a dedicated person for
this, and the current salaried staff of the Polish chapter does not have
sufficient time to answer all requests.
--
Piotr Konieczny, PhD
http://hanyang.academia.edu/PiotrKonieczny
http://scholar.google.com/citations?user=gdV8_AEJ
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Piotrus
On 2
I just got an email soliciting submissions to new, open source "Journal
of Wiki Studies".
I didn't see anything about this on this list yet, so...
See http://wikistudies.org/index.php?journal=wikistudies=index
--
Piotr Konieczny, PhD
http://hanyang.academia.edu/PiotrKoni
I have a paper on why long-term contributors retire, but it is still in
review. If you or anyone else would like a copy, do send me an email and
I'll send you the draft.
--
Piotr Konieczny, PhD
http://hanyang.academia.edu/PiotrKonieczny
http://scholar.google.com/citations?user=gdV8_AEJ
ask something else?
Thank you for any comments, and do not hesitate to be critical - I'd
much rather redo the survey now then after I send it out :)
--
Piotr Konieczny, PhD
http://hanyang.academia.edu/PiotrKonieczny
http://scholar.google.com/citations?user=gdV8_AEJ
http://en.wikipedia.
part... :>
--
Piotr Konieczny, PhD
http://hanyang.academia.edu/PiotrKonieczny
http://scholar.google.com/citations?user=gdV8_AEJ
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Piotrus
On 7/1/2016 14:56, Andrew Krizhanovsky wrote:
Thank you for this good news about the journal!
But I (as a us
that the OA movement
hasn't made much inroads in their field (well, it is, to some degree,
but that's going OT). Bottom line is that WMF grants should support
research and its dissemination in what is seen as quality journals and
related outlets, too.
--
Piotr Konieczny, PhD
http
Outside the widely popular percentage of female editors on Wikipedia/WMF
projects in general, and the percentage of Wikipedia biographical
articles about females, is there anything else that has been used in
literature / existing studies that you'd consider worth mentioning?
Thanks,
--
Piotr
We are very happy to hear that your findings corroborate ours. What's
your take on what we think is rather surprising high percentage of
female bios for the South Asian/Confucian clusters? (i.e. non-Islamic Asia)?
--
Piotr Konieczny, PhD
http://hanyang.academia.edu/PiotrKonieczny
http
/ministers. Through some of that may be, as you suggest, material
for separate paper(s). We will see if we can report on any of those
differences. If you know of any better data to compare ours too, please
don't hesitate to suggest it!
--
Piotr Konieczny, PhD
http://hanyang.academia.edu
inclusive of female biographies than others (including the Western
clusters). Are we seeing a data error, or something else - and if so, what?
--
Piotr Konieczny, PhD
http://hanyang.academia.edu/PiotrKonieczny
http://scholar.google.com/citations?user=gdV8_AEJ
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki
How complete is wikipapers referata site? Could it be the case of lack
of updates/maintenance/editor activity resulting in missing data?
--
Piotr Konieczny, PhD
http://hanyang.academia.edu/PiotrKonieczny
http://scholar.google.com/citations?user=gdV8_AEJ
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki
I am also a bit confused about what you are asking, particularly with
regards to the word thesis.
Are you asking for a list of possible student assignments regarding
Wikipedia? As in - topics they can write about? On Wikipedia? About
Wikipedia?
--
Piotr Konieczny, PhD
http
of an international political
opportunity structure in the form of worldwide awareness and protests,
which in turn enabled a national political opportunity structure by
informing and mobilizing American citizens.
http://csi.sagepub.com/content/early/2014/09/26/0011392114551649
--
Piotr Konieczny, PhD
http
outstanding research (through a prize perhaps as Aaron
suggested)
All +1
--
Piotr Konieczny, PhD
http://hanyang.academia.edu/PiotrKonieczny
http://scholar.google.com/citations?user=gdV8_AEJ
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Piotrus
___
Wiki
Wikipedia rules, our regular policies enforced by
regular admin corp, plus in extreme cases potential shaming of unethical
research through publicity/contacting unethical researcher departments
should be enough.
