Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] 7/29/06:
we do evangelize the OO wherever we can, but it mostly falls on deaf
ears.
have you ever seen a struts app? in most struts apps the notion of a
class is used mostly as a namespace to group some functions together.
its hard to explain something when
:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Igor
VaynbergSent: Saturday, July 29, 2006 9:54 AMTo:
wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.netSubject: Re: [Wicket-user]
Discussing Wicket
its not only that - most frameworks are not built around OO so the
developer is not required to know it/use
Of Igor Vaynberg
Sent: Saturday, July 29, 2006 9:54 AM
To: wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Wicket-user] Discussing Wicket
its not only that - most frameworks are not built around OO so the developer
is not required to know it/use it. i think the skill is mostly lost
: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Scott
Swank
Sent: Wednesday, August 09, 2006 11:36 AM
To: wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Wicket-user] Discussing Wicket
We have two applications that are largely the same. However, (along
with some minor variations between them
On 7/29/06, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
we do evangelize the OO wherever we can, but it mostly falls on deaf ears.
have you ever seen a struts app? in most struts apps the notion of a class
is used mostly as a namespace to group some functions together. its hard to
explain something
I agree with you Frank. I guess when we started out 'easy' and 'less
xml' etc were the things that attracted people. I was always attracted
in this just OO code from the start, but I obviously missed the fact
that this is what most people are into Wicket like best about the
framework. We're trying
its not only that - most frameworks are not built around OO so the developer is not required to know it/use it. i think the skill is mostly lost in the webspace.-IgorOn 7/29/06,
Eelco Hillenius [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 7/29/06, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: we do evangelize the OO
yeah you should say that learning wicket will actually make you a better developer :)-IgorOn 7/29/06, Eelco Hillenius
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:I agree with you Frank. I guess when we started out 'easy' and 'less
xml' etc were the things that attracted people. I was always attractedin this just OO
It
seems to me that most descriptions of Wicket that I've seen on the web focus on
two properties: the absence of configuration files and the radical
separation of HTML from Java code. (Then readers debate whether the
absence of configuration files limit flexibility and whether the use of
