Use new BookmarkableLink(MyPage.class);
On 9/16/06, Scott Lusebrink [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
here is a sample of what i was doing, ( i don't have my code infront of me
but i'll try to be close)
new BookmarkableLink(new MyPage())
class MyPage
public MyPage()
{
List options
On 9/16/06, Scott Lusebrink [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
here is a sample of what i was doing, ( i don't have my code infront of me but i'll try to be close)
new BookmarkableLink(new MyPage())new BookmarkableLink(MyPage.class);
class MyPage
public MyPage()
{IModel choiceModel=new
PageLink also has constructors for a Class.A bookmarkable page link is what it says it creates a bookmarkable link But maybe you don't want that at allthen you can use a PageLink and the PageLink class with the IPageLink param i the constructor is an easy think
for lazy creating pages but directly
At the very least, I'd be +100 for removing the constructor with the
Page. The only thing that constructor does is encourage bad practice.
Eelco
On 9/16/06, Johan Compagner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
PageLink also has constructors for a Class.
A bookmarkable page link is what it says it creates
It does one thing and one thing good: create a link to an already
existing page. We use it quite often in our apps. I'm +1(00) for the
constructor to stay.
Read the docs and understand what you're doing. If we were to remove
everything that 'encourages' bad practice we wouldn't have a framework
On 9/16/06, Martijn Dashorst [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It does one thing and one thing good: create a link to an already
existing page. We use it quite often in our apps. I'm +1(00) for the
constructor to stay.
For what are you using it? Hopefully only for things like linking back
to a page you
On 9/15/06, Scott Lusebrink [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I need a place where i can initialize a page, get data from the database and
set the models of my components. I assume I'm going to need the data before
i set the models.
The models and the actual data they link to are different things.
Why would you even create the page while you're actually linking toit? E.g, when you do (
2.0 code):because he wants to link to a page, the obvious component is PageLink and it takes a Page instance in its contructor - so its the most obvious way to link to a page for a noob. you guys keep
because he wants to link to a page, the obvious component is PageLink and it
takes a Page instance in its contructor - so its the most obvious way to
link to a page for a noob.
Erm. Maybe. I didn't get that from his email.
you guys keep outvoting me on removing that
constructor, but its
