what are these?
On Sun, 28 Apr 2024 at 20:06, delamora
mailto:delam...@unam.mx>> wrote:
Use the command;
hex2rhomb
hexagonal to rhombohedral
De: Wien
mailto:wien-boun...@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at>>
en nombre de shamik chakrabarti
mailto
Use the command;
hex2rhomb
hexagonal to rhombohedral
De: Wien en nombre de shamik
chakrabarti
Enviado: domingo, 28 de abril de 2024 08:00 a. m.
Para: A Mailing list for WIEN2k users
Asunto: [Wien] Rhombhohedral coordinates needed in simulation of LiNiO2
Dear
Thank you Professor Marks and Professor Blaha,
A mentioned before I ran these two systems
--
Graphene + M
ABNiO4
--
but this time I ran them
First without "-min"
then with "-min"
--
For
Graphene + M
it took many cycles, but it finally converged.
The same for
ABNiO4
but it took many more cycles,
08.03.2024 21:26, delamora wrote:
> I am trying to add atoms on top of graphene.
> Since it is a weak bond I need to use Non Local Van der Waals functional
> so I add Grafeno-M.innlvdw
> and run
> nohup run -p -nlvdw -NI &
> and then
> nohup run -p -nlvdw -NI -min -fc 1 &a
Dear WIEN2k community
I am trying to add atoms on top of graphene.
Since it is a weak bond I need to use Non Local Van der Waals functional
so I add
Grafeno-M.innlvdw
and run
nohup run -p -nlvdw -NI &
and then
nohup run -p -nlvdw -NI -min -fc 1 &
What happens is that the forces start to increase,
e Marks (Laurie)
Northwestern University
www.numis.northwestern.edu<http://www.numis.northwestern.edu>
https://scholar.google.com/citations?user=zmHhI9gJ=en
"Research is to see what everybody else has seen, and to think what nobody else
has thought" Albert Szent-Györgyi
On Thu, Feb 2
Dear WIEN2k community
I am trying to add atoms on top of graphene.
Since it is a weak bond I need to use Non Local Van der Waals functional
so I add
Grafeno-M.innlvdw
and run
nohup run -so -p -nlvdw -NI -min -fc 1 &
What happens is that when M is above C the system converges.
But if M it is put
3 index of atom, number of l, l
...
Edit case.indm and inorb and sort the atoms properly (don't forget also
to sort the U values).
PS: rm *.dmat* *.vorb*
Regards
Am 03.02.2024 um 03:31 schrieb delamora:
> Dear WIEN2k users;
> I am calculating NdNiO3
> I did a ferromagnetic ca
Dear WIEN2k users;
I am calculating NdNiO3
I did a ferromagnetic calculation without any problems.
I wanted to calculate the antiferromagnetic case, so I splited the 4 Nd
positions into 2 up and 2 dn, and when I ran the system, I had a problem;
In the second cycle, when the 'orb -up' was
Thank you, I changed the energy range in
case.int
and it worked
Pablo
Did you also change the energy range in case.int ???
Did you rerun x lapw1; x lapw2 -qtl; x tetra
AFTER you changed the case.in1 file ?
Am 07.11.2023 um 01:15 schrieb delamora:
> D
Dear WIEN2k community,
To enlarge the DOS energy range, one has to enlarge the "de" in case.in1
K-VECTORS FROM UNIT:4 -9.01.533 emin / de (emax=Ef+de) / nband
de; 1.5 => 4.5
---
but the range increases to
"min" -12eV, max 7eV
is there a way to have
"min"
2023-08-09 at 18:36 +, delamora wrote:
> I am having problems with XCrySDen; the figures and the letters are
> very small.
> I have the Fedora Linux;
> ---
> Linux fedora 6.4.7-100.fc37.x86_64 #1 SMP PREEMPT_DYNAMIC Thu Jul 27
> 19:56:37 UTC 2023 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU
elease.
Best regards,
Tone
--
Jožef Stefan Institute, Ljubljana, Slovenia
On Wed, 2023-08-09 at 18:36 +, delamora wrote:
> I am having problems with XCrySDen; the figures and the letters are
> very small.
> I have the Fedora Linux;
> ---
> Linux fedora 6.4.7-100.fc37.x86_64 #1 SM
I am having problems with XCrySDen; the figures and the letters are very small.
