I think the web-access is also not uptodate
http://cvs.sourceforge.net/viewcvs.py/wicket-stuff/wicket-contrib-spring/
http://cvs.sourceforge.net/viewcvs.py/wicket-stuff/wicket-contrib-spring/src/java/wicket/contrib/
here i can see the proxy/injection/spring packages, so its up to date.
I was
done.
-Igor
On 11/17/05, Christian Essl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 16 Nov 2005 23:50:11 -0800, Igor Vaynberg[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://cvs.sourceforge.net/viewcvs.py/wicket-stuff/wicket-contrib-spring/src/java/wicket/contrib/ here i can see the proxy/injection/spring packages, so its
Or take the whole CVS issue.We all know that Sourceforge's CVS can getvery annoying.I've been able to download the wicket-contrib modules
that I know about, but I've never been able to get a comprehensive listof such modules.SF always tells me that the list is not available, butI've never found
and dont forget irc.freenode.net #wicket
there is usually someone who can answer your question there if you are looking for more of a real time conversation.
-Igor
.
-Igor
On 11/17/05, Scott Sauyet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Igor Vaynberg wrote: Or take the whole CVS issue.We all know that Sourceforge's CVS can get very annoying.I've been able to download the wicket-contrib modules that I know about, but I've never been able to get a comprehensive list
irt spring+hibernate+wicket:
Dan is absolutely correct when he says that wicket should never touch
hibernate directly. all the hibernate-related logic should stay inside
spring and be exposed directly through a dao object or through a
service facade. i think wicket-contrib-data and
If i remember correctly, its been a while since i looked, tapestry book
takes a hybrid approach. first half explains how the major parts of the
framework work by giving small focused examples, while the second part
of the book is a bring it all together incremental build of the
tapestry virtual
imho that is the best practice. that is what i use whenever i do not need a bookmarkable page. i have yet to use the PageLink class. PageLink makes it easier to create links to pages because it lets you specify the class name of the page or the created page instance. This is ok for pages that are
irt conditional componentshttp://www.mail-archive.com/wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net/msg07414.htmlirt conditional form fields
this is nothing special, just throw in a panel into the form that contains form components if you need to. form components automatically link up to their parent form
for the view. That way yourclasses would be more testable too.
2005/11/18, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED]: imho that is the best practice. that is what i use whenever i do not need a bookmarkable page. i have yet to use the PageLink class. PageLink makes it
easier to create links to pages because
keep my point :P. 2005/11/18, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Actually what i meant was a simple static factory method that
translates strongly typed params into PageParameters. ie class MyBookmarkablePage extends WebPage { public MyBookmarkablePage(PageParameters params
wicket-contrib-data and wicket-contrib-data-hibernate do not provide any form of transaction management. furthermore, they are obsolete due to repeater package (what used to be wicket-contrib-dataview) in wicket-extensions.
also, this discussion did not have much to do with spring itself, but with
Than use for all non pageable lists an OrderedRepeatingView. This is IMOthe most straight to use without much models and indirection - otherwise a
DataView.dont know how useful an ordered repeating view would be for database driven lists since it doesnt refresh its children every request like
why not use the object as the model itself, this is easy with property models.Form form=new Form(form, new CompoundPropertyModel(new User());form.add(new TextField(name)); === maps to
user.nameform.add(new TextField(pacient.name)); === maps to pacient.name-Igor
On 11/21/05, Manuel Corrales [EMAIL
that would do it :]-IgorOn 11/21/05, Christian Essl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
dont know how useful an ordered repeating view would be for database driven
lists since it doesnt refresh its children every request like dataview, so be careful there.I have my own subclass:MyORView extends
. That solves mi issue. Thanks very very much. This list is
excelent!!.
Thanks againOn 11/21/05, Igor Vaynberg
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
why not use the object as the model itself, this is easy with property models.Form form=new Form(form, new CompoundPropertyModel(new User());form.add(new TextField(name
On 11/21/05, Christian Essl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A question: is the ItemReuseStrategy (OIR) still needed for forms andfeebackpanels, because it seems also to work with removeAll()?really depends on what you are doing.the component handlers are called before the onbeginrequest of the page and
On 11/21/05, Manuel Corrales [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi, i've asked this question once but dont get a solution. So here i go again:Sorry, must've missed it.
