispatch.ServletFilterChain.doFilter(ServletFilterChain.java:99)
> >>
> >> at
> >> com.caucho.server.webapp.WebAppFilterChain.doFilter(WebAppFilterChain.java:163)
> >>
> >> at
> >> com.caucho.server.dispatch.Ser
put both css file refs in your page markup and depending on IE or whatever call
WebMarkupContainer.setVisible(isIE())
Juergen
On 8/7/05, Gili <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I don't think CSS support in Wicket is able to do what I need. I
> understand the usefulness of CSS contribut
t; >>>>>>>> com.caucho.server.session.SessionImpl.removeAttribute(SessionImpl.java:376)
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> at
> >>>>>>>> wicket.protocol.http.WebSession.removeAttribute(WebSession.java:154)
> &
just invalidate the session
Juergen
On 8/7/05, David Liebeherr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all!
>
> How can i end a session and start a new one for logout function for exmaple?
> Is there a method in wicket for this?
>
> Thanx,
> Dave
>
>
>
That is not a matter of Wicket (Struts, Webwork). You have to
configure the servlet container (jetty, tomcat, etc)
Juergen
On 8/7/05, David Liebeherr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all!
>
> How can i set wicket to only use URL-Rewriting for sessions rather than
> cookies no matter if the
> bro
I think the point is, for the user we want to make it as easy as
possible. The solution described by Johan, IMO is possible, but of
course not very nice. It would fix the Formfeedback problem, but we
should think about a more general solution, as this is a problem not
only for FeedbackPanels. It mi
yes I agree, it seems to be a common problem for people migrating from
1.0 to 1.1, which is why the exception message is like
"If the root exception says something like "A child with id '_header'
already exists" then you most likely forgot to override autoAdd() in
your bordered page component."
M
r wrote:
> >>
> >>> hmm if you ask me making that customizable doesn't make much sense.
> >>> why is that interesting?? I still think we shouldn't be bother to
> >>> much how the urls look like
> >>> Except make it short and readable as poss
yo can't. If there is wicket:id there MUST be a component. What you
can do is using setVisible(true/false) to switch the visibility of a
component on or off. Visibility == gets rendered and written to the
output.
Juergen
On 8/4/05, David Liebeherr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I have a pa
you've several options.
a) create a simple Label like component which you attach to e.g.
WebRequestWithCryptedUrl is highly experimental and still based on the
old URL parameter scheme. And yes, making "secure" customizable does
make sense.
Juergen
On 8/4/05, David Liebeherr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Why does WebRequestWithCryptedUrl uses a string named "secure" for the masked
>
sorry, sometimes there are just to many mail. You are right, it fails
on http:/www.wicket-library.com as well.
Juergen
On 8/2/05, Jan Bares <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> nobody answered this question, it works for you? The same problem is present
> in Wicket 1.1b2, at least on my machine.
Model. Anything else that comes into your mind?
Juergen
On 8/2/05, David Liebeherr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Juergen Donnerstag wrote:
> > Sorry, I guess except the javadoc there is no extra doc on it. What is
> > your question? Signin and Signin2 and not very complex.
>
Sorry, I guess except the javadoc there is no extra doc on it. What is
your question? Signin and Signin2 and not very complex.
Juergen
On 8/1/05, David Liebeherr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is there any documentation/tutorial available for the Signin Exmaple?
> I realy have some problems underst
> Is there any exmaple for using the Loop Component as Model in a ListView
> avaiable?
I guess you misunderstood something. Loop is similar but simpler than
ListView. Loop, like ListView is a component.
Juergen
On 8/1/05, David Liebeherr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Is there any exmaple
May be the Loop component is the right thing for you than. It is
almost like a plain iterator.
Juergen
On 8/1/05, David Liebeherr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> i have a class Persons which has a method getPerson(int index) and
> getSize() (which returns the number of Persons).
> Now i
It is only the formcomponent's value, not the form, which is stored in
a cookie. A typical use case is to remember the login and password to
provide a rememberMe functionality and signin2 actually does it like
that. Very straight forward, very easy to use.