I have the Fedora Linux;
---
Linux fedora 6.4.7-100.fc37.x86_64 #1 SMP PREEMPT_DYNAMIC Thu Jul 27 19:56:37
UTC 2023 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
---
In earlier versions I did not have this problem
Saludos
een, and to think what nobody else
has thought" Albert Szent-Györgyi
On Mon, Jul 17, 2023, 13:43 delamora
mailto:delam...@unam.mx>> wrote:
In this version there are changes, where I can find about them?
For example, in
Gd_1.25 Sr_0.75 Ni O_4
after "init" I got
R-MT*K-MAX
In this version there are changes, where I can find about them?
For example, in
Gd_1.25 Sr_0.75 Ni O_4
after "init" I got
R-MT*K-MAX=5.96
GdSrNiO4-3.klist;
1 2 2 7 28 8.0 -7.0 1.5 147 k, div: ( 7
7 2)
2 2 6 728
)
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Northwestern University
www.numis.northwestern.edu<http://www.numis.northwestern.edu>
"Research is to see what everybody else has seen, and to think what nobody else
has thought" Albert Szent-Györgyi
On Mon, Jul 17, 2023, 13:30 delamo
edu>
"Research is to see what everybody else has seen, and to think what nobody else
has thought" Albert Szent-Györgyi
On Sun, Jul 16, 2023, 19:38 delamora
mailto:delam...@unam.mx>> wrote:
Prof Blaha,
Thank again for your reply.
I found what was wrong;
In GdSrNiO4.struct the ato
r commands.
Eventually, edit $WIENROOT/runsp and put -xf in the first line. This gives you
a lot of output, but one can trace what happens towards the end and where it
happens. (Eventually you also need to do this with $WIENROOT/x).
Am 12.07.2023 um 19:50 schrieb delamora:
Prof Blaha,
Thank for yo
Prof Blaha,
Thank for your reply;
--
Did you check case.inorb and indmc ?
***yes, they seem fine
Check case.dmatup and dn.
***I do not know what to check, but they seem right
Can you use the grep command on the commandline ?
***yes
Am 12.07.2023 um 04:30 schrieb delamora:
I am
I am running a complicated structure Gd_1.25 Sr_0.75 NiO_4
So I have the
struct file
then I initiate the calculation
then I run
init_orb -orb
So with this it should run correctly
so I put
nohup runsp -orb -p &
it stops at the second iteration, after lapw0;
-
LAPW0 END
grep: No existe
Dear Community,
When I have large Rmt >2.3 I get a message that I need to add lo (local
orbitals), what I did was to reduce Rmt = 2.3, and the message disapeared.
I did this in order to avoid the addition of these orbitals, since I did not
know how to include them.
Now I see that "lo" are
either TRIQS as suggested before or DFT+eDMFT:
http://hauleweb.rutgers.edu/tutorials/Overview.html
For me, the DFT+eDMFT was easier to install, but it may depend on the
software you already have on the machine.
Best regards,
Sylwia
W dniu 09.07.2021 05:24, delamora napisał(a):
> Dear W
ou can use GGAs (or mGGA) + U.
Am 31.03.2023 um 19:02 schrieb delamora:
> WIEN2k community,
> The Hubbard U is related in the Usersguide as LDA+U, does it mean that
> it should be used with LDA and not with GGA?
>
> I have always used the Hubbard U
WIEN2k community,
The Hubbard U is related in the Usersguide as LDA+U, does it mean that it
should be used with LDA and not with GGA?
I have always used the Hubbard U with GGA (PBE)
Pablo
___
Wien mailing list
Wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at
WIEN2k community,
The Hubbard U is related in the Usersguide as LDA+U, does it mean that it
should be used with LDA and not with GGA?
Pablo
___
Wien mailing list
Wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at
http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/mailman/listinfo/wien
The only difference is
semishared => shared
De: Wien en nombre de delamora
Enviado: viernes, 24 de marzo de 2023 06:28 p. m.
Para: A Mailing list for WIEN2k users
Asunto: [Wien] XCrySDen Version: 1.6.2
Dear WIEN2k community
I am having trouble with XCryS
Dear WIEN2k community
I am having trouble with XCrySDen, if I use;
xcrysden-1.5.60-bin-semishared
I have no problem, but if I use
xcrysden-1.6.2-bin-shared
+-+
: Re: [Wien] compiling the WIEN2k 23.1 version
Do not forget to upgrade to WIEN2k_23.2, in particular for systems with
atoms having a cubic point group.