--
Piotr Konieczny, PhD
http://hanyang.academia.edu/PiotrKonieczny
http
.
--
Piotr Konieczny, PhD
http://hanyang.academia.edu/PiotrKonieczny
http://scholar.google.com/citations?user=gdV8_AEJ
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Piotrus
On 7/29/2014 22:42, Aaron Halfaker wrote:
I don't believe there is any claim of authority for RCOM. At least I
was not involved
That's extremely helpful, and I suggest copying it to the
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Research:Committee page
(that page needs many updates)
--
Piotr Konieczny, PhD
http://hanyang.academia.edu/PiotrKonieczny
http://scholar.google.com/citations?user=gdV8_AEJ
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki
ones, and that's it. In other
words, we need to condolence and organize the sprawl mess that research
pages have become, not to add to them.
--
Piotr Konieczny, PhD
http://hanyang.academia.edu/PiotrKonieczny
http://scholar.google.com/citations?user=gdV8_AEJ
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki
meaningful way (as in, imposing
on them more than asking for few seconds-a minute or two each year,
collectively) I believe this discussion is a storm in a teacup and,
indeed, a waste of our time.
--
Piotr Konieczny, PhD
http://hanyang.academia.edu/PiotrKonieczny
http://scholar.google.com/citations
or visible than it has been for the past few years; in fact
I am predicting the continuation of its decline, as more and more people
realize its a toothless and basically unnecessary body.
--
Piotr Konieczny, PhD
http://hanyang.academia.edu/PiotrKonieczny
http://scholar.google.com/citations?user
be researched with regards to Wikipedia. So, at least as
far as I am concerned, instead of looking like a
best-practices-we-want-to-help body, it started to look like
IRB/Godking-wannabe, offering nothing but promising to contribute to
instruction/procedure creep.
--
Piotr Konieczny, PhD
Hey there,
I wonder if anyone from our group is coming to Yokohama's ISA's
conference next week, and would like to chat about Wikipedia research?
--
Piotr Konieczny, PhD
http://hanyang.academia.edu/PiotrKonieczny
http://scholar.google.com/citations?user=gdV8_AEJ
http://en.wikipedia.org
That's intriguing, any idea why Wikia is being so unfriendly with that?
Are they doing the usual corporation our data is ours/secrecy is
good/we don't need your research as it may reveal things we don't want
the world/competitors to know about shtick?
--
Piotr Konieczny, PhD
http
Hill (CC-ed), which did not however focus on vandalism.
Wikia (the largest wiki farm?) appears to be drastically under-researched...
--
Piotr Konieczny, PhD
http://hanyang.academia.edu/PiotrKonieczny
http://scholar.google.com/citations?user=gdV8_AEJ
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Piotrus
only just noticed this email (seems
it got routed to my newsgroup folder which I don't check regularly). I
looked into this again because of this on wiki message:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Piotrus#wikidashboard:_403:_User_account_expired
Cheers,
--
Piotr Konieczny, PhD
http
Hi everyone,
Another question: do we have an estimate of a vandal population?
I also asked this at
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Village_pump_%28technical%29#How_many_editors_are_blocked_indefinitely.3F
but so far no good estimates have been provided.
--
Piotr Konieczny, PhD
http
to Wikipedia every
given timeframe. About 100,000-120,000 editors make at least one edit to
Wikipedia each month. If we knew how many are indef blocked in that
period, that would be another useful estimate.
--
Piotr Konieczny, PhD
http://hanyang.academia.edu/PiotrKonieczny
http
This is just a note that the Dashboard us up and running again - thanks
to all who helped!
--
Piotr Konieczny, PhD
http://hanyang.academia.edu/PiotrKonieczny
http://scholar.google.com/citations?user=gdV8_AEJ
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Piotrus
On 6/1/2013 9:09 AM, Piotr Konieczny
Thank you for the update!