I have some clues about stateful beans and stateless beans but not too
much. What i need is that when a user logins, create an object and
examples of dataview and datatable in action are available in wicket-examples project under repeater examples-IgorOn 11/21/05, Matej Knopp
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:Hi,Have a look at wicket-extensions: DataView. You implement your own
IDataProvider which can use hibernate paging.-MatejJuhani K
)
{
this.user = user;
}
}
I have the sessionFactory on the application
and then on the submit method i do:
UserSession us = (UserSession)getSession();
us.setUser(usuario);
setResponsePage(new Bienvenido());
where usuario is an model object i get from database.
Is this right?
On 11/21/05, Igor Vaynberg
or use a url rewriting filter to change the url to a bookmarkable page ierewrite all www.example.com/shortcut/(expr)to
www.example.com/app?bookmarkablePage=Shortcutparam=expr-IgorOn 11/22/05, Eelco Hillenius
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:I think you can do stuff like that now, at least partially. I'm
please do.-IgorOn 11/22/05, Andrew Berman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am using the DataView component exactly how it is shown in the
repeater examples in wicket-example except that I'm using
Hibernate. When I look at the Hibernate logs I notice that on the
first creation of the DataView component
ok its fixed in cvs 1.2 and 1.1-IgorOn 11/22/05, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
please do.-Igor
On 11/22/05, Andrew Berman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I am using the DataView component exactly how it is shown in the
repeater examples in wicket-example except that I'm using
Hibernate. When I
nah, dont worry about it :)-IgorOn 11/22/05, Andrew Berman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hahahayou seem to always do this to me Igor. Thanks as always. You still want the bug?
--AndrewOn 11/22/05, Igor Vaynberg
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ok its fixed in cvs 1.2 and 1.1-IgorOn 11/22/05, Igor
working on it right now :) how did you know?-IgorOn 11/22/05, Andrew Berman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Igor, did you ever make a decision on how you wanted to proceed with this?
On 11/6/05, Andrew Berman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:Sounds and looks good to me.
On 11/6/05, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL
Igor,Did you adjust the changes.xml?wicket-extensions doesnt have
changes.xml. should i put it into wicket's changes? i thought we were talking about extensions having its own release cycle so maybe we should have a separate changes file for it.
BTW, I also stumbled upon this one. But it wasn't
nogroup=new Choices(nogroup, mylistofchoices, choicerenderer);select.add(nogroup);
Or something similar?
On 11/23/05, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
working on it right now :) how did you know?
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Something along those lines yeh.On 11/23/05, Igor Vaynberg
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
so you want to specify the optgroup tags in your model? something likeclass Category { String name; List choices }and provide ListCategory as the model? so that the name of categories become
, I'll check it out.
--AndrewOn 11/23/05, Igor Vaynberg
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
just checked in my first pass at this so you guys can check it out and
give me feedback. i had to check it into wicket_1_1 branch because
component reference doesnt work in head yet. i also put the new
components
thats the whole point. the request to retrieve the status would come from another request thread, maybe an iframe with a meta refresh tag or something. why wouldnt this be advisable? http is a multithreaded protocol, as long as the operation of retrieving a resource does not touch any objects in
{ if (invokePage != null) { invokePage.internalEndRequest(); }}
catch (RuntimeException e){ log.error(Exception occurred during invokerPage.internalEndRequest, e);}should be in the synch block.
the rest (threadDetach() doesn't have to be)johan
On 11/24/05, Igor
;
} xx
where do we do that now? I haven't used it yet but that is i think user parsed request.Where does that belong?
