Hi Andra,
Le 04/07/2018 à 13:00, Andra Waagmeester a écrit :
No, Wikidata is not going to change the CC0. You seem to be the
only person wanting that and trying to discredit Wikidata will not
help you in your crusade. I suggest the people who are still
interested in this to
Hi,
2018-07-04 12:50 GMT+02:00 Maarten Dammers :
> Hi Mathieu,
>
> So I see you started forum shopping (trying to get the Wikimedia-l people
> in) and making contentious trying to be funny remarks. That's usually a
> good indication a thread is going nowhere.
>
> No, Wikidata is not going to
I agree with Maarten and to add to that. It is a huge misconception that
CC0 makes data unreliable. It is only a legal statement about copyright,
nothing more, nothing less. Statements without proper references and
qualifiers make data unreliable, but Wikidata has a decent mechanism to
capture
Hi Mathieu,
On 04-07-18 11:07, mathieu stumpf guntz wrote:
Hi,
Le 19/05/2018 à 03:35, Denny Vrandečić a écrit :
Regarding attribution, commonly it is assumed that you have to
respect it transitively. That is one of the reasons a license that
requires BY sucks so hard for data: unlike with
Hi,
Le 19/05/2018 à 03:35, Denny Vrandečić a écrit :
Regarding attribution, commonly it is assumed that you have to respect
it transitively. That is one of the reasons a license that requires BY
sucks so hard for data: unlike with text, the attribution requirements
grow very quickly. It is
Hi,
Le 18/05/2018 à 19:45, Info WorldUniversity a écrit :
At a Wikimedia conference in early 2017, with Lydia and Dario present, I
think I learned that all books / WikiCitations in all 301 of Wikipedia
languages could be licensed, or heading to be licensed, with CC-0 licensing
-
Thank you for your answer, Sebastian.
Publishing the Gutachten would be fantastic! That would be very helpful and
deeply appreciated.
Regarding the relicensing, I agree with you. You can just go and do that,
and given that you ask for attribution to DBpedia, and not to Wikipedia, I
would claim
Info WorldUniversity, 18/05/2018 20:45:
Wikidata may be heading to
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/
which allows for a) sharing b) adapting and even c) commercially
No way. CC-BY-SA-4.0 handles, but doesn't waive, the sui generis
database rights. It might be fine for folks in
Hi Mathieu, Rob, Denny, and Wikidatans,
I'm writing to inquire about further Wikidata CC licensing clarifications.
Wikidata may be heading to
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/
which allows for a) sharing b) adapting and even c) commercially
MIT OCW uses, by way of comparison,
Hoi,
When you imply that I do not support Creative Commons and its work on
licenses, you are explicitly wrong. It is because of the CC that a
harmonisation has taken place. It it thanks to this harmonisation that a
lot of material gained a license, becoming accessible. This does not mean
that the
Hi Denny,
On 18.05.2018 02:54, Denny Vrandečić wrote:
Rob Speer wrote:
> The result of this, by the way, is that commercial entities sell modified
> versions of Wikidata with impunity. It undermines the terms of other
> resources such as DBPedia, which also contains facts extracted from
>
Rob Speer wrote:
> The result of this, by the way, is that commercial entities sell modified
> versions of Wikidata with impunity. It undermines the terms of other
> resources such as DBPedia, which also contains facts extracted from
> Wikipedia and respects its Share-Alike terms. Why would anyone
Hoi,
Thank you for the overly broad misrepresentation. As always, copyright is
predatory. As we can prove that copyright is the enemy of science and
knowledge we should not be upset that *copyright *is abused we should
welcome it as it proves the point. Also when we use texts from everywhere
and
13 matches
Mail list logo
