This thread just made me realize that it hasn't been implemented yet and
that what I have been using is yet another Magnus gadget, which, btw, I can
highly recommend!
When I search in Wikipedia, I see a subsection at the bottom which begins
with Wikidata search results. It's great and I use it
Hoi,
I agree when it is the only thing I said.
Yes, I asked you personally and Toby ... and Erik (both of them and several
times) and I always hear good idea, should be easy, we ill look into it
and we get back to you. But as I said, your reply is relevant when it is
the only thing I said and it
(broke Gerard's discussion into a separate thread. See
https://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/wiki-research-l/2014-October/003900.html
)
Kerry's conceptualization of a legitimizing ideology is interesting. It
doesn't seem like the ideology itself is a problem though. Quality control
is
On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 9:09 AM, Aaron Halfaker ahalfa...@wikimedia.org wrote:
When that kind of roadblock gets put in the path of innovation, we're
already ossified.
That's an interesting opinion. It seems that you are suggesting that the
problem is not recoverable. How do you know that is
Hey Pine,
Thanks for prod'ing the conversation. See also the discussion about
Wikipedia's decreasing adaptability on the Wikimedia analytics mailing list
here:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/analytics/2014-October/002651.html
IMO, the critical piece of evidence that English Wikipedia is
Both of the presentations at the October Wikimedia Research Showcase were
fascinating and I encourage everyone to watch them [1]. I would like to
continue to discuss the themes from the showcase about Wikipedia's
adaptability, viability, and diversity.
Aaron's discussion about Wikipedia's ongoing
Hoi,
I read your mail again. It makes me despair.
Wikimedia research is NOT about Wikipedia, not exclusively. When I read
what is an inspiration to you I find all the reasons why Wikipedians do not
accept anything new. Why we still do not have a search that also returns
information on what is NOT
I am currently on vacation and will not be able to answer your mail before
November 10. But I will get back then as soon as possible.
Best regards, Aileen Oeberst
___
Wiki-research-l mailing list
Wiki-research-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Sometimes I find the history of gcc ([[GNU Compiler Collection]]) enlightening.
gcc was one of the first pieces of open source software to be embedded
ubiquitously, globally, in lots of very important things. By 1997 it's
development had ossified and those pushing for new features forked the
code
Aileen makes a good point.
But seriously though, I'm confused about what just happened. I think there
are two interesting ideas being proposed here.
One the examination of a theoretical argument -- that English Wikipedia is
a type of system that requires *adaptive capacity* in order to survive
and
analytics.
Subject: Re: [Wiki-research-l] Research discussion: Visions for Wikipedia
Hey Pine,
Thanks for prod'ing the conversation. See also the discussion about
Wikipedia's decreasing adaptability on the Wikimedia analytics mailing list
here:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail
11 matches
Mail list logo