johanOn 11/24/05,
Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
boolean parsed = false;synchronize()should be boolean parsed = false;
synchronized(session)right?then we are back
any kind of verification you want. thats your business logic. you have access to the session so you can pull the user from that.-IgorOn 11/26/05,
Manuel Corrales [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ok, this worked ok. Now i have a question, what kind of verification
should i do on checkAccess(), and if i
is your border markup (AccessionBorder.html) contained by wicket:border and /wicket:border tags?iewicket:bordermy border markup herewicket:body/some more markup/wicket:border
i think ive seen this happen sometimes when wicket:border or wicket:panel tags are missing.-IgorOn 11/27/05, Pekka
thats really neat. i dont always have access to the command line that launhces the server so that might be a problem. also does it instrument every class construction? cant tell since there is no code, but if it does, that would be a performance hit.
did you see SpringPage class? it calls the
you might want to try dataview with ListDataProvider along with ReuseIfModelsEqualStrategy or your own IItemReuseStrategy. I think it will make this particular problem easier.-Igor
On 11/29/05, Laurent PETIT [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,In order to list and display editable fields for childrens
look in wicket-examples / repeater examplesall the components are there.-IgorOn 11/29/05, Laurent PETIT
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:This IItemReuseStrategy stuff seems to be exactly what the ListView
needs instead of the setOptimizeRemoval()! !Great :-)On 11/29/05, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED
. Is anyone who is reading with us interested in this? if so would you like it merged into wicket-contrib-spring? if so, Joni would you be interested in donating and supporting it in wicket-stuff?
-Igor
On 11/29/05, Joni Suominen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 2005-11-29 at 09:15 -0800, Igor Vaynberg
any feedback on this yet? if not, i guess i will polish it with its current feature set and that will be that.-IgorOn 11/23/05, Andrew Berman
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:I should've known
On 11/23/05, Igor Vaynberg
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
your wish is my command. now you just have to wait
if you call setRenderBodyOnly(true) on components, they will not render tags they are attached to. should fix your problem.-IgorOn 11/29/05, Vinsen, Kevin
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
To make the Dojo DropdownButtons work I need to generate html like this:ul dojoType=dropdownbuttonslia href="">ul
lia
PROTECTED] wrote:
Nah removed the
wicket:blah tags, but I need to remove the actual spans
Kevin
From: Igor Vaynberg
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, 30 November 2005
3:33 PMTo: wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.netSubject: Re:
[Wicket-user] Trying to be clever with a ListView
maybe a static factory method in the page is the cleanest solution. public class MyPage extends WebPage { private MyPage(String param) { } public static MyPage(String param) {
return new MyPage(param); } public static MyPageInjected(String param) { MyPage p=new MyPage(param);
yes it is in head, and also in 1.1 branch.-IgorOn 11/30/05, Davide Savazzi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:On 11/30/05, Igor Vaynberg
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: any feedback on this yet? if not, i guess i will polish it with its current feature set and that will be that.Is it in HEAD now? I've already
.-IgorOn 12/1/05, Eduardo Rocha
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Igor,I checked out wicket-contrib-spring and I could not find a exampleusing SpringWebPage. I think it is pretty easy to use, but ifwicket-contrib-spring-examples was updated it would nice.2005/12/1, Igor Vaynberg
[EMAIL PROTECTED]: i guess
i guess that was the point of redoing wicket-contrib-spring - to have a final solution that the wicket team is willing to support. so there it is. check out wicket-contrib-spring. of course suggestions for improvements are always welcome.
-IgorOn 12/1/05, Iman RahmatiZadeh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Honestly, it wasnt just me, you and the others helped out a lot.-IgorOn 12/1/05, Christian Essl [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:On Thu, 1 Dec 2005 14:24:20 -0500, Andrew Berman
[EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote: Honestly, I don't think there ever was a Spring Integration problem.I think people were just looking
it the primary example. MartijnOn 12/1/05, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote: I am thinking of dumping the wicket-contrib-spring-examples in favor of wicket-phonebook since it demonstrates spring integration. any developers reading with us, what do you think?
also see http
make it the primary example. Martijn On 12/1/05, Igor Vaynberg
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I am thinking of dumping the wicket-contrib-spring-examples in favor of wicket-phonebook since it demonstrates spring integration. any developers reading with us, what do you think?
also see http
: I'm fine with it. I constantly send people to the phone book example,
so might as well make it the primary example. Martijn On 12/1/05, Igor Vaynberg
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:I am thinking of dumping the wicket-contrib-spring-examples in favor ofwicket-phonebook since
!transient * *))public static final String MUST_BE_TRANSIENT = SpringBean annotated + field must be transient.;
2005/12/1, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED]: No, the phonebook example is small. currently it covers the first approach discussed on that wiki page. I can convert it to the second approach since
the default implementation of IFieldValueFactory (used by the proxy strategy) that is used to locate fields that hold spring references is jdk5 specific. but it is easy to create your own that stores this metadata somewhere else. wicket has a nice metadata system that can be used for this, or
it or not...