--
Piotr Konieczny, PhD
http://hanyang.academia.edu/PiotrKonieczny
http://scholar.google.com/citations?user=gdV8_AEJ
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Piotrus
On 6/9/2013 10:30 PM, LB wrote:
Hi Piotr,
I've prepared the statements and could start running them
non-CS
person friendly, as two or so years ago when I last research this topic
they were, IMHO, still beyond the means of a non-coder to deal with.
Alternatively, I can consider paying someone to run a number of such
queries for me, since I now even have a real research budget :)
--
Piotr
/listinfo/wiki-research-l
I have a paper on SOPA protests in review; email me if you'd like a
draft paper copy.
--
Piotr Konieczny, PhD
http://hanyang.academia.edu/PiotrKonieczny
http://scholar.google.com/citations?user=gdV8_AEJ
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Piotrus
Other than data from Wikipedia Editor Survey 2011, what has been
published on this topic?
Thanks,
--
Piotr Konieczny, PhD
http://hanyang.academia.edu/PiotrKonieczny
http://scholar.google.com/citations?user=gdV8_AEJ
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Piotrus
in the
WikiProject Pittsburgh, all to no avail. I am still at a loss to try to
explain why we failed (i.e. why the meetups failed to contribute to
editor retention).
--
Piotr Konieczny
To be defeated and not submit, is victory; to be victorious and rest on one's
laurels, is defeat. --Józef Pilsudski
On 11
tend to increase
the article size by about 10%. Is there any research on how an increase
in article size affects page load times, and editing window lag?
--
Piotr Konieczny
To be defeated and not submit, is victory; to be victorious and rest on one's
laurels, is defeat. --Józef Pilsudski
- MediaWiki has a pdf-export option (wikibook), and it is a standard
feature in Open/Libre Office, too.
--
Piotr Konieczny
On 11/2/2012 5:58 AM, Dariusz Jemielniak wrote:
unfortunately, if you want to make impact in the Academia, the
approach of all we need is a wiki will not work. Even the most avid
, with the understanding that the
non-anonymous reviews are not counted as official reviews, for the
purpose of double-blind peer review / indices assessment.
--
Piotr Konieczny
To be defeated and not submit, is victory; to be victorious and rest on one's
laurels, is defeat. --Józef Pilsudski
On 11/2/2012 8
.
--
Piotr Konieczny
To be defeated and not submit, is victory; to be victorious and rest on one's
laurels, is defeat. --Józef Pilsudski
On 11/1/2012 2:21 PM, Aaron Halfaker wrote:
I'd suggest focusing on the area of wiki studies, nothing more and
nothing less.
I don't think that this is a good
for less than a year
* of Wikipedians who have been registered for less than a month
The data does not have to be current.
--
Piotr Konieczny
To be defeated and not submit, is victory; to be victorious and rest on one's
laurels, is defeat. --Józef Pilsudski
who live in places where learning
English is difficult; my scorn concerns only languages which don't
classify under these criteria, and even there I acknowledge the
existence of generational digital/language divide issues.
--
Piotr Konieczny
To be defeated and not submit, is victory
On 10/31/2012 6:34 PM, Federico Leva (Nemo) wrote:
Piotr Konieczny, 31/10/2012 23:08:
Would anyone have/know where to find any of the following estimates for
* of Wikipedians with a userpage
http://stats.wikimedia.org/EN/TablesWikipediaEN.htm#namespaces gives
you the number of pages
that is your average article, copyedit/expand/reference
it, give it a uniform style, and move it towards the Wikipedia peer
review procedures (that most anons don't even know exists).
--
Piotr Konieczny
To be defeated and not submit, is victory; to be victorious and rest on one's
laurels
for a current GA
review, would fail, due to not meeting criteria and the primary author
being unreachable to address the issues raised).