On 14.03.2023 18:07, delamora wrote:
> Thanks Prof. Marks,
>
> I ran the simple Na BCC and I got
>
> Cholesky INFO =
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Northwestern University
www.numis.northwestern.edu<http://www.numis.northwestern.edu>
"Research is to see what everybody else has seen, and to think what nobody else
has thought" Albert Szent-Györgyi
On Mon, Mar 13, 2023, 23:33 delamo
just after LAPW0;
--
[pablo@delamora Na-prueb]$ run
LAPW0 END
SECLR4 - Error
grep: lapw2*.error: No such file or directory
> stop error
[pablo@delamora Na-prueb]$ more lapw1.error
Cholesky INFO = 87
'SECLR4' - POTRF (Scalapack/LAPACK) failed.
[pabl
I downloaded the WIEN2k 23.1 version
I followed the instructions
..
./expand_lapw
.siteconfig_lapw -update ../WIEN2k-21.1/
but I did not compile it
so I restarted the procedure from the begining and when I came to this last
command
.siteconfig_lapw -update ../WIEN2k-21.1/
it was
With;
"perl w2web"
you install w2web
but with
"w2web"
it is running, and each time that you start your computer you need to run it,
in order to allow the WIEN2k interface to work.
Pablo
De: Wien en nombre de zhouchao via
Wien
Enviado: lunes, 15 de agosto de
Dear Gerhard,
Thank for your comments.
I just want to comment that I used your cell parameters but I applied the
"sgroup" and I got an hexagonal cell;
R LATTICE,NONEQUIV.ATOMS: 2 166 R-3m
MODE OF CALC=RELA unit=ang
8.591340 8.591340 22.415740 90.00
Dear Gerhard,
The optimized cell is;
---
R LATTICE,NONEQUIV.ATOMS: 1 166_R-3m
MODE OF CALC=RELA unit=ang
8.591340 8.591340 22.415740 90.00 90.00120.00
ATOM 1: X=0.23592070 Y=0.23592070 Z=0.23592070
ATOM 1:X= 0.76407930 Y=0.76407930 Z=0.76407930
Bi NPT=
Saludos
Pablo
Von: Wien [wien-boun...@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at] im Auftrag von delamora
[delam...@unam.mx]
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 6. Juli 2022 23:44
An: A Mailing list for WIEN2k users
Betreff: [Wien] RV: Bi almost cubic
Dear WIEN2k community,
Its me again
uftrag von delamora
[delam...@unam.mx]
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 6. Juli 2022 23:44
An: A Mailing list for WIEN2k users
Betreff: [Wien] RV: Bi almost cubic
Dear WIEN2k community,
Its me again reporting something that does not seem correct;
Bi is almost cubic, next to Po, the only element with a true simple
Dear WIEN2k community,
Its me again reporting something that does not seem correct;
Bi is almost cubic, next to Po, the only element with a true simple cubic unit
cell
Bi unit cell parameters;
R LATTICE,NONEQUIV.ATOMS: 1
MODE OF CALC=RELA unit=ang
8.591340 8.591340 22.415740
Thank you,
But there is something strange;
If
MoS2-Ti.struct
is the doped supercell but without having run "x struct", then if I do;
x sgroup
cp MoS2-Ti.struct_sgroup MoS2-Ti.struct
init -b
it does not work
But if I do;
x sgroup
cp MoS2-Ti.struct_sgroup MoS2-Ti.struct
x sgroup
cp
Lawrence Marks,
With "sgroup" the impurity was at the corner "0,0,0"
With your instructions;
--
Now go through the initialization AND EVERY TIME IT ASKS YOU IF YOU WANT TO
ACCEPT THE CHANGE SAY "Y" (yes).
