to:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
> Jonathan Locke
> Sent: Monday, August 01, 2005 10:17 AM
> To: wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: Re: [Wicket-user] Hibernate/EJB3.0
>
>
> i don't know enough about any of this stuff to comment. it
> may be that my datab
ket application
using jndi and gain access through them.
-Igor
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Jonathan Locke
Sent: Monday, August 01, 2005 9:16 AM
To: wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Wicket-user] Hibernate/EJB3.0
[
1, 2005 9:16 AM
> To: wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: Re: [Wicket-user] Hibernate/EJB3.0
>
>
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> >I don't think you are disagreeing because I agree with both of you.
> >There's something in the Java water that
4:43 PM
To: wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Wicket-user] Hibernate/EJB3.0
nothing's perfect. i'm not talking about perfect. that's religion.
i'm just talking about
things where people bothered to work problems until the solution was not
only workable
but ju
ent: Saturday, July 30, 2005 4:43 PM
To: wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Wicket-user] Hibernate/EJB3.0
nothing's perfect. i'm not talking about perfect. that's religion.
i'm just talking about
things where people bothered to work problems until the solution w
nothing's perfect. i'm not talking about perfect. that's religion.
i'm just talking about
things where people bothered to work problems until the solution was not
only workable
but just reasonably good and simple. there are so very few things like
this given the
billions and billions and b
Just came by this blog:
http://blogs.sun.com/roller/page/gameguy?entry=my_least_favorite_quote
Thought it was funny, and touches our discussion :)
Eelco
Eelco Hillenius wrote:
I agree on the interface issue, but I also think you put it too strong
when you say it is just the fads that say thi
I agree on the interface issue, but I also think you put it too strong
when you say it is just the fads that say this. Software engineering is
still an immature industry, so we have to look for right principles and
best practices to get us to the next step. The Abstract Class vs
Interface is pr
thanks. it might not be complete yet, but i hope it's a good start at
something simple.
this rant isn't in response to you or anyone on this list... i'm just
venting
one of the many reasons i'm so sick of software lately is that nobody
ever takes the
time to think things through. th
Wow. This is really nice. / Paul
Jonathan Locke wrote:
i'm working on a hibernate wicket project myself right now and i've been
checking some stuff into wicket-contrib-database under wicket-stuff. i'm
not really developing this with other people yet, but it might be useful
anyway.
the motivat
rnate filter runs at the end of request it will know there was
> >an error and it needs to roll back the transaction.
> >
> >-Igor
> >
> >
> >
> >>-Original Message-
> >>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Beha
ay, July 29, 2005 10:29 AM
To: wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: RE: [Wicket-user] Hibernate/EJB3.0
Getting my hands on a WAR to see how you integrated
hibernate would be
great. I'd be very appreciative.
Unfortunately, I am not starting from scratch and I am
.
-Igor
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Jonathan Locke
Sent: Friday, July 29, 2005 12:50 PM
To: wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Wicket-user] Hibernate/EJB3.0
i have added some basic transaction semantics support to the
; From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
> Jonathan Locke
> Sent: Friday, July 29, 2005 12:50 PM
> To: wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: Re: [Wicket-user] Hibernate/EJB3.0
>
>
> i have added some basic transaction semantics support to
yah. i know that ejb3 works with this stuff cause i was using it until
i got confused by all
the implied values... i'll switch to ejb3 as soon as someone writes a
really simple book on it!
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jonathan,
I just did a quick (cvsgrab) checkout of your database package a
urceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Wicket-user] Hibernate/EJB3.0
I'll be committing a new version of CDApp shortly using
rewritten databinding and Hibernate3 integration. If you're
not into the whole CVS thing, I can post a WAR somewhere so
that you can get a feel for it.
On 7/29/05, Igor
Jonathan,
I just did a quick (cvsgrab) checkout of your database package and my
preliminary observation is that this will integrate pretty well. I will
have to re-write our DAO's because they are actually doing the
set-up/tear-down of our pooled connections but we would have to do that
with our mo
Thanks so much... I'll look into it. I'm sure it will be useful to me.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Phil Kulak
Sent: Friday, July 29, 2005 3:37 PM
To: wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Wicket-user] Hibernate/EJB3
s it is done for you.
>
> -Igor
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Friday, July 29, 2005 10:29 AM
> > To: wicket-user@lists.so
Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, July 29, 2005 10:29 AM
> To: wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: RE: [Wicket-user] Hibernate/EJB3.0
>
> Getting my hands on a WAR to see how you
he attatch events. Perhaps we can flesh out this aspect of
wicket in the wiki a bit more.
-Paul
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Phil Kulak
Sent: Friday, July 29, 2005 12:30 PM
To: wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Wicket-user]
I'll be committing a new version of CDApp shortly using rewritten
databinding and Hibernate3 integration. If you're not into the whole
CVS thing, I can post a WAR somewhere so that you can get a feel for
it.
On 7/29/05, Igor Vaynberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Paul,
> Im not aware of any of
Paul,
Im not aware of any official docs yet. I am currently using
wicket as a presentation tier for ejb3 project, and its pretty easy to
integrate.
IMHO there are two main areas that need integration:
application object, and detachable models for entities.
In the constructor's application
23 matches
Mail list logo