--
Piotr Konieczny
To be defeated and not submit, is victory; to be victorious and rest on one's
laurels, is defeat. --Józef Pilsudski
On 10/29/2012 4:30 PM, Laura Hale
many high
quality edits to a large number of other articles).
--
Piotr Konieczny
To be defeated and not submit, is victory; to be victorious and rest on one's
laurels, is defeat. --Józef Pilsudski
On 10/29/2012 12:49 PM, Felipe Ortega wrote:
- Mensaje original -
De: Piotr Konieczny
infrastructure, was and is being done by a small group of very dedicated
people.
--
Piotr Konieczny
To be defeated and not submit, is victory; to be victorious and rest on one's
laurels, is defeat. --Józef Pilsudski
On 10/28/2012 5:57 PM, Kerry Raymond wrote:
My comments on the top editors came from
front.
--
Piotr Konieczny
___
Wiki-research-l mailing list
Wiki-research-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l
this, you should aim for
keywords as categories. A dynamic listing like that may eventually have
a chance of being up to date, and exhaustive.
--
Piotr Konieczny
On 10/4/2012 2:57 PM, Ziko van Dijk wrote:
Hello,
Great list; I will have a closer look later.
Sometimes I have the impression
, and such, but this is not really needed...).
--
Piotr Konieczny
On 9/16/2012 4:12 AM, emijrp wrote:
2012/9/15 Kerry Raymond kerry.raym...@gmail.com
mailto:kerry.raym...@gmail.com
To establish a journal (of any kind), you need a:
* Topic
* A community to read, write, review
So what does it take to get a journal indexed in ISI?
--
Piotr Konieczny
On 9/14/2012 11:33 AM, Jodi Schneider wrote:
Getting First Monday indexed in ISI would be a good step.
I have helped start an open access journal before [1] so I'd be happy
to give advice. But generally, I don't think
This has been proposed before, and I do support it - I think a good case
can be made that there is a field in Wikipedia studies (or on a larger
scale, wiki studies) - yet there is no dedicated journal. This needs to
change.
--
Piotr Konieczny
On 9/14/2012 11:00 AM, Samuel Klein wrote:
I've
Excellent!
--
Piotr Konieczny
To be defeated and not submit, is victory; to be victorious and rest on one's
laurels, is defeat. --Józef Pilsudski
On 5/24/2012 3:26 PM, Dario Taraborelli wrote:
Hi everybody,
I wanted to give you the heads up that the Wikimedia Foundation is planning
of $3.2 billion Think a moment about
where that money is coming from, and where is it going...
--
Piotr Konieczny
To be defeated and not submit, is victory; to be victorious and rest on one's
laurels, is defeat. --Józef Pilsudski
On 5/22/2012 3:13 PM, Richard Jensen wrote:
There seems
a profit margin of 36% on revenues of $3.2
billion.
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/02/14/science/researchers-boycott-elsevier-journal-publisher.html?_r=1
--
Piotr Konieczny
To be defeated and not submit, is victory; to be victorious and rest on one's
laurels, is defeat. --Józef Pilsudski
is freely available online. This can be
done, just like many other free things were created in cyberspace
(Linux, Wikipedia, many open content journals...).
--
Piotr Konieczny
To be defeated and not submit, is victory; to be victorious and rest on one's
laurels, is defeat. --Józef Pilsudski
On 5/22
. With regard to your medical analogy, I have one word for you: generics.
(At least, patents last 20 years, scholarly knowledge is copyrighted and
locked for about a century...).
--
Piotr Konieczny
To be defeated and not submit, is victory; to be victorious and rest on one's
laurels, is defeat. --Józef
Thank you both, those are very useful to know about.
--
Piotr Konieczny
To be defeated and not submit, is victory; to be victorious and rest on one's
laurels, is defeat. --Józef Pilsudski
On 5/17/2012 6:41 PM, Dario Taraborelli wrote:
Piotr, have you seen this:
https://wiki.toolserver.org
, or reviewing a GA) for such assistance :)
--
Piotr Konieczny
To be defeated and not submit, is victory; to be victorious and rest on one's
laurels, is defeat. --Józef Pilsudski
On 5/10/2012 2:29 PM, Dario Taraborelli wrote:
Piotr,
if you are interested in getting fresh figures about lifetime edit
...