-
the impurity went into the cell "1/3, 2/3, 0.2" and the initiation was
Gavin Abo and Lawrence Marks,
Thanks for your answers, but I still get the same problem
I make the supercell, add an impurity (Ti) calculate Rmt
then I try two possibilities
a) I run "sgroup" and get the new struct file
b) I run "nn" get the new file and then "sgroup" and get the new file
in
-c -p > & .mist(14:38:21) running dstart in single mode
STOP DSTART ENDS
46.329u 0.129s 0:46.46 99.9%0+0k 0+23584io 0pf+0w
-> new MoS2-Ti-3.in0 generated
init_lapw finished ok
Kind Regards,
Gavin
WIEN2k user
On 7/4/2022 1:21 PM, delamora wrote:
Dear Wien community,
I
Dear Wien community,
I am trying to dope MoS2 which is
---
SG 194
a,b,c = 3.168, 3.168, 12.322
90, 90, 120
Mo: 1/3, 2/3, 1/4
S: 1/3, 2/3, 0.625
---
I make a 3x3x1 supercell and add a Ti atom at 8/9, 1/9, 0.95
With "sgroup" the SG=156 P3m1 (file attached)
and when I
I do not know if it would be large, but to compare them you need to use
compatible systems, and that includes Rmt
Pablo
Dear Prof. Delamora,
Thank you for your reply. You are right that we should keep
Rmt (Li) to 1.66 for both cases
I would assume that if you want to compare these 2 systems in energy then you
need to use the same Rmt in both systems, and it would be with 1.66, otherwise
I assume that in the secont system (after Li extracction) the spheres will
overlap if 1.72 is used.
Now, if you have different # of atoms
Thank you, it was installed without problem
Pablo
Go to https://www.fftw.org/. You may be able to get a pre-installed version,
although it may not be optimal.
Yes, you need fftw3 for 21.1. It is not an intel product.
On Wed, Jun 8, 2022 at 1:23 PM delamora
Dear WIEN2k community;
I am trying to compile the 21-1 version with oneAPI
I run;
./check_minimal_software_requirements.sh
and I get
---
/usr/bin/which: no fftw-wisdom in
(/root/.local/bin:/*/home/Programas/WIEN2k-19.1:.)
FFTW3 libraries:
No fftw3 libraries could be
://launchpad.net/ubuntu/focal/+package/libxss-dev
[3] https://packages.ubuntu.com/focal/libstdc++6
On 5/16/2022 4:10 PM, delamora wrote:
Dear WIEN2k Comunity,
I am installing the WIEN2k 19.1 version in Ubuntu 20.04 and I try to install;
perl-Math-Complex.noarch
libXScrnSaver
compat-libstdc++-33
I get
Dear WIEN2k Comunity,
I am installing the WIEN2k 19.1 version in Ubuntu 20.04 and I try to install;
perl-Math-Complex.noarch
libXScrnSaver
compat-libstdc++-33
I get as an answer
package cannot be found
Any suggestion is welcome
Saludos
Pablo
___
Wien
Dear WIEN2k community,
To optimize the internal coordinates by minimizing the forces it should not do
it with SOC.
Now my question is; I want to compare a system with ferromagnetic and
antiferromagnetic to see which one is more stable. Can I do it after I
incorporate SOC?
Saludos
Pablo
e.com/wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/msg12338.html
On 5/9/2022 4:41 PM, delamora wrote:
Dear Wien community,
I am doing a calculation with SOC, and when I try to plot the band structure
without SOC
spaghetti -p -up
it looks fine
but when I put it with SOC
spaghetti -p -up -so
I get a bandstructure with many vert
Dear Wien community,
I am doing a calculation with SOC, and when I try to plot the band structure
without SOC
spaghetti -p -up
it looks fine
but when I put it with SOC
spaghetti -p -up -so
I get a bandstructure with many vertical lines
Is there a way to fix it?
(WIEN2k-19.1)
Thanks
Pablo
om/content/www/us/en/develop/documentation/fortran-compiler-oneapi-dev-guide-and-reference/top/compiler-setup/using-the-command-line/specifying-the-location-of-compiler-components.html
[4] https://estuarine.jp/2021/03/install-oneapi/?lang=en
Kind Regards,
Gavin
WIEN2k user
On 2/22/2022 12:2
Dear WIEN2k community,
I installed the WIEN2k and corrected what Gabin Abo suggested;
dnf install compat-libstdc++-33
=>
dnf install libstdc++
but when I tried to run
w2web
I got;
-
$ w2web
Can't locate Sys/Hostname.pm in @INC (you may need to install the Sys::Hostname
module) (@INC
/showthread.php?203253-How-to-find-package-compat-libstdc-(contains-libstdc-so-5)
[3] https://forums.fedoraforum.org/showthread.php?202686-compat-libstdc-issue
On 1/26/2022 8:04 PM, delamora wrote:
Dear WIEN2k community,
I am trying to install the WIEN2k in Fedora, I tried Fedora 35 and later Fedora
34
so
Dear WIEN2k community,
I am trying to install the WIEN2k in Fedora, I tried Fedora 35 and later Fedora
34
so when I try to install the different packages;
-
dnf install tcsh emacs gnuplot perl-Math-Complex.noarch libXScrnSaver
have never actually known what the question is."
