Re: [Wicket-user] wicket:head in page template...

2006-08-27 Thread Erik Brakkee
Igor Vaynberg wrote: afaik it should be ok, where does it say otherwise? Well, on the wiki it said today: " If you are authoring a page, you don't need (and shouldn't use) tags but instead put it in the page's head section directly.". But Eelco edited the wiki page today, and modified it to:

Re: [Wicket-user] wicket:head in page template...

2006-08-27 Thread Eelco Hillenius
Thanks for finding that, that WIKI page was wrong. When I wrote it, I didn't think about markup inheritance. Using with base pages/ markup inheritance is perfectly alright. I updated the WIKI page. Eelco On 8/27/06, Erik Brakkee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > > In some of the documentatio

Re: [Wicket-user] wicket:head in page template...

2006-08-27 Thread Gwyn Evans
The wiki page is maybe a bit too general in saying "If you are authoring a page, you don't need (and shouldn't use) tags but instead put it in the page's head section directly." I think what it's trying to say is to use the "" section directly where possible, i.e. if the page is a simple page or

Re: [Wicket-user] wicket:head in page template...

2006-08-27 Thread Igor Vaynberg
afaik it should be ok, where does it say otherwise?-IgorOn 8/27/06, Erik Brakkee <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote:Hi,In some of the documentation it is mentioned that wicket:head is not supposed to be used in pages(e.g.http://www.wicket-wiki.org.uk/wiki/index.php/Including_CSS_resources).However, if I us