Incidentally, if anybody has those numbers, in addition to replying here
feel free to add the information and/or source the one present at
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Wikipedians
Thanks,
--
Piotr Konieczny
PhD Candidate
Dept of Sociology
Uni of Pittsburgh
http
That's a useful FAQ. May I suggest adding it as a link from the main
page of your wiki?
I'd do it myself, but the explanation of the email is @ by you unless
you release it, so... :)
--
Piotr Konieczny
To be defeated and not submit, is victory; to be victorious and rest on one's
laurels
Can somebody tell me why we have both the
http://wikipapers.referata.com/wiki/Main_Page and
http://wikilit.referata.com/wiki/Main_Page ?
--
Piotr Konieczny
PhD Candidate
Dept of Sociology
Uni of Pittsburgh
http://pittsburgh.academia.edu/PiotrKonieczny/
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki
://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:Persondata could
be of use.
--
Piotr Konieczny
PhD Candidate
Dept of Sociology
Uni of Pittsburgh
http://pittsburgh.academia.edu/PiotrKonieczny/
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Piotrus
___
Wiki-research-l mailing list
Wiki
/Wikipedia_interwiki_and_specialized_knowledge_test)
suggest Wikipedia is not even a tenth-complete at this point (just
talking about existing articles, and not their quality).
--
Piotr Konieczny
PhD Candidate
Dept of Sociology
Uni of Pittsburgh
http://pittsburgh.academia.edu/PiotrKonieczny/
http
[3] and follows the publication of two research
updates in the Signpost, see also last month's announcement on this
list [4].
Excellent initiative!
--
Piotr Konieczny
PhD Candidate
Dept of Sociology
Uni of Pittsburgh
http://pittsburgh.academia.edu/PiotrKonieczny/
http://en.wikipedia.org
data on that, or if somebody could create and
run some form of query on the database (as I don't code, this is
unfortunately beyond my capabilities).
--
Piotr Konieczny
PhD Candidate
Dept of Sociology
Uni of Pittsburgh
http://pittsburgh.academia.edu/PiotrKonieczny/
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki
to select feed from only some wikis (for
example, En Wikipedia only, or Pl Wikipedia only).
--
Piotr Konieczny
PhD Candidate
Dept of Sociology
Uni of Pittsburgh
http://pittsburgh.academia.edu/PiotrKonieczny/
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Piotrus
John Vandenberg wrote:
Thank you HaeB for this valuable addition to the signpost.
Seconded.
Ideally, new papers are going to be announced on
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Academic_studies_of_Wikipedia
--
Piotr Konieczny
To be defeated and not submit, is victory; to be victorious
be happy to share them.
Perhaps a public distribution on Google Docs would allow interested
researches to do so, wiki-style?
--
Piotr Konieczny
PhD Candidate
Dept of Sociology
Uni of Pittsburgh
To be defeated and not submit, is victory; to be victorious and rest on
one's laurels, is defeat
Joseph Reagle wrote:
Before getting to particulars, is there some other venue where this
discussion would be more appropriate?
The new https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/education perhaps?
--
Piotr Konieczny
To be defeated and not submit, is victory; to be victorious and rest
do
they intend to deal with potential trouble, and what kind of remedies
they use when they are imposing sanctions.
--
Piotr Konieczny
To be defeated and not submit, is victory; to be victorious and rest on
one's laurels, is defeat. --Józef Pilsudski
inform us of:
I see you found three out of my four papers, I will add the missing one :
A while ago I started a draft of a paper in which I attempted to review
the Wikipedia research up to 2007. I never finished it, but perhaps
you'd find it of use. Let me know if you'd like a copy.
--
Piotr
not half-bad, neither.
Glad to see that the doomsday scenarios are not supported by the data...