I like the getDefaultValue() or what is that method called of DropDown..johanOn 12/2/05,
Igor Vaynberg
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:just checked in a fix. also the Select element does not add a choose one choice for you, you have to do it yourself by adding a SelectChoice that represents
and null value isn't allowed...
johanOn 12/2/05, Igor Vaynberg
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
no, SelectChoice is a component that represents a single option element. you add that to the Select component. SelectChoices is a convinience component that draws out a bunch of option tags much like our current
Hi Mark,
if you are using wicket1.1 then your only choice is pretty much to use
a url rewriting filter to dress up the url. this is pretty easy to do.
there is a good filter here: http://tuckey.org/urlrewrite/
you can also add an alias to your page so it uses that in the url instead of fqn. but
gonna
go install that.I assume any additional parameters passed via
the traditional ?foo=barbar=foo scheme will be added to the
PageParameters instance as well?
MarkOn 12/3/05, Igor Vaynberg
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
set the above up
please see the cvs HEAD of wicket-examples - niceurls.
oh and btw you can specify a page parameters encoder on per mount basis as well.
-Igor
On 12/3/05, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
no, the additional parameters will not be added, in fact it will
probably cause an exception. this is because the part of the url after
the mount is processed
The data provider is kept as the model because that is where the
sorting state lives and that needs to be versioned. I need to refactor
that out of the dataprovider looks like.
-IgorOn 12/3/05, Christian Essl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 2 Dec 2005 22:51:05 +0100, Johan Compagner [EMAIL
itself. (null or something)On 12/3/05,
Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
but a SelectOption is not in your collection - its a component. The
whole point of the Select component is to have full control over the
markup. All our core choice elements limit your access to markup by
producing
Perhaps next time you can be bothered to look at the code before saying that we did something ugly.-IgorOn 12/3/05, Gili
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:I haven't taken a look at the latest code yet but I believe you simply
renamed the parameters to fixed single-character names (which I findequally
this is for ENCRYPTED urls and has nothing to do with what we are discussing here.-IgorOn 12/3/05, Gili
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: There you go, this is the CVS diff I was commenting on.
bookmarkablePage is replaced with 5. Original Message Subject: [Wicket-autocvs]
.
ChristianOn Sat, 3 Dec 2005 11:31:59 -0800, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote: already on it. havent figured it all out yet. the problem is i think i
will have to change IDataProvider to take extra parameters. this will break all the clients, but i dont see another way around it yet. im also modularizing
ok first pass is in. filter stuff is not all there and some of it is broken, but the major idea is there. the rest should be in pretty good shape though. its mostly backwards compatible so there should not be any problems. feedback?
-IgorOn 12/4/05, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think
why have yet another mailing list people would have to subscribe to? we already have 3 user lists and one admin list although i bet not that many subscribed to our most recent announcements list. i think we have more then enough lists already. if it was up to me we wouldnt even have wicket-stuff
announce has 34, wicket-user has 253 at this moment.thats exactly my point :)
-Igor
I think this is a problem with ajax and not with dojo support - although most people would argue that this is one of the bigger advantages of ajax. because the clicks do not change the browser's url the browser never records them in the history - and how could it.