Dr. Gerhard H. Fecher
Institut of Physics
Johannes Gutenberg - University
55099 Mainz
Von: Wien [wien-boun...@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at] im Auftrag von delamora
[delam.
Dear WIEN community,
I am trying to optimize a spinel structure.
The normal spinel AB2X4 is FCC with SG 227
A: 1/8,1/8,1/8
B: 1/2,1/2,1/2
X: x,x,x x~1/4
so it has 2 free parameters; 'volume' and 'x,x,x'
but in my cases B is magnetic and it has antiferromagnetic coupling, B also
forms the 3D
st with you,
is that you have never actually known what the question is."
Dr. Gerhard H. Fecher
Institut of Physics
Johannes Gutenberg - University
55099 Mainz
Von: Wien [wien-boun...@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at] im Au
I calculated IrO2 as an example with WIEN2k 19.1
"run -so"
and when I calculated the bands using the WIEN2k interface I do not see the
comand
"x lapwso -p"
in the "bandstructure" section, so the bands look wierd.
If I calculate the bands in the interface and after
"x lapw2 -qtl -band -so"
I run
compiler (and MPI if you need that).
[1] https://www.mail-archive.com/wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/msg21134.html
[2] https://www.scivision.dev/intel-oneapi-fortran-install/
On 7/16/2021 8:00 PM, delamora wrote:
Thank you Gavin Abo and Laurence Marks.
It seems that I can download it from Mexico
port.html__;!!Dq0X2DkFhyF93HkjWTBQKhk!BE815WRgDxTHbLBQEba9pFnKi7uazdHVymBvAltAP4QMMloTB75ba_nEMROoxaYq4nh_Uw$>
On 7/16/2021 5:28 PM, delamora wrote:
Dear WIEN community;
Are there free intel compilers for academic use?
Thanks
Pablo
___
Wien mailing list
Wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at<mailto:Wien@zeus.theochem.tuw
Dear WIEN community;
Are there free intel compilers for academic use?
Thanks
Pablo
___
Wien mailing list
Wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at
http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/mailman/listinfo/wien
SEARCH the MAILING-LIST at:
Dear WIEN community;
I want to do a DMFT calculation.
My quetion is which package is good to be used with WIEN2k
That is, it is easy to install and easy to run.
I say this because I had a lot of trouble to install one package in the past.
Thanks
Pablo
De: Wien en nombre de Pavel Ondračka
Enviado: miércoles, 14 de abril de 2021 01:30 a. m.
Para: A Mailing list for WIEN2k users
Asunto: Re: [Wien] Installing WIEN2k, w2web not running
On Wed, 2021-04-14 at 06:12 +, delamora wrote:
> Thank you Pavel
>
> I do a search
> dnf sea
,
there is a difference between the package with hostname utility and the
missing perl package with Sys::Hostname module. The proper package
should be perl-Sys-Hostname.
Best regards
Pavel
On Tue, 2021-04-13 at 23:21 +, delamora wrote:
> I have a comment at the end
> Dear WIEN2k comunity,
I have a comment at the end
Dear WIEN2k comunity,
I am installing the WIEN2k package in a new computer, all seems to run well,
except for
w2web
I run w2web
it says;
Can't locate Sys/Hostname.pm in @INC (you may need to install the Sys::Hostname
module) (@INC
Dear WIEN2k comunity,
I am installing the WIEN2k package in a new computer, all seems to run well,
except for
w2web
I run w2web
it says;
Can't locate Sys/Hostname.pm in @INC (you may need to install the Sys::Hostname
module) (@INC contains: /usr/local/lib64/perl5/5.32
.
But there is not a tool to search the topic
- Original Message -
From: "delamora"
To: "wien"
Sent: Monday, March 15, 2021 9:38:09 PM
Subject: [Wien] [SPAM?] Re: about effective mass
You could search in the mailing list...
Hello,
I want to find the effective mass for densitiy o
You could search in the mailing list...
Hello,
I want to find the effective mass for densitiy of state using wien2k code. I
searched some information on the internet and found some knowledge. it says the
spaghetti file should be used for the plot of E-k
r PRATTO ? Just guessing.
