Thanks again Dr Gavin
* I see that the procedure in w2web is different from that of terminal
* I couldn't understand why
use x lapw1 -band -dn -orb when up is selected
and
use x lapw1 -band -up -orb when dn is selected
* Do we make one plot for both spins or one plot for every spin?
Best
Your procedure looks like it would likely work fine.
However, as I mentioned before [
http://www.mail-archive.com/wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/msg15331.html
], I would follow the bandstructure steps that w2web gives, which is
most likely the following (as w2web might change them depending
Thank you Dr Gavin for the detailed explanation
Can we adopt this procedure for band structure
x lapw1(c) -band -up -orb # eece potential is included by orb
x lapw1(c) -band -dn -orb
x spaghetti (-c) -up
x spaghetti (-c) -dn
Best regards
--
Mr: A.Reggad
Laboratoire de Génie
Thank you again Dr Gavin for the answer
Effectively what you have said
The adding of the flag "-eece" doesn't make error but it doesn't make change
Best regards
--
Mr: A.Reggad
Laboratoire de Génie Physique
Université Ibn Khaldoun - Tiaret
Adresse: BP 144 AL ATTAF AIN DEFLA
Tel:
As you have said, putting -eece after x spaghetti should make no
calculation difference, such that it does no harm (similar to adding
-orb [1]) as the switch currently seems to do nothing for spaghetti,
except for maybe wasting your own time from continually typing those
extra unneeded
I am sorry I have made mistake
The main script x_lapw has a flag " -eece " and the script x lapw1 doesn't
I don't know what's the difference between them
And about the difference between the x lapw1 and x lapw1 -eece commands
lies in the fact that the first is for standard method (gga or lda )
Do you mean x_lapw or x lapw ? Sometimes an underscore makes a difference !
and what was the difference between x lapw1 -eece and x lapw1, when you tried
it ?
Ciao
Gerhard
DEEP THOUGHT in D. Adams; Hitchhikers Guide to the Galaxy:
"I think the problem, to be quite honest with you,
is that you
Thanks Dr Gavin for your answer
- The the -eece flag exists for the script x lapw ( page 58 of the
usetguide (
http://susi.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/reg_user/textbooks/usersguide.pdf ) and I
tried it and it works well.
- Even for spaghetti I have executed the following command and it doesn't
give
In a terminal ($ is a bash shell):
$ x -h lapw1 | tail -1
x lapw1 [-c -up/-dn -it -noHinv -noHinv0 -p -nohns -orb -band -nmat_only
-nmr -scratch dir]
$ x -h spaghetti | tail -1
x spaghetti [-up/-dn -so -p -hf -enefile]
Using "x -h PROGRAMNAME" above, the -eece flag is not given as a valid
Hello again
I have found the procedure for DFT+U and I have deduct that for onsite
hybrid as follows and I want to know if it's correct:
- *Band Structure*
1. copy case.klist (case= hcp,fcc,bcc,sc)
2. copy case.insp and enter the value of Efermi in case.scf2
3. verify Emin Emax
Dear wien users
What's the procedure used to calculate the band structure and DOS using the
onsite hybrid method.
Best regards
--
Mr: A.Reggad
Laboratoire de Génie Physique
Université Ibn Khaldoun - Tiaret
Adresse: BP 144 AL ATTAF AIN DEFLA
Tel: +213(0)561861963
Algerie
11 matches
Mail list logo