-IgorOn 12/5/05, Eelco Hillenius
As far as I know all Change(s) get recorded through the component in thePage's versionManager which on the automatic version rewinde just executes
all the Change.undo(). Where the Change comes from, what it does and howit get's there is not important. IMO it would work for Models as forComponents
So to summarize your idea it would be like thisclass SingleSortState IChangeRecorder recorder; SortState(IChangeRecorder) {...} setPropertyState(...) { recorder.addChange( new Change() {...} )
}OrderByLink { onclick () { getState().setProperty(...); } }this has the same net affect as OrderByLink
without the need of an extra component for
registering the Pojo.ChristianOn Tue, 6 Dec 2005 15:36:55 -0800, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
I guess the question is do we want to infact make it something wicket-specific. right now its just an ordinary pojo you can use anywhere you like
John, this is not the greatest time to check out wicket-phonebook HEAD from CVS as i am in a process of refactoring it and the wicket-extension-repeater packages it uses.my recommendation is that if you want to see it in a clean state check out the WICKET_1_1 branch of the phonebook. Right now the
The wicket-phonebook uses all that, yes. see src/conf/applicationContext.xml for its spring context setup.-IgorOn 12/7/05, John Moore
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:Eelco Hillenius wrote:Yeah. The idea is to get rid of the things we don't use anymore and
merge them into one project. We've had enough
by doing maven jar:install in their dirs )
-IgorOn 12/7/05, Scott Sauyet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Igor Vaynberg wrote: this is not the greatest time to check out wicket-phonebook HEAD from CVS as i am in a process of refactoring it and the wicket-extension-repeater packages it uses.Ahh, that explains why
i never said extensions werent compiling. everything should be compiling just fine but not necessarily with maven because you need to have the latest snapshots installed in your local maven repo (since we cannot provide snapshots in an online repo unless someone wants to host them and a a
actually my intention was to use wicket-phonebook as a guide to best-practices for db-driven wicket apps. that is why it uses the repeaters and will soon use wicket-contrib-spring. i intentinally kept it very small and focused.
i was thinking of creating another project that will use the latest /
the selectObjectAction then the model will add a Change() object to the version manager.
The problem is that a model doesn't know the component/page where it is bound on so it can't call addStateChange()johan
On 12/7/05, Igor Vaynberg
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
heh, excuse me while i pull my head
ive ran into this myself a few times. especially when i need to know a path of the component in the constructor, but it has not been added to the hierarchy yet.what i was thinking is to add an void init() method to component that gets called after its been added to its parent component. that way
. Or the idmodel itself? (if setIdModel is called)
johan
On 12/7/05, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
i guess the question is does calling setmodelobject on the model modify the model itself. i would think this is not a very good pattern because the model should only be responsible for locating the object
I still do not think we need to provide a public setStateChange() method, but maybe i am wrong. I think if pojo wants to implement its own versioning it is out of scope of wicket. you can always call Page.getVersion() and do your own rollback.
What may help is maybe having two interfaces
ok here is a new thread because the old one is out of control-Igor
On 12/7/05, Christian Essl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Or you can implement your own Page{addPublicStateChange()} ;)good, then we can at least drop this part of the discussion :)
What may help is maybe having two interfaces IModelVersionable { Change getModelSnapshot() } and IModelObjectVersionable
not completely familiar with wicket's internals, but I think Igor's solution might work. Marco Ruud Igor Vaynberg wrote: ive ran into this myself a few times. especially when i need to know a
path of the component in the constructor, but it has not been added to the hierarchy yet. what i
using setters before it is initialized.-IgorOn 12/8/05, Jim McLaughlin
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Igor Vaynberg wrote: i was just falling asleep and thought of something (still sleepy so dont know if this will make sense in the morning). with all this talk of testing why not borrow a page from
yes this is expected because you are actually taking the panel that contains form components out of the component hierarchy of the form by replacing it with another panel.you can add all the panels and hide all but one. the form will ignore any hidden form components so they will not update your
uhm, disregard that last one :)On 12/8/05, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
yes this is expected because you are actually taking the panel that contains form components out of the component hierarchy of the form by replacing it with another panel.you can add all the panels and hide all
the repeaters refactoring is pretty much complete so the api should be stable (possibly with the exception of the new table.filter package)there are a few api breaks, but nothing major. also i moved things around a little bit so might want to run the organize imports command in your ide.
