Hey folks :)
We've enabled data access for Meta last night. Welcome to Wikidata,
Meta! Questions and coordination is happening at
https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Wikidata:Meta-Wiki
Cheers
Lydia
--
Lydia Pintscher - http://about.me/lydia.pintscher
Product Manager for Wikidata
Wikimedia Deutschla
Obviously data can't be licensed but graphs and other parts can be
copyrighted. I'm just trying to make re-useability easier.
Best
On Wed, Dec 16, 2015 at 4:14 PM Gerard Meijssen
wrote:
> Hoi,
> What is achieved in this way and, on what basis can you license the output
> of a tool?
> Thanks,
>
Hoi,
What is achieved in this way and, on what basis can you license the output
of a tool?
Thanks,
GerardM
On 16 December 2015 at 12:58, Amir Ladsgroup wrote:
> Content created by this tools is licensed under CC-BY v4.0. I made it
> explicit now :)
>
> Best
>
> On Wed, Dec 16, 2015 at 3:11 P
On 16.12.2015 11:10, Gerard Meijssen wrote:
Hoi,
In the WDQ database all the data on P and Q values exist. It is stable
and it has proven itself over the last years as flexible and very fast.
Why build another database that is specific to one goal when another
database already exists that largely
Content created by this tools is licensed under CC-BY v4.0. I made it
explicit now :)
Best
On Wed, Dec 16, 2015 at 3:11 PM Jane Darnell wrote:
> Amir,
> Thanks for your work! I like this one showing how our Sum-of-all-Paintings
> project is doing compared to sculptures (which have many copyrigh
Amir,
Thanks for your work! I like this one showing how our Sum-of-all-Paintings
project is doing compared to sculptures (which have many copyright issues,
but you could still put the data on Wikidata)
http://tools.wmflabs.org/wd-analyst/index.php?p=p31&q=Q3305213%7CQ860861
Jane
On Wed, Dec 16, 2
Hey,
Thanks for your feedback. That's exactly what I'm looking for.
On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 5:29 PM Paul Houle wrote:
> It's a step in the right direction, but it took a very long time to load
> on my computer.
>
It's maybe related to labs recent issues. Now I get reasonable time:
http://tools
Hoi,
In the WDQ database all the data on P and Q values exist. It is stable and
it has proven itself over the last years as flexible and very fast. Why
build another database that is specific to one goal when another database
already exists that largely provides a similar function? A database that
On 16.12.2015 09:06, Gerard Meijssen wrote:
Hoi,
The WDQ database is likely to include all the information that you need.
It is optimised to be fast. Did you consider to use it?
Can you explain this a bit more? How would I use the WDQ database for
this application? (I guess you don't mean via
Hoi,
The WDQ database is likely to include all the information that you need. It
is optimised to be fast. Did you consider to use it?
Thanks,
GerardM
On 15 December 2015 at 22:54, Markus Krötzsch wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Something to be noted here is that initial loading is quite a bit slower
> tha
10 matches
Mail list logo