Juergen
On 8/1/05, Phil Kulak <[EMAIL PR
Gili,
are you sure you need it? You didn't say what you try to do. But in
many cases FormComponent.setPersistent(true/false) should do it as
well.
Juergen
On 7/30/05, Matej Knopp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> page.getWebRequestCycle().getWebResponse().getHttpServletResponse()
>
> -Matej
>
> Gil
it is already in head
Juergen
On 7/30/05, Matej Knopp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This would be great to have in next release. IMHO it solves all relevant
> problems.
>
> -Matej
>
> Juergen Donnerstag wrote:
> > may be I have a pratical solution. All components
Gili sorry, but I'm not realy able to follow you. IMO the current
implementation is fairly simple and straight forward and with a low
probability of a user asking to switch it on. The only reason one
would like to switch it on, would be to try to understand markup
inheritance. But that it not the s
Rick,
as this question might pop up here and than, mind providing us the jsp
wrapper, or may be even a simple example.
thanks a lot
Juergen
On 7/29/05, Rick Duyckinck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thanks guys. I managed to get it to work through a jsp wrapper that
> set up all the needed junk for
please see below
Juergen
On 7/29/05, Gili <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>But what is wrong with the earlier proposal (which no one replied to)?
>
>I'm reposting it here for your convenience:
>
> ---
> If one is forced to strip away Wicket tags in production mode in
> order t
+1
Juergen
On 7/29/05, Eelco Hillenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> +1
>
> Eelco
>
>
> Johan Compagner wrote:
>
> > We now have:
> >
> > public AbstractChoice(final String id, IModel model, final List
> > choices, final IChoiceRenderer renderer)
> >
> > I want to change it to:
> >
> > public
an Bares wrote:
>
> >I would like this solution too.
> >
> >Jan
> >
> >"Juergen Donnerstag" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> >news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >may be I have a pratical solution. All components support
> >setRenderBodyO
we did have fairly little changes recently which might indicate that
the major new changes are sufficiently stable. Still, there plenty of
(minor) RFEs and bugs. But because the major changes seem to be
stable, I'd go or RC1.
Juergen
On 7/29/05, Martijn Dashorst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> All,
may be I have a pratical solution. All components support
setRenderBodyOnly(). If we set the default or
WicketInheritanceComponent to true, all wicket:extend will be removed
from output. And only in case you have troubles and you realy need it,
you could switch it on.
Juergen
On 7/29/05, Eelco Hi
actually autolinks should work with all href attributes by now. At
least that the impression from the code.
Juergen
On 7/28/05, Eelco Hillenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> No really elegant solution to this yet. Good that you remind us... we
> should investigate whether we can handle this like w
How important is it for you that tags are included in the
output? IMO it is useful for debugging and development. But how often
do you need to look at it and the wicket tags therein, even during
development? If setStripWicketTag(TRUE) would/does what it is meant to
do, and the value be mostly true
the question is, what is more important.
Juergen
On 7/27/05, Matej Knopp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Juergen Donnerstag wrote:
> > I agree, nothing should go before doctype. But we don't test it.
> > Actually you might add doctype whereever you want to. I think non
>
>
>
> and the result being
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> is corrent? I think _nothing_ should get before doctype. Doctype should
> be the first thing to come out (except of course). Or am I
> missing something?
>
> (I think result
Matej,
On 7/27/05, Matej Knopp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi, I'm using 1.1 and I just tried markup inheritance. It works almost
> ok, but there's one strange thing. The generated page source code starts
> with . It's even before doctype, and that's bad.
I'd call it wicket standard behaviour.
Exactly, and we fixed it in wicket. It should work in 1.1.
Juergen
On 7/25/05, Jan Bares <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> "Johan Compagner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > do you still have that problem in 1.1?
>
> No, it is fixed, but I am talking about differen
801 - 900 of 1117 matches
Mail list logo