-0800, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote: the repeaters refactoring is pretty much complete so the api should be stable (possibly with the exception of the new table.filter package) there are a few api breaks, but nothing major. also i moved things
around a little bit so might want to run
does anyone have any experience with tigris? i think that is a promising choice if we were to move.-IgorOn 12/9/05, Eelco Hillenius
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:Yeah. I'm not in favor of
Java.net either, though I think there are acouple of projects using java.net just for CVS. I think the rest of
there is a simple way to do that without the feedback panel. add a label with the error message and override its isvisible to poll the form componentieadd(new Label(error, phonenumber invalid) {
isvisible() { return !textfield.isValid(); });-IgorOn 12/10/05, Cameron Taggart
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
we usually hang out in ##wicket not #wicket. and there is about 5-6 of us there generally.-IgorOn 12/11/05, Mark Derricutt
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:Out of curiosity - how many of you guys hang out on #wicket on
irc.freenode.org? I've popped in every now and then to find the channel empty...Mark
fixed.-IgorOn 12/11/05, Eelco Hillenius [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You are right. It's a bug. We should check on that first slash. Can'tfix it now though, so if anyone wants to do it...EelcOn 12/11/05, Mark Derricutt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote: I had the following code in my app (using HEAD):
i just refactored the wicket-contrib-spring project, here are the changes* all jdk 5 stuff has been factored out into wicket-contrib-spring-jdk5 project so wicket-contrib-spring can compile with 1.4* the injector for automatic dependencies is now aquired through a static methods of the
as activeInjectorHolder.setInjector(injector);
to the constructor of the mock.--Joni Suominen [EMAIL PROTECTED]On Mon, 2005-12-12 at 00:09 -0800, Igor Vaynberg wrote: i just refactored the wicket-contrib-spring project, here are the
changes * all jdk 5 stuff has been factored out into wicket-contrib
On 12/13/05, Christian Essl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ReuseIfModelObjectsEqualStrategy is a good idea (much better thanextending ListDataProvider and Model). Maybe Igor could take it intoextensions.I did not put this strategy in extensions on purpose. The reason being is that this can really get
after discussing on irc we found out that the actual problem was that we did not tag the wicket-stuff modules with WICKET_1_1 when we released. i think that should be done for future releases.-Igor
On 12/13/05, Gili [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
wicket-stuff has:
WICKET_1_1
automatic injection is not the problem. the problem is that injected dependencies cannot be serialized, thus the whole proxy approach.-IgorOn 12/13/05,
Eduardo Rocha [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Spring 2.0 will bring support to objects which are not instantiated bythe
aspectj sounds pretty sweet. i guess it would work in majority of cases. the reason i would still prefer proxies is because I like constructs like this:MyDataProvider implements IDataProvider { private MyService svc;
MyDataProvider(MyService svc) { this.svc=svc; }...}this allows me to use the
http:://my.domainname.com/ that
that url isn't therethere it just should behttp:://my.domainname.com/wicketservlet/resources/application/MyResource.jpgSo in other words there is no context path..Juergen
On 12/14/05, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: maybe what we can do is only prepend
cycle,
and as such its own tagging mechanism. There is absolutely no reason to
tag a non released project with WICKET_1_1. That code may not even
compile with wicket 1.1!
Martijn
On 12/14/05, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
so the mentality is use cvs wicket-stuff at your own risk?-IgorOn 12
On 12/14/05, Eduardo Rocha [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
With AspectJ is you can code naturally like(if you do not use the service in constructor):MyPage page = new MyPage();page.setService(mockService);tester.startPage(page);tester.assertRenderedPage(MyPage.class
);instead of setting the context mock,
On 12/14/05, Gili [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You know... the base technique supposidly works fine but I am workingfor the other technique you were mentioning where I will be able toupgrade from WICKET_1_1 without any modification to my HTML files and
CSS will automagically work like it used to.
so now all you need to do is override getAdditionalMarkupHandler() in your application subclass and return an instance of PrependContextPathHandler-IgorOn 12/14/05,
Juergen Donnerstag [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 12/14/05, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 12/14/05, Gili [EMAIL PROTECTED
401 - 500 of 3657 matches
Mail list logo