--
Piotr Konieczny
To be defeated and not submit, is victory; to be victorious and rest on
one's laurels, is defeat. --Józef Pilsudski
___
Wiki
term (it is a great tool, but one I will
not need for most of my edits). It would be nice if the window was
draggable and would remember its position.
Great job!
--
Piotr Konieczny
To be defeated and not submit, is victory; to be victorious and rest on
one's laurels, is defeat. --Józef
and no
graphical user interface, many would-be users will not be able to use it
* ditto for things like Python and Subversion (I never even heard of the
latter...).
I assume that having a GUI is planned in some foreseeable future?
--
Piotr Konieczny
To be defeated and not submit, is victory
Some time ago - around 2007/2008 - I collected related tools at
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Researching_Wikipedia
I missed the WikiSym session, but I think merging the notes from it with
that page would be useful.
--
Piotr Konieczny
Jodi Schneider wrote:
We
://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Academic_studies_of_Wikipedia
--
Piotr Konieczny
PhD Candidate
Dept of Sociology
Uni of Pittsburgh
To be defeated and not submit, is victory; to be victorious and rest on
one's laurels, is defeat. --Józef Piłsudski
___
Wiki
/Wikipedia:Miscellany_for_deletion/Wikipedia:Subject_Recruitment_Approvals_Group
--
Piotr Konieczny
To be defeated and not submit, is victory; to be victorious and rest on
one's laurels, is defeat. --Józef Piłsudski
___
Wiki-research-l mailing list
Wiki-research-l
by people who don't know what a DOM parser
or SAX interface is?
--
Piotr Konieczny
The problem about Wikipedia is, that it just works in reality, not in
theory.
___
Wiki-research-l mailing list
Wiki-research-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https
for vandalism: as others
pointed out here, anything more complex that obvious vandalism may in
fact be productive. Of course, this is erring on the side of
productivity (just like discarding all revert edits is erring of the
side of unproductivity - WP:BRD and so on...).
--
Piotr Konieczny
/Wikipedia:Wikipedia_Signpost/2009-04-20/News_and_notes#Preliminary%20results%20from%20the%20UNU%20merit%20survey
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/foundation/a/a7/Wikipedia_General_Survey-Overview_0.3.9.pdf
--
Piotr Konieczny
The problem about Wikipedia is, that it just works in reality, not in
theory
Matthew Flaschen wrote:
I'm not at all clear how you arrived at the figure 8 millions vandal
sockpuppet accounts, nor what you mean by it. However, it doesn't
follow from the figures you've cited. Rather, I believe most of the 8.5
million user accounts are simply inactive. Someone made an
it.
Is asking for a survey spamming? That's a good question. If we could
raise it on a community page and get a consensus that it is not, than we
could potentially create a bot that could be fed a survey and would
deliver it to x random users via the above page.
--
Piotr Konieczny
The problem
American Sociological Conference will have its 2008 conference in Boston
on August 1-4th. I wonder if any wikipedia/wiki researchers with a
sociological bent will be there? Perhaps we could organize a lunch or
some other form of impromptu meeting...
--
Piotr Konieczny
The problem about
Nice job, please add it to WP:ACST so it can be known to a wider audience.
--
Prokonsul Piotrus aka Piotr Konieczny ||| __ __
I=I__|_|I__I=
Lennier, get us the hell out of here. |||
Initiating 'getting the hell out of here' maneuver
Aude wrote:
Congratulations! Very interesting to read over the first chapter. If
possible, it would be helpful to look over the pdf.
Indeed. May I suggest adding the direct link to
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:ACST#Thesis ?
--
Piotr Konieczny
The problem about Wikipedia
at this
kind of impact of wikis?
Check: WP:ACST for a list of articles with abstracts. There should be a
few suitable.
--
Piotr Konieczny
The problem about Wikipedia is, that it just works in reality, not in
theory.
___
Wiki-research-l mailing list
84 matches
Mail list logo
