Re: [Wien] ipv6 with olsrd2?

2017-08-16 Diskussionsfäden Henning Rogge
On Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 4:30 PM, Christian Pock wrote: > Looks like Henning fixed an issue with the MPR handling of oonf/olsrd2. > The most current commit v0.14.1-16-g8c625e9 seems to work fine right know. > > As soon as David updated the daemon on our "TranslationServer"/Gateway,

Re: [Wien] ipv6 with olsrd2?

2017-08-16 Diskussionsfäden Christian Pock
@lists.funkfeuer.at> Betreff: Re: [Wien] ipv6 with olsrd2? Just to mention it, we found a major issue in the message generation code of Olsrd2 during the Battlemesh in Vienna... which was the reason behind releasing 0.14.0... I would suggest you update to a new version if you have something

Re: [Wien] ipv6 with olsrd2?

2017-08-16 Diskussionsfäden Henning Rogge
On Tue, Aug 15, 2017 at 4:52 PM, Erich N. Pekarek wrote: >> But the real solution should be to make sure Olsrd2 measures the link >> cost right... so if there are good examples of links Olsrd2 classifies >> "too good", a modification of the metric would be the right thing. > > I

Re: [Wien] ipv6 with olsrd2?

2017-08-15 Diskussionsfäden Erich N. Pekarek
Hello! Am 2017-08-15 um 14:16 schrieb Henning Rogge: On Tue, Aug 15, 2017 at 2:12 PM, Markus Kittenberger wrote: my 2 cents are that bridges without WDS already cause ipv4 problems and not only issues with ipv6, so they should never have been used. Unfortunately i

Re: [Wien] ipv6 with olsrd2?

2017-08-15 Diskussionsfäden Erich N. Pekarek
Am 2017-08-15 um 14:12 schrieb Markus Kittenberger: my 2 cents are that bridges without WDS already cause ipv4 problems and not only issues with ipv6, so they should never have been used. Unfortunately i fear there are still quite a few of them in our network. Definitely all firmware builds

Re: [Wien] ipv6 with olsrd2?

2017-08-15 Diskussionsfäden Henning Rogge
On Tue, Aug 15, 2017 at 2:12 PM, Markus Kittenberger wrote: > my 2 cents are that bridges without WDS already cause ipv4 problems and not > only issues with ipv6, so they should never have been used. > > Unfortunately i fear there are still quite a few of them in our

Re: [Wien] ipv6 with olsrd2?

2017-08-15 Diskussionsfäden Markus Kittenberger
my 2 cents are that bridges without WDS already cause ipv4 problems and not only issues with ipv6, so they should never have been used. Unfortunately i fear there are still quite a few of them in our network. lg Markus On Tue, Aug 15, 2017 at 12:07 PM, Erich N. Pekarek wrote:

Re: [Wien] ipv6 with olsrd2?

2017-08-15 Diskussionsfäden Erich N. Pekarek
Hi! Am 2017-08-15 um 11:43 schrieb Matthias Šubik: let me have a guess ... Let me guess a bit further... On 11 Aug 2017, at 15:37, Gui Iribarren wrote: On 11/08/17 13:43, Christian Pock wrote: ... For some reason, not all routers running olsr2 are reachable via IPv6.

Re: [Wien] ipv6 with olsrd2?

2017-08-15 Diskussionsfäden Matthias Šubik
let me have a guess ... > On 11 Aug 2017, at 15:37, Gui Iribarren wrote: > > On 11/08/17 13:43, Christian Pock wrote: ... >> >> >> For some reason, not all routers running olsr2 are reachable via IPv6. As >> far as we found out, this is related to the setting "WDS

Re: [Wien] ipv6 with olsrd2?

2017-08-11 Diskussionsfäden Henning Rogge
Just to mention it, we found a major issue in the message generation code of Olsrd2 during the Battlemesh in Vienna... which was the reason behind releasing 0.14.0... I would suggest you update to a new version if you have something like 0.13.x or before. Henning Rogge On Fri, Aug 11, 2017 at

Re: [Wien] ipv6 with olsrd2?

2017-08-11 Diskussionsfäden Christian Pock
Hi Gui, you are right: IPv6 on olsr1 is no longer active on the majority of node that supported it earlier this year (or last year). Anyway, as far as I know the tunnel service "6in4" is still active, thus: as long as you are able to find a path on IPv6@olsr1, you might be lucky to get online.