---
Prof Laurence Marks
"Research is to see what everyone else has seen, and to think what nobody else
has thought", Albert Szent-Györgyi
www.numis.northwestern.edu<http://www.numis.northwestern.edu>
On Wed, Mar 10, 2021, 13:40 delamora
mailto:delam...@una
Dear WIEN2k comunity;
I am doping Dy3TaO7 with Sc, so I have a large cell with 44 atoms.
I put
RxK = 7
500 k points
This system is an insulator, so after converging I did a mBJ, but the
calculation stoped at cycle 18;
in cycle 15ETEST: .13247691 CTEST: .0181758
in cycle 16
Thank you Gavin,
I adjusted the
case.int
and it worked
I am using the WIEN2k 19.1 version
Pablo
___
Wien mailing list
Wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at
http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/mailman/listinfo/wien
SEARCH the MAILING-LIST at:
Dear WIEN2k community,
I am doing Al2O3 and the DOS stops at 7eV, in the gap
In Al2O3.in1 I increased emax to 20.5 with no improvement
K-VECTORS FROM UNIT:4 -9.0 20.5 74 emin / de (emax=Ef+de) / nband
Pablo
Struct;
Title
R LATTICE,NONEQUIV.ATOMS: 2 167_R-3c
.youtube.com/watch?v=EWkrqqnOgdo). It
has a number of advantages over X11 display forwarding.
Oleg
From: Wien on behalf of delamora
Sent: Friday, October 2, 2020 15:39
To: A Mailing list for WIEN2k users
Subject: [Wien] View structure in a remote machine
Dear WI
Re: [Wien] View structure in a remote machine
I would suggest trying VNC (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EWkrqqnOgdo). It
has a number of advantages over X11 display forwarding.
Oleg
From: Wien on behalf of delamora
Sent: Friday, October 2,
Dear WIEN2k community,
I am doing calculations in a remote machine ("remote.machine")
I can connect with
remote.machine:7890
and with this I can do calculations in than machine
but when I try to see the crystal structure, xcrysden, the image appears in
"remote.machine" so I cannot see it in my
Ti d-orbitals
Saludos
Pablo
____
De: delamora
Thank you, I will
Pablo
Try looking in the lecture notes on the W2k page. I am sure you will find a
Based exercise.
_
Professor Laurence Marks
On Sat, Mar 21, 2020, 20:26 delamora
mailto:delam..
ent-Gyorgi
www.numis.northwestern.edu<http://www.numis.northwestern.edu>
On Sat, Mar 21, 2020, 20:26 delamora
mailto:delam...@unam.mx>> wrote:
Dear WIEN2k community
I want to do bader analysis, but I find the usersguide difficult to use for the
case.inaim;
The usersguide gives two
Dear WIEN2k community
I want to do bader analysis, but I find the usersguide difficult to use for the
case.inaim;
The usersguide gives two very different inputs, with "CRIT" or "SURF" in the
first line
Are these the only options? What do they mean?
The first case has 5 lines and the second has 8
Dear Wien2k community,
I have a half metal system, a dn spin gap can be seen in the bands and DOS, but
when the Fermi surfaces are calculated there are some Fermi surfaces both, up
and dn, directions
Cheers
Pablo
___
Wien mailing list
Dear WIEN2k community;
I tried to make a spin polarized calculation the Ce metal;
FCC a=b=c=5.16A with a U=5eV
and also an antiferromagnetic calculation
a=b=c/sqrt(2), c=5.16A
Ce up; 0,0,0
Ce dn; 1/2, 1/2, 1/2
and they did not converge with cc=0.001
for the ferromagnetic calculation I did 140
The spinel structure has AB2O4
There are many issues; If you dope, then you would replace some atoms by
others, there you break the symmetry, no longer Fd-3m
This new atoms have a different size the position of the atoms and the cell
parameters would also change.
Pablo
Dear WIEN community,
I have a technical question;
I try to optimize the graphite unit cell and when I try to get the interplane
axis, C axis, I get a different answer if I use GGA or LDA; with GGA I get a
large value, but with LDA I get the correct answer.
My intuition says that between planes
Asunto: [Wien] Magnetic classification?
Hello Wien2k users
Does the magnetic classification in the Wien2k community is done according the
atomic magnetic moment or the total magnetic moment?
>From the following magnetic states which one is magnetic and which one is non
>magnetic?
This seems to be a simple error, overlapping spheres, you have RMT=2.5
De: Wien en nombre de Aamir Shafique
Enviado: miércoles, 31 de julio de 2019 08:41 a. m.
Para: wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at
Asunto: [Wien] wien2k error during initialization
Dear wien2k
I find a small error in case.outputd
At the beginning of the file I see
=
gmin =4.8
gmax = 12.0
...
KVEC(27) = 00 -84.7329786
KVEC(28) =-3 -3 -74.842637 24
...
KVEC(
I forget how to multiply...
It is "formula units" that should be taken into account and not primitive cells
With x=0.0125=1/16 would require a supercell of 8 (=2x2x2), that is 8 primitive
cells, 16 formula units = 112 atoms
With x=0.01 = 1/100 => 100 formula units => 100*7 =700 atoms
LiMn1-x NdxO4
With x=0.125=1/8 would require a supercell of 8 (=2x2x2), that is 8 primitive
cells, 16 formula units = 112 atoms
With x=0.01 = 1/100 = **1,200** => 1,400 atoms
LiMn1.99Nd0.01O4
This would require a supercell of 100 size, which would be very
LiMn1.99Nd0.01O4
This would require a supercell of 100 size, which would be very difficult to
calculate due to its large size.
A larger doping would require a smaller supercell
At present we are working on LiMn2O4 spinel Fd-3m.
Is it
What I see is
run -i120
if this is the case, there is a space missing, it should be
run -i 120
Mensaje original
De: Indranil mal
Fecha: 30/5/19 1:49 PM (GMT-06:00)
A: A Mailing list for WIEN2k users
Asunto: [Wien] Issue regarding default iteration (40) in scf calculation
See the end
===
So, you are saying that from this file
Title
P LATTICE,NONEQUIV.ATOMS: 2
MODE OF CALC=RELA unit=ang
10.263863 10.263863 10.263863 55.256000 55.256000 55.256000
ATOM -1: X=0.3550 Y=0.3550 Z=0.3550
ATOM -1:X= 0.6450 Y=0.6450 Z=0.6450
ATOM
Sorry
It should be
P LATTICE,NONEQUIV.ATOMS: 4 =>
P LATTICE,NONEQUIV.ATOMS: 2
Thank you for your valuable feedback, I appreciate it very much. I still do not
know how to create the structure file. Please see below.
No. You should not run a supercell for a R structure, since this will
Sorry
It should be
P LATTICE,NONEQUIV.ATOMS: 4 =>
P LATTICE,NONEQUIV.ATOMS: 2
Thank you for your valuable feedback, I appreciate it very much. I still do not
know how to create the structure file. Please see below.
No. You should not run a supercell for a R structure, since this will
Thank you for your valuable feedback, I appreciate it very much. I still do not
know how to create the structure file. Please see below.
No. You should not run a supercell for a R structure, since this will
even with 1x1x1 create a 3 times (conventional hexagonal) cell.
Instead,
i) remove the
Estimado Israel,
You make long questions, and people do not read them
What about this cell
R LATTICE,NONEQUIV.ATOMS: 3 161_R3c
9.519303 9.519303 26.005203 90.00 90.00120.00
ATOM -1: X=0.1450 Y=0.1450 Z=0.1450
Fe1NPT= 781 R0=0.5000 RMT= 1.97Z:
Dear WIEN2k community;
I am trying to learn about the optical properties that can be calculated, I
have the papers of Claudia Ambrosch-Draxl (usersguide), but they are quite
complicated.
Is there a text where one can learn about this subject without too many
equations?
Cheers
Pablo
to make a heterostructure of TiO2/ZnO,
just two layers for now. Your response is highly appreciated.
Kind regards
Lawal
On Sunday, April 28, 2019, 7:01:09 AM GMT+8, delamora wrote:
Dear Developers and Users,
I need your help to generate unit cell of a semiconductor structure of two
layers
Dear Developers and Users,
I need your help to generate unit cell of a semiconductor structure of two
layers of different materials. Any hint is highly appreciated.
Your question is not clear... There are many possibilities
Do you want to put two layers?
Free electrons do not contribute to the magnetic moment, this magnetic moment
is due to localized electrons around atoms, but go out of the MT sphere.
De: Wien en nombre de Wien2k User
Enviado: viernes, 19 de abril de 2019 07:01 a. m.
Para: A Mailing list for
1 - 100 of 322 matches
Mail list logo